贴过来一个相关的宇宙网络理论，这是个物理学家的理论。 英文的： https://www.sciencenews.org/article/stephen-wolfram-hypergraph-project-fundamental-theory-physics/amp Stephen Wolfram’s hypergraph project aims for a fundamental theory of physics Simple rules generating complicated networks may be how to build the universe A computer visualization depicts a “hypergraph” consisting of relationships between points constructed by repeatedly applying a simple rule for expanding, or “updating,” the network. Stephen Wolfram believes a massively complex hypergraph could represent all of physical space and its contents, a clue to finding the fundamental theory of physics. COURTESY OF WOLFRAM RESEARCH By Tom Siegfried APRIL 14, 2020 AT 10:01 AM 中文的： https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/aSa6R2o_Pz_z67_A024Yxw 宇宙是一个图网络？「全球最聪明的人」刚刚为物理基础理论指出了全新道路 著名计算机科学、数学、理论物理学家斯蒂芬·沃尔夫勒姆（Stephen Wolfram）可能是世界上最聪明的人，他的研究经常被人们视为「神作」。但当昨天沃尔夫勒姆宣布「找到了理论物理基础的正确道路」时，所有人仍然感到非常惊讶，第一时间不知如何做出评论。 本周二，这位因粒子物理学、元胞自动机、宇宙学、复杂性理论、计算机系统而闻名的科学家突然发表了一篇超长文章，吸引了所有人的注意。 这篇长达近百页的文章是 Wolfram 物理项目的首次曝光，详述了作者对于空间、时间和基本粒子性质的全新理解。沃尔夫勒姆还邀请所有人参加对基本物理学进行解码的研究。 「我从没预料到会是这样，」沃尔夫勒姆在开头写道。「这是出乎预料，令人惊讶的。从某种程度来说，我已经为此奋斗了 50 年，但是直到最近几个月，它们才终于融合在一起。而且它比我想象的还要精彩、美丽。」 现实世界中，网络的存在多种多样，除了神经网络、社交网络和病毒传播网络之外，还有电网、生态网络和最明显的——互联网。从这个角度上看，整个宇宙肯定是一个巨大的网络。 沃尔夫勒姆认为宇宙是巨大且不断增长的关系网络，这些关系构成了空间以及空间中的一切。他从中看到了构成所有物理定律的底层终极理论的基础。 其实早在 18 年前，沃尔夫勒姆在一本 1197 页的著作「A New Kind of Science」中表达过类似的观点。但是那时候他的构想还不太清晰。现在，他认为自己找到了解释现实的更好视角。 他在昨日发布的文章里表示，「我认为我们找到了一条通往物理学基础理论的道路。」 沃尔夫勒姆方法的核心是超图（hypergraph）。这里，「图」类似于网络的图示：用线条连接不同的点。但是在一张白纸上是无法用这类线条表示现实的。于是，沃尔夫勒姆利用计算机视觉化，用更复杂的「超图」来描述关系。（在超图中，「线条」可以连接任意数量的点，而不是仅连接两个点。） 沃尔夫勒姆的研究表明，复杂的超图可以模仿宇宙的许多特征，包括物质和能量，还能复现相对论和量子力学所描述的物理结构和过程。
Isn't that interesting? My, my that's a nice story but with all due respect, so what? Well, real quietly without anyone seeing you, juxtapose the word "God" with "Quality". Do you see what happens? Quality exists before we recognize it; God exists before we recognize it. Quality precedes and thus creates the world; God precedes and thus creates the world. We all know what Quality is; we all know what God is. Think about what that says. We all know what God is. All of a sudden God has done everything the Bible says He's done but is not something found exclusively in the Bible or in churches or up in the mountains of Tibet. God is something we all feel every day. God is accessible. If we see something that is high in quality, that something is high in "God-stuff". If someone is of high quality, that someone has a high content of God in him. To get closer to God, make yourself have high quality. Now everything is starting to make sense.
...
By not locking yourself into a premise that leads to the absurd and then inter-mixing "God" and "Quality", life becomes a lot clearer. It also becomes a lot easier to believe in God. In fact, it becomes downright impossible not to believe. You know the way you feel when you do something absolutely perfect? That's God. You the way you feel when you do something nice for someone for no reason at all? That's God. You remember what you felt the first time you looked at your wife? That's God. The only way you can't believe is to not feel any quality ever. And that's ridiculous. "
这里面对神的理解偏差得也太大了。 “You remember what you felt the first time you looked at your wife? That's God！” 这种理解是完全错误的。 对神的理解不可能仅仅通过理性来获取。而是要去在实践中去体验，然后才有可能知晓。怎么去体验？最简单的就是去尊从耶稣的话。
" God is Not a Person (Swelsh) https://www.original.moq.org/forum/ScottWelsh/godisnotaperson.html By not locking yourself into a premise that leads to the absurd and then inter-mixing "God" and "Quality", life becomes a lot clearer. It also becomes a lot easier to believe in God. In fact, it becomes downright impossible not to believe. You know the way you feel when you do something absolutely perfect? That's God. You the way you feel when you do something nice for someone for no reason at all? That's God. You remember what you felt the first time you looked at your wife? That's God. The only way you can't believe is to not feel any quality ever. And that's ridiculous." " " Isn't that interesting? My, my that's a nice story but with all due respect, so what? Well, real quietly without anyone seeing you, juxtapose the word "God" with "Quality". Do you see what happens? Quality exists before we recognize it; God exists before we recognize it. Quality precedes and thus creates the world; God precedes and thus creates the world. We all know what Quality is; we all know what God is. Think about what that says. We all know what God is. All of a sudden God has done everything the Bible says He's done but is not something found exclusively in the Bible or in churches or up in the mountains of Tibet. God is something we all feel every day. God is accessible. If we see something that is high in quality, that something is high in "God-stuff". If someone is of high quality, that someone has a high content of God in him. To get closer to God, make yourself have high quality. Now everything is starting to make sense. " EvenOdd 发表于 4/18/2020 2:43:00 AM
" God: Personification ≠ Person Rev. Michael Dowd, Contributor Big history/pro-future evangelist, religious naturalist, sacred realist, and bestselling author https://www.huffpost.com/entry/god-is-a-personification-_b_2866764 Religion Is About Right Relationship to Reality, Not the Supernatural "I believe in God, only I spell it N-A-T-U-R-E." -- Frank Lloyd Wright "
(3) Everything is God. ... (for the pantheist, God is the world; for the Swinburnian, God transcends the world)
"
Everyone (and everything) is part of God, (the Universe, Nature, etc) including Jesus (who should understand very well Stoicism, which was the most popular practical-philosophy of the era)!
The Gospel of Mary is an apocryphal book discovered in 1896 in a 5th-century papyruscodex written in Sahidic Coptic. This Berlin Codex was purchased in Cairo by German diplomat Carl Reinhardt. Although the work is popularly known as the Gospel of Mary, it is not technically classed as a gospel by scholastic consensus because "the term 'gospel' is used as a label for any written text that is primarily focused on recounting the teachings and/or activities of Jesus during his adult life".[1]
The Gospel of Thomas (also known as the Coptic Gospel of Thomas) is a non-canonicalsayings gospel. It was discovered near Nag Hammadi, Egypt, in December 1945 among a group of books known as the Nag Hammadi library. Scholars speculate that the works were buried in response to a letter from Bishop Athanasius declaring a strict canon of Christian scripture. Scholars have proposed dates of composition as early as AD 60 and as late as AD 140.[1] "
Spirit should be logically the law of nature (or Logo/ Universal Reason), which is also part of God.
Science, including both hard and soft sciences, is invented/discovered/evolved/developed to understand more and more about God (a systemic construct of Nature/Universe/Law of Nature/Reason/etc).
" Tao Te Ching = The Nature's Way: Living, Harmony, Politics, Economics, and War
" #4 Tao can be infused into the nature and put to use without being exhausted. It is so deep and subtle like an abyss that is the origin of all things. It is complete and perfect as a wholeness that can Round off sharp edges; Resolve confusion; Harmonize with the glory; Act in unity with the lowliness. Tao is so profound and yet in invisible, It exists in everywhere and anywhere. I don not know whose Son It is, It existed before heaven and earth.
#5 Nature nurtures all things with the wholeness of complete virtue. It shows the greatest and perfect kindness by giving life to let all things grow and accomplish them with the hastening of harvest. Therefore, according to ancient custom, nature may seem unkind to regard all beings as a traditional straw dog for sacrifice. And likewise with a saint, he may seem unkind to regard people as a traditional straw dog for sacrifice. The space between heaven and earth is like the bellows, it appears empty yet it gives a supply that never fails; The more it moves, the more it brings forth. Many words lead to exhaustion. It is better to center on the true essence within.
#16 Human must achieve the ultimate void and maintain calmness with sincerity in order to observe the growth and flourish of all beings. It is in this way that one can understand the law of nature. All things and beings will eventually return to the original source. This is called “peace.” “Peace” means returning to one’s original nature. This original nature is the eternal law. To know the nature’s law is to be enlightened.
He who is ignorant of the nature’s law shall act recklessly, and thus will invite misfortune. To know the constant law of nature is to be generous. Being generous, one is impartial. Being impartial, one is the sovereign. Sovereign is the nature itself. Nature is Tao. Tao is everlasting. When one’s physical body dies away, Tao still long endures.
#73 He who is brave in being daring, acts recklessly and shall be killed. He who is brave but acts cautiously and kindly shall live. Of these two, one is beneficial while the other is harmful. What nature wishes, who may know what the reasons are? Thus, the saint is aware of the subtlety and profoundness of the Nature’s Way, So he takes great caution in practicing It. The Tao of Nature, Does not contend, yet easily wins. Does not speak, yet always responds. Does not summon, yet all things gather. Does not contemplate as if at ease, Yet all plans were devised perfectly. The Law of Nature is like a giant web, Although sparsely meshed, nothing can slip through.
#77 The Tao of Nature is like stretching a bow. When the stretch is too high, it needs to be pressed down. When the stretch is too low, it needs to be raised high. The excess will be reduced. The deficient will be replenished. The Tao of Nature is to reduce the excessive and to replenish the insufficient. The Tao of man, however is otherwise.
It takes from the needy to serve those who already have a surplus. Who can spare one’s surplus to serve the world? A person of Tao. Thus, a saint acts without holding on to the achievements. He accomplishes but does not claim for credit. He has no desire to distinguish himself.
#81 Words of truth are not pleasing. Pleasing words are not truthful. The wise one does not argue. He who argues is not wise. A wise man of Tao knows the subtle truth, And may not be learned. A learned person is knowledgeable but may not know the subtle truth of Tao. A saint does not possess and accumulate surplus for personal desire. The more he helps others, the richer his life becomes. The more he gives to others, the more he gets in return. The Tao of Nature benefits and does not harm. The Way of a saint is to act naturally without contention."
“Religion Is About Right Relationship to Reality, Not the Supernatural” The above statement is absurdly WRONG. Religion is about the TRUTH. The so called reality is just the delusions of wrong minds.
" God: Personification ≠ Person Rev. Michael Dowd, Contributor Big history/pro-future evangelist, religious naturalist, sacred realist, and bestselling author https://www.huffpost.com/entry/god-is-a-personification-_b_2866764 Religion Is About Right Relationship to Reality, Not the Supernatural "I believe in God, only I spell it N-A-T-U-R-E." -- Frank Lloyd Wright " EvenOdd 发表于 4/18/2020 3:21:00 AM
God created the world, and God is far beyond the world. But one shall never say God is the world. The content you presented is full of self boosting, which God dislikes. Thus, you shall go away.
" God is not a person (an argument via pantheism) Simon Hewit https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11153-018-9678-x (1) God is everything. ... (3) Everything is God. ... (for the pantheist, God is the world; for the Swinburnian, God transcends the world) " Everyone (and everything) is part of God, (the Universe, Nature, etc) including Jesus (who should understand very well Stoicism, which was the most popular practical-philosophy of the era)! Cf. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stoicism EvenOdd 发表于 4/18/2020 3:32:00 AM
Reality is the sum or aggregate of all that is real or existent within a system, as opposed to that which is only imaginary. The term is also used to refer to the ontological status of things, indicating their existence.[1] In physical terms, reality is the totality of a system, known and unknown.[2] Philosophical questions about the nature of reality or existence or being are considered under the rubric of ontology, which is a major branch of metaphysics in the Western philosophical tradition. Ontological questions also feature in diverse branches of philosophy, including the philosophy of science, philosophy of religion, philosophy of mathematics, and philosophical logic. These include questions about whether only physical objects are real (i.e., Physicalism), whether reality is fundamentally immaterial (e.g., Idealism), whether hypothetical unobservable entities posited by scientific theories exist, whether God exists, whether numbers and other abstract objects exist, and whether possible worlds exist.
Those who deny that Jesus has two natures, the divine and human, will often quote Numbers 23:19 as proof that Jesus cannot be God in flesh. But this verse is not ...
我刚刚把那一章读了一遍。的确是故意停留了两天。但没有具体解释为什么？但紧接着门徒说，上次去那里犹太人还要拿石头砸你......不知道故意停留两天是否是和这个有关联。还是有其它原因，这本福音书的作者自己也不理解。 耶稣说Lazarus睡着了是故意这么说的。结合后面他和门徒的讨论，耶稣要传递的信息就是信他的在灵里得到永生，即使肉体上死了，也只是如同睡着了一样。这次救活Lazarus是最重磅的一次神迹，是对他的传播的福音最完美的解释，仅次于他自己的复活。 这次救治是对他挑战最大的一次。Mary的话让他产生了巨大的怜悯和慈爱。When Jesus saw her weeping, and the Jews who had come along with her also weeping, he was deeply moved in spirit and troubled. 借助这极其强的爱，他成功的复活了Lazarus。 至于为什么特意等两天，我觉得有种可能他是在等待最佳的时间，那时他灵里的力量最强大。根据Cayce，耶稣和当时很多犹太人都学占星术，都能够知晓灵界的一些运行规律。毕竟复活一个死去的人是一件非常难的事情。而这个时候的耶稣还只是人，一个sinless的人。他这个时候的能力和他自己复活之后相比还是有很大的差距的。所以他需要找到近期最佳的时间点。 顺便八卦一下，他和Lazarus和他的两个姐姐关系都是极亲近的。Mary及其美，非常爱慕耶稣。但是耶稣为了他的使命，把两人的关系限制在了师徒之间。耶稣上十字架的时候，Mary也在场。耶稣死了，Mary和耶稣的母亲和妹妹一起清理他的尸体。这被认为是只有极亲近的人才可以做的事情。耶稣复活的时候，Mary是第一个见到他的人。
回复146楼 surezzz 的帖子 所以每个人的理解力和感受力很不一样。我第一次看约翰福音就震撼了，耶稣去救拉撒路那段是有幽默的成分在里面的。耶稣故意等了两天才颠吧颠吧去了。还说拉撒路睡着了。这明显是一个大牛觉得自己大显身手的时候到了的小得意。就好像你找一个大牛给你修bug，你急的不行，大牛一听就是小case，说你急什么急，这小事一桩，故意逗逗你。结果耶稣的门徒都很愣，哦，睡着了就不用去了。耶稣只能说他其实是死了。。。但我很高兴他死了，因为我大显身手的时候到了😂结果去了之后看到别人在哭，而且耶稣明显是喜欢拉撒路的，他自己也哭了。 我看到的耶稣是一个真性情的人，很真实的人。有点木讷，有点小作，有时候得理不饶人，不高兴了又一句话不说。他的门徒都很愣是真的。如果说多马福音是真的，只能说耶稣这强大的幽默感不能被门徒理解，他也够郁闷的😅 girlinblack 发表于 4/18/2020 10:31:00 AM
那也讲讲路上见闻，当年途径各国风土人情。估计很多人有兴趣。
前几天正好我也想过这个问题，哈哈。头顶有个螺旋，我猜是为了更好的沟通。
谢谢🙏🏻
楼主只记得一些人际关系的纠葛，如果关于风土人情有具体的问题可以问我，我尽量回忆一下。越具体越好，谢谢🙏🏻
头发应该是个非常神奇的东西吧。
现在再看圣经不明白的地方少多了🤓
玉皇大帝是帝释天主，Father上帝是大梵天主。孙大圣西天取经早已经是斗战胜佛了。这类基本的信息还是要查询准确再说，乱说小心回去被罚哦。
三藏法师一个人去，但是灵界确实有孙悟空，八戒，悟能，以及龙王三太子化身的白马四大护法。西游记中讲的更多是灵界的真实经历。孙悟空最后修成斗战胜佛，三藏法师的果位就不用说了。
能经历越大的磨难，才能承载越大的成就，老天往往通过困境磨炼人的心境。
楼主越是接引到多有缘受众，就越是要尽量客观传达。提及具体人事要斟酌，尤其是对已经修成有果位的。
三十三天那么多层，欲界，色界，无色界，各有不同。
三生三世十里桃花是为了唤醒某人而做的。不当爱情片看，传载很多高层信息，和仙剑1一样都是真正的神剧。
lz这个贴圣经问题可以问你吗？
可以啊。关于书的内容当然可以问，但是楼主懂得不多，只能知之为知之，不知为不知。
第一个堕天使路西法也是上帝创造出来的，某种意义上也是爱子，也是耳濡目染，最后却坠入欲望，变得邪恶无比。这种事不好说的，有人是出淤泥而不染，有人是腐臭于芝兰之室。
本体就是天使，多少是不确定的，因为那边没有时间。所以不能说某个时间有几个。
这个问题楼主还真没研究过，当时我也读得很纳闷，个人意见感觉是经文传播中有些脱节的地方。至于后续内容，应该是为了维护当时风俗的强化观点。楼主一般不太注意这些细节问题，也没有深入研究过风俗。
感觉经文有脱节，这个内容似乎是想要强调风俗的神圣性来源，个人意见应该是当时人加工过的。
没有堕落的人上帝都会牢牢抓住，有点动摇的也要拼命拉回来，绝不会轻易放弃，上帝有时严厉只是担心人会沉溺错误导致最终堕落，并非喜欢惩戒人。就如人类看待爱子。
唤醒谁？
谢谢🙏🏻
一直都在，就是没有给出连接的指示，相当于没有赐下。
佛是觉者。每个人都可以成佛。
佛不是上帝。
God is Not a Person (By Swelsh)
https://www.original.moq.org/forum/ScottWelsh/godisnotaperson.html
...
Isn't that interesting? My, my that's a nice story but with all due respect, so what? Well, real quietly without anyone seeing you, juxtapose the word "God" with "Quality". Do you see what happens? Quality exists before we recognize it; God exists before we recognize it. Quality precedes and thus creates the world; God precedes and thus creates the world. We all know what Quality is; we all know what God is. Think about what that says. We all know what God is. All of a sudden God has done everything the Bible says He's done but is not something found exclusively in the Bible or in churches or up in the mountains of Tibet. God is something we all feel every day. God is accessible. If we see something that is high in quality, that something is high in "God-stuff". If someone is of high quality, that someone has a high content of God in him. To get closer to God, make yourself have high quality. Now everything is starting to make sense.
...
By not locking yourself into a premise that leads to the absurd and then inter-mixing "God" and "Quality", life becomes a lot clearer. It also becomes a lot easier to believe in God. In fact, it becomes downright impossible not to believe. You know the way you feel when you do something absolutely perfect? That's God. You the way you feel when you do something nice for someone for no reason at all? That's God. You remember what you felt the first time you looked at your wife? That's God. The only way you can't believe is to not feel any quality ever. And that's ridiculous.
"
"
God is not a person (an argument via pantheism) Simon Hewit
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11153-018-9678-x
(1) God is everything.
...
(3) Everything is God.
...
(for the pantheist, God is the world; for the Swinburnian, God transcends the world)
"
Everyone (and everything) is part of God, (the Universe, Nature, etc) including Jesus (who should understand very well Stoicism, which was the most popular practical-philosophy of the era)!
Cf. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stoicism
"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Mary
The Gospel of Mary is an apocryphal book discovered in 1896 in a 5th-century papyrus codex written in Sahidic Coptic. This Berlin Codex was purchased in Cairo by German diplomat Carl Reinhardt.
Although the work is popularly known as the Gospel of Mary, it is not technically classed as a gospel by scholastic consensus because "the term 'gospel' is used as a label for any written text that is primarily focused on recounting the teachings and/or activities of Jesus during his adult life".[1]
"
Cf. http://gnosis.org/library/marygosp.htm
"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Thomas
The Gospel of Thomas (also known as the Coptic Gospel of Thomas) is a non-canonical sayings gospel. It was discovered near Nag Hammadi, Egypt, in December 1945 among a group of books known as the Nag Hammadi library. Scholars speculate that the works were buried in response to a letter from Bishop Athanasius declaring a strict canon of Christian scripture. Scholars have proposed dates of composition as early as AD 60 and as late as AD 140.[1]
"
Cf. http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/thomas_poxy.htm
Spirit should be logically the law of nature (or Logo/ Universal Reason), which is also part of God.
Science, including both hard and soft sciences, is invented/discovered/evolved/developed to understand more and more about God (a systemic construct of Nature/Universe/Law of Nature/Reason/etc).
"
Tao Te Ching = The Nature's Way: Living, Harmony, Politics, Economics, and War
http://www.with.org/tao_te_ching_en.pdf
" #4 Tao can be infused into the nature and put to use without being exhausted. It is so deep and subtle like an abyss that is the origin of all things. It is complete and perfect as a wholeness that can Round off sharp edges; Resolve confusion; Harmonize with the glory; Act in unity with the lowliness. Tao is so profound and yet in invisible, It exists in everywhere and anywhere. I don not know whose Son It is, It existed before heaven and earth.
#5 Nature nurtures all things with the wholeness of complete virtue. It shows the greatest and perfect kindness by giving life to let all things grow and accomplish them with the hastening of harvest. Therefore, according to ancient custom, nature may seem unkind to regard all beings as a traditional straw dog for sacrifice. And likewise with a saint, he may seem unkind to regard people as a traditional straw dog for sacrifice. The space between heaven and earth is like the bellows, it appears empty yet it gives a supply that never fails; The more it moves, the more it brings forth. Many words lead to exhaustion. It is better to center on the true essence within.
#16 Human must achieve the ultimate void and maintain calmness with sincerity in order to observe the growth and flourish of all beings. It is in this way that one can understand the law of nature. All things and beings will eventually return to the original source. This is called “peace.” “Peace” means returning to one’s original nature. This original nature is the eternal law. To know the nature’s law is to be enlightened.
He who is ignorant of the nature’s law shall act recklessly, and thus will invite misfortune. To know the constant law of nature is to be generous. Being generous, one is impartial. Being impartial, one is the sovereign. Sovereign is the nature itself. Nature is Tao. Tao is everlasting. When one’s physical body dies away, Tao still long endures.
#73 He who is brave in being daring, acts recklessly and shall be killed. He who is brave but acts cautiously and kindly shall live. Of these two, one is beneficial while the other is harmful. What nature wishes, who may know what the reasons are? Thus, the saint is aware of the subtlety and profoundness of the Nature’s Way, So he takes great caution in practicing It. The Tao of Nature, Does not contend, yet easily wins. Does not speak, yet always responds. Does not summon, yet all things gather. Does not contemplate as if at ease, Yet all plans were devised perfectly. The Law of Nature is like a giant web, Although sparsely meshed, nothing can slip through.
#77 The Tao of Nature is like stretching a bow. When the stretch is too high, it needs to be pressed down. When the stretch is too low, it needs to be raised high. The excess will be reduced. The deficient will be replenished. The Tao of Nature is to reduce the excessive and to replenish the insufficient. The Tao of man, however is otherwise.
It takes from the needy to serve those who already have a surplus. Who can spare one’s surplus to serve the world? A person of Tao. Thus, a saint acts without holding on to the achievements. He accomplishes but does not claim for credit. He has no desire to distinguish himself.
#81 Words of truth are not pleasing. Pleasing words are not truthful. The wise one does not argue. He who argues is not wise. A wise man of Tao knows the subtle truth, And may not be learned. A learned person is knowledgeable but may not know the subtle truth of Tao. A saint does not possess and accumulate surplus for personal desire. The more he helps others, the richer his life becomes. The more he gives to others, the more he gets in return. The Tao of Nature benefits and does not harm. The Way of a saint is to act naturally without contention."
"
Cf. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tao
"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality
Reality is the sum or aggregate of all that is real or existent within a system, as opposed to that which is only imaginary. The term is also used to refer to the ontological status of things, indicating their existence.[1] In physical terms, reality is the totality of a system, known and unknown.[2] Philosophical questions about the nature of reality or existence or being are considered under the rubric of ontology, which is a major branch of metaphysics in the Western philosophical tradition. Ontological questions also feature in diverse branches of philosophy, including the philosophy of science, philosophy of religion, philosophy of mathematics, and philosophical logic. These include questions about whether only physical objects are real (i.e., Physicalism), whether reality is fundamentally immaterial (e.g., Idealism), whether hypothetical unobservable entities posited by scientific theories exist, whether God exists, whether numbers and other abstract objects exist, and whether possible worlds exist.
Contents
1 Related concepts
1.1 World views and theories
2 Western philosophy
2.1 Being
2.2 Perception
2.3 Abstract objects and mathematics
2.4 Properties
2.5 Time and space
2.6 Possible worlds
2.7 Theories of everything (TOE) and philosophy
2.8 Phenomenological reality
2.9 Skeptical hypotheses
3 Jain philosophy
4 Physical sciences
4.1 Scientific realism
4.2 Realism and locality in physics
4.3 Role of the observer in quantum mechanics
4.4 Multiverse
4.5 Scientific theories of everything
5 Technology
5.1 Virtual reality and cyberspace
5.2 "RL" in internet culture
6 See also
7 Notes
8 References
9 Further reading
10 External links
"
"
Can Jesus be God if God is not a man (Numbers 23:19 ...carm.org › jesus-christ › god-is-not-a-man
Those who deny that Jesus has two natures, the divine and human, will often quote Numbers 23:19 as proof that Jesus cannot be God in flesh. But this verse is not ...
"
你也有幽默感。
哈哈。谢谢！
这些经文是你手动整理的吗？谢谢你！
我也更愿意相信耶稣没有依靠过占星术。一个是术，只能带来一时的便利。一个是道，能真正得到灵里的永生。
通过今天的讨论，我知道了Cayce的话只能借鉴，不能迷信。
最近一年多，有不少人在给我提示，有道教的，佛届的，基督教的，周易的，还有其它一些灵性的方法的。现在我觉得，真正的道路在我们的内心，从我们自己的生活中寻找。因为神早已经安排好了一切。
圣经没有大问题，如何解经很重要。经文让人死，精义让人活。通过圣经看见神的圣洁、人的罪恶，看到预言、审判、救赎，才是最重要的。不能卡死在具体的个别片段上。比如有人读了很久圣经，始终走不出创世纪。
mm，看了你说的去搜了这个人，真的是很神奇，他是灵界有人直接给信息吗？我看到他在照片里眼神非常犀利，我不敢直视，但是同照片里其他人就没有，你有没有感觉？
我看他的书很多，有给初学者推荐的吗？
圣经只是提供Message，关键的还是在自己个人的修行，从自己内心，从自己的生活中开始。太多的人把目光只放在圣经上。圣经很多地方写得很模糊，不完整。这其实也是神默许的。因为他要让我们把关注放到自己的内心，在自己的痛苦中真正的领悟神的话。每个人的修行方式都是不同的，只有从自己的经历中去寻找神的爱才能真正的走进神的国度。
很多人读圣经不太会有什么灵里的感动。少部分人会有。但是这种感动仅仅是一个信号而已，让我们在灵里去接近神。但是这远远不是真正的功课。太多的人因为经历过这种感动，就以为回到神的家了。不是的，那只是唤醒我们，告诉我们在这物质的世界之上有一个属灵的家，一个永远的家。这个回家的路其实是在我们自己之内，神的光芒会一直引导我们，如果我们会时时仰望他的话。
是的，我也有类似的感受。两年前别人给我介绍一个灵媒，我看了那个人的照片就觉得灵里非常不舒服，本能排斥。Cayce应该也是灵媒体质，不过他是一个极其虔诚的基督徒，我对他就没有那么大的排斥。
他的书中有一段，是一个刚刚去世不久的演员的亡灵突然跑到他的身体里说话，而且说话的声音也不一样。我没有看那一页，因为只要我眼睛扫到那页，就会非常不舒服。不过这样的事情在他一生中只发生过一次。
因为很多原因，他的书都挺难读的。我现在在读Edgar Cayce's story of Jesus。尽量从中吸收点养分吧。或者我们可以线下交流。
我不知道像他这种道破天机的做法是圣灵允许的泄露，就像一种传道的方式，还是什么原因？
之前看了一段净空法师讲鬼神的视频，他说鬼道，我理解应该就是堕天使，引诱人信他就是通过给人一些很准的预测。也许Cayce是连接圣灵的，但是鉴于害怕他的眼神这一点，我还是暂时不读他的书了。
跟了这两个楼之后每天都像信息爆炸，太多都是第一次知道了。
同问， 想知道这部经文是楼主自己翻的还是给你的时候就已经是中文了？
谢谢！辛苦了
原文是英语
还有30页。我把这个帖子也编辑进去了。
写得已经比较白话文了
是的，我也觉得有些比较难理解。
巴比伦之牢找了个视频，结合着看就生动了，LZ看看是这个意思不？
https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/104276275?utm_source=wechat_session&utm_medium=social&utm_oi=1050424984698195968&from=singlemessage&isappinstalled=0
同求英文版本！
我需要说明一下： 楼主你写的这部阅读感很好，语言明了 逻辑清晰。读起来有种理性的金属质感。同时又会有“就如同金丝带一般将所有耀目的珍珠全部穿起”这样的金句出现。
我求英文版本是希望能够分享给我只会英文的朋友们并有所交流。
楼主这是完全记录下来的，没法改动，哪里有疑问请提问好了。
多谢多谢🙏🏻
英文版已经出版，因为亚马逊不能出版免费书，所以定价0.99https://www.amazon.com/Book-Lord-revelation-before-harvest-ebook/dp/B07CLV791H/ref=mp_s_a_1_3?dchild=1&keywords=the+book+of+the+lord+reve&qid=1587273572&sr=8-3
对基督教了解甚少，可以解释一下基督教的可操性吗？我理解佛教的可操性更强，通过觉知一世训练可以达到佛的境界