There are many demographic fault lines emerging in this year’s presidential campaign, but few are deeper than the division among likely voters based on educational attainment. Those with the least number of years of education are far more likely to support Donald Trump, while those who have had the most schooling are much more likely to back Hillary Clinton, according to a Bloomberg Politics national poll released this week.
There are many demographic fault lines emerging in this year’s presidential campaign, but few are deeper than the division among likely voters based on educational attainment. Those with the least number of years of education are far more likely to support Donald Trump, while those who have had the most schooling are much more likely to back Hillary Clinton, according to a Bloomberg Politics national poll released this week.
There are many demographic fault lines emerging in this year’s presidential campaign, but few are deeper than the division among likely voters based on educational attainment. Those with the least number of years of education are far more likely to support Donald Trump, while those who have had the most schooling are much more likely to back Hillary Clinton, according to a Bloomberg Politics national poll released this week. poinciana 发表于 11/3/2016 2:34:43 PM
There are many demographic fault lines emerging in this year’s presidential campaign, but few are deeper than the division among likely voters based on educational attainment. Those with the least number of years of education are far more likely to support Donald Trump, while those who have had the most schooling are much more likely to back Hillary Clinton, according to a Bloomberg Politics national poll released this week. poinciana 发表于 11/3/2016 2:34:43 PM
There are many demographic fault lines emerging in this year’s presidential campaign, but few are deeper than the division among likely voters based on educational attainment. Those with the least number of years of education are far more likely to support Donald Trump, while those who have had the most schooling are much more likely to back Hillary Clinton, according to a Bloomberg Politics national poll released this week. poinciana 发表于 11/3/2016 2:34:43 PM
There are many demographic fault lines emerging in this year’s presidential campaign, but few are deeper than the division among likely voters based on educational attainment. Those with the least number of years of education are far more likely to support Donald Trump, while those who have had the most schooling are much more likely to back Hillary Clinton, according to a Bloomberg Politics national poll released this week.
我觉得希拉里的支持者一般是还在校园的liberals和吃福利的龙虾党。我周围支持trump的PHD多着呢，倒真是settle down工作的人。Paypal的创始人 Peter Thiel说的很对，很多人觉得trump过去言论举止不正确，但支持trump不是缺乏判断力去支持他不正确的地方。恰恰相反，而是有判断力，支持的是他大方向的正确性，同时担心希拉里的人品和利益驱使下的政见会给美国带来不可挽救的倒退。
学历低其实没什么，很多成功的人学历低，也有很多学历高的人庸碌一辈。只是好奇为什么华人里有些高学历的会支持Trump?
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-08-12/education-level-sharply-divides-clinton-trump-race
There are many demographic fault lines emerging in this year’s presidential campaign, but few are deeper than the division among likely voters based on educational attainment.
Those with the least number of years of education are far more likely to support Donald Trump, while those who have had the most schooling are much more likely to back Hillary Clinton, according to a Bloomberg Politics national poll released this week.
这个说法对吗？
BBC評論指出，川普對移民、穆斯林和女性的貶抑侮辱，使西方深受人道主義、平等意識和民權運動洗禮的知識菁英，完全無法認同。但中國菁英在「社會達爾文主義」盛行的中國社會成長，30多年改革開放是大亂後開始，沒有思想啟蒙運動，中共官方也貶抑過去吃大鍋飯、福利制弊病，社會流行弱肉強食的叢林法則，崇拜和諂媚強者，關愛與平等對待弱勢群體氛圍遠未建立，間接影響中國人對川普想法。不少華裔崇拜川普，幾乎至「照單全收、無怨無悔」地步
不知道gre逻辑部分怎么考的。
（note：这里的发帖指的是主题帖，不是回帖）
拿学历压人的人最可笑。
北华大学？
有个说法是川普在未获得大学学历的白人这个群体中，支持率远高于希拉里，这个是事实
可能是传着传着就成了楼主说的版本了
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-08-12/education-level-sharply-divides-clinton-trump-race
There are many demographic fault lines emerging in this year’s presidential campaign, but few are deeper than the division among likely voters based on educational attainment.
Those with the least number of years of education are far more likely to support Donald Trump, while those who have had the most schooling are much more likely to back Hillary Clinton, according to a Bloomberg Politics national poll released this week.
☆ 发自 iPhone 华人一网 1.11.08
reeeeeee
难怪说人以类聚，那个优越感哪真是装都懒的装，我去
轮子的经费是CIA给的，川普不对中国搞意识形态，上台就会断了他们的狗粮
那是因为美国的大学都被民主党洗脑了，想说自己是保守派都会被歧视，绑架，和文革差不多
共和党理念和我们新移民相同。我们和老移民直接去唐人街打工不一样！
你是馒头的老爸？。。。你家馒头和黑人墨墨穆斯林通婚呢，他们都是你的好女婿
你是真觉得希拉里和trump上台对aa 没有影响， 还是因为你的孩子有非洲拉丁的血统， 所以你觉得aa 实行了他们会受益？
兰州说的对，都是连英文都看不懂的低学历，比如看到希粉经常挂在嘴边load and order, camping manager直接一脸黑线的
听好了，北京大学！！！
不过以你的眼界，也就知道什么我都没听说过的”北华大学“了。。。
校友好～
现在deplorable已经有了全新意义，语言就是这么演变的，作为见证历史的一份子，我表示激动三秒钟
校友好～
应该不都是吧，信法轮功的不是也有几个脑子晕头高学历的，信川教主的跟信李教主的都差不多同类人
嗯，我看也像学历不高的，而且估计龙虾吃很多，有没有身份也是个迷思
MITBBS 上大部分博士，都支持trump。中国人对左的东西看的太多了，知道是不好的。楼主为啥不说说偷渡的龙虾党是否都是高学历。要是自己收入高，谁愿意多交钱养别人？不养就是没爱心？那爱心是怎么界定的？你们献爱心，掏别人口袋里的钱，算要脸还是不要？
我猜lz博士毕业找不到工作怕trump当选连h1 都拿不到。
嗯，没，没错，俺就上不了清华北大。呃，好像也能挤进个清华的差一点儿的系。
如果是你的孩子呢？
有时觉得男克真的是很悲哀！本来好好的，结果希拉偏要去选举，结果查出犯罪记录。他肯定是很死这个烂婆娘了！
编啊，只要你编完能上每日邮报这样的小报都行
‘250 children were kneaded to death in bread machines and men were baked in an oven
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=/amp/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3875112/amp/250-children-kneaded-death-bread-machines-men-baked-oven-Grieving-mother-reveals-evil-ISIS-thugs-swept-Syria-murdered-Christians-including-son.html&ved=0ahUKEwjNtIb5643QAhVr04MKHc4oBvgQFggaMAA&usg=AFQjCNHDSGWzTOPsonjkp76q2pH56Ej81g&sig2=fvYEZiUHprmd5ruhyY6fGw
你错乱了吧，川普支持者到底是“这些高学历的人”还是“没上过大学的人”，拆队友的台。
还是你以为高学历=高中学历
☆ 发自 iPhone 华人一网 1.11.08
你根本就没有选举权。以后有不有还不知道，你的党员身份根本拿不到公民。
☆ 发自 iPhone 华人一网 1.11.08
但希粉挺好总结的啊，camping了后camping manager把人体排泄物到处扔，砸GOP办公室，扰乱川普拉力，就三个字”素质低“。