转发这个故事。要想能拿得住妖股,真得有些信仰。欢迎大家分享观点 He began buying Tesla at just $7.50, and now he's retiring at 39 years old with $12-million worth --- he still refuses to sell a single share (ampproject.org) He began buying Tesla at just $7.50, and now he’s retiring at 39 years old with $12-million worth — he still refuses to sell a single share Don’t try this at home kids. While most financial planners espouse the “diversify” mantra, particularly as the bull market pushes deeper into uncharted territory, Jason DeBolt, a former Googler GOOGand current Amazon AMZNemployee, has taken a decidedly different approach. Like other outspoken “TSLA-naires” before him, DeBolt took to social media last week to celebrate in his massive Tesla TSLAwindfall, as the stock was in the midst of an 11-session win streak. His tweet went viral: While Tesla bulls cheered, other, more conservative types, winced. Ben Carlson, portfolio manager at Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC, acknowledged pangs of jealousy when he comes across stories like DeBolt’s, but the approach just isn’t for him, nor should it be for most. “I’ll never put my life savings into a single investment that could go to the moon,” he wrote in a “Wealth of Common Sense” blog post. “But being a diversified investor means I’ll never put my family in the position of being completely wiped out by a single position.” Read:‘Big Short’ investor says his big Tesla short is getting ‘bigger and bigger’ DeBolt, however, is 39 years old, doesn’t have a wife or kids and is more than willing to ride the ups and downs. He’s already been through plenty with his Tesla stake — he lost $1.3 million in one day last year — and he doesn’t appear to be sweating potential drawdowns in the future. Ramp Capital, a popular anonymous financial blogger, found his story “captivating” because of DeBolt’s “grit and determination to buy and hold through thick and thin — while having faith in a single company and god-like CEO in the face of all odds. “ So Ramp reached out and asked DeBolt if he was concerned that Tesla is in a bubble after its nosebleed rally in 2020. “No, I don’t think so. The energy and transportation sectors are being disrupted, and Tesla’s stock price reflects that,” DeBolt explained. “I think we could eventually see $20,000 to $30,000 per share by 2030 if they can execute, assuming no more stock splits.” He said he currently owns 14,850 Tesla shares at an average cost basis of $58 each. His first purchase was 2,500 shares at $7.50 in 2013. That batch is now worth about $2.2 million, he said. “This company is just getting started,” DeBolt told Ramp. “We might not see a company like Tesla in the next 50 years.” The TSLA-naires were having a rough session on Monday — a rarity lately — with shares down about 6%. The broader market was also under pressure, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA, Nasdaq Composite COMPand S&P 500 SPXall in the red.
赌博的成分肯定有。 如果没有长远眼光,相信TSLA 可以颠覆 能源和交通行业,也拿不住这种妖股。 他自己说的 The energy and transportation sectors are being disrupted, and Tesla’s stock price reflects that. 要说赌,也是他在赌 市场之前严重低估TSLA在能源和交通行业的潜力
股价跌幅大怎么就和赌博挂钩啦? 巴菲特和芒格一直强调要是心理上不能接受股价腰斩就不要投资。就最近二十年,伯克希尔股价也腰斩过几次。大盘也腰斩过几次。我们投资的是股票后面的公司,不是股票本身。股票可以在短期内巨幅波动而公司本身的业绩却一路向上。一旦决定买了一个公司,就要把重心放在公司的业绩而不是股价上。只要公司的业绩一直向上,股价一路下跌不是问题。这个时候更应该加仓。 特斯拉2019年股价表现不好,业绩其实很好。Model 3 供不应求。唯一的瓶颈是产能跟不上。但这个长远来看根本不是问题。 Volatility is NOT risk. Risk is the total loss of capital. Volatility is not.
股价跌幅大怎么就和赌博挂钩啦? 巴菲特和芒格一直强调要是心理上不能接受股价腰斩就不要投资。就最近二十年,伯克希尔股价也腰斩过几次。大盘也腰斩过几次。我们投资的是股票后面的公司,不是股票本身。股票可以在短期内巨幅波动而公司本身的业绩却一路向上。一旦决定买了一个公司,就要把重心放在公司的业绩而不是股价上。只要公司的业绩一直向上,股价一路下跌不是问题。这个时候更应该加仓。 特斯拉2019年股价表现不好,业绩其实很好。Model 3 供不应求。唯一的瓶颈是产能跟不上。但这个长远来看根本不是问题。 Volatility is NOT risk. Risk is the total loss of capital. Volatility is not. 密码必须大于8位 发表于 2021-01-11 23:33
He began buying Tesla at just $7.50, and now he's retiring at 39 years old with $12-million worth --- he still refuses to sell a single share (ampproject.org)
He began buying Tesla at just $7.50, and now he’s retiring at 39 years old with $12-million worth — he still refuses to sell a single share
Don’t try this at home kids.
While most financial planners espouse the “diversify” mantra, particularly as the bull market pushes deeper into uncharted territory, Jason DeBolt, a former Googler GOOG and current Amazon AMZN employee, has taken a decidedly different approach. Like other outspoken “TSLA-naires” before him, DeBolt took to social media last week to celebrate in his massive Tesla TSLA windfall, as the stock was in the midst of an 11-session win streak. His tweet went viral: While Tesla bulls cheered, other, more conservative types, winced. Ben Carlson, portfolio manager at Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC, acknowledged pangs of jealousy when he comes across stories like DeBolt’s, but the approach just isn’t for him, nor should it be for most. “I’ll never put my life savings into a single investment that could go to the moon,” he wrote in a “Wealth of Common Sense” blog post. “But being a diversified investor means I’ll never put my family in the position of being completely wiped out by a single position.”
Read: ‘Big Short’ investor says his big Tesla short is getting ‘bigger and bigger’ DeBolt, however, is 39 years old, doesn’t have a wife or kids and is more than willing to ride the ups and downs. He’s already been through plenty with his Tesla stake — he lost $1.3 million in one day last year — and he doesn’t appear to be sweating potential drawdowns in the future.
Ramp Capital, a popular anonymous financial blogger, found his story “captivating” because of DeBolt’s “grit and determination to buy and hold through thick and thin — while having faith in a single company and god-like CEO in the face of all odds. “ So Ramp reached out and asked DeBolt if he was concerned that Tesla is in a bubble after its nosebleed rally in 2020. “No, I don’t think so. The energy and transportation sectors are being disrupted, and Tesla’s stock price reflects that,” DeBolt explained. “I think we could eventually see $20,000 to $30,000 per share by 2030 if they can execute, assuming no more stock splits.” He said he currently owns 14,850 Tesla shares at an average cost basis of $58 each. His first purchase was 2,500 shares at $7.50 in 2013. That batch is now worth about $2.2 million, he said.
“This company is just getting started,” DeBolt told Ramp. “We might not see a company like Tesla in the next 50 years.” The TSLA-naires were having a rough session on Monday — a rarity lately — with shares down about 6%. The broader market was also under pressure, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA , Nasdaq Composite COMP and S&P 500 SPX all in the red.
其实投资就是赌博啦 大多数人来说还是只能fire式攒钱
最近被川普搞烦了,还以为是说特朗普死忠粉。
我也是
巴菲特和芒格一直强调要是心理上不能接受股价腰斩就不要投资。就最近二十年,伯克希尔股价也腰斩过几次。大盘也腰斩过几次。我们投资的是股票后面的公司,不是股票本身。股票可以在短期内巨幅波动而公司本身的业绩却一路向上。一旦决定买了一个公司,就要把重心放在公司的业绩而不是股价上。只要公司的业绩一直向上,股价一路下跌不是问题。这个时候更应该加仓。
特斯拉2019年股价表现不好,业绩其实很好。Model 3 供不应求。唯一的瓶颈是产能跟不上。但这个长远来看根本不是问题。
Volatility is NOT risk. Risk is the total loss of capital. Volatility is not.
上周五涨了2mil, 今天跌了1.3mil, 很亏吗?🤔
得了吧 一开始我也研究了巴菲特那套 普通散户怎么知道产能跟不上长远来看是不是根本问题 别说普通散户了 基金公司那些人平时行业会议多不多 研究多不多 还不是该亏的时候亏
巴菲特那套根本不适合普通人 普通人最正经的路只有fire,注意开源节流
适合不适合也不就是说买的股价跌幅大就是赌博。这是两回事情。某些人做不到不等于别人做不到。其实Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, 和Elon Musk等等也可以看作是长期投资者,而且是All In,只不过他们都投的是自己公司。Elon Musk每次都All In(Zip2, Paypal, Tesla, SpaceX, Boring Company, etc.),都成功了,这些不是偶然的,也不是一个赌博能够解释的。巴菲特也是一样。他们的成功不是一个赌博能够解释。
节衣缩食FIRE加上定投大盘肯定是一条路。但并不是唯一行得通的路。