qq新闻。。。引用breitbart。。。咋不直接引用QAnon呢？ 看看原文是如何被断章取义的，阴谋论也就哄哄不懂英文的人好吗？ https://www.google.com/amp/s/time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/%3famp=true The handshake between business and labor was just one component of a vast, cross-partisan campaign to protect the election–an extraordinary shadow effort dedicated not to winning the vote but to ensuring it would be free and fair, credible and uncorrupted. For more than a year, a loosely organized coalition of operatives scrambled to shore up America’s institutions as they came under simultaneous attack from a remorseless pandemic and an autocratically inclined President. Though much of this activity took place on the left, it was separate from the Biden campaign and crossed ideological lines, with crucial contributions by nonpartisan and conservative actors. The scenario the shadow campaigners were desperate to stop was not a Trump victory. It was an election so calamitous that no result could be discerned at all, a failure of the central act of democratic self-governance that has been a hallmark of America since its founding. 爱与自由 发表于 2021-03-23 22:49
RESPONSE TO THE FAKE NEWS ATTACKS ON SIDNEY POWELL
FREE SPEECH - This defamation lawsuit is yet another attempt to silence critics and citizens who want to investigate voter fraud. The statements Dominion claims are defamatory are actually protected speech under the First Amendment because they deal with matters of public concern, i.e., election integrity. The Fake News media and their allies are spinning meritless claims because their arguments have neither the facts nor the law needed to hold up in a courtroom. - The statements complained of are also protected because Dominion is a public figure and must prove that Ms. Powell acted with malice. This is impossible, as Ms. Powell’s lawyer has explained, because Ms. Powell’s statements were based on sworn affidavits, declarations, expert reports and documentary evidence. She presented this evidence for all to see in four court filings and on her website. FAKE NEWS - Contrary to what the Fake News is pushing, Sidney did NOT claim in court that ‘no reasonable person would believe her claims’. The press is using twisted legalese and manipulating the legal standard to confuse the issue, as they have done before in other high-profile cases. Ms. Powell’s statements were legal opinions that she stands behind, as they were based on sworn affidavits, declarations, expert reports and documentary evidence. - Dominion claims that the evidence Ms. Powell relied upon to assert her claims concerning the lack of election integrity is incredible and not believable. Ms. Powell responded by pointing out that her assertions were her legal opinions based on the evidence she presented to four different courts. Accordingly, her statements are not subject to challenge under defamation law.
她所有的努力都是为了能够打开选举机器看看怎么回事，所以当然她说的是猜测和观点 直到现在选举的过程都是不透明的，很多有争议的地方chain of custody is broken and not accounted for。没人能够否认这是一场有很大争议和很多问题的选举 strawberrykiwi 发表于 2021-03-24 15:34
她所有的努力都是为了能够打开选举机器看看怎么回事，所以当然她说的是猜测和观点 直到现在选举的过程都是不透明的，很多有争议的地方chain of custody is broken and not accounted for。没人能够否认这是一场有很大争议和很多问题的选举 strawberrykiwi 发表于 2021-03-24 15:34
她所有的努力都是为了能够打开选举机器看看怎么回事，所以当然她说的是猜测和观点 直到现在选举的过程都是不透明的，很多有争议的地方chain of custody is broken and not accounted for。没人能够否认这是一场有很大争议和很多问题的选举 strawberrykiwi 发表于 2021-03-24 15:34
她所有的努力都是为了能够打开选举机器看看怎么回事，所以当然她说的是猜测和观点 直到现在选举的过程都是不透明的，很多有争议的地方chain of custody is broken and not accounted for。没人能够否认这是一场有很大争议和很多问题的选举 strawberrykiwi 发表于 2021-03-24 15:34
她所有的努力都是为了能够打开选举机器看看怎么回事，所以当然她说的是猜测和观点 直到现在选举的过程都是不透明的，很多有争议的地方chain of custody is broken and not accounted for。没人能够否认这是一场有很大争议和很多问题的选举 strawberrykiwi 发表于 2021-03-24 15:34
她所有的努力都是为了能够打开选举机器看看怎么回事，所以当然她说的是猜测和观点 直到现在选举的过程都是不透明的，很多有争议的地方chain of custody is broken and not accounted for。没人能够否认这是一场有很大争议和很多问题的选举 strawberrykiwi 发表于 2021-03-24 15:34
她所有的努力都是为了能够打开选举机器看看怎么回事，所以当然她说的是猜测和观点 直到现在选举的过程都是不透明的，很多有争议的地方chain of custody is broken and not accounted for。没人能够否认这是一场有很大争议和很多问题的选举 strawberrykiwi 发表于 2021-03-24 15:34
就是只要我的目标是好的 撒谎是可以接受，这叫善意的谎言，正义的谎言，引蛇出洞的谎言 对吗？ 然而，老鸨说，non reasonable people would believe..... 就是“家人们啊，白嫖下哈，别激动”
没有兴趣跟这个事，当时现在看个新闻都要去证实一下是常识了。只有WSJ全文引用了她的原话，CNN等都是断章取义的。她这是很标准的对诽谤罪的应对。居然被说成是认罪了。 In its Monday motion, Ms. Powell’s legal team argued that “reasonable people would not accept such statements as fact but view them only as claims that await testing by the courts through the adversary process."
选举本来就应该是公开透明的，根本不需要公民要求，整个过程就不应该有任何不透明的地方。这个和一般刑事案民事案burden of proof不一样，那些案子的原则是宁可错放一千，不可冤枉一个，你希望我们的大选也用同样的标准吗？稀里糊涂就过去了？ 这次几个摇摆州用疫情做借口，违法修改程序，事后又不允许检查，全国至少一半人质疑结果，让美国在全世界面前丢脸，到现在拜登还躲着不敢直接面对公众，这就是不正常遗臭万年的选举
没有兴趣跟这个事，当时现在看个新闻都要去证实一下是常识了。只有WSJ全文引用了她的原话，CNN等都是断章取义的。她这是很标准的对诽谤罪的应对。居然被说成是认罪了。 In its Monday motion, Ms. Powell’s legal team argued that “reasonable people would not accept such statements as fact but view them only as claims that await testing by the courts through the adversary process." mary的小绵羊 发表于 2021-03-24 19:52
hahaha mm说得太好笑了
哎呀 这可戳到川粉的痛处了
你就直截了当说吧，到底投票机有没有作假？其他的都是废话，说再多也没用。
或者，你就是她说的那种没脑子的，可能，比那种没脑子的更加没脑子，到现在还想着拿些废话来给她辩论？
好像法律上有挑唆未成年人，低智商的人做犯法的有罪，比方说给未成年人买酒的那种，这个不知道能不能算？
如果川粉要救女神， 那就只有一种办法： 出门游行：高举牌子， “我们自愿被骗！不怪女神！”
想起台湾慰安妇权益事件， 绿绿小伙急的直喊“我阿麻是自愿的！”
FREE SPEECH
- This defamation lawsuit is yet another attempt to silence critics and citizens who want to investigate voter fraud. The statements Dominion claims are defamatory are actually protected speech under the First Amendment because they deal with matters of public concern, i.e., election integrity. The Fake News media and their allies are spinning meritless claims because their arguments have neither the facts nor the law needed to hold up in a courtroom.
- The statements complained of are also protected because Dominion is a public figure and must prove that Ms. Powell acted with malice. This is impossible, as Ms. Powell’s lawyer has explained, because Ms. Powell’s statements were based on sworn affidavits, declarations, expert reports and documentary evidence. She presented this evidence for all to see in four court filings and on her website.
FAKE NEWS
- Contrary to what the Fake News is pushing, Sidney did NOT claim in court that ‘no reasonable person would believe her claims’. The press is using twisted legalese and manipulating the legal standard to confuse the issue, as they have done before in other high-profile cases. Ms. Powell’s statements were legal opinions that she stands behind, as they were based on sworn affidavits, declarations, expert reports and documentary evidence.
- Dominion claims that the evidence Ms. Powell relied upon to assert her claims concerning the lack of election integrity is incredible and not believable. Ms. Powell responded by pointing out that her assertions were her legal opinions based on the evidence she presented to four different courts. Accordingly, her statements are not subject to challenge under defamation law.
绿绿小伙急的直喊“我阿麻是自愿的！”
NM 湾湾真有这种人？
直到现在选举的过程都是不透明的，很多有争议的地方chain of custody is broken and not accounted for。没人能够否认这是一场有很大争议和很多问题的选举
骗粉丝钱，比他做房地产商赚得多多了
需要说谎骗人才能得到注意？这不是骗流量是什么？那个在国会被击毙的川粉，可是因为这个骗局连命都送了的！
美国大选搞了多少次？只有这次有这么大的争议？还是，你们这些人就是输不起？？？？？？
2015年7月25日台湾爆发反课纲运动，台湾反课纲学生朱震在得知曾祖母曾是慰安妇后哭诉：“国民党是骗子，我阿祖当慰安妇是自愿。”
称：选举投票机舞弊 问：有何证据，秀秀？ 答：选举过程不透明，有争议，民主党不让没办法找证据 没证据你叫个毛？脑补吗
Powell不是说她手里有大量证据啊，在法庭上甩出来看看呀。
争议和问题都只在你们川粉脑子里。
你们川粉非得要争议，那是你们的问题。
现在好，连骗子都骂你们傻了，你还洗啥？
选票都手点了几遍了还在纠结机器
所以明知后果还能如此，这样的良知更加可贵。
错了，这次选举和以前选举差不多，没啥区别，非常smooth。
当然按照Powell的说法，Powell大嘴巴一说，很多unreasonable的人信了，unreasonable的人觉得有很多问题，就是这样。
你这一问一答很精彩，充分表达出了川粉们的那套逻辑。
这意思是，说人作弊总是要说的，万一成真了呢？
就是只要我的目标是好的 撒谎是可以接受，这叫善意的谎言，正义的谎言，引蛇出洞的谎言 对吗？
然而，老鸨说，non reasonable people would believe..... 就是“家人们啊，白嫖下哈，别激动”
哈哈哈，当时微信群里铺天盖地的证据去哪了
快把微信群里川粉的证据翻译打印了给法官瞧瞧啊，把我急的真是
时事版就有，那时不是有id每天报道何时公布证据么？还啥美国军队和德国军队火拼拿服务器，各种军事活动她都了如指掌。。。咋现在说不给她看证据了呢？谁质疑 谁举证。
这么机密的事她就发在公共论坛了？不怕坏了川普的大事！
难道 law and order 不是讲究 innocent until guilty“”?
嚷嚷 "舞弊"，又不给证据， 那你嚷嚷啥？ 想白嫖吗？
这样吧 我说你strawberrykiwi 昨晚杀了全家并藏尸体， 请你现在自己证明下你没有，你不证明就是杀了， 就是这个逻辑对吧
只有在明知道事实是A，却说是B的时候才是撒谎。 SP应该是真诚地相信选举舞弊，怀疑选举机器有被操纵的可能，即使她的观点是错的，指责她说谎也是没有根据的 在你们左派嘴里，只要观点跟你们不一样就是在撒谎，真是头脑简单，逻辑粗暴，搞不清事实跟观点的界限，动不动就扣帽子
她说的几个机器舞弊，人家根本就没有用它家的机器。用它家机器的几个郡县是trump赢了。 https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.mcall.com/news/pennsylvania/mc-nws-spotlight-pa-dominion-voting-machines-20201130-nv6nn575lbfi5pxmog2ewnjmca-story.html%3foutputType=amp Pa. counties reported no major issues with Dominion voting machines, a target of Trump and his campaign
https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN27S2Z9 Fact check: Dominion software was not used only in states where Trump is filing lawsuits
太牛逼了
只要我坚定信念手里的白纸是美元 我用白纸去买东西，就不是撒谎！ 我的认知里面这张白纸明明就是美元， 我有什么错？ 你没有办法证明我认为白纸是白纸,对吧？ 你们这些人不讲武德啊，真是的 不可理喻
连newsmax也对投票机作弊的话题避忌万分，说没有证据。
pillow guy说他有100%的证据，建议他出来提供证据（哦，他也被告了，正好，公布一下他的证据，帮人帮己）
这个访问好好玩，建议看一下
系统提示：若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://www.youtube.com/embed/uHKuFyd1aCY
我家昨天丢了一万现金，我真诚地相信是我邻居偷的，他每次经过都斜眼看我家，鬼鬼祟祟。我于是要求去邻居家搜查，上网发帖说邻居是贼。邻居不让搜查，典型的做贼心虚！我相信得更真诚了。他还好意思说我诽谤！
这次几个摇摆州用疫情做借口，违法修改程序，事后又不允许检查，全国至少一半人质疑结果，让美国在全世界面前丢脸，到现在拜登还躲着不敢直接面对公众，这就是不正常遗臭万年的选举
你显然希望大选用只要有不完美地方就是作弊的标准。哦，前提还得是你支持的人输了。
不好意思你错了，我没有这么想，显然你的读心术不灵光
我真诚地相信
那我只会认为你逻辑学的差，不会说你在撒谎
看得出来你还真诚地相信鲍大律。good luck!
没人说她“认罪”。
Powell根本就知道她忽悠的可不就是那群unreasonable person吗。效果貌似不错。
她的问题是，她说她掌握大量证据，动不动就实锤了！欺骗了很多人，是导致国会骚乱的重要原因之一。
现在想装糊涂，说这些不着边际的话，是不可能逃脱的！ 她这次完蛋了！
真想认识一下你实际当中是一个什么样的人，是个老年妇女，会撒泼打滚吗？有点逻辑吗？说你是傻X都觉着侮辱了傻X，真不知道你是什么样的低级蠢货
你是歧视妇女还是歧视老年？真低级，拿块镜子照照自己，羞不羞愧？
妈呀全凭你嘴皮子上下一翻还说的有板有眼，撒谎传谣下地狱！
我说了我没跟这个新闻。只是指出除了华尔街日报以外别家媒体都断章取义。
“居然被说成是认罪了。” 不是你写的么？ 除了你写的，还有谁说她认罪了呢？
至于你说只有wsj引用了她的原话，其他媒体都断章取义了，如果没有跟新闻的话可以看看下面几个再下定论： https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/03/22/politics/sidney-powell-dominion-lawsuit-election-fraud/index.html https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/2021/3/23/22346333/sidney-powell-dominion-defamation-lawsuit-trump 截屏方便你找