Looks like the China system is to train a street-smart national CEO evaluated by long time experience. Whereas conventional democratic system is to provide the making-people-happy freedom that everyone can potentially become CEO of overall country decided by quick elections supported by expensive publicity locally.
上世纪90年代俄国企图民主西化过,被弄得好惨,高兴的只有西方国家。从国情资源上看,中国搞西化民主肯定比地大物博的俄罗斯更惨,成为印度的可能性最大。
“有中国特色的社会主义”这个名字不伦不类,还动不动被扣上共产专治的帽子,我们海外华人听着心里不是滋味,有人恨不得中国赶快“改邪归正”。但大多数中国人好像无所谓,不然怎么一年几亿人出国旅游好像没有几个不回去的。
A lot of people either way, would u say
系统提示:若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://www.youtube.com/embed/7UBdYuWOdiM
倒未必会比现在富裕多少,但是不会走到整个民主社会对立面上去跟一群shithole country为伍。
东亚东南亚有儒家文化的国家,民主化之后失败的基本没有,马来西亚表现也可以。新加坡这种有限威权也比大陆好多了。
不知道你从哪里看到西方的政治家不干实事的,当年交485的时候因为移民局的失误,迟迟批不了绿卡,写信给当地议员,议员办公室马上打电话给local移民局,结果就是移民局马上处理case,批了绿卡。 另外,公司的同事,也有写信给议员反应各种问题的,虽然也是有些解决有些没解决,但也不至于像你说的不干实事。
Looks like the China system is to train a street-smart national CEO evaluated by long time experience.
Whereas conventional democratic system is to provide the making-people-happy freedom that everyone can potentially become CEO of overall country decided by quick elections supported by expensive publicity locally.
系统提示:若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://www.youtube.com/embed/jmlWn95wHt0