final decision-making authority—meaning the authority to have the final say in the event of a disagreement with the other parent (aka the coparent)—may be vested with one parent over the other in joint custodial situations.
final decision-making authority—meaning the authority to have the final say in the event of a disagreement with the other parent (aka the coparent)—may be vested with one parent over the other in joint custodial situations. baby_blue 发表于 2021-05-12 21:46
这是郑爽团队造谣,你就别装了。。。 https://www.colorado-family-law.com/parenting-custody/parental-decision-making Modification of Decision-Making Under C.R.S. 14-10-131, a domestic relations court shall not modify decision-making responsibility absent a change in circumstances making the modification necessary to serve the best interests of the child. The standard for modifying decision-making responsibility is similar to modifying the majority parent - the established allocation of decision-making responsibility should be retained unless: The parties agree to the modification, The child has been integrated into the requesting party's family with the consent of the other party, and the integration warrants the change, There was a modification of parenting time which justifies the change, One party has consistently allowed the other to make unilateral decisions for the child, or The child is endangered by the current allocation of decision-making responsibility, and the advantage of changing residence outweighs any harm such a change would cause. If at dissolution one parent is awarded sole decision-making, the other parent in the future can try to get joint decision-making by showing that it is in the child’s best interests. But the same is not true in reverse - once parents have joint decision-making, a parent seeking to take away the other’s participation in decisions must show endangerment.
🔥 最新回帖
不就是为了钱吗?转移公司财产 拖欠不给公司员工工资 欠2000万不还 2019年底疫情爆发前跑到美国锁定孩子 夺孩子决定权不都是为了以后捞钱有筹码吗? 把zs玩命使劲踩的同时希望zs做负责任的妈妈 不就是希望利用孩子捞钱吗? 为什么没有立 人穷志不穷的人设,拿出志气来公证并昭告天下:不需要消费貌似zs的2娃博眼球,也不用zs的钱抚养孩子?
有机会在zs身上捞钱了?
🛋️ 沙发板凳
两个烂人。希望小朋友能健康成长。
养自己的孩子是起码的要求吧。
那另外那一位看过一天孩子吗
苦了娃
另一个烂,这个就不烂?。lol
这话说的,看看版上多少生一个公婆不给力要记恨一辈子,他一个男的在疫情期间异国他乡养2个小婴儿很不容易了
就算有保姆帮忙也很不容易
郑爽只要不打算在美国定居,就可以赖着不付抚养费。而且反正违约金赔得七七八八,她自己可能本来也没什么钱了。
想回国吧,国内不让代孕,虽然没有法律规定,但是宣传是这样的。。。
在中国这并不是违法的,何况孩子是在美国代孕的。。。
对,他是一个合格的爸爸,希望他跟郑爽的事能赶快解决。。。不过如果郑爽是帮人洗钱,估计他回去会被报复。。。
只能说他很懂爹国的大众心理
得亏一天没看过,要不然万一放鞋盒子里扔了怎么办
肯定不够养娃的
同感
那是自然 起码他还像个爹
只说电视 不说其他还行
哈哈
双方都为了孩子的事情,付出了最惨痛的代价
还是希望俩个孩子能够平安,快乐的长大
相信我,不会有多少抚养费的,如果有,郑爽方肯定第一时间跳出来说。。。
确实,在美国想拿到单独抚养权很难吧?
不能说难,美国法庭上以孩子稳定为最高原则,基本上谁带的多就会给谁
抚养费不管多少,美国判的,ZS人在国内可以拒不执行,美国法院拿她没办法,版上离婚夫妻男的海归了不给留在美国的小孩抚养费的例子很多。。
不是单独抚养权吧?不是说他自己都说了需要母亲一起抚养的再?在搞文字游戏吧。
这两个孩子还真不如送人了,在美国,找个好人家,平平淡淡的成长。闹成现在这样,等长大了,明白事儿了,知道有个这么不靠谱的妈,一个把他们妈捅了无数刀,渣到冒烟儿的爹。
有道理
孩子是美国人,计划生育还没扩张到美帝
他文里写的是solo decision making 大可不必把Google出来第一个就贴过来
其实他写错了,是sole decision making right,不是solo,这个不等于抚养权,是抚养权的一部分,但是这是他所需要的,他可以一个人帮孩子做决定。。。妈妈肯定有探视权,不知道还有没有别的。。。
难的 一般还是sharedcustody为主 女方的抚养权被剥夺 男方solecustody大部分是女方磕药吸毒酗酒的 爽子也没这些问题 就是明显精神疾病
谁说不是用的郑爽的卵子。郑爽水军吗?
一直不能理解你这种想法,有亲爸且亲爸愿意养也有能力养,却让人家把孩子送人。。。可能是我破案的剧看太多,不相信领养的家庭。。。也可能是你太天真。。。
一个是孩子住哪儿的决定权 一个是legal decision的决定权。 他这个应该是legal decision。
还真敢瞎说,敢情华人上我们这些住了美国20年30年的都厉害到把美国司法研究的死死的了
这素质...法官也被你脏话骂上了?
正解,他可以决定要不要送养 在哪里养等等,但是不是独立抚养权,他又在误导看官们
刚刚没注意,下面那个回复说这个sole decision making是两年一轮,我真是从来没听说过还有这种说法。。。
是渣,但他俩真是一对啊,咋不凑合过了
这种回复居然也有人点赞?人家亲爹一直在养也愿意继续养为啥要送人?你怎么不把你家孩子送人呢?
美国警察法官干的B事儿还少吗?这有什么不能骂的?让渣男造谣就对了吗?
不是一直传郑爽吸毒.
我也搜到的信息是两年一轮不太了解科州的法律。谁来科普一下,大家别净说些没用的行吗?
这是郑爽团队造谣,你就别装了。。。
https://www.colorado-family-law.com/parenting-custody/parental-decision-making
Modification of Decision-Making Under C.R.S. 14-10-131, a domestic relations court shall not modify decision-making responsibility absent a change in circumstances making the modification necessary to serve the best interests of the child. The standard for modifying decision-making responsibility is similar to modifying the majority parent - the established allocation of decision-making responsibility should be retained unless: The parties agree to the modification, The child has been integrated into the requesting party's family with the consent of the other party, and the integration warrants the change, There was a modification of parenting time which justifies the change, One party has consistently allowed the other to make unilateral decisions for the child, or The child is endangered by the current allocation of decision-making responsibility, and the advantage of changing residence outweighs any harm such a change would cause. If at dissolution one parent is awarded sole decision-making, the other parent in the future can try to get joint decision-making by showing that it is in the child’s best interests. But the same is not true in reverse - once parents have joint decision-making, a parent seeking to take away the other’s participation in decisions must show endangerment.
留后路还想回国?
网上说 现在zs 和孩子住一起
不圆滑
父母无业无收入 2娃美国公民有食物券 免费daycare 无忧?
zs名下在美国无业无收入无资产 0 抚养费 如果zh也无w2,2娃美国公民是纳税人养
zs爸妈的基因没有聪明到培养一个女儿避开/不招惹xx?
为了抚养费 为了2000万不还?
至少2000万可以不还?
保持热搜 可以做媒体人?
官司没有公布前 网上说z要爆zs露骨视频?
为了利益和钱 因为谁有抚养权谁得利?
没有抚养权 就有床灶?