Whether or not you liked Parasite, which I did, the academy awards have increasingly begun to elevate and honor a specific type of movies with a liberal message that appeals mostly to a left-leaning crowd. Look at some of the films that won best picture in the 1990s and 2000s: Braveheart, Titanic, Gladiator, Return of the King, Silence of the Lambs. Forest Gump.
Look at some of the movies that have won the last few years: Moonlight, Birdman, Parasite, the Shape of Water. These are movies that far fewer people have seen; or even want to see.
Trump is often wrong but in this case I think he’s into something — the Academy awards have become unwatchable. And for somebody who used to love watching the show that’s regrettable. meanGirl7 发表于 2/21/2020 8:33:32 AM
I really liked parasite and thought it deserved to win best picture. I also think Trump can be a buffoon and say things that are childish and divisive. With that said, I understand the larger point he’s (probably) getting at the Academy Awards have become a woke fest filled with smug, overpaid stars preaching to us about how we should live our lives. Whether or not you liked Parasite, which I did, the academy awards have increasingly begun to elevate and honor a specific type of movies with a liberal message that appeals mostly to a left-leaning crowd. Look at some of the films that won best picture in the 1990s and 2000s: Braveheart, Titanic, Gladiator, Return of the King, Silence of the Lambs. Forest Gump. Say what you will about these movies but they had a broad appeal and were very successful at the box office. This in turn made people want to tune into the academy awards.
Look at some of the movies that have won the last few years: Moonlight, Birdman, Parasite, the Shape of Water. These are movies that far fewer people have seen; or even want to see.
And as a result fewer and fewer people watch the oscars. And when they do watch they got scolded for stealing a mother cows milk or hear a star extolling the virtues of having an abortion.
Trump is often wrong but in this case I think he’s into something — the Academy awards have become unwatchable. And for somebody who used to love watching the show that’s regrettable. meanGirl7 发表于 2/21/2020 8:33:32 AM
that's bs. just because the recent academy winners are not box office crowd pleasers, doesn't mean they don't deserve the best picture prize at the oscars. I don't see nobel literature prizes awarded to nora roberts, dan brown and stephen king and the like. give the prize to the most deserving, regardless of its popularity among regular movie goers, regardless of how they conform to the traditional hollywood movie mold - this should be the goal of the academy.
说的好!!明显感觉猪党要变成ccp一样的独裁了,太可怕了。学校高层都给老师灌输政治正确,上面都是猪党的走狗,为了统治独裁给孩子们洗脑。卧槽,民主党这个毒瘤不知道如何才能去掉
說得太好了 1990-2000那些年好片子不斷,都看不過來。現在的電影根本不想看。 川普就是個一天到晚瞎說大實話的老小孩,動了那麼多道貌岸然的人的奶酪,所以遭恨呢。
就是,差得太遠了,這個例子誰能駁?!
越想越覺得天佑美國啊,如果是16年豬黨上台的話,那真是全世界都跟土共一起命運共同體了,後怕!
有事说事,他评价parasites这个事情,是霸凌了?起外号了?觉得奖项不该给韩国电影就是煽动国家主义?和着电影就一定该颁给韩国才不是煽动国家主义,是吧
以后奥斯卡要不把最佳影片颁给外国影片,那都是煽动国家主义,要和奥斯卡反应一下。
本来这个事情,就是他一个个人看法的发表,你可以同意,可以不同意,非要上纲上线。知道群众为什么那么讨厌政治正确吗?因为政治正确说穿了,只让你一个方向正确,另一个方向就是政治不正确,这是最有悖于言论自由的。
对 所以大统领非常神奇的符合天朝酱缸文化的审美。从践踏道德底线,以金钱为信仰的极端实用主义,到神奇的因为对假大空教育的反弹,而膜拜真小人的价值观。所以大统领在天朝在华人才有那么多忠心粉丝。
我看了寄生虫,不错的影片。不过好的影片看过的太多,所以不觉得寄生虫有啥惊艳的地方。
至于川普,人家自然有权利喜欢和不喜欢某个作品。
有事说事是好习惯。自己这么讲的时候最好自己对照一下。有一个字说一定该颁给韩国了么?非得走极端化才显得自己有理?
对,这件事就是大统领个人看法。但是你忘记了,他不是普通公民是总统。他说的,用不着华人给他上纲上线,是必然有。知道他推特是档案保存么?总统可以签行政令,普通公民可以么?普通群众爱说啥是自由,但是普通群众上班打工都必须遵循一定的行为准则,合着大统领,总统有绝对自由?有这么荒谬的标准么?
他有绝对自由??你开玩笑吧,从上台开始就要被弹劾。他从来就没有比别的总统更多的自由。然后还要剥夺他个人言论自由?他对这个韩国电影的看法是以发总统行政令的形式出现??你说来说去,不就是说他作为总统,评价韩国电影不正确吗?凭什么,他作为总统,连个电影都不能评价了?还是说,没评价到你的心坎上,就政治不正确了???
别搞得别人都跟你一样,反川都反魔怔了。我们分得清哪些是他大嘴胡说,哪些是国家大计。就好比前面我说的,小克跟个女学生乱来,我们觉得没关系。这个大事小事,我们拎得清。老抓着点小破事跟在川大后面,显得你真可怜。
是,可球队是密苏里的
对,而且说贸易上我们大美帝没有占到便宜,怎么可以在美国评的奥斯卡给韩国呢?
凸显了这个人的无知无畏无底线!
左派的道德就是无视法律,乱性吸毒堕胎。 而且虚伪慷他人之慨,卑鄙龌龊。然后还把这些当成他们的尊严。
猪党可以把老川随便一句话就上升到种族歧视的高度,心疼老川啊,最没有自由的一位总统。左逼怎一个下流可以形容
川粉吹彩虹屁真不是盖的
普通观众?你去问问你家川黄,看他接受不接受你赠送给他的普通这两个字。真是彩虹屁都不会吹还想做川粉,丢人。
谢天谢地美国的宪法与制度限制了大统领的绝对自由。虽然大统领是非常羡慕独裁者的,也只能羡慕一下,大嘴一下,侵蚀一下,攻击一下。顶不住众多川粉恨不得捧他为国王啊。整天义愤填膺的保护大统领的言论自由啊。 真是太好笑了,大统领说的话,百分之一放别的政客那里,基本就是政治生命终结,大统领不仅能说,还变本加厉的说,像金刚护体一样,什么出格言论都没有关系,而且川粉还欢呼鼓掌,而且反对意见就成了限制他言论自由。这种颠倒黑白也是服了。
而且一开始就说了,这跟电影好坏根本没关系。麻烦回头看贴。
哈,开始扣帽子了。
你真的觉得你的发言是代表言论自由?凡是不同意你的都是川粉?
你认为Trump对这部电影的评价,放在别的政客那里,基本就是政治生命终结?好怕怕哦
你不知道的是,你口口声声说的独裁,在你这里,表现的淋漓尽致。所以你看别人不如你意的,都是独裁。
that's bs. just because the recent academy winners are not box office crowd pleasers, doesn't mean they don't deserve the best picture prize at the oscars. I don't see nobel literature prizes awarded to nora roberts, dan brown and stephen king and the like. give the prize to the most deserving, regardless of its popularity among regular movie goers, regardless of how they conform to the traditional hollywood movie mold - this should be the goal of the academy.
又來這套,煩死。 乾脆說那就是政治不正確的年代,把它從歷史上劃掉吧,就沒有飄了,政治永遠正確
飘的意识形态的确有点一言难尽,尤其是原著。。。看过原著,被作者深入骨髓的白人优越感震惊了
样板戏恰恰是和政治挂钩呀。傻孩子。所以样板戏的艺术水平是很高的。
就这片子还需要被看懂?你花了很多力气才看懂的?
你家川黄明明就是要在新时代继续飘那一套好吧
和屎一样的《水形物语》比是好不少,但和《飘》比就是自取其辱,差了何止几条银河系。《飘》有历史局限,但原著和电影都是史诗级的,几个主演也不可复制。老头是总统也是观众,表达自己的观点有啥问题
个人意见在政治rally上发表还扯上贸易?啥目的不用遮遮掩掩吧,这彩虹屁吹的太没档次了,6楼虽然也是吹彩虹屁,但是比你高级太多。
他有说他看过这部电影了么?
https://www.ft.com/content/fc5d6188-5403-11ea-8841-482eed0038b1
Trump当总统,是美国之幸!
no,这部电影是教育大家如果富人独富,即使住在富人区还有地下坑道,也是一个死。因为穷人面临生存危机,必然要不择手段,这是人的本性,结果就是富人最终也躲不开被灭的命运,这个历史已经一再证明了。解决的办法就是减少贫富差距,要给穷人活路,这样富人才有活路
这真是我见过最无厘头的一句回复。。。
如果没看过就不能说是观众了吧。 “And never mind that, by his own admission, Trump hasn’t actually seen Bong’s genre-scrambling thriller, which explores the gap between rich and poor and which became the first foreign-language film to win the academy’s top prize.” https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/movies/story/2020-02-21/president-trump-favorite-movies-parasite-oscar%3f_amp=true
他说他不知道这个片子好不好,但是就是不如飘好,奥斯卡就是不能把最佳影片奖颁给韩国电影,最多给个最佳外语片奖,哈哈哈哈哈哈
网上的各种调侃啊,好好玩。