Subscriber 4 hours ago Much of China's population has become accustom to a better standard of living. Millions will be very disappointed if the government cannot continue that standard. Can Xi blame America and the populace accepts the explanation? Or, will they hold Xi's fragile Communist regime responsible? It may not be a risk that Xi is willing to take for long. In order words, China would have to cave long before the U.S. would. Why start a battle they cannot finish?
It is necessary for the U.S. to level the playing field with China. Not only in direct trade but more open and fair trade within the economic system. Sure, we gain a few profits from companies in China, but we lose far more from the trade deficit, and the imbalance of China owned companies in the United States. To continue delaying the task of taking on China would only be that more difficult in the future. President Trump is doing the right thing, and all Americans should stand with our country through this process.
Subscriber 4 hours ago Our trade deficit with China is beyond massive. Other than a few select US companies/industries, I do not see how we can lose a trade war. China has been eating our lunch and stealing our intellectual property for decades (how do you think they got where they are economically in a few short years?). I have no problem with paying more for US products. And, anyone who wants the US to remain the world's most powerful country had better be willing to fork over a few more bucks..
Subscriber 4 hours ago Much of China's population has become accustom to a better standard of living. Millions will be very disappointed if the government cannot continue that standard. Can Xi blame America and the populace accepts the explanation? Or, will they hold Xi's fragile Communist regime responsible? It may not be a risk that Xi is willing to take for long. In order words, China would have to cave long before the U.S. would. Why start a battle they cannot finish?
It is necessary for the U.S. to level the playing field with China. Not only in direct trade but more open and fair trade within the economic system. Sure, we gain a few profits from companies in China, but we lose far more from the trade deficit, and the imbalance of China owned companies in the United States. To continue delaying the task of taking on China would only be that more difficult in the future. President Trump is doing the right thing, and all Americans should stand with our country through this process.
Subscriber 4 hours ago Our trade deficit with China is beyond massive. Other than a few select US companies/industries, I do not see how we can lose a trade war. China has been eating our lunch and stealing our intellectual property for decades (how do you think they got where they are economically in a few short years?). I have no problem with paying more for US products. And, anyone who wants the US to remain the world's most powerful country had better be willing to fork over a few more bucks..
人权其实川普也跟金正恩提了。
白宫新闻秘书长周四(14日)出席记者会时,指总统川普本周二在新加坡出席峰会时,曾向北韩领袖金正恩提出,北韩侵犯人权的问题。
在峰会过后,川普接受美国广播公司访问时,被问到之前曾批评金正恩无视人权,例如让国民挨饿、运作劳改营甚至暗杀自己的亲人。川普强调亲自跟对方倾谈过有关问题,相信他希望为北韩做美好的事。
唱得太高调小心以后被打脸
Subscriber
4 hours ago
Much of China's population has become accustom to a better standard of living. Millions will be very disappointed if the government cannot continue that standard. Can Xi blame America and the populace accepts the explanation? Or, will they hold Xi's fragile Communist regime responsible? It may not be a risk that Xi is willing to take for long. In order words, China would have to cave long before the U.S. would. Why start a battle they cannot finish?
It is necessary for the U.S. to level the playing field with China. Not only in direct trade but more open and fair trade within the economic system. Sure, we gain a few profits from companies in China, but we lose far more from the trade deficit, and the imbalance of China owned companies in the United States. To continue delaying the task of taking on China would only be that more difficult in the future. President Trump is doing the right thing, and all Americans should stand with our country through this process.
Subscriber
4 hours ago
Our trade deficit with China is beyond massive. Other than a few select US companies/industries, I do not see how we can lose a trade war. China has been eating our lunch and stealing our intellectual property for decades (how do you think they got where they are economically in a few short years?). I have no problem with paying more for US products. And, anyone who wants the US to remain the world's most powerful country had better be willing to fork over a few more bucks..
最新民调就是大多数美国人都支持川普对中国货上关税,所以川普政府已经做好准备了。
美国贸易代表署资深官员官员表示,总统川普上任后、美国透过许多不同管道清楚向中国表达上述相关问题必须解决处理,美国不是没给过中国机会,双方应合作解决问题,然而,中国一直错失良机。
官员强调不是美国要打贸易战,中国在强迫技术转移、制造不公平竞争环境及窃取美国的智慧财产权上,才是制造问题的始作俑者。
官员说,在智慧财产权、创新及科技上,美国的四大发现包括中国确实向美国高科技产业与航空业施压,要求技术转移;二是美国企业想在中国市场推出产品或服务,无法和中国企业享有同等待遇;三是中国以国家资本的举国体制,在美国大肆蒐购美国企业的智慧财产权;四是中国侵扰或以网络骇客的方式,窃取美国企业的商业机密,获取利益。
尽管川普上周在七大工业国集团(G7)加拿大峰会上、和传统盟邦如欧洲与加拿大因贸易引起的言语冲突达新高峰,不过,官员表示,在中国制造不公平的竞争环境上,美国仍会与盟国合作,继续借由世界贸易组织(WTO)的争端解决机制,共同迎战中国。
中共现在用人强调红色基因,能力是次要的。
这是当然的。金正恩受过西方教育,喜欢NBA足球,用西方名牌,苹果电脑,他哥去英国看演唱会。
金正恩有孩子了,为了下一代肯定也不愿意朝鲜一直被中共压着,希望朝鲜能被世界接受,这么多年,也就川普能给金家这样的机会,金家肯定是不会放过的。
金正恩要减减肥,搞不好是个帅哥。
你朋友打肿脸充胖子的行为你居然没有看出来。就是为了让子女回国围着自己你居然没看出人家的用心来。
真是,唉,在美国呆傻了。。。
很慢了,现在只是340亿,160亿估计要等等,Trump的500亿已经有俩礼拜了吧,美国还有1000亿,就看土共会不会跟上了。
同时的,美国7月6号开征,中国也是同等规模同时开始
把土工踢开,金三就啥也不是
从贸易关系上来说,土工是大赢家,很多地下的生意都可以公开做了,也可以扩大了。其他外国公司都还反应不过来就没机会了
川大嘴把三胖夸成花只能说明川大嘴已经咬勾了
普京、安倍都猴急了,这小子绝对要耍花样的,最喜欢借着别人之间的矛盾占便宜
把金三想象成对大嘴忠心耿耿?!走着瞧
朝鲜可以和很多国家公开做生意的话,就不那么非要靠中国了,现在是金正恩要美国保护,中共本来是要搞掉金正恩的,要不为啥朝鲜要刺杀金正男呢。
凤凰卫视这两天已经在经济节目里讨论“美国应该如何安于老二的位置”了
土工已经给美国安排好了老二的位置,你让美国不叫唤几声怎么做拍档?
美国这是给美国企业足够的时间准备,很多企业早就开始找中国替代品,现在应该是差不多READY了,
哈哈,没准又不打了
没到真开打之前,都是诈唬
基建、能源、运输都得靠中国,除了中国,其他国家也供不起,最后还是会形成对中国的依赖
估计也是出口导向型经济,技术可以从美韩拿
最新的说法是,以前谈的都不算数了
川大嘴夸三胖是为了让三胖回去有个面子,否则这么多年朝鲜宣传反美,这一下转弯太大。。
金三不反美,美国少个敌人,就可以更好的干别的了。
这些年偷偷私下里和朝鲜做生意的可不只是中国。
哪中兴又死了?高通的并购又黄了?干脆痛快淋漓的打一场算了?今天股市好像还顶住没怎么跌,听说中国股市跌的一踏糊涂?
中兴的案子还搁在国会那儿
高通中国就一直在卡,当成一张牌,还没出
其他国家和朝鲜偷偷做生意的规模,连中国的零头都不到
那当然,偷偷的你能指望有多大规模,美国认可那就不一样了。
必须死磕,觉得今上最想当成三胖那样的备受人民爱戴的国家领导人,而不是川普这种焦头烂额不论做什么都有人追着骂的总统。这并没有对错,只是一个选择而已。
到了这么高层,他们看到的世界跟我们普通人完全不同,中国对全世界大规模行贿,欧美政治高层一个一个的躺在金钱下面出卖国家利益,习这种从小在毛主席的政治理念下长大的人估计早就看不上欧美的政治体系了,知道欧美的政治体系一样龌蹉不堪,尤其奥巴马这8年,欧美整体腐败到了极点,把伊朗当洗钱国家,欧美政治高层和各大财团无耻的掠夺美国欧洲民众的财富,在媒体的洗脑下民众还各种拥戴奥巴马,习近平根本不会对欧美政治体系有一点点的好感,甚至是不屑,从内心深处的鄙视欧美的政治群体,甚至是恐惧中国会变成那样被世界财团控制的傀儡,对他来说,走回毛的革命理想主义是不可避免的,如果要控制住自己的政治班子不会集体卖国那他就需要绝对的权力,绝对的权力就是靠对外死磕,对内洗脑。
欧美的民主是真的民主吗,呵呵,就难民而言,欧洲就是纳粹行为,因言获罪。
美国要没有民主,川普也上不了台,媒体黑川普,川普还不是上台了,现在人很多根本不会只靠主流媒体获取信息。现在就是要把左派搞下台。
铀矿储量吓死人?有人说是谣传,有官方权威数据吗?
老友粉 发表于 6/15/2018 10:40:36 PM [/quote]是吗?
中国的国情和这俩一样?
中国好像已经宣布报复关税了
https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/us-closing-the-trade-gap-with-china-wilbur-ross
哈, 中国根本不怕老川1000亿的威胁哦。
反正勒紧裤腰带的又不是他。
确实也没啥怕的,继续升级吧。
伊朗手里有一张欧美高层受贿的名单,扔出来可以瞬间让欧美崩盘,中国手里也有一张,呵呵。
习近平只要自己干净,坦荡,真就没必要怕,中美分道扬镳是可以预见的,政治理念不同,习近平绝对不能允许中国被世界财团控制,会死磕到底的,从另一个角度看,没有错。
世界财团以为自己无所不能,习近平这样的硬骨头也让他们知道锅是铁打的。习近平不卖国,已经足够在历史上留下浓重的一笔。
习自己也没那么干净啦。美国把那个啥王立军闯进美国领事馆带来的证据扔出来共产党就要完蛋了。 中国现在无官不贪的啦,美国掌握的比中共多多了。
估计王立军爆料的人已经都被习哥给处理了。中国本来就是独裁国家,无官不贪人人都知道,习一直在反腐。但欧美号称民主清廉,
贪就是贪了,也没人对他们反腐,欧美也是无官不贪,爆出来,国家就能直接瘫痪了。
习近平没在怕,帝国主义都是纸老虎。
王立军都没被处理掉,才判了15年,当年是因为美国不支持薄熙来。
那对美国是利好。
今非昔比了,习近平不是一个用钱利益可以收买的人,他有更高层次的追求。而欧美政坛依旧明码实价的卖着国家和民众,假以时日,还不知道哪边先倒呢。
别把习近平当神,他并不如你想象的那么干净,他拥抱马克思主义,他以为他有追求,可惜他是错的。
冷战对美国是好事。
其它小国美国好控制。
比送钱给中国养个反美的白眼狼强多了。
中国不算白眼狼,中国只是不想被世界财团控制,成为傀儡。其实川普做的是同样的事,只是两个人手段不同。
习近平做现在这个位子做出了很大的妥协,你还说不被控制,没那帮人点头,他早下台了。
那就接着搞中兴呗
不是说中国已经批了高通的案子了么
你根本不知道他为了现在这个权利做出了怎样的妥协,这个妥协就是他头上一把刀。
脑洞有点大……
习现在其实并没有绝对的权利,他现在的权利是各方妥协的结果。
没批
这是有可能的