别紧张，审核期间被临时屏蔽了。。你发数据作假这个不是打轮子和弯弯的脸么，还有那些换个国家就兴奋的双标狗，你让他们怎么活。 avplus 发表于 5/3/2020 10:15:24 PM
Washington times 是个什么东东？权威吗？只听过 Washington post 和 new York times babypiggy 发表于 5/3/2020 10:30:47 PM
这个表没有问题啊，只是拿流感作比较啊 hy34 发表于 5/3/2020 10:47:43 PM
先不说这个新闻真伪。假设如果确证总数里面混入流感，那么真实coronavirus死亡率岂不是更高？所以请问作者，究竟cdc这么做是帮助复工还是反对复工？这片文章的作者是反对复工还是觉得这个是big flu？ rabbitu 发表于 5/3/2020 11:24:39 PM
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/apr/28/coronavirus-hype-biggest-political-hoax-in-history/
人数上不去，不够吓人，CDC拿流感和肺炎充数
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/health_policy/Provisional-Death-Counts-COVID-19-Pneumonia-and-Influenza.pdf
多谢， 多谢。 吓死我了。还以为5毛7毛控制了华人
等等看路透社或FT会不会报
Washington post ， new York times，这二假话骗子货， 还有人信吗？
这个锋尖浪口上，居然终于有媒体说人话说真话， 是条汉子，还有点职业道德，不错。
它把3 个数字放一起了，仔细看，减法一下就出来了。
垃圾报纸，credit 0，经常撒谎。估计看到Trump肺炎死亡超6万，开始到处找借口。
你问的我发懵。
图表显示每周肺炎死亡人数急剧下降
把别的死亡冒充成新冠，把数字搞大, 这么恐怖， 复不复工， 我们这些屁民看着办。坛子里不是有人说如果必须去办公室上班就辞职吗？
cdc这么做是帮助复工还是反对复工， 就不知道了。要搞事，这个是肯定的。
楼主，对你的表格没有研究，第一， 指明CDC 的是你，不是报纸，第二，你知道不知道CDC 只是统计各州的数据，各州只是统计各郡的数据。所以你要说，美国各州，各郡都修改，编造数据，是不是？
The Washington Times is an American conservative daily newspaper published in Washington, D.C., that covers general interest topics with a particular emphasis on national politics. Its broadsheet daily edition is distributed throughout the District of Columbia and in parts of Maryland and Virginia. A weekly tabloid edition aimed at a national audience is also published.[3]
The Washington Times was founded on May 17, 1982, by Unification movement leader Sun Myung Moon and owned until 2010 by News World Communications, an international media conglomerate founded by Moon. It is currently owned by Operations Holdings, which is owned by the Unification movement.[4][5]
Throughout its history, The Washington Times has been known for its conservative political stance.[6][7][8][9] It has published many columns which reject the scientific consensuses on climate change,[10][11][12] on ozone depletion,[13] on the harmful effects of second-hand smoke,[14][15] and which have spread misinformation regarding the 2019–2020 coronavirus outbreak.[16] It has drawn controversy for publishing racist content, including commentary and conspiracy theories about U.S. President Barack Obama,[17][18] supporting neo-Confederate historical revisionism,[19][20] and promoting Islamophobia.[21] The paper's reporting has been criticized many times, and has been characterized as "lies" and "myths."[22]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Washington_Times
極右的conspiracy theory 組織