The discontent driving Donald Trump’s campaign stems partly from the dashed employment promises of the late 1990s; $7-an-hour robots
The technology revolution has delivered Google searches, Facebook friends, iPhone apps, Twitter rants and shopping for almost anything on Amazon, all in the past decade and a half. What it hasn’t delivered are many jobs. Google’s Alphabet Inc. and Facebook Inc. had at the end of last year a total of 74,505 employees, about one-third fewer than Microsoft Corp. even though their combined stock-market value is twice as big. Photo-sharing service Instagram had 13 employees when it was acquired for $1 billion by Facebook in 2012.
Hiring in the computer and chip sectors dove after companies shifted hardware production outside the U.S., and the newest tech giants needed relatively few workers. The number of technology startups fizzled. Growth in productivity and wages slowed, and income inequality rose as machines replaced routine, low- and middle-income, human-powered work.
Technology Booms, But Not For American Workers After rising in the 1990s, employment at computer and electronic firms has fallen by more than 40%, though a smaller number of jobs has been created in other tech sectors.
This outcome is a far cry from what many political leaders, tech entrepreneurs and economists predicted about a generation ago. In 2000, President Bill Clinton said in his last State of the Union address: “America will lead the world toward shared peace and prosperity and the far frontiers of science and technology.” His economic team trumpeted “the ferment of rapid technological change” as one of the U.S. economy’s “principal engines” of growth.
The gap between what the tech boom promised and then delivered is another source of the rumbling national discontent that powered the rise this year of political outsiders Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders.
The tech-powered disappointment is subtler than the anger caused by the crushing impact of China’s import invasion and the perceived failures of government institutions like the Federal Reserve in guiding the economy. Instead, it stems from the idea that Americans expected larger economic gains from these amazing new machines and the companies that created them, not a widening between the haves and have-nots.
“There is a growing sense of frustration that people haven’t seen the progress that their parents and grandparents did,” says Erik Brynjolfsson, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology economist whose work has chronicled how technology widens the income gap between rich and poor. “That frustration spills into the political arena.”
In 1997, Time magazine named computer-chip maker Intel Corp. ’s chief executive, Andrew S. Grove, who died in March 2016, as “Man of the Year.” Amazon.com Inc. CEO Jeff Bezos won in 1999. Companies spent billions of dollars reprogramming their computers for the Year 2000 bug, and profitless dot-com startups won giant valuations from optimistic investors.
The bursting of the dot-com bubble in early 2000, the recession in 2001 and deepening globalization proved to be turning points for the tech economy and its broader impact on American prosperity. U.S. tech companies accelerated the reshuffling of their supply networks to China and elsewhere in Asia, places filled with growth potential and cheap labor. Hardware makers concentrated production overseas to supply U.S. and foreign computer makers.
Apple made early iMac computers in California but then shifted most of the company's production to outside the U.S., including assemblers in China.
After rising through the 1990s, total employment at computer and electronic firms in the U.S. sank to 1.03 million in August 2016 from 1.87 million in 2001, according to Labor Department statistics. Employment at semiconductor makers fell by half to 359,000 in the same period.
In the 1990s, Micron Technology Inc. was a successful example of how far the tech industry reached beyond its nexus in Silicon Valley. Based in Boise, Idaho, Micron was founded by Idaho farmers and businessmen, including the late billionaire J.R. Simplot, who supplied McDonald’s Corp. with most of its frozen french fries and had “MR SPUD” license plates on his pickup truck.
Micron’s workforce quadrupled to 18,800 between 1994 and 2000, with the growth overwhelmingly in the U.S. The company fought with Japan in the 1980s to restrict imported memory chips and protect its U.S. base.
These days, Micron is a case study in how technology companies have exported jobs to other countries. As of 2013, the most recently disclosed data, Micron had 11,300 workers in the U.S., down from 14,000 in 2000. The company’s non-U.S. workforce surged to 19,600, mainly in China and other Asian nations, from 4,800.
Securities filings show that the percentage of employees at Micron who were in the U.S. shrank to 37% from 74% in the same period. The company stopped disclosing the annual percentage in 2014. A Micron spokesman says much of the growth outside the U.S. came from acquisitions.
“What we’re doing is replacing more resources there to support the growing customer base—both the multinationals that are leveraging the low labor-cost areas in China, in particular, as well as the indigenous Chinese manufacturers,” Mike Sadler, Micron’s head of sales, told analysts in 2014. He is now Micron’s strategic chief.
The Semiconductor Industry Association says semiconductors remain a big U.S. business and are America’s third-largest export, trailing cars and aircraft.
Superstar Tech Companies Create Fewer Jobs Few technology companies are doing initial public offerings, which can help spawn more jobs as those companies grow. And companies that went public in the five years before the dot-com bubble burst in 2000 have more employees overall than those with IPOs since then.
Apple Inc. followed a similar path. Co-founder Steve Jobs made it a mission early in his Apple career and after creating NeXT Inc., another computer maker, to revitalize U.S. manufacturing. Macintosh computers rolled off the line at an Apple factory “like a Holiday Inn toaster turns out toasted bagels,” says Brent Schlender, who co-wrote a biography of Mr. Jobs.
By the time Mr. Jobs died in 2011, Apple made nearly every one of its products outside America, largely in Asia. Apple halted U.S. manufacturing in 2004 and didn’t resume until 2013, when it began producing Mac Pro personal computers in Austin, Texas.
Apple says it employs about 80,000 workers in the U.S., or two-thirds of the company’s overall workforce. About half the U.S. employees have retail jobs.
An Apple spokeswoman says it is “creating jobs in new industries like the App Economy,” or apps developed for the iPhone, and is “a major contributor to U.S. manufacturing” by buying American-made components and materials.
Mr. Schlender, the Jobs biographer, says it made sense to assemble the iPod outside the U.S. when production began in 2001. “The components were hard to make, and putting them together was a labor-intensive job because everything was so small,” he says. “You had to piece it together by hand.”
The computer-hardware exodus spread. International Business Machines Corp. , the company that turned computers into a big business, was born in Endicott, N.Y., and built its first factories there.
From 2001 to 2015, though, employment in computer and electronics manufacturing in surrounding Broome County fell about two-thirds to 3,055 jobs. Warehouses and transportation companies scooped up some laid-off workers at salaries of less than half those paid in high-tech manufacturing, says Christian Harris, an analyst for the New York State Department of Labor.
American tech workers are getting a smaller piece of the economic pie created from what they produce. As of 2014, employee compensation in computer and electronic-parts making was equal to 49% of the value of the industry’s output, down from 79% in 1999, according to the Commerce Department.
While other tech jobs have been created in sectors such as software publishing, that growth is smaller than the losses in tech manufacturing.
Since 2002, the number of technology startups has slowed, hurting job creation. In a 2014 study, economists Javier Miranda, John Haltiwanger and Ian Hathaway said the growth of tech startups accelerated to 113,000 in 2001 from 64,000 in 1992.
That number slumped to 79,000 in 2011 and hasn’t recovered, according to the economists’ calculations using updated data. The causes include global competition and increased domestic regulation, says Mr. Haltiwanger, an economics professor at the University of Maryland.
Another problem is that fewer tech companies have gone public, which can enrich early employees and spawn more jobs as companies grow.
Jay Ritter, a professor at the University of Florida’s Warrington College of Business, says there were 548 initial public offerings of technology-related companies from 2001 to 2015. From 1990 to 2000, by contrast, 1,853 went public.
The latest generation of hot tech startups has attracted a mountain of venture-capital funding and gigantic valuations, led by Uber Technologies Inc., which was worth $68 billion as of June.
The influx of wealth has created more prosperity in Silicon Valley but exemplifies the economic polarization rippling through America.
WhatsApp had more than 450 million users world-wide when Facebook bought the messaging service for $19 billion in 2014, turning founder Jan Koum into a billionaire several times over. At the time of the acquisition, WhatsApp had 55 employees.
Economists call the phenomenon “skill-biased technical change.” The spoils of growth go to those few people with skills and luck and who are best positioned to take advantage of new technology.
The five largest U.S.-based technology companies by stock-market value—Apple, Alphabet, Microsoft, Facebook and Oracle Corp. —are worth a combined $1.8 trillion today. That is 80% more than the five largest tech companies in 2000.
Today’s five giants have 22% fewer workers than their predecessors, or a total of 434,505 as of last year, compared with 556,523 at Cisco Systems Inc., Intel, IBM, Oracle and Microsoft in 2000.
Robots help fill orders at an Amazon.com warehouse in Tracy, Calif., in December 2014. Amazon uses robots at about a third of its warehouses in the U.S. Photo: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg News
Amazon uses 45,000 small robots at about one-third of its U.S. warehouses to automate order processing. The robots look like bread boxes on wheels, lifting modular shelves stuffed with products and carrying the shelves to workers who pick out pieces.
An Amazon spokesman says the company has added about 200,000 employees since it began using the robots in early 2012. Amazon has 268,000 employees world-wide.
Robots aren’t dexterous enough yet to identify different sized-packages, pick the right ones and place them safely in boxes, says Mr. Brynjolfsson, the MIT economist. That is the fundamental skill in warehousing. Researchers now are trying to automate that part of the job, too.
In coming decades, machines are likely to replace new forms of routine work done by humans. From 1991 to 2001, the number of secretaries declined about 35%, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The number of textile and apparel workers fell 37%.
For a long time, those with bachelor’s degrees in science seemed to be safe from automation-related layoffs because their cognitive knowledge was tough for computers to duplicate. Less-educated workers who dispense personal service, such as home health aides or masseuses, also seemed safe.
Harvard University economist David Deming estimates that the hollowing-out of work spread to programmers, librarians and engineers between 2000 and 2012. As much as $2 trillion worth of human economic activity could be automated away using existing technologies, such as Amazon’s robots, in coming years, consulting firm McKinsey & Co. estimates.
Knightscope Inc., based in Mountain View, Calif., makes robots that serve as night watchmen. About three dozen are on patrol, including at shopping malls, corporate campuses such as Microsoft’s in Mountain View and the new home arena of the Sacramento Kings. Knightscope clients pay $7 an hour per robot.
“Robots don’t complain,” says Stacy Stephens, a Knightscope co-founder and vice president of marketing and sales. “There’s no pension. And there’s no worker’s comp,” he adds.
Mike Pence had to talk down a supporter at an Iowa town hall Tuesday suggesting a "revolution" if Hillary Clinton becomes president.
The woman, who identified herself as Rhonda, told the GOP vice presidential nominee that she was worried because "our kids' futures depend on this election."
"I will tell you just for me — and I don't want this to happen — but I will tell you for me, personally, if Hillary Clinton gets in ... I'm ready for a revolution because we can't have her in," she said in an emotional moment.
Pence, who remains steadfast to running mate Donald Trump, interjected: "Yeah, you don't want — don't say that."
Instead, Indiana's governor shifted the focus to the ballot box, adding, "There's a revolution coming on November the 8th. I promise you."
Two Republican senators who turned against Donald Trump after the release of a damning 2005 video appear to have reversed their positions.
The first to do was Sen. Deb Fischer of Nebraska, who had called for Trump to step aside and cede the GOP nomination to his running mate, Gov. Mike Pence. She now says she will vote for Trump.
"I plan to vote for Mr. Trump and Mr. Pence on Nov. 8," she said Tuesday on Lincoln radio station KLIN.
"I put out a statement ... with regard to Mr. Trump's comments," she said of her initial response to the video, in which Trump boasts of grabbing women without their consent.
"I felt they were disgusting. I felt they were unacceptable, and I never said I was not voting for our Republican ticket.
We are headed for a revolution. When enough Americans are broke, unemployed and hungry, there will be a violent revolution. ScottishFold 发表于 10/12/2016 1:06:09 PM
Harvard University economist David Deming estimates that the hollowing-out of work spread to programmers, librarians and engineers between 2000 and 2012. As much as $2 trillion worth of human economic activity could be automated away using existing technologies, such as Amazon’s robots, in coming years, consulting firm McKinsey & Co. estimates.
Podesta's passwords were cracked, they got into his iPhone and Mac. Another huge leak coming? Stay tuned! 他们拿到了appleID和密码，可能是通过这个途径破解掉邮箱的。他们还顺手把Podesta 的手机给远程重置了。 而且这密码是wikileaks放出来的。他们肯定把里面的东西都下载走了。 内部的poll, trump已经大胜 [attachimg]4007428[/attachimg]
Time: Here’s Why Gallup Won’t Poll the 2016 Election http://time.com/4067019/gallup-horse-race-polling/ The announcement this week that Gallup, one of America’s most storied pollsters, will no longer do horse-race polling on who’s ahead in the 2016 election cycle only underscored the huge changes in the industry.
稀拉拉anti-Catholics and Evangelicals，她肯定完蛋了，这可是要比PUSSY门要严重多了。她几乎把大多数美国人都得罪了，川普的支持者，BERNIE支持者，WORKING CLASS，再加上Catholics and Evangelicals，女人票也不行了，她老公强奸，她欺负VICTIMS。
稀拉拉anti-Catholics and Evangelicals，她肯定完蛋了，这可是要比PUSSY门要严重多了。她几乎把大多数美国人都得罪了，川普的支持者，BERNIE支持者，WORKING CLASS，再加上Catholics and Evangelicals，女人票也不行了，她老公强奸，她欺负VICTIMS。
Millions of American Catholics are outraged at Hillary Clinton — again. Here's why:
On Tuesday, it was revealed Clinton campaign staffers mocked conservative Catholics as an "amazing bastardization of the faith" in the latest emails released by WikiLeaks.
They described Catholics as "severely backwards" and "utterly ignorant."
This is unbelievable. The next President should be working to unite our country and protect the religious liberties of all Americans.
Instead, Hillary's camp is dead set on insulting and belittling people of all religions — especially Catholics.
This election is crucial. The next President of the United States will play an unprecedented role in how the government honors and values the religious freedoms of all Americans — and it's our responsibility to tell our leaders we will no longer stand for the violations of our rights.
Catholic Advocate
Friend,
Millions of American Catholics are outraged at Hillary Clinton — again. Here's why:
On Tuesday, it was revealed Clinton campaign staffers mocked conservative Catholics as an "amazing bastardization of the faith" in the latest emails released by WikiLeaks.
They described Catholics as "severely backwards" and "utterly ignorant."
CatholicAdvocate
Friend, will you add your name to our petition to tell Hillary to end her attacks on Catholics?
This is unbelievable. The next President should be working to unite our country and protect the religious liberties of all Americans.
Instead, Hillary's camp is dead set on insulting and belittling people of all religions — especially Catholics.
This election is crucial. The next President of the United States will play an unprecedented role in how the government honors and values the religious freedoms of all Americans — and it's our responsibility to tell our leaders we will no longer stand for the violations of our rights.
CatholicAdvocate
Our country cannot afford another President who would rather divide us than protect us. Please join me in standing up to Hillary Clinton on behalf of all Ameircan Catholics.
维基解密曝光暗杀大法官Scalia的交易手段！
https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1459#searchresult
The Great Unraveling
America’s Dazzling Tech Boom Has a Downside: Not Enough Jobs
http://www.wsj.com/articles/americas-dazzling-tech-boom-has-a-downside-not-enough-jobs-1476282355
The discontent driving Donald Trump’s campaign stems partly from the dashed employment promises of the late 1990s; $7-an-hour robots
The technology revolution has delivered Google searches, Facebook friends, iPhone apps, Twitter rants and shopping for almost anything on Amazon, all in the past decade and a half. What it hasn’t delivered are many jobs. Google’s Alphabet Inc. and Facebook Inc. had at the end of last year a total of 74,505 employees, about one-third fewer than Microsoft Corp. even though their combined stock-market value is twice as big. Photo-sharing service Instagram had 13 employees when it was acquired for $1 billion by Facebook in 2012.
Hiring in the computer and chip sectors dove after companies shifted hardware production outside the U.S., and the newest tech giants needed relatively few workers. The number of technology startups fizzled. Growth in productivity and wages slowed, and income inequality rose as machines replaced routine, low- and middle-income, human-powered work.
Technology Booms, But Not For American Workers After rising in the 1990s, employment at computer and electronic firms has fallen by more than 40%, though a smaller number of jobs has been created in other tech sectors.
This outcome is a far cry from what many political leaders, tech entrepreneurs and economists predicted about a generation ago. In 2000, President Bill Clinton said in his last State of the Union address: “America will lead the world toward shared peace and prosperity and the far frontiers of science and technology.” His economic team trumpeted “the ferment of rapid technological change” as one of the U.S. economy’s “principal engines” of growth.
The gap between what the tech boom promised and then delivered is another source of the rumbling national discontent that powered the rise this year of political outsiders Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders.
The tech-powered disappointment is subtler than the anger caused by the crushing impact of China’s import invasion and the perceived failures of government institutions like the Federal Reserve in guiding the economy. Instead, it stems from the idea that Americans expected larger economic gains from these amazing new machines and the companies that created them, not a widening between the haves and have-nots.
“There is a growing sense of frustration that people haven’t seen the progress that their parents and grandparents did,” says Erik Brynjolfsson, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology economist whose work has chronicled how technology widens the income gap between rich and poor. “That frustration spills into the political arena.”
The bursting of the dot-com bubble in early 2000, the recession in 2001 and deepening globalization proved to be turning points for the tech economy and its broader impact on American prosperity.
U.S. tech companies accelerated the reshuffling of their supply networks to China and elsewhere in Asia, places filled with growth potential and cheap labor. Hardware makers concentrated production overseas to supply U.S. and foreign computer makers.
Apple made early iMac computers in California but then shifted most of the company's production to outside the U.S., including assemblers in China.
In the 1990s, Micron Technology Inc. was a successful example of how far the tech industry reached beyond its nexus in Silicon Valley. Based in Boise, Idaho, Micron was founded by Idaho farmers and businessmen, including the late billionaire J.R. Simplot, who supplied McDonald’s Corp. with most of its frozen french fries and had “MR SPUD” license plates on his pickup truck.
Micron’s workforce quadrupled to 18,800 between 1994 and 2000, with the growth overwhelmingly in the U.S. The company fought with Japan in the 1980s to restrict imported memory chips and protect its U.S. base.
These days, Micron is a case study in how technology companies have exported jobs to other countries. As of 2013, the most recently disclosed data, Micron had 11,300 workers in the U.S., down from 14,000 in 2000. The company’s non-U.S. workforce surged to 19,600, mainly in China and other Asian nations, from 4,800.
Securities filings show that the percentage of employees at Micron who were in the U.S. shrank to 37% from 74% in the same period. The company stopped disclosing the annual percentage in 2014. A Micron spokesman says much of the growth outside the U.S. came from acquisitions.
“What we’re doing is replacing more resources there to support the growing customer base—both the multinationals that are leveraging the low labor-cost areas in China, in particular, as well as the indigenous Chinese manufacturers,” Mike Sadler, Micron’s head of sales, told analysts in 2014. He is now Micron’s strategic chief.
The Semiconductor Industry Association says semiconductors remain a big U.S. business and are America’s third-largest export, trailing cars and aircraft.
Few technology companies are doing initial public offerings, which can help spawn more jobs as those companies grow. And companies that went public in the five years before the dot-com bubble burst in 2000 have more employees overall than those with IPOs since then.
Technology IPOs, by year
By the time Mr. Jobs died in 2011, Apple made nearly every one of its products outside America, largely in Asia. Apple halted U.S. manufacturing in 2004 and didn’t resume until 2013, when it began producing Mac Pro personal computers in Austin, Texas.
Apple says it employs about 80,000 workers in the U.S., or two-thirds of the company’s overall workforce. About half the U.S. employees have retail jobs.
An Apple spokeswoman says it is “creating jobs in new industries like the App Economy,” or apps developed for the iPhone, and is “a major contributor to U.S. manufacturing” by buying American-made components and materials.
Mr. Schlender, the Jobs biographer, says it made sense to assemble the iPod outside the U.S. when production began in 2001. “The components were hard to make, and putting them together was a labor-intensive job because everything was so small,” he says. “You had to piece it together by hand.”
The computer-hardware exodus spread. International Business Machines Corp. , the company that turned computers into a big business, was born in Endicott, N.Y., and built its first factories there.
From 2001 to 2015, though, employment in computer and electronics manufacturing in surrounding Broome County fell about two-thirds to 3,055 jobs. Warehouses and transportation companies scooped up some laid-off workers at salaries of less than half those paid in high-tech manufacturing, says Christian Harris, an analyst for the New York State Department of Labor.
While other tech jobs have been created in sectors such as software publishing, that growth is smaller than the losses in tech manufacturing.
Since 2002, the number of technology startups has slowed, hurting job creation. In a 2014 study, economists Javier Miranda, John Haltiwanger and Ian Hathaway said the growth of tech startups accelerated to 113,000 in 2001 from 64,000 in 1992.
That number slumped to 79,000 in 2011 and hasn’t recovered, according to the economists’ calculations using updated data. The causes include global competition and increased domestic regulation, says Mr. Haltiwanger, an economics professor at the University of Maryland.
Another problem is that fewer tech companies have gone public, which can enrich early employees and spawn more jobs as companies grow.
Jay Ritter, a professor at the University of Florida’s Warrington College of Business, says there were 548 initial public offerings of technology-related companies from 2001 to 2015. From 1990 to 2000, by contrast, 1,853 went public.
The latest generation of hot tech startups has attracted a mountain of venture-capital funding and gigantic valuations, led by Uber Technologies Inc., which was worth $68 billion as of June.
The influx of wealth has created more prosperity in Silicon Valley but exemplifies the economic polarization rippling through America.
WhatsApp had more than 450 million users world-wide when Facebook bought the messaging service for $19 billion in 2014, turning founder Jan Koum into a billionaire several times over. At the time of the acquisition, WhatsApp had 55 employees.
Economists call the phenomenon “skill-biased technical change.” The spoils of growth go to those few people with skills and luck and who are best positioned to take advantage of new technology.
The five largest U.S.-based technology companies by stock-market value—Apple, Alphabet, Microsoft, Facebook and Oracle Corp. —are worth a combined $1.8 trillion today. That is 80% more than the five largest tech companies in 2000.
Today’s five giants have 22% fewer workers than their predecessors, or a total of 434,505 as of last year, compared with 556,523 at Cisco Systems Inc., Intel, IBM, Oracle and Microsoft in 2000.
Robots help fill orders at an Amazon.com warehouse in Tracy, Calif., in December 2014. Amazon uses robots at about a third of its warehouses in the U.S. Photo: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg News
Amazon uses 45,000 small robots at about one-third of its U.S. warehouses to automate order processing. The robots look like bread boxes on wheels, lifting modular shelves stuffed with products and carrying the shelves to workers who pick out pieces.
An Amazon spokesman says the company has added about 200,000 employees since it began using the robots in early 2012. Amazon has 268,000 employees world-wide.
Robots aren’t dexterous enough yet to identify different sized-packages, pick the right ones and place them safely in boxes, says Mr. Brynjolfsson, the MIT economist. That is the fundamental skill in warehousing. Researchers now are trying to automate that part of the job, too.
In coming decades, machines are likely to replace new forms of routine work done by humans. From 1991 to 2001, the number of secretaries declined about 35%, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The number of textile and apparel workers fell 37%.
For a long time, those with bachelor’s degrees in science seemed to be safe from automation-related layoffs because their cognitive knowledge was tough for computers to duplicate. Less-educated workers who dispense personal service, such as home health aides or masseuses, also seemed safe.
Harvard University economist David Deming estimates that the hollowing-out of work spread to programmers, librarians and engineers between 2000 and 2012. As much as $2 trillion worth of human economic activity could be automated away using existing technologies, such as Amazon’s robots, in coming years, consulting firm McKinsey & Co. estimates.
Knightscope Inc., based in Mountain View, Calif., makes robots that serve as night watchmen. About three dozen are on patrol, including at shopping malls, corporate campuses such as Microsoft’s in Mountain View and the new home arena of the Sacramento Kings. Knightscope clients pay $7 an hour per robot.
“Robots don’t complain,” says Stacy Stephens, a Knightscope co-founder and vice president of marketing and sales. “There’s no pension. And there’s no worker’s comp,” he adds.
Write to Jon Hilsenrath at [email protected] and Bob Davis at [email protected]
The woman, who identified herself as Rhonda, told the GOP vice presidential nominee that she was worried because "our kids' futures depend on this election."
"I will tell you just for me — and I don't want this to happen — but I will tell you for me, personally, if Hillary Clinton gets in ... I'm ready for a revolution because we can't have her in," she said in an emotional moment.
Pence, who remains steadfast to running mate Donald Trump, interjected: "Yeah, you don't want — don't say that."
Instead, Indiana's governor shifted the focus to the ballot box, adding, "There's a revolution coming on November the 8th. I promise you."
http://www.nbcnews.com/card/pence-revolution-rally-goer-dont-say-n664776
Republican Senators Who Urged Donald Trump to Step Aside Support Him Again
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/republican-senators-urged-donald-trump-step-support/story?id=42748881
Two Republican senators who turned against Donald Trump after the release of a damning 2005 video appear to have reversed their positions.
The first to do was Sen. Deb Fischer of Nebraska, who had called for Trump to step aside and cede the GOP nomination to his running mate, Gov. Mike Pence. She now says she will vote for Trump.
Trump Campaign Manager Berates 'Wishy-Washy' Republican Leaders
"I plan to vote for Mr. Trump and Mr. Pence on Nov. 8," she said Tuesday on Lincoln radio station KLIN.
"I put out a statement ... with regard to Mr. Trump's comments," she said of her initial response to the video, in which Trump boasts of grabbing women without their consent.
"I felt they were disgusting. I felt they were unacceptable, and I never said I was not voting for our Republican ticket.
就看这届人民行不行了
就是人类走向共产主义/社会主义或某种修正的共产主义和社会主义的开始。其实桑德斯和床铺是一个思路。大势所趋。
贸易保护和逆全球化也解决不了工作减少的问题。就是生产力/生产效率提高到一个质变的阶段了，没有工作这个途径来分配生活资料和财富了。
马克思早看到了。
美国人民肯定行，不行的是加州民主党大州的那帮脑残，可惜加州不是摇摆州，稀拉拉粉就别做梦了。
☆ 发自 iPhone 华人一网 1.11.08
周一参加了创普pa的拉力，几千上万的支持者，在现场能够感受到人民的愤怒，和对Trump的热情。当时那么多人，对着媒体区高喊CNN Sucks，非常得有气势。
不是你说的这个样子，奥巴马搞的大政府，重税收，高福利就是共产党那套，现在是全球向右转，英国，美国，欧盟要完蛋。
听多了它就习惯了，呵呵。
隔壁那个脑残还开楼骂人，稀拉拉不是都要赢了吗，这么激动干什么。
http://wallstreetcn.com/node/267163
就业数据不好，还想赢大选，稀拉拉就别做梦了，稀拉拉已经完蛋了
yeah
看看股市什么时候跌，那个也是很重要的指标，不过花街现在还在力撑吧
Harvard University economist David Deming estimates that the hollowing-out of work spread to programmers, librarians and engineers between 2000 and 2012. As much as $2 trillion worth of human economic activity could be automated away using existing technologies, such as Amazon’s robots, in coming years, consulting firm McKinsey & Co. estimates.
不要看股市，看川普的RALLY就行了。
历史大势不会改变。右转也是暂时，因为解决不了根本问题。
根本不是你说的这个样子，全球都右转，不行的就淘汰掉，稀拉拉已经完蛋了。
法律是人订的，自然可以改，所谓的科技进步一样可以用政策来干预。而且全球应该做的是反垄断，反垄断才能创造更多工作机会。
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/wikileaks-bomb-clinton-camp-discussed-deleting-emails-despite-knowing-law/
https://twitter.com/Bullitino/status/785875904073457664
http://thewashingtonstandard.com/bill-clinton-expelled-oxford-raped-eileen-wellstone-video/
☆ 发自 iPhone 华人一网 1.11.08
http://www.breitbart.com/sports/2016/10/12/racial-divide-majority-americans-disagree-anti-american-anthem-protests/
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-russian-trump-idUSKCN12C28Q?il=0
赞！
ＭＭ有没有什么照片什么的？
Mac. Another huge leak coming? Stay tuned!
他们拿到了appleID和密码，可能是通过这个途径破解掉邮箱的。他们还顺手把Podesta
的手机给远程重置了。
而且这密码是wikileaks放出来的。他们肯定把里面的东西都下载走了。
内部的poll, trump已经大胜
第二行说，内部poll在把共党比例调到和主党一样，并提高independents之后，很不妙。。。有Huge Influx
FBI, DOJ roiled by Comey, Lynch decision to let Clinton slide by on emails, says insider
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/12/fbi-doj-roiled-by-comey-lynch-decision-to-let-clinton-slide-by-on-emails-says-insider.html
http://time.com/4067019/gallup-horse-race-polling/
The announcement this week that Gallup, one of America’s most storied pollsters, will no longer do horse-race polling on who’s ahead in the 2016 election cycle only underscored the huge changes in the industry.
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/10/12/trump-campaign-calls-hillary-clinton-apologize-fire-staff-involved-anti-catholic-bigotry/
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/12/wikileaks-catholic-church-middle-ages-dictatorship-need-revolution-bishops/
这些没用的。投票作弊，希拉里稳赢。
稀拉拉anti-Catholics and Evangelicals，她肯定完蛋了，这可是要比PUSSY门要严重多了。她几乎把大多数美国人都得罪了，川普的支持者，BERNIE支持者，WORKING CLASS，再加上Catholics and Evangelicals，女人票也不行了，她老公强奸，她欺负VICTIMS。
☆ 发自 iPhone 华人一网 1.11.08
现在就担心选举作弊怎么办呢
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2016/10/12/yemen-rebels-believed-to-have-fired-missiles-at-us-ship-for-2nd-time-in-4-days.html
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/12/obama-pace-bring-20000-syrian-refugees-u-s-fy-2017/
http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/10/12/hundreds-asylum-seekers-africa-russia-arriving-u-s-border/
☆ 发自 iPhone 华人一网 1.11.08
奥巴马一直想通过法律 让非公民都可以投票 上次被联邦法院否决
但是加州通过了法案 我今天新开了个贴 讲的就是这个 加州有驾照就可以投票
还有一个人可以两个州投票 佛州寄信投 纽约州真人去投
总之只要想作弊 办法都有
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2004/10/people_who_vote_twice.html
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/10/12/criminal-aliens-sexually-assault-70000-american-women-paul-ryan-mad-trump/
http://wallstreetcn.com/node/267234
而纽约不能作弊，还是任何人在纽约投完了还能跑佛罗里达投一次？ 没人查的？可这个罚很重啊！ 一般人没必要吧， 非法移民倒有可能
http://thefederalist.com/2016/10/12/nbcwsj-poll-shows-hillary-clinton-losing-significant-ground-post-debate/
http://fox6now.com/2016/10/12/none-of-this-took-place-trump-threatens-to-sue-new-york-times-over-sexual-harassment-report/
纽约和佛州这个 是一个人的亲身经历 他在纽约和佛州都有居所 所以可以两边都做registered voter
因为投票可以用邮件方式 所以可以作弊
其实连我都可以 因为我也在不同的州有居所 当两个州都有合法居民身份的时候 就可以 美国这方面管理似乎有点混乱 当然我不会两边都去投票 只是说 这是可以操作的
-----
bella20152016
2016-10-12 22:21
回复
也就是加州非法移民可以投？
而纽约不能作弊，还是任何人在纽约投完了还能跑佛罗里达投一次？ 没人查的？可这个罚很重啊！ 一般人没必要
点了CNN, NBC, NYT, WP, 所以可以想象，这些作弊搞的POLL都是垃圾
☆ 发自 iPhone 华人一网 1.11.08
☆ 发自 iPhone 华人一网 1.11.08
http://truthfeed.com/did-a-wikileaks-email-just-reveal-the-assassination-of-justice-scalia/29277/
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/10/12/jill_stein_hillary_clintons_declared_syria_policy_could_start_a_nuclear_war.html
不是吧?!
这个要是真的,还用选么今年
☆ 发自 iPhone 华人一网 1.11.07
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/10/11/green-partys-jill-stein-hillary-is-the-face-of-new-republican-party-progressives-have-been-lied-to-and-sold-out-by-dnc/
so convenient
☆ 发自 iPhone 华人一网 1.11.08
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/10/13/rasmussen-poll-donald-trump-leads-clinton-two-points/
Millions of American Catholics are outraged at Hillary Clinton — again.
Here's why:
On Tuesday, it was revealed Clinton campaign staffers mocked conservative
Catholics as an "amazing bastardization of the faith" in the latest emails
released by WikiLeaks.
They described Catholics as "severely backwards" and "utterly ignorant."
This is unbelievable. The next President should be working to unite our
country and protect the religious liberties of all Americans.
Instead, Hillary's camp is dead set on insulting and belittling people of
all religions — especially Catholics.
This election is crucial. The next President of the United States will play
an unprecedented role in how the government honors and values the religious
freedoms of all Americans — and it's our responsibility to tell our leaders
we will no longer stand for the violations of our rights.
Catholic Advocate
Friend,
Millions of American Catholics are outraged at Hillary Clinton — again.
Here's why:
On Tuesday, it was revealed Clinton campaign staffers mocked conservative
Catholics as an "amazing bastardization of the faith" in the latest emails
released by WikiLeaks.
They described Catholics as "severely backwards" and "utterly ignorant."
CatholicAdvocate
Friend, will you add your name to our petition to tell Hillary to end her
attacks on Catholics?
This is unbelievable. The next President should be working to unite our
country and protect the religious liberties of all Americans.
Instead, Hillary's camp is dead set on insulting and belittling people of
all religions — especially Catholics.
This election is crucial. The next President of the United States will play
an unprecedented role in how the government honors and values the religious
freedoms of all Americans — and it's our responsibility to tell our leaders
we will no longer stand for the violations of our rights.
CatholicAdvocate
Our country cannot afford another President who would rather divide us than
protect us. Please join me in standing up to Hillary Clinton on behalf of
all Ameircan Catholics.