The Justice Department on Saturday evening filed a notice that it will formally appeal a federal judge's ruling halting President Trump's immigration order.
Justice Department Attorney Michelle Bennett's filing was made in response to a temporary nationwide restraining order issued Friday that halted Trump's executive order banning citizens of seven countries from entering the United States.
The case now goes to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
【 在 brihand (brihand) 的大作中提到: 】 The Justice Department on Saturday evening filed a notice that it will formally appeal a federal judge's ruling halting President Trump's immigration order. Justice Department Attorney Michelle Bennett's filing was made in response to a temporary nationwide restraining order issued Friday that halted Trump' s executive order banning citizens of seven countries from entering the United States. The case now goes to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
你们这些学法律的，这个有道理吗？ =========================================== “Dear President Trump, you have legal precedent for your ban on illegal immigration. The McCarran-Walter Act of 1952, duly passed by Congress, signed by Harry Truman and last used by Jimmy Carter in 1979 to prevent Iranian immigration. How is it possible a judge from Seattle can rule in direct opposition to law already on the books and duly made as law? As you promised on the campaign trail to enforce laws already on the books, using and enforcing McCarran-Walter can be added to the promises you have already kept. ”
【 在 xjbjcd (路人甲) 的大作中提到: 】 你们这些学法律的，这个有道理吗？ =========================================== “Dear President Trump, you have legal precedent for your ban on illegal : immigration. The McCarran-Walter Act of 1952, duly passed by Congress, signed by Harry Truman and last used by Jimmy Carter in 1979 to prevent Iranian immigration. How is it possible a judge from Seattle can rule in : direct opposition to law already on the books and duly made as law? As you promised on the campaign trail to enforce laws already on the books, using and enforcing McCarran-Walter can be added to the promises you have already kept. ”
“As of May 2012, a total of 3,294 individuals had been appointed to federal judgeships, including 2,758 district court judges, 714 courts of appeals judges, 95 judges to the now-extinct circuit courts, and 112 Supreme Court justices.” https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_judge
【 在 bundchen (艾买提61邦辰) 的大作中提到: 】 应该都是现任的吧？这些职位又不是打从2012年才有的: “As of May 2012, a total of 3,294 individuals had been appointed to federal judgeships, including 2,758 district court judges, 714 courts of appeals judges, 95 judges to the now-extinct circuit courts, and 112 Supreme Court justices.” https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_judge
【 在 xjbjcd (路人甲) 的大作中提到: 】 你们这些学法律的，这个有道理吗？ =========================================== “Dear President Trump, you have legal precedent for your ban on illegal : immigration. The McCarran-Walter Act of 1952, duly passed by Congress, signed by Harry Truman and last used by Jimmy Carter in 1979 to prevent Iranian immigration. How is it possible a judge from Seattle can rule in : direct opposition to law already on the books and duly made as law? As you promised on the campaign trail to enforce laws already on the books, using and enforcing McCarran-Walter can be added to the promises you have already kept. ”
If the executive branch decides to go it alone, there is nothing the Judicial branch can do. It will be up to the legislative branch to impeach or wait for the end of the 4-year term.
【 在 TeddyBear001 (TeddyBear001) 的大作中提到: 】 If the executive branch decides to go it alone, there is nothing the Judicial branch can do. It will be up to the legislative branch to impeach or wait for the end of the 4-year term.
formally appeal a federal judge's ruling halting President Trump's
immigration order.
Justice Department Attorney Michelle Bennett's filing was made in response
to a temporary nationwide restraining order issued Friday that halted Trump's executive order banning citizens of seven countries from entering the
United States.
The case now goes to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
希望这些法院有点操守，把本来归行政管的还给行政。否则以后进小黑屋的，被check
的都可以诉讼了，打个电话给美国律师就可以了。
俺猜第九法庭管华盛顿州的地区法庭。
跟circuit court是一个概念吗？
每个区法官数目不一样的吗？
intention行为的判例了。
要不清除左逼那么难呢
州会提名保守派.小布什在蓝州会提名自由派.比如这位华盛顿的法官.
跑不动。
后来改名为上诉法庭，但是很多人还是叫circuit
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_circuit_court
===========================================
“Dear President Trump, you have legal precedent for your ban on illegal
immigration. The McCarran-Walter Act of 1952, duly passed by Congress,
signed by Harry Truman and last used by Jimmy Carter in 1979 to prevent
Iranian immigration. How is it possible a judge from Seattle can rule in
direct opposition to law already on the books and duly made as law? As you promised on the campaign trail to enforce laws already on the books, using
and enforcing McCarran-Walter can be added to the promises you have already kept. ”
的也不会自己砸自己的名声
参见密州废除AA宪法修正案在高院被反对的票数。
“As of May 2012, a total of 3,294 individuals had been appointed to federal judgeships, including 2,758 district court judges, 714 courts of appeals
judges, 95 judges to the now-extinct circuit courts, and 112 Supreme Court
justices.”
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_judge
112位大法官，四十五届总统，每人提名两个到三个大法官。
所以川普这点很伟大， 把这个傻逼的布撤下来
所以理论上Trump可以让新政分支直接无视。不过一来Trump想扮好孩子，二来行政分支还没清理好，内鬼太多。所以就走标准程序咯。
前的？俺没做过研究了。
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/06/22/us/who-is-affected-by-supreme-court-decision-on-immigration.html?_r=0
派.老布什被自己的chief of staff给忽悠了.
后来被那个Harvard教授纠正说只有trump不执行法院order的时候才可能有宪法危机。
当然巴马是不会有媒体这么说的。
提名gorsuch 的时候有新闻说，肯尼迪和Obama提名的女卡跟走的很近，希望为肯尼迪
打过工的
gorsuch 能掰回来一点。
看不出来肯尼迪这个老不死还喜欢年轻小姑娘。。。
他除了Obama医保，好像没有任何不良记录。
还是John Roberts写的反对派观点。
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit#Political_liberalism
尼玛，感觉必然会捅到最高法院的
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2015/07/31/federal-judges-furious-with-obama-administration-n2032726
Judicial branch can do. It will be up to the legislative branch to impeach or wait for the end of the 4-year term.
current Constitution.
But it does look like the Constitution will have to be amended.