I think it is a stupid policy, simply awarding those home owners who should not get a house at the first place. Those people are not sustainable. Saving them will not save the market.
IMHO, the 15000 credit to buyers are the right way to move the market. In the end, it is the buyers who move the market, not those deliquent home owners.
US is no longer a free market. the credit is now $8,000 and no need to pay back
the credit is now $8,000 and no need to pay back But it only gives to first time home buyers, with income limitation. That has excluded a lot of buyers.
That one is sold? But you said that area is not very clean or has some other disadvantage. Livingston's price looks still very high. [此贴子已经被作者于2009-2-19 9:32:13编辑过] 我说有什么用。。。再说了，房子我又没去看过，说不定里面很好呢。
under contract now. it is really a good deal, from 1million to 699K!!!! the fair value for this unit in this market is 750K i guess 我觉得可能不到。。我看listing上面，有好几状750k在那里，都没人问。。不过，也难说，里面装修不一样。。。
I think it is a stupid policy, simply awarding those home owners who should not get a house at the first place. Those people are not sustainable. Saving them will not save the market.
IMHO, the 15000 credit to buyers are the right way to move the market. In the end, it is the buyers who move the market, not those deliquent home owners.
US is no longer a free market.
the credit is now $8,000 and no need to pay back
the credit is now $8,000 and no need to pay back
But it only gives to first time home buyers, with income limitation. That has excluded a lot of buyers.
Before, the 15000 credit has no limits.
That one is sold? But you said that area is not very clean or has some other disadvantage. Livingston's price looks still very high.
[此贴子已经被作者于2009-2-19 9:32:13编辑过]
我说有什么用。。。再说了，房子我又没去看过，说不定里面很好呢。
under contract now. it is really a good deal, from 1million to 699K!!!! the fair value for this unit in this market is 750K i guess
我觉得可能不到。。我看listing上面，有好几状750k在那里，都没人问。。不过，也难说，里面装修不一样。。。