Twitter上那张MI翻蓝的图难道不是作弊的铁证吗?

p
pp.piggy
楼主 (北美华人网)

从昨天晚上到今天早上的变化… 新加的票全是Biden,Trump一张没有。大家也都是学过基本的概率和统计的,这有可能吗?
a
anniekevin
神奇
a
alex_alex
嗯 看到网上有人说这事。
不娶何撩
这是华人网神奇的地方吧。 这张图几乎全网都传遍了,在twitter都被删了多少次了。
现在才到华人。

可以想象信息多么闭塞


b
bellamia
We will see...
l
lnmichelle
输不起就造谣
M
Mcdonald

从昨天晚上到今天早上的变化… 新加的票全是Biden,Trump一张没有。大家也都是学过基本的概率和统计的,这有可能吗?
pp.piggy 发表于 2020-11-04 11:16

r
rosesavels
作弊贴开始发了
P
Perseus2000
回复 1楼pp.piggy的帖子
要是正经监控的点票能作弊,网上不知什么人的截图也能作弊
不娶何撩
楼上某些ID值钱的也就那张嘴
J
Jaelynleaf
这是历史上两党之争,从谦谦君子变成流氓无赖,在众目睽睽之下
H
Hershel
回复 1楼pp.piggy的帖子
有可能是先sort by candidate然后再分别count,这样效率比较高
c
cutekitty
WI也是啊,101%的投票率????
t
tseco
这是华人网神奇的地方吧。 这张图几乎全网都传遍了,在twitter都被删了多少次了。
现在才到华人。

可以想象信息多么闭塞



不娶何撩 发表于 2020-11-04 11:18

Twitter删帖厉害。很多人,包括在twitter上发fraud相关信息被封号的,都迁去parler了。
c
cutekitty

w
woshihai
Twitter又开始大规模删帖了
n
nihao9
真是不要脸,猪党只会用这种下作无耻的手段,必须要上诉彻查!
h
hannahana
回复 1楼pp.piggy的帖子
你们川粉造谣成性,大选前一周还疯狂污蔑,好意思说铁证。你们有个屁铁证
葡萄藤上葡萄果
回复 13楼cutekitty的帖子
这是虚假信息,如果不是有意造谣,就是犯了基本的统计学错误。 https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/wisconsin-more-votes-than-voters/
The claim made in this tweet is false. Wisconsin has not counted more votes than it has registered voters. This tweet is comparing the vote count from 2020 with the number of registered voters from 2018. When we take a look at Wisconsin’s current total of registered voters, we see that there is nothing fraudulent about the state’s count.  According to the Wisconsin Election Commission, the “State of Wisconsin had 3,684,726 active registered voters on November 1, 2020.” It’s unclear where the “3,239,920” number shown in the above-displayed tweet comes from. As of this writing, The New York Times reports that a total of “3,296,836” votes have been cast in Wisconsin. In either case, the number of votes counted does not exceed the number of registered voters.  So where did the “3,129,000 registered voters” statistic come from? The 2018 midterms.  According to data from the United States Census Bureau concerning “Voting and Registration in the Election of November 2018,” Wisconsin had 3,129,000 registered voters in 2018. 
c
cnp
轉:民主党造假,也輸、宾夕法尼亚州丢失三十万张选票,视频显示在一辆货车里面和附近发现大量被撕毁的投川普的选票。
https://mobile.twitter.com/crystal78243104/status/1323986081881169920?from=timeline&isappinstalled=0
c
cutekitty
回复 13楼cutekitty的帖子
这是虚假信息,如果不是有意造谣,就是犯了基本的统计学错误。 https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/wisconsin-more-votes-than-voters/
The claim made in this tweet is false. Wisconsin has not counted more votes than it has registered voters. This tweet is comparing the vote count from 2020 with the number of registered voters from 2018. When we take a look at Wisconsin’s current total of registered voters, we see that there is nothing fraudulent about the state’s count.  According to the Wisconsin Election Commission, the “State of Wisconsin had 3,684,726 active registered voters on November 1, 2020.” It’s unclear where the “3,239,920” number shown in the above-displayed tweet comes from. As of this writing, The New York Times reports that a total of “3,296,836” votes have been cast in Wisconsin. In either case, the number of votes counted does not exceed the number of registered voters.  So where did the “3,129,000 registered voters” statistic come from? The 2018 midterms.  According to data from the United States Census Bureau concerning “Voting and Registration in the Election of November 2018,” Wisconsin had 3,129,000 registered voters in 2018. 
葡萄藤上葡萄果 发表于 2020-11-04 13:58

谢谢解释!明白了!对不起发了错误信息!
c
cutekitty
回复 13楼cutekitty的帖子
这是虚假信息,如果不是有意造谣,就是犯了基本的统计学错误。 https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/wisconsin-more-votes-than-voters/
The claim made in this tweet is false. Wisconsin has not counted more votes than it has registered voters. This tweet is comparing the vote count from 2020 with the number of registered voters from 2018. When we take a look at Wisconsin’s current total of registered voters, we see that there is nothing fraudulent about the state’s count.  According to the Wisconsin Election Commission, the “State of Wisconsin had 3,684,726 active registered voters on November 1, 2020.” It’s unclear where the “3,239,920” number shown in the above-displayed tweet comes from. As of this writing, The New York Times reports that a total of “3,296,836” votes have been cast in Wisconsin. In either case, the number of votes counted does not exceed the number of registered voters.  So where did the “3,129,000 registered voters” statistic come from? The 2018 midterms.  According to data from the United States Census Bureau concerning “Voting and Registration in the Election of November 2018,” Wisconsin had 3,129,000 registered voters in 2018. 
葡萄藤上葡萄果 发表于 2020-11-04 13:58

虚心求教,这个怎么解释?
d
denis_sis
宾州丢了30 万选票,上诉了。。WI 有个作弊的曲线,哎,民主党真是和共产党一个样。
d
denis_sis
虚心求教,这个怎么解释?
cutekitty 发表于 2020-11-04 14:55

这个就是作弊,很多老美也在说,又不是几张票是上万,不和逻辑
葡萄藤上葡萄果
回复 22楼cutekitty的帖子
https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/11/04/michigan-election-ballots-mail-absentee-hour-count-update/6161367002/
看这里呀。选票不是实时一张张report的,所以会有人为失误和机器失误,也会有延时,光靠不知道数据来源是什么的图很难解释这些数字突增都是怎么回事。推特上报告说拜登在密歇根平白增加了1.3million票数的保守派人士已经澄清并删除了那条消息,因为他后来发现这一说法并不准确。