瞄了眼我家老大周末写的。。也许可以解释一点这种乱象 Freedom must be given in doses. Absolute freedom is only a recipe for disaster, it will consume everyone in chaos. And so the government's first job is to feed these doses and put on the impression of absolute freedom. The government's second job is to establish order and keep money out of private stores. The worst fear of the government is for private industry to surpass central industry. The most natural type of government is a monarchy as the monarchy relates to the father of a family or the chief of a tribe. Monarchy has had its benefits as well as flaws. It is likely to be full of stupidity and brute force. Really it all comes down to the monarch himself. For a period in Rome the monarchs did not choose their kin, they chose the most able man. Despite this there were exceptions. Marcus Aurelius never named his successor and so his son Commodus became king. This went on and became worse until chaos took over. Chaos was their king. It is easier to have a minority rule than a majority, as it can be easier to unite a minority under one cause. These minority rulers will be chosen by birth, by ritual, or by wealth. This is called a oligarchie. Aristocrats control art, they control work. Yet they rarely produce art. They leave that to the people. They can’t see themselves downgraded to such a position, but still they boast. They boast of all those things that the people accomplished. That the people did for them. And so the people eventually revolted. Riots were held in the streets, revolutions were being called upon, the guillotine killed one thousand nobles, and democracy became the replacement. So does history see revolutions as “right”? This has been a debated subject for years and is well illustrated by Luther's break from catholicism. Democracy has strictly only existed in modern times, and comes after revolution. It started in the midst of the french revolution. And started in america when andrew jackson was president. In ancient attica only 43000 people out of 315,000 people could vote when democracy prevailed.
还真是这样。懒的还是懒。分了田地也没有彻底改变命运。
这种帖子多了 没人信 具体名字说出来 大家可以查询 对比 否则就是造谣
我正想回几句，突然发现这ID是个new born baby.
这就是土共整人的本事。整的下三代不敢说话。
Freedom must be given in doses. Absolute freedom is only a recipe for disaster, it will consume everyone in chaos. And so the government's first job is to feed these doses and put on the impression of absolute freedom. The government's second job is to establish order and keep money out of private stores. The worst fear of the government is for private industry to surpass central industry. The most natural type of government is a monarchy as the monarchy relates to the father of a family or the chief of a tribe. Monarchy has had its benefits as well as flaws. It is likely to be full of stupidity and brute force. Really it all comes down to the monarch himself. For a period in Rome the monarchs did not choose their kin, they chose the most able man. Despite this there were exceptions. Marcus Aurelius never named his successor and so his son Commodus became king. This went on and became worse until chaos took over. Chaos was their king. It is easier to have a minority rule than a majority, as it can be easier to unite a minority under one cause. These minority rulers will be chosen by birth, by ritual, or by wealth. This is called a oligarchie.
Aristocrats control art, they control work. Yet they rarely produce art. They leave that to the people. They can’t see themselves downgraded to such a position, but still they boast. They boast of all those things that the people accomplished. That the people did for them. And so the people eventually revolted. Riots were held in the streets, revolutions were being called upon, the guillotine killed one thousand nobles, and democracy became the replacement. So does history see revolutions as “right”? This has been a debated subject for years and is well illustrated by Luther's break from catholicism. Democracy has strictly only existed in modern times, and comes after revolution. It started in the midst of the french revolution. And started in america when andrew jackson was president. In ancient attica only 43000 people out of 315,000 people could vote when democracy prevailed.
脑子清楚的都知道土共是啥货色，好在凭着好基因，后人也能很快翻身
董宏也落馬了
董宏長期擔任薄熙來父親、中共元老薄一波的秘書，後來長期跟隨王岐山，被外界視為是王岐山的大管家。2000年3月後
就是老毛說的
臭老九 的後代
呵呵，不造谣、不整人，这是我家家训之一，说我造谣的，爱信不信吧。我今天估计是太闲了，家里事情拿出来絮叨。我有病才会把家人名字拿出来说，也别去人肉我们家了，细节特意做了些修改，防的就是人肉。 我们两大家子人，现在无论在国内还是在国外的都过得还不错，没啥怨恨，更不反党。我们家老人后来是平反了的，我们也认识一些红二代红三代，有不少都是聊得来的朋友。不入党，不参政，纯属我们自己的选择，请别想多了
如果那个年代一去不复返，自然也就只能叫叫屈而已，叫的目的是希望历史不会重复。
藏奴制度 維奴制度
秘書跟大公安都垮台了
帝 學的是毛主席跟史達林啊
我离开中国主要是因为这个原因，执政党为了一手遮天，没有下限，为达目的不择手段，不分黑白。
看看白鹿原，其实就是很真实的写照。
这就跟相信华人贫困线是多少多少万一样，谁信谁傻～～
当然啦，高情商人士都是看破不说破，和光同尘一起吹，然后假装互相相信～～
没错，有人就想激你说出具体情况以便人肉攻击
谁是洪荒？
洪晃吧。
一帮流氓的后代想堵住别人的嘴。就算是没文化的假富豪，就该给流氓抢？只能说流氓的基因代代传，初心不改
没办法，现在新一代改开和苏联垮台后成长起来的，没见过什么阶级斗争左右之分，自然容易被一些口号忽悠。你也唤不醒，随他去吧。。。
有些ID故意过来搅混水以便堵住别人的嘴
土共再整人，第一个整你这种的。
土共下次整人不再挑既得利益阶层了，改地下室5毛阶层的来整？
5毛挺合适造反的，有良心要脸面的人干不出来
版上的流氓后代把自己的基因秀得清清楚楚。到底什么样的基因让他们的祖宗做了流氓无产者，做了红卫兵，一目了然.
大公安都垮台了啊 光看這些本來混得很好的 都成那樣
帝 底下沒有一個安穩的
他們就快看到了
共產黨啊 過不了二十年好日子 就是得攪和
別以為五毛就沒法被整
五毛二十年前能吃炒飯
現在加個蛋都要一塊
美国地下室5毛这波瘟疫中被trump忽悠的，不少被整。川又出来蹦跶了，喊着病毒不可怕，这一波不晓得又会整多少？不过不管如何，亚裔5毛是同胞，俺还是喊一声，小心哈。。工作归工作，别被川迷了心窍，信以为真了哈。咱们同胞不搞阶级斗争，在米国，中产还是很容易的，下一代努力一把，就上来了，窝里斗没意思！
華人早就習慣不相信政府了
不過這次美國竟然有可以把 血氧 85的77歲胖老人救回來的單株抗體 大量生產一下也就是了
帝 民怎麼可能不搞階級鬥爭
帝 還得鬥大公安呢
啥？那谁也喜欢吃蛋炒饭？
上海閔行對面右手邊的炒飯麵攤子
炒飯一定有肉 沒肉沒法炒
加蛋要加一塊 加肉也要加一塊
都不加的原來要三塊 2010年
後來要五塊 2014年
這漲價也太快了點
大家都有钱了，当然愿意多掏钱买同样的物品。据说这是共产党会搞经济的明证啊
但 上海閔行拖鞋們 左前方小區
請 阿姨 的薪水 也沒漲到 1.6倍啊
當然可能請
小阿姨 的薪水有漲到