https://khn.org/news/abbott-rapid-test-problems-grow-fda-standards-on-covid-tests-under-fire/ The agency at that point had received 15 “adverse event reports” about Abbott’s ID NOW rapid COVID test suggesting that infected patients were wrongly told they did not have the coronavirus, which had led to the deaths of tens of thousands of Americans. The warning followed multiple academic studies showing higher “false negative” rates from the Abbott device, including one from New York University researchers who found it missed close to half of the positive samples detected by a rival company’s test.
取样不象传说中的使劲捅鼻子，一点都不痛苦，护士就是用棉签轻轻地在每个鼻孔转几下。
等结果的时候跟护士聊了会儿，说这个测试准确率还挺高的。
我测了两次，两周前第一次是必测的，今天测第二次是自愿的。
前些天剛批准緊急使用，政府已经签采购了。
不准。灵敏度不够。
反了，false negative 高。
The agency at that point had received 15 “adverse event reports” about Abbott’s ID NOW rapid COVID test suggesting that infected patients were wrongly told they did not have the coronavirus, which had led to the deaths of tens of thousands of Americans. The warning followed multiple academic studies showing higher “false negative” rates from the Abbott device, including one from New York University researchers who found it missed close to half of the positive samples detected by a rival company’s test.
你说的这个是antibody test，false negative很正常因为很多人得了还没产生抗体，最近这个是抗原测试，基本不会有这个问题false negative不会高
对，这个是测antigen，护士说挺准的。测antibody 连我家庭医生都不推荐，说不准。
缺点是一次只测一个样品，不像核酸测试一下子测好多。
现在雅培出的试纸最好了，方便在家就可以自己测了
白宫用的就是这个，还是很方便的