这帖子正面方面都帮她说了，她说 "I object to the recent effort in Congress to pass a law saying after 20 weeks, you know, no such exceptions, because although these are rare, Bret, they sometimes arise in the most complex, difficult medical situation." 难道一开始不就说了事实是 For starters, it’s worth noting that abortions in the weeks leading up to birth are rare; 91 percent in 2012 occurred before the 14th week of pregnancy, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a New York-based reproductive health nonprofit. That year, the institute says, 1.3 percent took place in the 21st week or later. Notably too, as of October 2016, Texas ranked among 15 states to have proscribed abortion after about 20 weeks post-fertilization, the institute says. 受精后的20周，已经相当于22周左右了，这些已经是允许的
他这个if the vote is fair是辩论后补救说的，辩论前8:04接受采访的时候他说：I've said before we.ll certainly accept the outcome of this election. 这不是第一次了，pence说一，trump说二，pence然后赶紧出来补救，说其实就是二。If the vote is fair是什么意思，trump如果输了是不是就是不 fair？
WHAT'S TRUE: Both Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton support abortion access with few restrictions, and Clinton indicated she would agree with late-term abortion bans if provisions were included for the health of the mother.
[p=24, null, left]WHAT'S FALSE: Clinton and Sanders didn't expressly seek to legalize all elective abortions up to 36 weeks, and neither candidate said that fetuses didn't feel pain or have rights.
[p=24, null, left]WHAT'S FALSE: Clinton and Sanders didn't expressly seek to legalize all elective abortions up to 36 weeks, and neither candidate said that fetuses didn't feel pain or have rights.
特别同意这个，东西两岸就是吃饱了撑的才考虑厕所这种变态问题。像国内那么多农村孩子还吃不上饭，有人敢提厕所问题早就被全国网民骂了。
2016-10-20 00:08
回复
纯好奇一下，本人在加拿大，搁岸观火，这边我们同事也工余热烈讨论一把，关注着三场辩论。身边不少美加双国籍人士，还挺有参与感。
感觉与版上的风向正好相反。其实辩论前，不少像我这样的对政治无感人士还是很看好Trump的。三场下来，大跌眼镜。这边很少有认为trump会赢的。太偏激，领袖要有包容力，亲和力。
suibianqi 发表于 10/20/2016 12:13:00 AM
[/quote]
ecnanif 发表于 10/20/2016 9:32:36 AM [/quote]
希拉拉会做的是拿钱收买，收买不来的就被自杀
这帖子正面方面都帮她说了，她说
"I object to the recent effort in Congress to pass a law saying after 20 weeks, you know, no such exceptions, because although these are rare, Bret, they sometimes arise in the most complex, difficult medical situation."
难道一开始不就说了事实是
For starters, it’s worth noting that abortions in the weeks leading up to birth are rare; 91 percent in 2012 occurred before the 14th week of pregnancy, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a New York-based reproductive health nonprofit. That year, the institute says, 1.3 percent took place in the 21st week or later. Notably too, as of October 2016, Texas ranked among 15 states to have proscribed abortion after about 20 weeks post-fertilization, the institute says.
受精后的20周，已经相当于22周左右了，这些已经是允许的
这篇评级是False，但是昨天debate上她表示的态度是？Trump那么明显的举出了due前1-2-3-4天允许堕胎，她如果不那么认为，为啥不直接回答，不是due前，是在几几周，due前1-2-3-4天，哪怕是一个心脏病很严重马上要死掉的妇女，如果要顺产，弄死胎儿生出来也是需要催产，直接生还是需要催产；如果是要剖腹产，弄死需要剖腹产，活产也还是剖腹产，有什么对妇女健康有什么根本改善么？
普京厉害！
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/landing/volunteer-to-be-a-trump-election-observer
但是我觉得没必要
1 川普是个商人 最明白什么是让步与协商
2 川普明显在第一次辩论时的态度 是准备低姿态的 然后希拉里却无耻加傲慢 再加两轮被主持人联合希拉里吊打 川普已经对希拉里的底线和媒体的底线 完全失去信心 才要采取抵抗的态度
说明他是 先低姿态 如果对方不识好歹 则遇强则强的性格
我反而欣赏这种个性 我本人也是这样啊 但我很善于听取别人意见的 嘻嘻
但确实 不了解前因后果的人 容易产生误解
ecnanif
2016-10-20 09:32
回复
我觉得很多人都担心床铺不好合作，到时候和congress 各方之类的闹的水火不容。 当政治领袖的都知道要听取各方意见， 要退步合作，一个太偏激的人做领导容易出问题。比起希拉里的假大空，至少大家知道希拉里会怎么做。两者
配合民主党从小的洗脑，这就是拉那些小清新的选票，完全不顾正常人的人生观，道德观，价值观，这社会将来要变成什么样无法想象啊！
我支持同性恋可以结婚什么的，现在社会已经对他们很同情了，很理解了，还要怎么样呢？难道要同性恋成风尚，搞得异性恋跟做贼一样？有没有想过那个允许堕胎的法案，会引起多少不负责任的女生就这样随便堕胎，难道这对他们的身体就好？？？有病的，生孩子会危及生命的，促使他们在早期做出决定难道不是对大人孩子都好的事情吗？
一声叹息！
[p=24, null, left]WHAT'S FALSE: Clinton and Sanders didn't expressly seek to legalize all elective abortions up to 36 weeks, and neither candidate said that fetuses didn't feel pain or have rights.
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/landing/volunteer-to-be-a-trump-election-observer