Polls: Clinton leads Trump in Colorado, Florida, Pennsylvania, tied in Ohio By NOLAN D. MCCASKILL 10/17/16 03:20 PM EDT While Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are tied in Ohio, the Democratic nominee is leading her opponent in Colorado, Florida and Pennsylvania, according to a batch of Quinnipiac University polls released Monday. Clinton and Trump each garner 45 percent support in Ohio among likely voters, with Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson and Green Party candidate Jill Stein at 6 percent and 1 percent, respectively. Clinton’s largest lead in the swing state polls comes in Colorado, where the former secretary of state tops Trump by 8 percentage points, 45 percent to 37 percent. She leads by 6 percentage points in Pennsylvania, 47 percent to 41 percent, and 4 percentage points in Florida, 48 percent to 44 percent. Johnson sits at 10 percent in Colorado, 4 percent in Florida and 6 percent in Pennsylvania. Stein registers at 3 percent in Colorado and 1 percent in Florida and Pennsylvania. The surveys of 685 likely voters in Colorado, 660 likely voters in Florida, 624 likely voters in Ohio and 660 likely voters in Pennsylvania were conducted Oct. 10-16 via landlines and cellphones. The margin of error is plus or minus 3.7 percentage points in Florida, 3.8 percentage points in Florida and Pennsylvania, and 3.9 percentage points in Ohio.
Polls: Clinton leads Trump in Colorado, Florida, Pennsylvania, tied in Ohio By NOLAN D. MCCASKILL 10/17/16 03:20 PM EDT While Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are tied in Ohio, the Democratic nominee is leading her opponent in Colorado, Florida and Pennsylvania, according to a batch of Quinnipiac University polls released Monday. Clinton and Trump each garner 45 percent support in Ohio among likely voters, with Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson and Green Party candidate Jill Stein at 6 percent and 1 percent, respectively. Clinton’s largest lead in the swing state polls comes in Colorado, where the former secretary of state tops Trump by 8 percentage points, 45 percent to 37 percent. She leads by 6 percentage points in Pennsylvania, 47 percent to 41 percent, and 4 percentage points in Florida, 48 percent to 44 percent. Johnson sits at 10 percent in Colorado, 4 percent in Florida and 6 percent in Pennsylvania. Stein registers at 3 percent in Colorado and 1 percent in Florida and Pennsylvania. The surveys of 685 likely voters in Colorado, 660 likely voters in Florida, 624 likely voters in Ohio and 660 likely voters in Pennsylvania were conducted Oct. 10-16 via landlines and cellphones. The margin of error is plus or minus 3.7 percentage points in Florida, 3.8 percentage points in Florida and Pennsylvania, and 3.9 percentage points in Ohio. sc31415 发表于 10/17/2016 3:41:46 PM
疮泼与北朝鲜剑拔弩张要挑起核战最后把中国带进来你不反对吗？ The brazen billionaire claimed in a book he would "bomb" North Korea's nuclear reactor and advocated attacks on its military bases. He wrote: "What would I do in North Korea? Fair question. It's easy to point out the problem, but what should be done to solve it? Am I ready to bomb this reactor? You're damned right."
Top public election pollsters are almost unanimous in their belief that Hillary Clinton will be the next president and are pretty sure that Republicans will retain control of the House. But they’re much less sure about who will control the next Senate. Many also anticipate a bigger gap than usual between late polling and the election result.
Top public election pollsters are almost unanimous in their belief that Hillary Clinton will be the next president and are pretty sure that Republicans will retain control of the House. But they’re much less sure about who will control the next Senate. Many also anticipate a bigger gap than usual between late polling and the election result.
By NOLAN D. MCCASKILL 10/17/16 03:20 PM EDT
While Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are tied in Ohio, the Democratic nominee is leading her opponent in Colorado, Florida and Pennsylvania, according to a batch of Quinnipiac University polls released Monday.
Clinton and Trump each garner 45 percent support in Ohio among likely voters, with Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson and Green Party candidate Jill Stein at 6 percent and 1 percent, respectively.
Clinton’s largest lead in the swing state polls comes in Colorado, where the former secretary of state tops Trump by 8 percentage points, 45 percent to 37 percent. She leads by 6 percentage points in Pennsylvania, 47 percent to 41 percent, and 4 percentage points in Florida, 48 percent to 44 percent.
Johnson sits at 10 percent in Colorado, 4 percent in Florida and 6 percent in Pennsylvania. Stein registers at 3 percent in Colorado and 1 percent in Florida and Pennsylvania.
The surveys of 685 likely voters in Colorado, 660 likely voters in Florida, 624 likely voters in Ohio and 660 likely voters in Pennsylvania were conducted Oct. 10-16 via landlines and cellphones. The margin of error is plus or minus 3.7 percentage points in Florida, 3.8 percentage points in Florida and Pennsylvania, and 3.9 percentage points in Ohio.
在margin of error 以外就比较放心啦
这一方面也解释了床迷越来越狠毒的行为。跟主子一般狗急跳墙，可以理解可以理解
但是他跟公司hr要求从某天开始用女厕所因为他的胸部做好了可以穿裙裙了
公司hr把楼层所有女员工 也就十个人吧 汗 召集起来开会 说这个人开始用女厕了哈 要求大家不准议论 说如果那个人因为此事对任何一个员工提出complaints 这位被告的就要走人了
然后女同事们都觉得挺生气的 突然这么被要求
比较雷的是 这个人 自己跟同事们说 他/她还跟女朋友住在一起呢
West Virginia
Kentucky
Alabama
Arkansas
如果今年GOP nominee换一个人的话，情况可能很不一样
今年好像是真的应了那句the lesson of the two devils. 当然，希拉里在政坛的贡献我是承认的。但她的缺点也太让人捉急了
不是吧，小部分粉属于政治诉求不同，可以理解。
而大部分是智力问题，比如楼上这位。
政治诉求不同完全可以理解，我觉得换一个靠谱一点的人来代表右派的政治诉求，估计民主党今年完全没戏
不过我之前一直听说华人是socially liberal，但是这段事件发现版上好像并不是这样
看到一个2012年为Mitt 助选的人出来说，当年Mitt动辄，2，3万人集会，床铺的比起来根本不够看。选举前一周还是3万人大会。结果还是输了
当年的盛况
很好奇， 如果有一个女性因为宗教信仰问题，不能和 transgender 共用女厕所，那该咋办呢？
那可以标明Pork Free就行了吧？
这几年国人有钱了， 留学出国工作出国留下来的人越来越多， 这部分人应该是更倾向共和党的。
你那么大方自己捐款去， 看看那些为你打工的偷渡来的人住什么地方发多少薪水再谈liberal！ 你支持希拉里不过是为了能继续用最低时薪剥削那些非法移民而已。
中国人是最务实的最守规则的，不会像极个别人明明是吸血鬼非要打着政治正确的旗号装大方， 什么时候就被你label 成liberal了 笑！。别代表华人， 别张口闭口华人， 你代表不了！
没有的话，整天跟着主子叫嚣rigged system, 痛诉满世界都conspiracy来反对你们，这样下去会得被迫害妄想症的
除了那些专业搞政治的 我真没见过几个技术移民路线的不支持trump的？
喔，可是每次大选华人50%以上都是投的民主党哎。还有，新来的华人在学校研究所里面工作的不少，这些人一般是支持民主党的，毕竟民主党可以保证funding。共和党不相信science，喜欢god，显然对这些搞研究的不利。
我觉得可能不止是funding的原因，可能左一点的人本身就更愿意去做科研
从生物的角度上说，一个群体里的variation对生存是很重要的，华人里有右派、有左派，才能做到在各种政治环境下都能生存下去
这个版上的某些粉丝恶言相向的行为有点幼稚了
很多治国很有一套的国家领导人私德不好， 尤其女人问题上比较开放， 这不应该被扣不尊重女性的帽子， 看trump对子女的态度就知道他从不觉得女人比男人差。那些抨击他和女儿伊万卡不伦恋的就更是太low了！
信他的当然就跟着他觉得现在生活在黑社会
学生里怕H1B拿不到很正常，trump本来就不为这些人带盐啊。我周围学生支持trump的全都是要回国的。
我也认识反对共和党不是，别动不动就洗脑啊什么的，本来年轻人就更理想主义一点
我没那么反对共和党上台，（当然我还是更希望是民主党，嘿嘿，别喷我），但是这次阻止共和党的是Trump......
还有希拉里一点都不左，从她的副总统选择就可以看出来。ｔｒｕｍｐ私德不好不仅仅是不尊重女性，他是打心里认为女人就是玩物。他的眼里没有法律和道德。Ｔｒｕｍｐ这辈子骗了很多人，这次大选是他骗得最多的一次。如果希拉里真的像ｔｒｕｍｐ粉说的那么不济，那么邪恶，她在白宫待了８年，真是蛇蝎心肠，想置美国于死地，至于等到现在吗？
不仅幼稚而已卑鄙。我本来从来不对她们生气的，觉得好笑而已。但昨天看了那个AZ的飞机条幅，真觉得这些人太可恶了，怎么就自己脸大代表一个州所有的华人了呢。。。
Democratic president and Democratic control of the House and Senate: 19 years, average gain of 9.10 percent.
Democratic president and Democratic control of the Senate, with Republican control of the House: 3 years, average gain of 13.66 percent.
Democratic president, Republican control of the Senate, Democratic control of the House: No occurrences since 1950.
Democratic president, Republican control of the House and Senate: 6 years, average gain of 19.25 percent.
Republican president and Republican control of the House and Senate: 6 years, 13.81 percent.
Republican president and Republican control of the Senate, with Democratic control of the House: 6 years, average gain of 10.13 percent.
Republican president and Democratic control of the House and Senate: 22 years, average gain of 2.91 percent.
Republican president, Democratic control of the Senate, Republican control of the House: 2 years, -18.37 percent
这是我喜欢的最佳组合，民主党总统+共和党议会。。。至少这一次是这样。
还能出个女总统也是PLUS
“有几个华人是liberal！”
“搞清楚socially liberal是什么意思再进来吧.”
“Socially liberal 本身是什么意思并不重要! 重要的是....”
基本能代表版上床粉的政治素养
一言不合即恶语相向+贴标签，别说政治素养啦，基本做人的素养都堪忧。
8020是什么你给我科普下？
根本不适合做政治。
看你这智商， 妄想代表华人还不够还教别人怎么做人？
你有资格吗！ 支持希拉里你就以为自己是第一夫人？ 官拜国务卿了？ 别逗了好吗！ 照照镜子再发帖！
咱能不写啥都一堆惊叹号么。
请问一下，我哪句话要教别人怎么做人， 哪句话说我想代表华人，哪句话说我支持希拉里，哪句话说我想官拜国务卿？
很抱歉，面对基本的阅读理解能力都匮乏的人，我不应该提政治素养........
可以公开表态啊，虽然军人多数支持民主党，但我并不支持希拉里
多经历几次你就会发现，对多数选民来说，大选中并不是你更支持谁就会投票给谁，而是你更反对谁当选就会投票给另一方
这是我的第四次大选，真正支持过的只有一个候选人，08年的奥巴马
The brazen billionaire claimed in a book he would "bomb" North Korea's nuclear reactor and advocated attacks on its military bases. He wrote: "What would I do in North Korea? Fair question. It's easy to point out the problem, but what should be done to solve it? Am I ready to bomb this reactor? You're damned right."
尼玛，大白天的发什么神经。谁都只能代表自己，别想代表一大帮子人。我们这里的人也没想代表什么在美华人，倒是你们这些粉丝，一天到晚代表chinese american的，谁高兴被你代表了？你们爱飞横幅就去飞，我才懒得抬头看天空呢，免得被车撞了。谁说支持希拉里就以为自己是第一夫人了，这个帖子的标题看看清楚好吗？反对床铺！这两个候选人都不是很受欢迎，两者相比较，这里的人更讨厌床铺，仅此而已。
看来信奉床铺的都是床铺的一贯作风啊：
全世界都在一个conspiracy里反对我！
"Should Clinton Play For An Electoral College Landslide?"
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/should-clinton-play-for-an-electoral-college-landslide/
太惨了。
回EErCeM MM的话，南方人喜欢清蒸，北方人喜欢红烧。
两党候选人的施政纲领都包含了很多政策，每位选民也都拥有属于自己的多重身份。最后选择支持或者反对哪位候选人肯定是各方面综合性的考量，并不能出于某一两条政策或是自己的某一个身份而做决定。所以床普支持增加军费+ 我是军人= 我应该支持川普，这个逻辑是不通的。
简单解释一下为什么很多军队背景的协会和机构并不支持甚至会反对床普：
首先世界主要经济体和军事大国之间99.99%不会发生战争。共和党增加军费并主张用武力干涉国际事务的一个重要原因是保持美军的威慑力，但对床普而言却并不是这样。虽然床普也宣称要打击ISIS和恐怖主义，但更多时候却是在抱怨美国在国际事务上投入太多、盟友们如北约及日韩等国都在搭美国的顺风车，甚至提出要放手让日韩发展装备核武器，甚至连二战时“美国优先（AmericaFirst）”这个著名的孤立主义口号都拿出来作为竞选的主打文宣。
我神烦民主党政府一轮轮无止境的削减军事研发预算，但我更担心的是反狗哨政治和新保守主义的川普宣扬的本土主义和新孤立主义，因为此类观点一旦成为气候，美军在全球范围内的威慑力会开始削弱，世界范围内发生区域冲突的可能性则会大大增加，绝大多数军人都极度热爱和平，所以床普也并没有像一般共和党候选人那样获得多数军队背景机构和协会的支持。
bella20152016根本就是无脑。
“你没Trump富所以没权利评价他。”
”你投Hillary是想做国务卿。“
吐槽无力啊。。。