ZT: “参与暴乱者，将永远不得领取龙虾票！” BRILLIANT! Charlotte Official INSTANTLY Silence Rioters With 1 EPIC Announcement
The rioting and discord in Charlotte continues, but government officials in the city just made a major announcement. This is a decision that will go a long way in curbing the violence and is definitely something other cities in the future should consider also.
City officials have essentially put their foot down, with a proclamation that any individuals caught rioting, looting, destroying property, or otherwise being violent in any unlawful manner will have their government benefits permanently revoked.
The proposed punishment also applies to minors who participate in the violence. Not only that, but parents of underage individuals who are caught will also be held fully accountable and also risk losing state benefits. Moreover, there could also be referrals to Charlotte’s social services division regarding whether their custody should be allowed to continue.
“Parents are responsible for their children. If they are allowing them to engage in lawless behaviors there will be consequences for them as parents, ” city official Wilson Stewart said during a 30-minute press conference.
“Many of the individuals we have detained are high school students. We urge parents out there to know where their children are at all times until tensions are quelled,” he continued. “Have them adhere to the mandatory curfew. Make them aware that participation in looting, destruction of property, and violently demonstrating on any level will come with severe penalties.”
The announcement was made on the heels of hundreds of national guardsmen and law enforcement officials intent on restoring calm to the city.
Although it remains to be seen whether this pronouncement will have an impact on the rioting, it definitely illustrates to some that there are consequences to their actions. Your decisions are often something you will have to live with.
Besides these steep consequences, a curfew continues to be imposed and those who violate it will also face some pretty serious ramifications.
This was a decision that is inherent in the traditional system of American society.
Law and order must be upheld and citizens need to know they can be safe in their neighborhoods. Although Wilson Stewart’s decision might be indicative to liberals of racism, to us it means he is a “law and order” politician, and worthy of our respect.
What do you think about this decision by Charlotte city officials to permanently revoke any government benefits by rioters? Please share the story on Facebook and tell us because OUR voice is YOUR voice!
ZT: “参与暴乱者，将永远不得领取龙虾票！” BRILLIANT! Charlotte Official INSTANTLY Silence Rioters With 1 EPIC Announcement
The rioting and discord in Charlotte continues, but government officials in the city just made a major announcement. This is a decision that will go a long way in curbing the violence and is definitely something other cities in the future should consider also.
City officials have essentially put their foot down, with a proclamation that any individuals caught rioting, looting, destroying property, or otherwise being violent in any unlawful manner will have their government benefits permanently revoked.
The proposed punishment also applies to minors who participate in the violence. Not only that, but parents of underage individuals who are caught will also be held fully accountable and also risk losing state benefits. Moreover, there could also be referrals to Charlotte’s social services division regarding whether their custody should be allowed to continue.
“Parents are responsible for their children. If they are allowing them to engage in lawless behaviors there will be consequences for them as parents, ” city official Wilson Stewart said during a 30-minute press conference.
“Many of the individuals we have detained are high school students. We urge parents out there to know where their children are at all times until tensions are quelled,” he continued. “Have them adhere to the mandatory curfew. Make them aware that participation in looting, destruction of property, and violently demonstrating on any level will come with severe penalties.”
The announcement was made on the heels of hundreds of national guardsmen and law enforcement officials intent on restoring calm to the city.
Although it remains to be seen whether this pronouncement will have an impact on the rioting, it definitely illustrates to some that there are consequences to their actions. Your decisions are often something you will have to live with.
Besides these steep consequences, a curfew continues to be imposed and those who violate it will also face some pretty serious ramifications.
This was a decision that is inherent in the traditional system of American society.
Law and order must be upheld and citizens need to know they can be safe in their neighborhoods. Although Wilson Stewart’s decision might be indicative to liberals of racism, to us it means he is a “law and order” politician, and worthy of our respect.
What do you think about this decision by Charlotte city officials to permanently revoke any government benefits by rioters? Please share the story on Facebook and tell us because OUR voice is YOUR voice!
有Trump在，政治圈永不寂寞，flowers已经接受川普邀请了BACKFIRE: Bill Clinton's Ex Mistress Accepts Trump Invite To Sit Next To Mark Cuban At Debate
Talk about your all-time backfires. Last week it was announced that billionaire owner of the Dallas Mavericks Mark Cuban would be sitting front row at Monday's presidential debate at Hillary Clinton's invitation. Cuban has been a vocal antagonist and detractor of Donald Trump since he endorsed Clinton several months ago. The move was an obvious attempt to rattle Trump, however it looks like the real estate mogul might get the last laugh. On Saturday afternoon, Donald Trump threatened to invite Gennifer Flowers, a former model who had an affair with Bill Clinton in the 1980s, to sit in the front row next to Cuban: Flowers also posted on her Twitter account that she'll be at the debate:
READOUT OF DONALD J. TRUMP'S MEETING WITH ISRAELI PRIME MINISTER BENJAMIN NETANYAHU
NEW YORK, NY - Donald J. Trump met privately today with Prime Minister Netanyahu for over an hour at Mr. Trump's residence in Trump Tower. The two have known each other for many years and had the opportunity to discuss many topics important to both countries.
Mr. Trump and the Prime Minister discussed the special relationship between America and Israel and the unbreakable bond between the two countries. The topics of military assistance, security and regional stability were addressed. Mr. Trump agreed that the military assistance provided to Israel and missile defense cooperation with Israel are an excellent investment for America. Mr. Trump said that under a Trump administration, there will be extraordinary strategic, technological, military and intelligence cooperation between the two countries. Mr. Trump recognized Israel as a vital partner of the United States in the global war against radical Islamic terrorism.
They discussed at length the nuclear deal with Iran, the battle against ISIS and many other regional security concerns.
Mr. Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu discussed at length Israel's successful experience with a security fence that helped secure its borders. They discussed Israel’s burgeoning hi-tech and biotech economy and how it has made stunning advances improving and saving lives around the world. In particular, Mr. Trump noted Israel’s emergence as a world leader in cyber defense and security and its cooperation with the United States in this regard.
Mr. Trump recognized that Israel and its citizens have suffered far too long on the front lines of Islamic terrorism. He agreed with Prime Minister Netanyahu that the Israeli people want a just and lasting peace with their neighbors, but that peace will only come when the Palestinians renounce hatred and violence and accept Israel as a Jewish State.
Finally, Mr. Trump acknowledged that Jerusalem has been the eternal capital of the Jewish People for over 3000 years, and that the United States, under a Trump administration, will finally accept the long-standing Congressional mandate to recognize Jerusalem as the undivided capital of the State of Israel.
The meeting concluded with both leaders promising the highest level of mutual support and cooperation should Mr. Trump have the honor and privilege of being elected President of the United States.
ZT：前布什政府的高官们纷纷背书川普 BREAKING : 50 Former TOP Bush Appointees Endorse Trump By Amy Moreno September 26, 2016
The global Bush family may not like Trump because he whooped Jebby’s ass, but 50 of their appointees do – many TOP NAMES – and they have endorsed Donald Trump!
From Reuters:
Fifty former Bush appointees were on a list of people described as founding members of a coalition of Bush alumni supportive of Trump.
The list was provided by a Republican official close to the Trump campaign. The list included former White House press secretary Ari Fleischer , former U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft, former Labor Secretary Elaine Chao, former Treasury Secretary John Snow and former Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson.
The list also included former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, former Veterans Affairs Secretary Anthony Principi and former deputy White House political director Matt Schlapp, who is chairman of the American Conservative Union.
国家移民和海关执法委员会背书川普！ National ICE Council Anounces First-Ever Presidential Endorsement In Its History
Early Monday morning, the National Immigration and Customs Enforcement Council made a huge announcement that rocked the political world.
“We hereby endorse Donald J. Trump, and urge all Americans, especially the millions of lawful immigrants living within our country, to support Donald J. Trump, and to protect American jobs, wages and lives,” the organization’s president, Chris Crane, wrote in a statement published at DonaldJTrump.com.
What made the endorsement so stunning was that the National ICE Council had never before in its history made an endorsement for a candidate running for an elected office.
Plus, the council represented 7,600 federal immigration officers and law enforcement support staff members.
Yet this time around, the council chose to have a vote, and according to the results of that vote, GOP candidate Donald Trump received the vast majority of the council members’ support.
“This first-ever endorsement was conducted by a vote of our membership, with Hillary Clinton receiving only 5 percent of that vote,” Crane’s statement clarified.
In explaining why council members disliked Democrat candidate Clinton so much, Crane pointed to her support of “the most radical immigration proposal in U.S. history.”
He also claimed that her plan had been crafted with the assistance of “special interests and open-borders radicals.”
“Her radical plan would result in the loss of thousands of innocent American lives, mass victimization and death for many attempting to immigrate to the United States, the total gutting of interior enforcement, the handcuffing of ICE officers, and an uncontrollable flood of illegal immigrants across U.S. borders,” his statement went on.
The Democrat candidate would also expand executive amnesty, expand catch-and-release and prioritize the non-enforcement of America’s federal immigration laws, Crane wrote.
Trump’s plan, on the other hand, would “restore immigration security” by, among other things, cancelling President Barack Obama’s executive amnesty, putting an end to sanctuary cities and providing immigration agents with the tools and resources they need to effectively carry out their jobs.
“America has been lied to about every aspect of immigration in the United States,” Crane continued.
“We can fix our broken immigration system, and we can do it in a way that honors America’s legacy as a land of immigrants, but Donald Trump is the only candidate who is willing to put politics aside so that we can achieve that goal,” he concluded.
国家移民和海关执法委员会背书川普！ National ICE Council Anounces First-Ever Presidential Endorsement In Its History
Early Monday morning, the National Immigration and Customs Enforcement Council made a huge announcement that rocked the political world.
“We hereby endorse Donald J. Trump, and urge all Americans, especially the millions of lawful immigrants living within our country, to support Donald J. Trump, and to protect American jobs, wages and lives,” the organization’s president, Chris Crane, wrote in a statement published at DonaldJTrump.com.
What made the endorsement so stunning was that the National ICE Council had never before in its history made an endorsement for a candidate running for an elected office.
Plus, the council represented 7,600 federal immigration officers and law enforcement support staff members.
Yet this time around, the council chose to have a vote, and according to the results of that vote, GOP candidate Donald Trump received the vast majority of the council members’ support.
“This first-ever endorsement was conducted by a vote of our membership, with Hillary Clinton receiving only 5 percent of that vote,” Crane’s statement clarified.
In explaining why council members disliked Democrat candidate Clinton so much, Crane pointed to her support of “the most radical immigration proposal in U.S. history.”
He also claimed that her plan had been crafted with the assistance of “special interests and open-borders radicals.”
“Her radical plan would result in the loss of thousands of innocent American lives, mass victimization and death for many attempting to immigrate to the United States, the total gutting of interior enforcement, the handcuffing of ICE officers, and an uncontrollable flood of illegal immigrants across U.S. borders,” his statement went on.
The Democrat candidate would also expand executive amnesty, expand catch-and-release and prioritize the non-enforcement of America’s federal immigration laws, Crane wrote.
Trump’s plan, on the other hand, would “restore immigration security” by, among other things, cancelling President Barack Obama’s executive amnesty, putting an end to sanctuary cities and providing immigration agents with the tools and resources they need to effectively carry out their jobs.
“America has been lied to about every aspect of immigration in the United States,” Crane continued.
“We can fix our broken immigration system, and we can do it in a way that honors America’s legacy as a land of immigrants, but Donald Trump is the only candidate who is willing to put politics aside so that we can achieve that goal,” he concluded.
“We can fix our broken immigration system, and we can do it in a way that honors America’s legacy as a land of immigrants, but Donald Trump is the only candidate who is willing to put politics aside so that we can achieve that goal,” he concluded.
@杰瑞Au 强烈推荐这部纪录片small enough to jail ：08年次贷危机后，美国政府一方面救助too big to fail的华尔街大投行，另一方面试图找替罪羊来平息民愤。这家唐人街小银行成为唯一一家被刑事起诉的金融机构。所幸华裔老板四个女儿都是律师，花了五年1000万刀代价，战胜曼哈顿检察院500条律棍，罪名全部不成立！
@杰瑞Au 强烈推荐这部纪录片small enough to jail ：08年次贷危机后，美国政府一方面救助too big to fail的华尔街大投行，另一方面试图找替罪羊来平息民愤。这家唐人街小银行成为唯一一家被刑事起诉的金融机构。所幸华裔老板四个女儿都是律师，花了五年1000万刀代价，战胜曼哈顿检察院500条律棍，罪名全部不成立！
#1 When Barack Obama entered the White House, the U.S. government was 10.6trillion dollars in debt. Today, the U.S. government is 19.5 trillion dollars in debt, and Obama still has several months to go until the end of his second term. That means that an average of more than 1.1 trillion dollars will be added to the national debt during his presidency. We are stealing a tremendous amount of consumption from the future to make the economy look much, much better than it otherwise would be, and we are systematically destroying the future in the process.
#2 As Obama prepares to leave office, the rate at which we are adding to the national debt is actually increasing. During the fiscal year that is just ending, the U.S. government has added another 1.36 trillion dollars to the national debt.
#3 It isn’t just the federal government that is on a massive debt binge. Total U.S. corporate debt has nearly doubled since the end of 2007.
#4 Default rates on U.S. corporate debt are the highest that they have been since the last financial crisis.
#5 Corporate profits have fallen for five quarters in a row, and it is being projected that it will be six in a row once the final numbers for the third quarter come in.
#6 During the month of August, commercial bankruptcy filings were up 29 percent compared to the same period a year ago.
#7 The rate of new business formation in the United States dropped dramatically during the last recession and has hovered at that new lower level ever since.
#8 The Wall Street Journal says that this is the weakest “economic recovery ” since 1949.
#9 Barack Obama is on track to be the only president in all of U.S. history to never have a single year when the U.S. economy grew by at least 3 percent.
#10 In August, the Cass Freight Index dipped to the lowest level that we have seen for that month since 2010. What this means is that the total amount of stuff being shipped around the country by air, by rail and by truck is really dropping, and this is a clear sign that real economic activity is slowing down in a major way.
#11 Capital expenditure growth has turned negative, and history has shown that this is almost always followed by a new recession.
#12 The percentage of Americans with a full-time job has been sitting at about 48 percent since 2010. You have to go back to 1983 to find a time when full-time employment in this country was so low.
#13 The labor force participation rate peaked back in 1997 and has been steadily falling ever since.
#14 The “inactivity rate” for men in their prime working years is actually higher today than it was during the last recession.
#15 The United States has lost more than five million manufacturing jobs since the year 2000 even though our population has become much larger over that time frame.
#16 If you can believe it, the total number of government employees now outnumbers the total number of manufacturing employees in the United States by almost 10 million.
#17 One study found that median incomes have fallen in more than 80 percent of the major metropolitan areas in this country since the year 2000.
#18 According to the Social Security Administration, 51 percent of all American workers make less than $30,000 a year.
#19 The rate of homeownership in the U.S. has fallen every single year while Barack Obama has been in the White House.
#20 Approximately one out of every five young adults are currently living with their parents.
#21 The auto loan debt bubble recently surpassed the one trillion dollar mark for the first time ever.
#22 Auto loan delinquencies are at the highest level that we have seen since the last recession.
#23 In 1971, 61 percent of all Americans were considered to be “middle class”, but now middle class Americans have actually become a minority in this nation.
#24 One recent survey discovered that 62 percent of all Americans have less than $1,000 in savings.
#25 According to the Federal Reserve, 47 percent of all Americans could not even pay an unexpected $400 emergency room bill without borrowing the money from somewhere or selling something.
#26 The number of New Yorkers sleeping in homeless shelters just set a brand new record high, and the number of families permanently living in homeless shelters is up a whopping 60 percent over the past five years.
Despite all of the facts that you just read, the truth is that there is one particular group of people that have been doing quite well during the Obama years. I really like how Charles Hugh Smith made this point in one of his recent articles…
The top 5% of households that dominate government, Corporate America, finance, the Deep State and the media have been doing extraordinarily well during the past eight years of stock market bubble (oops, I mean boom) and “recovery,” and so they report that the economy is doing splendidly because they’ve done splendidly.
Economists have a message: Clinton's policies are wrong for America
Statement by economists concerned by Hillary Clinton's economic agenda
The outcome of this year's presidential election will influence the U.S. economy for years to come. Should Hillary Clinton win that election, her outdated policy prescriptions won't return our economy to the faster growth rates it once enjoyed. And without more economic growth, her agenda won't result in more jobs or a higher national standard of living. Hillary Clinton's economic agenda is wrong for America.
The U.S. economy is underperforming. Misguided federal policies have produced one of the slowest recoveries on record. Since early 2009, the economy has grown at an average annual rate of 2 percent. It could and should be growing 3 to 4 percent.
Hillary Clinton promises to repeat almost all of Obama's policy mistakes. She wants yet another massive debt-financed public works program; she wants to raise tax rates on investment and incomes to nearly 50 percent; she wants to raise the federal minimum wage to at least $12 an hour and supports state and local efforts to hike theirs; she wants to stall America's development of fossil fuels; she wants to continue the Obama administration's regulatory assault on business and entrepreneurship; and she wants to double down on ObamaCare.
What America needs, and what Americans deserve, is an agenda of economic freedom: limited but effective government, policies that rely on and strengthen markets, pro-growth tax reform, sensible federal spending restraint, regulatory relief, sound money, and freedom to trade. These things are necessary if we are to revive American prosperity.
For these reasons and more, the undersigned urge everyone concerned about threats to American prosperity to reject Hillary Clinton's ill-advised economic agenda.
Signed (affiliations listed for identification purposes only),
Burton A. Abrams, University of Delaware Zoltan Acs, George Mason University Douglas Adie, Ohio University Lee C. Adkins, Oklahoma State University Richard Agnello, University of Delaware William Albrecht, University of Iowa Gordon Alexander, University of Minnesota John W. Allen, Texas A&M University William Allen, University of California, Los Angeles Dom Armentano, University of Hartford Nathan Ashby, University of Texas at El Paso Howard Baetjer, Towson University Department of Economics Charles Baird, California State University, East Bay Marjorie Baldwin, Arizona State University Ray Ball, University of Chicago Christopher C. Barnekov, Ph.D., Fort Wayne, Indiana Bill Barnett, Loyola University New Orleans James Barth, Auburn University Robert Battalio, University of Notre Dame Stacie Beck, University of Delaware Daniel K. Benjamin, Clemson University James T. Bennett, George Mason University Michael Bennett, Curry College Bill Beranek, University of Georgia Dianne Betts, Raymond James & Associates Sanjai Bhagat, University of Colorado Michael Bond, University of Arizona Michael J. Boskin, Stanford University Samuel Bostaph, University of Dallas Fred Bounds, Georgia State University John Boyd, University of Minnesota Michael Bradley, Duke University Charles Breeden, Marquette University Wayne Brough, FreedomWorks Lawrence Brunner, Central Michigan University Phillip Bryson, Brigham Young University Van Bullock, New Mexico State University Richard Burkhauser, Cornell University David Burnett, Whitworth University and Gonzaga University Edwin T. Burton, University of Virginia William Butos, Trinity College Charles Calomiris, Columbia University Oral Capps Jr., Texas A&M University Tom Cargill, University of Nevada Carmen Carro, AEA Member James Carter, former Chief Economist, U.S. Senate Budget Committee Ava Gail Cas, The Catholic University of America Richard J. Cebula, Jacksonville University Dustin Chambers, Salisbury University Don Chance, Louisiana State University Semoon Chang, Gulf Coast Center for Impact Studies K. C. Chen, California State University, Fresno Gregory C. Chow, Princeton University Susan Christoffersen, Philadelphia University Lawrence Cima, John Carroll University Lloyd Cohen, George Mason University Scalia Law School John Coleman, Duke University Ben Collier, Northwest Missouri State University Boyd Collier, Tarleton State University Robert Collinge, University of Texas at San Antonio Michael Cosgrove, University of Dallas T. Norman Van Cott, Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana James Cover, University of Alabama Eleanor Craig, University of Delaware W. Mark Crain, Lafayette College Nicole Crain, Lafayette College John R. Crooker, University of Central Missouri K. Cundiff, Park University Ward Curran, Trinity College Carl Dahlman, US Department of Defense and RAND Corporation, retired Michael Daniels, Columbus State University Larry Dann, University of Oregon Lawrence S. Davidson, Indiana University Joseph DeSalvo, University of South Florida, Tampa Allan DeSerpa, Arizona State University Bob DeYoung, University of Kansas School of Business Gregg Dimkoff , Grand Valley State University Floyd H. Duncan, Virginia Military Institute James Dunlevy, Miami University Gerald Dwyer, Dwyer Economics John Eckalbar, California State University, Chico John Egger, Towson University Jeffrey Eisenach, George Mason University Scalia Law School Richard Ericson, East Carolina University Molly Espey, Clemson University Mel Evans, Hopkinsville Community College Dorla Evans, University of Alabama, Huntsville Eugene Fama, University of Chicago W. Ken Farr, Georgia College and State University Michael Faulkender, University of Maryland Susan Feigenbaum, University of Missouri, St. Louis Garry Fleming, Roanoke College Christopher Flinn, New York University Harold Flint, Montclair State University, retired Ralph Frasca, University of Dayton Gary French, Nathan Associates Inc. Diana Furchtgott-Roth, Manhattan Institute for Policy Research Dave Garthoff, The University of Akron Robert Genetski, Classicalprinciples.com Moheb Ghali, Western Washington University Joseph Giacalone, St. John’s University Adam Gifford Jr., California State University David Gillette, Truman State University Otis W. Gilley, Louisiana Tech University William Glade, University of Texas at Austin Rodolfo A. Gonzalez, San Jose State University Lawrence Goodman, Bergen County, NJ Daniel Graham, Duke University J. Edward Graham, University of North Carolina, Wilmington Phil Gramm, former U.S. Senator, Texas Wendy Gramm, Mercatus Center, retired Richard Grant, Lipscomb University Anthony Greco, University of Louisiana, Lafayette Kenneth Greene, Binghamton University Thomas Gresik, University of Notre Dame Earl Grinols, Baylor University Noreen Haas-Lephardt, Marquette University R. W. Hafer, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville Simon Hakim, Temple University Thomas Hall, Miami University Gerald A. Hanweck, George Mason University Stephen Happel, Arizona State University Scott Harrington, University of Pennsylvania Lydia Harris, Goucher College William R. Hart, Miami University Joseph Haslag, University of Missouri John Haslem, University of Maryland Janice A. Hauge, University of North Texas Arthur Havenner, University of California, Davis Daniel Heath, Georgetown University Law Center Scott Hein, Texas Tech University John Helmuth, University of Michigan, Flint James Henderson, Baylor University Jesse Hill, Tarrant County College John Hoehn, Michigan State University Gregory Hoelscher, Blue Stripe Investors, LLC Arlene Holen, former Associate Director, Congressional Budget Office Douglas Holtz-Eakin, former Director, Congressional Budget Office Charles L. Hooper, Objective Insights, Inc. William Hosek, California State University, Northridge Forrest Huffman, Temple University Ed Ireland, Texas Christian University Thomas R. Ireland, University of Missouri at St. Louis Austin Jaffe, Pennsylvania State University Mark Jamison, University of Florida Shane Johnson, Texas A&M University Dennis Johnson, University of South Dakota Richard Just, University of Maryland Alexander Katkov, Johnson & Wales University Michael S. Kaylen, University of Missouri Barry Keating, University of Notre Dame David Kendall, University of Virginia Richard Kilmer, University of Florida Charles Knoeber, North Carolina State University Don Koch, former Senior Vice President, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Larry Kudlow Arthur B. Laffer, Laffer Associates William Laird, Florida State University Deepak Lal, UCLA Nicholas Lash, Loyola University Chicago Don Leet, California State University, Fresno Norman Lefton, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville Kenneth Lehn, University of Pittsburgh Jim Leiby, University of Maine David Leonard, Miami University of Ohio Stan Liebowitz, University of Texas, Dallas Dean R. Lillard, Ohio State University Christopher Lingle, Ph.D. in economics, University of Georgia Jody Lipford, Presbyterian College Luis Locay, University of Miami Dennis E. Logue, Tuck School at Dartmouth College John R. Lott Jr., Crime Prevention Research Center Timothy Loughran, University of Notre Dame Donald L. Luskin, TrendMacro R. Ashley Lyman, University of Idaho Billy Lynn, St. Ambrose University, Davenport, IA Glenn MacDonald, Washington University in St. Louis Maurice MacDonald, Kansas State University Keith Malone, University of North Alabama David Malpass, Encima Global Yuri Maltsev, Carthage College Michael L. Marlow, Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo Noralyn Marshall, Risk Management Advisors Paul Mason, McMurry University Timothy Mathews, Kennesaw State University John Matsusaka, University of Southern California Thomas Mayor, University of Houston John McArthur, Wofford College W. Douglas McMillin, Louisiana State University William L. Megginson, University of Oklahoma Roger Meiners, University of Texas at Arlington John Merrifield, University of Texas, San Antonio Steven C. Michael, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign J. Edgar Mihelic, Community Support Services James Miller III, former Director, Office of Management and Budget James D. Miller, Smith College Chandra Mishra, Florida Atlantic University Ron Moomaw, Oklahoma State University Steve Moore, FreedomWorks John C. Moorhouse, Wake Forest University Barry Morris, University of North Alabama Frank Murray, University of Minnesota Robert J. Newman, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge Lilian Ng, Schulich School of Business, York University Robert D. Niehaus, Robert D. Niehaus, Inc. Edd Noell, Westmont College David J. Nye, University of Florida Jim O'Neill, University of Delaware June O'Neill, former Director, Congressional Budget Office Lydia Ortega, San Jose State University Dale Osborne, University of Texas Donald Oswald, California State University, Bakersfield Walton Padelford, Union University Richard Palfin, Economic Analysis Charles Parekh, Duff & Phelps Stephen Parente, University of Minnesota Randall Parker, East Carolina University Douglas Patterson, Virginia Tech Judd Patton, Bellevue University G. Michael Phillips, California State University, Northridge Ivan Pongracic, Hillsdale College Arturo Porzecanski, American University Barry Poulson, University of Colorado Boulder James Prieger, Pepperdine University R. L. Promboin, University of Maryland University College Gary Quinlivan, Saint Vincent College Richard W. Rahn, Institute for Global Economic Growth David Ranson, H. C. Wainwright & Co. Economics Inc. Eric Rasmusen, Indiana University James Refalo, California State University, Los Angeles Jon Reisman, University of Maine at Machias Mark William Rider, Georgia State University Christine Ries, Georgia Institute of Technology Mario Rizzo, New York University Nancy Roberts, Arizona State University M. Christopher Roebuck, RxEconomics LLC Philip Romero, University of Oregon Steven S. Rosefielde, UNC, Chapel Hill Larry Ross, University of Alaska Anchorage Timothy Roth, University of Texas at El Paso Jack Rowe, University of South Florida Paul Rubin, Emory University Roy J. Ruffin, University of Houston Tony Rufolo, Portland State University John Ruggiero, University of Dayton Philip Jay Rushing, University of Illinois Don Sabbarese, Kennesaw State University Joseph Salerno, Pace University Anthony Sanders, George Mason University Jonathan Sandy, University of San Diego Robert Sauer, University of Bristol Thomas Saving, Texas A&M University Paul Schultz, University of Notre Dame John Seater, North Carolina State University Barry Seldon, Florida State University Sherrill Shaffer, University of Wyoming Dennis Sheehan, Penn State University, Smeal College of Business Judy Shelton, Atlas Economic Research Foundation Ann Sherman, DePaul University Stephen Shmanske, California State University, East Bay Don Siegel, University at Albany, SUNY Evangelos Otto Simos, University of New Hampshire Timothy F. Slaper, Indiana Business Research Center Richard L. Smith, University of California, Riverside Ted Snyder, Yale School of Management Donald Snyder, Utah State University Lawrence Southwick, University at Buffalo Frank Spreng, McKendree University Brad Stamm, Cornerstone University Robert Stauffer, Roanoke College Thomas Stoker, MIT Bernell Stone, Brigham Young University Joe Stone, University of Oregon Michael Sullivan, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Richard Sweeney, Georgetown University Robert Tamura, Clemson University T. Craig Tapley, University of Florida Jason Taylor, Central Michigan University Timothy Terrell, Wofford College Rebecca Thacker, Ohio University Clifford Thies, Shenandoah University Henry Thompson, Auburn University David G. Tuerck, Suffolk University David Tufte, Southern Utah University Carl J. Ullrich, James Madison University Richard Vedder, Ohio University Hrishikesh Vinod, Fordham University Donald Walker, Indiana University of PA Sherri Wall, University of Alaska Fairbanks Alan Rufus Waters, California State University, Fresno Andrew Weintraub, Temple University Robert Whaples, Wake Forest University J. Gregg Whittaker, William Jewell College Elliott Willman, New Mexico State University Lonny Wilson, William Penn University Michael Wohlgenant, North Carolina State University Arthur Woolf, University of Vermont Gene Wunder, Washburn University Sheng Xiao, Westminster College Bill Yang, Georgia Southern University Nancy Bord Yonge, Heritage Foundation, Hoover Institution and MicroCapital Institute Frank Zahn, University of Nebraska at Omaha Mokhlis Y. Zaki, Northern Michigan University, retired John Zdanowicz, Florida International University Jerry Zimmerman, Univeristy of Rochester Joseph Zoric, Franciscan University of Steubenville
Economists have a message: Clinton's policies are wrong for America
Statement by economists concerned by Hillary Clinton's economic agenda
The outcome of this year's presidential election will influence the U.S. economy for years to come. Should Hillary Clinton win that election, her outdated policy prescriptions won't return our economy to the faster growth rates it once enjoyed. And without more economic growth, her agenda won't result in more jobs or a higher national standard of living. Hillary Clinton's economic agenda is wrong for America.
For these reasons and more, the undersigned urge everyone concerned about threats to American prosperity to reject Hillary Clinton's ill-advised economic agenda.
Signed (affiliations listed for identification purposes only),
Burton A. Abrams, University of Delaware Zoltan Acs, George Mason University Douglas Adie, Ohio University Lee C. Adkins, Oklahoma State University Richard Agnello, University of Delaware William Albrecht, University of Iowa Gordon Alexander, University of Minnesota John W. Allen, Texas A&M University William Allen, University of California, Los Angeles Dom Armentano, University of Hartford Nathan Ashby, University of Texas at El Paso Howard Baetjer, Towson University Department of Economics Charles Baird, California State University, East Bay Marjorie Baldwin, Arizona State University Ray Ball, University of Chicago Christopher C. Barnekov, Ph.D., Fort Wayne, Indiana Bill Barnett, Loyola University New Orleans James Barth, Auburn University Robert Battalio, University of Notre Dame Stacie Beck, University of Delaware Daniel K. Benjamin, Clemson University James T. Bennett, George Mason University Michael Bennett, Curry College Bill Beranek, University of Georgia Dianne Betts, Raymond James & Associates Sanjai Bhagat, University of Colorado Michael Bond, University of Arizona Michael J. Boskin, Stanford University Samuel Bostaph, University of Dallas Fred Bounds, Georgia State University John Boyd, University of Minnesota Michael Bradley, Duke University Charles Breeden, Marquette University Wayne Brough, FreedomWorks Lawrence Brunner, Central Michigan University Phillip Bryson, Brigham Young University Van Bullock, New Mexico State University Richard Burkhauser, Cornell University David Burnett, Whitworth University and Gonzaga University Edwin T. Burton, University of Virginia William Butos, Trinity College Charles Calomiris, Columbia University Oral Capps Jr., Texas A&M University Tom Cargill, University of Nevada Carmen Carro, AEA Member James Carter, former Chief Economist, U.S. Senate Budget Committee Ava Gail Cas, The Catholic University of America Richard J. Cebula, Jacksonville University Dustin Chambers, Salisbury University Don Chance, Louisiana State University Semoon Chang, Gulf Coast Center for Impact Studies K. C. Chen, California State University, Fresno Gregory C. Chow, Princeton University Susan Christoffersen, Philadelphia University Lawrence Cima, John Carroll University Lloyd Cohen, George Mason University Scalia Law School John Coleman, Duke University Ben Collier, Northwest Missouri State University Boyd Collier, Tarleton State University Robert Collinge, University of Texas at San Antonio Michael Cosgrove, University of Dallas T. Norman Van Cott, Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana James Cover, University of Alabama Eleanor Craig, University of Delaware W. Mark Crain, Lafayette College Nicole Crain, Lafayette College John R. Crooker, University of Central Missouri K. Cundiff, Park University Ward Curran, Trinity College Carl Dahlman, US Department of Defense and RAND Corporation, retired Michael Daniels, Columbus State University Larry Dann, University of Oregon Lawrence S. Davidson, Indiana University Joseph DeSalvo, University of South Florida, Tampa Allan DeSerpa, Arizona State University Bob DeYoung, University of Kansas School of Business Gregg Dimkoff , Grand Valley State University Floyd H. Duncan, Virginia Military Institute James Dunlevy, Miami University Gerald Dwyer, Dwyer Economics John Eckalbar, California State University, Chico John Egger, Towson University Jeffrey Eisenach, George Mason University Scalia Law School Richard Ericson, East Carolina University Molly Espey, Clemson University Mel Evans, Hopkinsville Community College Dorla Evans, University of Alabama, Huntsville Eugene Fama, University of Chicago W. Ken Farr, Georgia College and State University Michael Faulkender, University of Maryland Susan Feigenbaum, University of Missouri, St. Louis Garry Fleming, Roanoke College Christopher Flinn, New York University Harold Flint, Montclair State University, retired Ralph Frasca, University of Dayton Gary French, Nathan Associates Inc. Diana Furchtgott-Roth, Manhattan Institute for Policy Research Dave Garthoff, The University of Akron Robert Genetski, Classicalprinciples.com Moheb Ghali, Western Washington University Joseph Giacalone, St. John’s University Adam Gifford Jr., California State University David Gillette, Truman State University Otis W. Gilley, Louisiana Tech University William Glade, University of Texas at Austin Rodolfo A. Gonzalez, San Jose State University Lawrence Goodman, Bergen County, NJ Daniel Graham, Duke University J. Edward Graham, University of North Carolina, Wilmington Phil Gramm, former U.S. Senator, Texas Wendy Gramm, Mercatus Center, retired Richard Grant, Lipscomb University Anthony Greco, University of Louisiana, Lafayette Kenneth Greene, Binghamton University Thomas Gresik, University of Notre Dame Earl Grinols, Baylor University Noreen Haas-Lephardt, Marquette University R. W. Hafer, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville Simon Hakim, Temple University Thomas Hall, Miami University Gerald A. Hanweck, George Mason University Stephen Happel, Arizona State University Scott Harrington, University of Pennsylvania Lydia Harris, Goucher College William R. Hart, Miami University Joseph Haslag, University of Missouri John Haslem, University of Maryland Janice A. Hauge, University of North Texas Arthur Havenner, University of California, Davis Daniel Heath, Georgetown University Law Center Scott Hein, Texas Tech University John Helmuth, University of Michigan, Flint James Henderson, Baylor University Jesse Hill, Tarrant County College John Hoehn, Michigan State University Gregory Hoelscher, Blue Stripe Investors, LLC Arlene Holen, former Associate Director, Congressional Budget Office Douglas Holtz-Eakin, former Director, Congressional Budget Office Charles L. Hooper, Objective Insights, Inc. William Hosek, California State University, Northridge Forrest Huffman, Temple University Ed Ireland, Texas Christian University Thomas R. Ireland, University of Missouri at St. Louis Austin Jaffe, Pennsylvania State University Mark Jamison, University of Florida Shane Johnson, Texas A&M University Dennis Johnson, University of South Dakota Richard Just, University of Maryland Alexander Katkov, Johnson & Wales University Michael S. Kaylen, University of Missouri Barry Keating, University of Notre Dame David Kendall, University of Virginia Richard Kilmer, University of Florida Charles Knoeber, North Carolina State University Don Koch, former Senior Vice President, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Larry Kudlow Arthur B. Laffer, Laffer Associates William Laird, Florida State University Deepak Lal, UCLA Nicholas Lash, Loyola University Chicago Don Leet, California State University, Fresno Norman Lefton, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville Kenneth Lehn, University of Pittsburgh Jim Leiby, University of Maine David Leonard, Miami University of Ohio Stan Liebowitz, University of Texas, Dallas Dean R. Lillard, Ohio State University Christopher Lingle, Ph.D. in economics, University of Georgia Jody Lipford, Presbyterian College Luis Locay, University of Miami Dennis E. Logue, Tuck School at Dartmouth College John R. Lott Jr., Crime Prevention Research Center Timothy Loughran, University of Notre Dame Donald L. Luskin, TrendMacro R. Ashley Lyman, University of Idaho Billy Lynn, St. Ambrose University, Davenport, IA Glenn MacDonald, Washington University in St. Louis Maurice MacDonald, Kansas State University Keith Malone, University of North Alabama David Malpass, Encima Global Yuri Maltsev, Carthage College Michael L. Marlow, Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo Noralyn Marshall, Risk Management Advisors Paul Mason, McMurry University Timothy Mathews, Kennesaw State University John Matsusaka, University of Southern California Thomas Mayor, University of Houston John McArthur, Wofford College W. Douglas McMillin, Louisiana State University William L. Megginson, University of Oklahoma Roger Meiners, University of Texas at Arlington John Merrifield, University of Texas, San Antonio Steven C. Michael, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign J. Edgar Mihelic, Community Support Services James Miller III, former Director, Office of Management and Budget James D. Miller, Smith College Chandra Mishra, Florida Atlantic University Ron Moomaw, Oklahoma State University Steve Moore, FreedomWorks John C. Moorhouse, Wake Forest University Barry Morris, University of North Alabama Frank Murray, University of Minnesota Robert J. Newman, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge Lilian Ng, Schulich School of Business, York University Robert D. Niehaus, Robert D. Niehaus, Inc. Edd Noell, Westmont College David J. Nye, University of Florida Jim O'Neill, University of Delaware June O'Neill, former Director, Congressional Budget Office Lydia Ortega, San Jose State University Dale Osborne, University of Texas Donald Oswald, California State University, Bakersfield Walton Padelford, Union University Richard Palfin, Economic Analysis Charles Parekh, Duff & Phelps Stephen Parente, University of Minnesota Randall Parker, East Carolina University Douglas Patterson, Virginia Tech Judd Patton, Bellevue University G. Michael Phillips, California State University, Northridge Ivan Pongracic, Hillsdale College Arturo Porzecanski, American University Barry Poulson, University of Colorado Boulder James Prieger, Pepperdine University R. L. Promboin, University of Maryland University College Gary Quinlivan, Saint Vincent College Richard W. Rahn, Institute for Global Economic Growth David Ranson, H. C. Wainwright & Co. Economics Inc. Eric Rasmusen, Indiana University James Refalo, California State University, Los Angeles Jon Reisman, University of Maine at Machias Mark William Rider, Georgia State University Christine Ries, Georgia Institute of Technology Mario Rizzo, New York University Nancy Roberts, Arizona State University M. Christopher Roebuck, RxEconomics LLC Philip Romero, University of Oregon Steven S. Rosefielde, UNC, Chapel Hill Larry Ross, University of Alaska Anchorage Timothy Roth, University of Texas at El Paso Jack Rowe, University of South Florida Paul Rubin, Emory University Roy J. Ruffin, University of Houston Tony Rufolo, Portland State University John Ruggiero, University of Dayton Philip Jay Rushing, University of Illinois Don Sabbarese, Kennesaw State University Joseph Salerno, Pace University Anthony Sanders, George Mason University Jonathan Sandy, University of San Diego Robert Sauer, University of Bristol Thomas Saving, Texas A&M University Paul Schultz, University of Notre Dame John Seater, North Carolina State University Barry Seldon, Florida State University Sherrill Shaffer, University of Wyoming Dennis Sheehan, Penn State University, Smeal College of Business Judy Shelton, Atlas Economic Research Foundation Ann Sherman, DePaul University Stephen Shmanske, California State University, East Bay Don Siegel, University at Albany, SUNY Evangelos Otto Simos, University of New Hampshire Timothy F. Slaper, Indiana Business Research Center Richard L. Smith, University of California, Riverside Ted Snyder, Yale School of Management Donald Snyder, Utah State University Lawrence Southwick, University at Buffalo Frank Spreng, McKendree University Brad Stamm, Cornerstone University Robert Stauffer, Roanoke College Thomas Stoker, MIT Bernell Stone, Brigham Young University Joe Stone, University of Oregon Michael Sullivan, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Richard Sweeney, Georgetown University Robert Tamura, Clemson University T. Craig Tapley, University of Florida Jason Taylor, Central Michigan University Timothy Terrell, Wofford College Rebecca Thacker, Ohio University Clifford Thies, Shenandoah University Henry Thompson, Auburn University David G. Tuerck, Suffolk University David Tufte, Southern Utah University Carl J. Ullrich, James Madison University Richard Vedder, Ohio University Hrishikesh Vinod, Fordham University Donald Walker, Indiana University of PA Sherri Wall, University of Alaska Fairbanks Alan Rufus Waters, California State University, Fresno Andrew Weintraub, Temple University Robert Whaples, Wake Forest University J. Gregg Whittaker, William Jewell College Elliott Willman, New Mexico State University Lonny Wilson, William Penn University Michael Wohlgenant, North Carolina State University Arthur Woolf, University of Vermont Gene Wunder, Washburn University Sheng Xiao, Westminster College Bill Yang, Georgia Southern University Nancy Bord Yonge, Heritage Foundation, Hoover Institution and MicroCapital Institute Frank Zahn, University of Nebraska at Omaha Mokhlis Y. Zaki, Northern Michigan University, retired John Zdanowicz, Florida International University Jerry Zimmerman, Univeristy of Rochester Joseph Zoric, Franciscan University of Steubenville
Tax returns. Holt never asked Clinton about her e-mail scandal, about Benghazi, or about the Clinton Foundation and its dubious dealings. But he did ask Trump about his tax returns, arguing — not asking — that there might be questionable information in them that the American public deserved to hear.
Birther conspiracy theory. Holt never asked Clinton about her past record of racist statements, including her “super-predator” remarks as First Lady, or her explicit appeal to “white Americans” in her 2008 primary campaign against Obama. Yet he asked Trump about the Birther conspiracy theory and cast it as racist.
Stop-and-frisk. After an exchange between the candidates over the policy of “stop-and-frisk,” Holt interjected to bolster Clinton’s point by stating, erroneously, that stop-and-frisk had ended in New York because it had been declared unconstitutional by a court. Trump countered, correctly, that the new mayor had canceled the policy before the litigation was over.
“A presidential look.” Towards the end of the debate, Holt asked Trump about what he meant by saying Hillary Clinton did not have “a presidential look.” He did so after noting that Clinton had become “the first woman” to be nominated for president by a major political party, thus setting Trump up as a sexist. As Trump answered, Holt interrupted him, then gave Clinton a chance to respond with her talking points about Trump’s past comments on women.
Iraq War. The question of whether Trump supported the Iraq War or not has been widely debated. What is beyond doubt is that Hillary Clinton voted for it. Holt only represented one side of the debate about Trump, and never asked Clinton about her own vote.
Donald J. Trump shared Ted Cruz's post. 30 mins · Thank you Senator Ted Cruz!
Ted Cruz 1 hr · Facebook Mentions · Tonight, a clear contrast was drawn between the two nominees. Tonight, Hillary Clinton made it clearer than ever that if elected President, our future will continue on the same path that is hurting millions of Americans.
If Clinton is elected, we know that the havoc Obamacare is wreaking on American families, on small businesses, and on our healthcare system will continue. We know that President Obama’s relentless efforts to crush the oil and gas industry and to wage war on coal will continue. We know that the Obama administration’s willful blindness to radical Islamic terrorism and the influx of unvetted refugees from nations infiltrated by terrorists will continue. We know that President Obama’s lawless executive amnesty will continue and even expand.
If Clinton is elected, we know that a liberal justice will be named to fill Scalia’s seat and we will lose the Supreme Court for a generation. With that, we know for a certainty that our right to keep and bear arms, our religious liberty and federalism are in danger.
Tonight we received insight into what a Hillary Clinton presidency would look like for Americans. We know that her policies would kill jobs, reduce wages, and continue the downward spiral our country has endured under President Obama.
Tonight, Donald Trump had his strongest debate performance of the election cycle. He drew strong contrasts with Hillary on taxes, regulations, law and order, and the disastrous Iran deal.
Rather than Hillary's America, we need to take a different path. A path that would begin to restore our country from the damage it has suffered the last eight years. We need to unite to defend freedom and restore the Constitution. And Hillary Clinton made absolutely clear tonight she would not do so.
Donald J. Trump shared Ted Cruz's post. 30 mins · Thank you Senator Ted Cruz!
Ted Cruz 1 hr · Facebook Mentions · Tonight, a clear contrast was drawn between the two nominees. Tonight, Hillary Clinton made it clearer than ever that if elected President, our future will continue on the same path that is hurting millions of Americans.
If Clinton is elected, we know that the havoc Obamacare is wreaking on American families, on small businesses, and on our healthcare system will continue. We know that President Obama’s relentless efforts to crush the oil and gas industry and to wage war on coal will continue. We know that the Obama administration’s willful blindness to radical Islamic terrorism and the influx of unvetted refugees from nations infiltrated by terrorists will continue. We know that President Obama’s lawless executive amnesty will continue and even expand.
If Clinton is elected, we know that a liberal justice will be named to fill Scalia’s seat and we will lose the Supreme Court for a generation. With that, we know for a certainty that our right to keep and bear arms, our religious liberty and federalism are in danger.
Tonight we received insight into what a Hillary Clinton presidency would look like for Americans. We know that her policies would kill jobs, reduce wages, and continue the downward spiral our country has endured under President Obama.
Tonight, Donald Trump had his strongest debate performance of the election cycle. He drew strong contrasts with Hillary on taxes, regulations, law and order, and the disastrous Iran deal.
Rather than Hillary's America, we need to take a different path. A path that would begin to restore our country from the damage it has suffered the last eight years. We need to unite to defend freedom and restore the Constitution. And Hillary Clinton made absolutely clear tonight she would not do so. YRG 发表于 9/27/2016 12:30:39 AM 这篇总结得真不错
Lester Holt shows he doesn’t know the meaning of impartial
The ref not only made himself part of the game on Monday night, he ran up to the scrimmage line, then sacked the quarterback three times.
In the early going, it looked like it was going to be an ideal, Jim Lehrer-style performance from Lester Holt, the NBC Nightly News anchor. Lehrer was so boringly nonpartisan, so unwilling to play gotcha that he was always hotly in demand to moderate debates. For the first half or so, Holt gave simple, broad, open-ended questions and let the candidates go at it. He didn’t venture into live fact-checking, didn’t much quarrel with the nominees, didn’t ask persnickety questions.
For the most part, Holt asked the kinds of basic questions that gave Hillary Clinton and Trump plenty of opportunities to repeat favored talking points: what would you do to pump some life into the job market? How would you heal the race divide? Are police biased against minorities? What’s your policy on homegrown terrorist attacks?
But in the last half of the show, Holt started going after Trump. He got into an unfortunate bickering match with the Republican nominee over the latter’s (apparently offhand) support for the Iraq War in a 2002 Howard Stern interview. It was perfectly reasonable to bring up the point, but the exchange became tiresome on both sides, with the two men talking past each other. Holt would have been wiser to simply say, “In 2002, you told Howard Stern you supported the Iraq War. Tonight you say you didn’t. Can you explain?” Arguing with Trump is Clinton’s job, not Holt’s.
Trump’s birther argle-bargle is something the media have shown far too much interest in given its relative non-importance, but it was also fair of Holt to give Trump a chance to put the question to rest in front of a large audience. Trump bungled the opportunity, but it was hardly an unfair topic to bring up given that questioning President Obama’s birthplace is how Trump became a national political figure in the first place, and given that Trump made a circus out of the matter just 10 days earlier.
Still, having put Trump on the hot seat on a couple of questions, and giving no such pushback to Clinton, Holt then got into a third tug-of-war with the GOP standard-bearer, demanding that Trump answer for his remark that Clinton didn’t have “the look” of a president.
When Trump tried to change the subject to stamina, Holt (and then Clinton) pressed the point.
So Holt’s questions were fair game, but it’s not the case that Clinton has nothing to be embarrassed about either. Holt might have questioned her about, for instance, the role she played in arranging the sale of American uranium assets to Russia after Clinton and her foundation accepted large checks from shady intermediaries. He might have noted that she was chided by the FBI for her reckless mishandling of classified information, or that she put sensitive national security information on a server, less secure than Gmail, that could easily be hacked by the Russians. He could have asked her whether she could be trusted about her health given that she apparently wasn’t going to tell the public she had pneumonia until she collapsed on 9/11 (and even then stonewalled for hours).
True, Hillary Clinton has answered a lot of these kinds of questions before, but the not in front of a huge national audience. For Holt to allow her to get away with saying, “”It was a mistake” on her usage of email doesn’t cut it, not from a guy who was willing to hammer Trump on a remark like “I just don’t think she has a presidential look.”
CNN poll的sample: 26% of the respondents who participated in tonight's survey identified themselves as Republicans, 41% identified themselves as Democrats,
Former New Hampshire Governor, Chief of Staff To President George H.W. Bush Backs Trump-Pence Ticket
“Donald Trump is the only candidate in this race who can bring bold change to Washington D.C. I support the Trump-Pence ticket for their pro-growth agenda and commitment to protecting American interests. Republicans, Independents and smart Democrats need to come together to elect Donald Trump and Mike Pence.” – Governor John H. Sununu
笨
BRILLIANT! Charlotte Official INSTANTLY Silence Rioters With 1 EPIC Announcement
The rioting and discord in Charlotte continues, but government officials in
the city just made a major announcement. This is a decision that will go a
long way in curbing the violence and is definitely something other cities in
the future should consider also.
City officials have essentially put their foot down, with a proclamation
that any individuals caught rioting, looting, destroying property, or
otherwise being violent in any unlawful manner will have their government
benefits permanently revoked.
The proposed punishment also applies to minors who participate in the
violence. Not only that, but parents of underage individuals who are caught
will also be held fully accountable and also risk losing state benefits.
Moreover, there could also be referrals to Charlotte’s social services
division regarding whether their custody should be allowed to continue.
“Parents are responsible for their children. If they are allowing them to
engage in lawless behaviors there will be consequences for them as parents,
” city official Wilson Stewart said during a 30-minute press conference.
“Many of the individuals we have detained are high school students. We urge
parents out there to know where their children are at all times until
tensions are quelled,” he continued. “Have them adhere to the mandatory
curfew. Make them aware that participation in looting, destruction of
property, and violently demonstrating on any level will come with severe
penalties.”
The announcement was made on the heels of hundreds of national guardsmen and
law enforcement officials intent on restoring calm to the city.
Although it remains to be seen whether this pronouncement will have an
impact on the rioting, it definitely illustrates to some that there are
consequences to their actions. Your decisions are often something you will
have to live with.
Besides these steep consequences, a curfew continues to be imposed and those
who violate it will also face some pretty serious ramifications.
This was a decision that is inherent in the traditional system of American
society.
Law and order must be upheld and citizens need to know they can be safe in
their neighborhoods. Although Wilson Stewart’s decision might be indicative
to liberals of racism, to us it means he is a “law and order” politician,
and worthy of our respect.
What do you think about this decision by Charlotte city officials to
permanently revoke any government benefits by rioters? Please share the
story on Facebook and tell us because OUR voice is YOUR voice!
http://truthfeed.com/brilliant-charlotte-official-instantly-silence-rioters-with-1-epic-announcement/25798/
第一个问题是选总统对下列candidate的favorability
第一个问Obama
后面问Clinton vs Trump选谁
还问了assembly 选举是否会投票 投谁
无关党派会投谁
Baker vs someone 选谁
我当然是说选tump and Catherine baker
做survey 的居然没有挂断我电话 认真听我说完了
真好笑，怕被传染肺炎
以前没有关注过选举，就想问问大家都在选举前到处见别国政要吗？
一点没必要紧张，就是个批稀拉拉和奥巴的大会。
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3806660/Bill-Clinton-sexual-harassment-accuser-Paula-Jones-rape-victim-Juanita-Broaddrick-want-come-presidential-debate-confront-Hillary.html
哈哈哈哈哈，说的好，不知道老太婆会不会气的癫痫又犯了
这下可热闹了，好想知道男女克的表情，女克要撒什么谎来证明自己代表女性选民呢？
哈哈哈哈～～从来没有这么同意过O8说的话
哈哈哈哈，真精妙！
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/09/go-trump-set-drop-140-million-ads-now-election/
Clinton campaign在辩论前发动媒体攻势抹黑Trump
http://hotair.com/archives/2016/09/26/trump-lies-articles-come-weekend-clinton-campaign-course/
BREAKING : 50 Former TOP Bush Appointees Endorse Trump
By Amy Moreno September 26, 2016
The global Bush family may not like Trump because he whooped Jebby’s ass,
but 50 of their appointees do – many TOP NAMES – and they have endorsed
Donald Trump!
From Reuters:
Fifty former Bush appointees were on a list of people described as
founding members of a coalition of Bush alumni supportive of Trump.
The list was provided by a Republican official close to the Trump
campaign. The list included former White House press secretary Ari Fleischer
, former U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft, former Labor Secretary Elaine
Chao, former Treasury Secretary John Snow and former Health and Human
Services Secretary Tommy Thompson.
The list also included former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, former
Veterans Affairs Secretary Anthony Principi and former deputy White House
political director Matt Schlapp, who is chairman of the American
Conservative Union.
http://truthfeed.com/breaking-50-former-top-bush-appointees-endorse-trump/25882/
http://hk.on.cc/int/bkn/cnt/news/20160926/bknint-20160926202721101-0926_17011_001.html
快公布，把奥巴这个恐怖分子抓起来
National ICE Council Anounces First-Ever Presidential Endorsement In Its History
Early Monday morning, the National Immigration and Customs Enforcement Council made a huge announcement that rocked the political world.
“We hereby endorse Donald J. Trump, and urge all Americans, especially the millions of lawful immigrants living within our country, to support Donald J. Trump, and to protect American jobs, wages and lives,” the organization’s president, Chris Crane, wrote in a statement published at DonaldJTrump.com.
What made the endorsement so stunning was that the National ICE Council had never before in its history made an endorsement for a candidate running for an elected office.
Plus, the council represented 7,600 federal immigration officers and law enforcement support staff members.
Yet this time around, the council chose to have a vote, and according to the results of that vote, GOP candidate Donald Trump received the vast majority of the council members’ support.
“This first-ever endorsement was conducted by a vote of our membership, with Hillary Clinton receiving only 5 percent of that vote,” Crane’s statement clarified.
In explaining why council members disliked Democrat candidate Clinton so much, Crane pointed to her support of “the most radical immigration proposal in U.S. history.”
He also claimed that her plan had been crafted with the assistance of “special interests and open-borders radicals.”
“Her radical plan would result in the loss of thousands of innocent American lives, mass victimization and death for many attempting to immigrate to the United States, the total gutting of interior enforcement, the handcuffing of ICE officers, and an uncontrollable flood of illegal immigrants across U.S. borders,” his statement went on.
The Democrat candidate would also expand executive amnesty, expand catch-and-release and prioritize the non-enforcement of America’s federal immigration laws, Crane wrote.
Trump’s plan, on the other hand, would “restore immigration security” by, among other things, cancelling President Barack Obama’s executive amnesty, putting an end to sanctuary cities and providing immigration agents with the tools and resources they need to effectively carry out their jobs.
“America has been lied to about every aspect of immigration in the United States,” Crane continued.
“We can fix our broken immigration system, and we can do it in a way that honors America’s legacy as a land of immigrants, but Donald Trump is the only candidate who is willing to put politics aside so that we can achieve that goal,” he concluded.
http://usa2016elections.com/national-ice-council-anounces-first-ever-presidential-endorsement-history/
http://www.westernjournalism.com/national-ice-council-anounces-first-ever-presidential-endorsement-in-its-history/?utm_source=Facebook&utm_medium=WesternJournalism&utm_content=2016-09-26&utm_campaign=manualpost
首次辩论
将在
美东时间9月26日晚9点
北京时间9月27日早9点
进行
非得逼我换个字号140
地点：霍夫斯特拉大学（Hofstra University）
主持人：莱斯特霍尔特（Lester Holt）
本场辩论将分为6个部分，每部分15分钟。目前已经确定辩论的三个主题：美国的方向，实现繁荣和保障美国安全，每个主题两小节。
直播源：
twitter：https://twitter.com/i/live/778347749217406976
斗鱼：https://www.douyu.com/617970
CBSN首页有live：http://www.cbsnews.com/
辩论前夜民调：
538
彭博
CNN
NBC/WSJ
NEW：如何看待 2016 年 9 月 26 号美国总统大选第一场电视辩论？
总统选举辩论安排（182页5739L）
本楼备份：（感谢 @宏 ）
民调 http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/
http://projects.fivethirtyeight. ... 16/primary-forecast
专题 http://www.foxnews.com/politics/ ... mary-caucus-results
http://www.politico.com/2016-election/schedule
http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results
我站TRUMP专区 https://www.zhihu.com/topic/20023724
我站大选专区 https://www.zhihu.com/topic/20019119
如果证明这个是真的，那奥马桶真可以马上下台了
红顶女商人被捕牵出重要人物 疑涉前中共高层(图)
http://www.wenxuecity.com/news/2016/09/26/5630544.html
近日涉嫌向朝鲜推进核计划的美女红顶商人马晓红被捕，其背后是否有更强大的政治背景，成为海外舆论界关注的焦点。有美媒披露，马晓红用于走私的七艘船都出入红顶商人王文良的港口。而王文良前不久因向美国民主党总统候选人希拉里的基金会政治献金遭调查。王文良其政治背景浮出水面，据称王至少得到某前中共高层的大力支持。
“We can fix our broken immigration system, and we can do it in a way that honors America’s legacy as a land of immigrants, but Donald Trump is the only candidate who is willing to put politics aside so that we can achieve that goal,” he concluded.
这句话说得真好
强烈推荐这部纪录片small enough to jail
：08年次贷危机后，美国政府一方面救助too big to fail的华尔街大投行，另一方面试图找替罪羊来平息民愤。这家唐人街小银行成为唯一一家被刑事起诉的金融机构。所幸华裔老板四个女儿都是律师，花了五年1000万刀代价，战胜曼哈顿检察院500条律棍，罪名全部不成立！
听说过这部纪录片，据说很感人。一家人团结一致，尤其是4个学法律的女儿们坚持不懈地和政府法律机构对抗，最终成功的故事！
不管替罪羊找没找成，一群律师挣翻了啊
http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/26-incredible-facts-about-the-economy-that-every-american-should-know-for-the-trump-clinton-debate
#1 When Barack Obama entered the White House, the U.S. government was 10.6trillion dollars in debt. Today, the U.S. government is 19.5 trillion dollars in debt, and Obama still has several months to go until the end of his second term. That means that an average of more than 1.1 trillion dollars will be added to the national debt during his presidency. We are stealing a tremendous amount of consumption from the future to make the economy look much, much better than it otherwise would be, and we are systematically destroying the future in the process.
#2 As Obama prepares to leave office, the rate at which we are adding to the national debt is actually increasing. During the fiscal year that is just ending, the U.S. government has added another 1.36 trillion dollars to the national debt.
#3 It isn’t just the federal government that is on a massive debt binge. Total U.S. corporate debt has nearly doubled since the end of 2007.
#4 Default rates on U.S. corporate debt are the highest that they have been since the last financial crisis.
#5 Corporate profits have fallen for five quarters in a row, and it is being projected that it will be six in a row once the final numbers for the third quarter come in.
#6 During the month of August, commercial bankruptcy filings were up 29 percent compared to the same period a year ago.
#7 The rate of new business formation in the United States dropped dramatically during the last recession and has hovered at that new lower level ever since.
#8 The Wall Street Journal says that this is the weakest “economic recovery ” since 1949.
#9 Barack Obama is on track to be the only president in all of U.S. history to never have a single year when the U.S. economy grew by at least 3 percent.
#10 In August, the Cass Freight Index dipped to the lowest level that we have seen for that month since 2010. What this means is that the total amount of stuff being shipped around the country by air, by rail and by truck is really dropping, and this is a clear sign that real economic activity is slowing down in a major way.
#11 Capital expenditure growth has turned negative, and history has shown that this is almost always followed by a new recession.
#12 The percentage of Americans with a full-time job has been sitting at about 48 percent since 2010. You have to go back to 1983 to find a time when full-time employment in this country was so low.
#13 The labor force participation rate peaked back in 1997 and has been steadily falling ever since.
#14 The “inactivity rate” for men in their prime working years is actually higher today than it was during the last recession.
#15 The United States has lost more than five million manufacturing jobs since the year 2000 even though our population has become much larger over that time frame.
#16 If you can believe it, the total number of government employees now outnumbers the total number of manufacturing employees in the United States by almost 10 million.
#17 One study found that median incomes have fallen in more than 80 percent of the major metropolitan areas in this country since the year 2000.
#18 According to the Social Security Administration, 51 percent of all American workers make less than $30,000 a year.
#19 The rate of homeownership in the U.S. has fallen every single year while Barack Obama has been in the White House.
#20 Approximately one out of every five young adults are currently living with their parents.
#21 The auto loan debt bubble recently surpassed the one trillion dollar mark for the first time ever.
#22 Auto loan delinquencies are at the highest level that we have seen since the last recession.
#23 In 1971, 61 percent of all Americans were considered to be “middle class”, but now middle class Americans have actually become a minority in this nation.
#24 One recent survey discovered that 62 percent of all Americans have less than $1,000 in savings.
#25 According to the Federal Reserve, 47 percent of all Americans could not even pay an unexpected $400 emergency room bill without borrowing the money from somewhere or selling something.
#26 The number of New Yorkers sleeping in homeless shelters just set a brand new record high, and the number of families permanently living in homeless shelters is up a whopping 60 percent over the past five years.
Despite all of the facts that you just read, the truth is that there is one particular group of people that have been doing quite well during the Obama years. I really like how Charles Hugh Smith made this point in one of his recent articles…
The top 5% of households that dominate government, Corporate America, finance, the Deep State and the media have been doing extraordinarily well during the past eight years of stock market bubble (oops, I mean boom) and “recovery,” and so they report that the economy is doing splendidly because they’ve done splendidly.
☆ 发自 iPhone 华人一网 1.11.08
Statement by economists concerned by Hillary Clinton's economic agenda
The outcome of this year's presidential election will influence the U.S. economy for years to come. Should Hillary Clinton win that election, her outdated policy prescriptions won't return our economy to the faster growth rates it once enjoyed. And without more economic growth, her agenda won't result in more jobs or a higher national standard of living. Hillary Clinton's economic agenda is wrong for America.
The U.S. economy is underperforming. Misguided federal policies have produced one of the slowest recoveries on record. Since early 2009, the economy has grown at an average annual rate of 2 percent. It could and should be growing 3 to 4 percent.
Hillary Clinton promises to repeat almost all of Obama's policy mistakes. She wants yet another massive debt-financed public works program; she wants to raise tax rates on investment and incomes to nearly 50 percent; she wants to raise the federal minimum wage to at least $12 an hour and supports state and local efforts to hike theirs; she wants to stall America's development of fossil fuels; she wants to continue the Obama administration's regulatory assault on business and entrepreneurship; and she wants to double down on ObamaCare.
What America needs, and what Americans deserve, is an agenda of economic freedom: limited but effective government, policies that rely on and strengthen markets, pro-growth tax reform, sensible federal spending restraint, regulatory relief, sound money, and freedom to trade. These things are necessary if we are to revive American prosperity.
For these reasons and more, the undersigned urge everyone concerned about threats to American prosperity to reject Hillary Clinton's ill-advised economic agenda.
Signed (affiliations listed for identification purposes only),
Burton A. Abrams, University of Delaware
Zoltan Acs, George Mason University
Douglas Adie, Ohio University
Lee C. Adkins, Oklahoma State University
Richard Agnello, University of Delaware
William Albrecht, University of Iowa
Gordon Alexander, University of Minnesota
John W. Allen, Texas A&M University
William Allen, University of California, Los Angeles
Dom Armentano, University of Hartford
Nathan Ashby, University of Texas at El Paso
Howard Baetjer, Towson University Department of Economics
Charles Baird, California State University, East Bay
Marjorie Baldwin, Arizona State University
Ray Ball, University of Chicago
Christopher C. Barnekov, Ph.D., Fort Wayne, Indiana
Bill Barnett, Loyola University New Orleans
James Barth, Auburn University
Robert Battalio, University of Notre Dame
Stacie Beck, University of Delaware
Daniel K. Benjamin, Clemson University
James T. Bennett, George Mason University
Michael Bennett, Curry College
Bill Beranek, University of Georgia
Dianne Betts, Raymond James & Associates
Sanjai Bhagat, University of Colorado
Michael Bond, University of Arizona
Michael J. Boskin, Stanford University
Samuel Bostaph, University of Dallas
Fred Bounds, Georgia State University
John Boyd, University of Minnesota
Michael Bradley, Duke University
Charles Breeden, Marquette University
Wayne Brough, FreedomWorks
Lawrence Brunner, Central Michigan University
Phillip Bryson, Brigham Young University
Van Bullock, New Mexico State University
Richard Burkhauser, Cornell University
David Burnett, Whitworth University and Gonzaga University
Edwin T. Burton, University of Virginia
William Butos, Trinity College
Charles Calomiris, Columbia University
Oral Capps Jr., Texas A&M University
Tom Cargill, University of Nevada
Carmen Carro, AEA Member
James Carter, former Chief Economist, U.S. Senate Budget Committee
Ava Gail Cas, The Catholic University of America
Richard J. Cebula, Jacksonville University
Dustin Chambers, Salisbury University
Don Chance, Louisiana State University
Semoon Chang, Gulf Coast Center for Impact Studies
K. C. Chen, California State University, Fresno
Gregory C. Chow, Princeton University
Susan Christoffersen, Philadelphia University
Lawrence Cima, John Carroll University
Lloyd Cohen, George Mason University Scalia Law School
John Coleman, Duke University
Ben Collier, Northwest Missouri State University
Boyd Collier, Tarleton State University
Robert Collinge, University of Texas at San Antonio
Michael Cosgrove, University of Dallas
T. Norman Van Cott, Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana
James Cover, University of Alabama
Eleanor Craig, University of Delaware
W. Mark Crain, Lafayette College
Nicole Crain, Lafayette College
John R. Crooker, University of Central Missouri
K. Cundiff, Park University
Ward Curran, Trinity College
Carl Dahlman, US Department of Defense and RAND Corporation, retired
Michael Daniels, Columbus State University
Larry Dann, University of Oregon
Lawrence S. Davidson, Indiana University
Joseph DeSalvo, University of South Florida, Tampa
Allan DeSerpa, Arizona State University
Bob DeYoung, University of Kansas School of Business
Gregg Dimkoff , Grand Valley State University
Floyd H. Duncan, Virginia Military Institute
James Dunlevy, Miami University
Gerald Dwyer, Dwyer Economics
John Eckalbar, California State University, Chico
John Egger, Towson University
Jeffrey Eisenach, George Mason University Scalia Law School
Richard Ericson, East Carolina University
Molly Espey, Clemson University
Mel Evans, Hopkinsville Community College
Dorla Evans, University of Alabama, Huntsville
Eugene Fama, University of Chicago
W. Ken Farr, Georgia College and State University
Michael Faulkender, University of Maryland
Susan Feigenbaum, University of Missouri, St. Louis
Garry Fleming, Roanoke College
Christopher Flinn, New York University
Harold Flint, Montclair State University, retired
Ralph Frasca, University of Dayton
Gary French, Nathan Associates Inc.
Diana Furchtgott-Roth, Manhattan Institute for Policy Research
Dave Garthoff, The University of Akron
Robert Genetski, Classicalprinciples.com
Moheb Ghali, Western Washington University
Joseph Giacalone, St. John’s University
Adam Gifford Jr., California State University
David Gillette, Truman State University
Otis W. Gilley, Louisiana Tech University
William Glade, University of Texas at Austin
Rodolfo A. Gonzalez, San Jose State University
Lawrence Goodman, Bergen County, NJ
Daniel Graham, Duke University
J. Edward Graham, University of North Carolina, Wilmington
Phil Gramm, former U.S. Senator, Texas
Wendy Gramm, Mercatus Center, retired
Richard Grant, Lipscomb University
Anthony Greco, University of Louisiana, Lafayette
Kenneth Greene, Binghamton University
Thomas Gresik, University of Notre Dame
Earl Grinols, Baylor University
Noreen Haas-Lephardt, Marquette University
R. W. Hafer, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville
Simon Hakim, Temple University
Thomas Hall, Miami University
Gerald A. Hanweck, George Mason University
Stephen Happel, Arizona State University
Scott Harrington, University of Pennsylvania
Lydia Harris, Goucher College
William R. Hart, Miami University
Joseph Haslag, University of Missouri
John Haslem, University of Maryland
Janice A. Hauge, University of North Texas
Arthur Havenner, University of California, Davis
Daniel Heath, Georgetown University Law Center
Scott Hein, Texas Tech University
John Helmuth, University of Michigan, Flint
James Henderson, Baylor University
Jesse Hill, Tarrant County College
John Hoehn, Michigan State University
Gregory Hoelscher, Blue Stripe Investors, LLC
Arlene Holen, former Associate Director, Congressional Budget Office
Douglas Holtz-Eakin, former Director, Congressional Budget Office
Charles L. Hooper, Objective Insights, Inc.
William Hosek, California State University, Northridge
Forrest Huffman, Temple University
Ed Ireland, Texas Christian University
Thomas R. Ireland, University of Missouri at St. Louis
Austin Jaffe, Pennsylvania State University
Mark Jamison, University of Florida
Shane Johnson, Texas A&M University
Dennis Johnson, University of South Dakota
Richard Just, University of Maryland
Alexander Katkov, Johnson & Wales University
Michael S. Kaylen, University of Missouri
Barry Keating, University of Notre Dame
David Kendall, University of Virginia
Richard Kilmer, University of Florida
Charles Knoeber, North Carolina State University
Don Koch, former Senior Vice President, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
Larry Kudlow
Arthur B. Laffer, Laffer Associates
William Laird, Florida State University
Deepak Lal, UCLA
Nicholas Lash, Loyola University Chicago
Don Leet, California State University, Fresno
Norman Lefton, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville
Kenneth Lehn, University of Pittsburgh
Jim Leiby, University of Maine
David Leonard, Miami University of Ohio
Stan Liebowitz, University of Texas, Dallas
Dean R. Lillard, Ohio State University
Christopher Lingle, Ph.D. in economics, University of Georgia
Jody Lipford, Presbyterian College
Luis Locay, University of Miami
Dennis E. Logue, Tuck School at Dartmouth College
John R. Lott Jr., Crime Prevention Research Center
Timothy Loughran, University of Notre Dame
Donald L. Luskin, TrendMacro
R. Ashley Lyman, University of Idaho
Billy Lynn, St. Ambrose University, Davenport, IA
Glenn MacDonald, Washington University in St. Louis
Maurice MacDonald, Kansas State University
Keith Malone, University of North Alabama
David Malpass, Encima Global
Yuri Maltsev, Carthage College
Michael L. Marlow, Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo
Noralyn Marshall, Risk Management Advisors
Paul Mason, McMurry University
Timothy Mathews, Kennesaw State University
John Matsusaka, University of Southern California
Thomas Mayor, University of Houston
John McArthur, Wofford College
W. Douglas McMillin, Louisiana State University
William L. Megginson, University of Oklahoma
Roger Meiners, University of Texas at Arlington
John Merrifield, University of Texas, San Antonio
Steven C. Michael, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign
J. Edgar Mihelic, Community Support Services
James Miller III, former Director, Office of Management and Budget
James D. Miller, Smith College
Chandra Mishra, Florida Atlantic University
Ron Moomaw, Oklahoma State University
Steve Moore, FreedomWorks
John C. Moorhouse, Wake Forest University
Barry Morris, University of North Alabama
Frank Murray, University of Minnesota
Robert J. Newman, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge
Lilian Ng, Schulich School of Business, York University
Robert D. Niehaus, Robert D. Niehaus, Inc.
Edd Noell, Westmont College
David J. Nye, University of Florida
Jim O'Neill, University of Delaware
June O'Neill, former Director, Congressional Budget Office
Lydia Ortega, San Jose State University
Dale Osborne, University of Texas
Donald Oswald, California State University, Bakersfield
Walton Padelford, Union University
Richard Palfin, Economic Analysis
Charles Parekh, Duff & Phelps
Stephen Parente, University of Minnesota
Randall Parker, East Carolina University
Douglas Patterson, Virginia Tech
Judd Patton, Bellevue University
G. Michael Phillips, California State University, Northridge
Ivan Pongracic, Hillsdale College
Arturo Porzecanski, American University
Barry Poulson, University of Colorado Boulder
James Prieger, Pepperdine University
R. L. Promboin, University of Maryland University College
Gary Quinlivan, Saint Vincent College
Richard W. Rahn, Institute for Global Economic Growth
David Ranson, H. C. Wainwright & Co. Economics Inc.
Eric Rasmusen, Indiana University
James Refalo, California State University, Los Angeles
Jon Reisman, University of Maine at Machias
Mark William Rider, Georgia State University
Christine Ries, Georgia Institute of Technology
Mario Rizzo, New York University
Nancy Roberts, Arizona State University
M. Christopher Roebuck, RxEconomics LLC
Philip Romero, University of Oregon
Steven S. Rosefielde, UNC, Chapel Hill
Larry Ross, University of Alaska Anchorage
Timothy Roth, University of Texas at El Paso
Jack Rowe, University of South Florida
Paul Rubin, Emory University
Roy J. Ruffin, University of Houston
Tony Rufolo, Portland State University
John Ruggiero, University of Dayton
Philip Jay Rushing, University of Illinois
Don Sabbarese, Kennesaw State University
Joseph Salerno, Pace University
Anthony Sanders, George Mason University
Jonathan Sandy, University of San Diego
Robert Sauer, University of Bristol
Thomas Saving, Texas A&M University
Paul Schultz, University of Notre Dame
John Seater, North Carolina State University
Barry Seldon, Florida State University
Sherrill Shaffer, University of Wyoming
Dennis Sheehan, Penn State University, Smeal College of Business
Judy Shelton, Atlas Economic Research Foundation
Ann Sherman, DePaul University
Stephen Shmanske, California State University, East Bay
Don Siegel, University at Albany, SUNY
Evangelos Otto Simos, University of New Hampshire
Timothy F. Slaper, Indiana Business Research Center
Richard L. Smith, University of California, Riverside
Ted Snyder, Yale School of Management
Donald Snyder, Utah State University
Lawrence Southwick, University at Buffalo
Frank Spreng, McKendree University
Brad Stamm, Cornerstone University
Robert Stauffer, Roanoke College
Thomas Stoker, MIT
Bernell Stone, Brigham Young University
Joe Stone, University of Oregon
Michael Sullivan, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Richard Sweeney, Georgetown University
Robert Tamura, Clemson University
T. Craig Tapley, University of Florida
Jason Taylor, Central Michigan University
Timothy Terrell, Wofford College
Rebecca Thacker, Ohio University
Clifford Thies, Shenandoah University
Henry Thompson, Auburn University
David G. Tuerck, Suffolk University
David Tufte, Southern Utah University
Carl J. Ullrich, James Madison University
Richard Vedder, Ohio University
Hrishikesh Vinod, Fordham University
Donald Walker, Indiana University of PA
Sherri Wall, University of Alaska Fairbanks
Alan Rufus Waters, California State University, Fresno
Andrew Weintraub, Temple University
Robert Whaples, Wake Forest University
J. Gregg Whittaker, William Jewell College
Elliott Willman, New Mexico State University
Lonny Wilson, William Penn University
Michael Wohlgenant, North Carolina State University
Arthur Woolf, University of Vermont
Gene Wunder, Washburn University
Sheng Xiao, Westminster College
Bill Yang, Georgia Southern University
Nancy Bord Yonge, Heritage Foundation, Hoover Institution and MicroCapital Institute
Frank Zahn, University of Nebraska at Omaha
Mokhlis Y. Zaki, Northern Michigan University, retired
John Zdanowicz, Florida International University
Jerry Zimmerman, Univeristy of Rochester
Joseph Zoric, Franciscan University of Steubenville
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/presidential-campaign/297719-economists-have-a-message-clintons-policies-are
http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2016/09/26/orlando-jihadi-new-911-transcripts-alludes-ramadan-fasted-whole-day-prayed/
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeo-lTZCqF9xH0jzgyswoilG-Y8QWKPQLBTkldFsUPrCIVm6g/viewanalytics?usp=form_confirm
http://bbs.wenxuecity.com/currentevent/870247.html
另：到底几个直播讨论帖？我在3个底下都发言了。汗~~~
他今天挺好的哈。
其实我觉得川普今天表现中规中矩，情绪控制的挺好，没有给猪党很多小辫子抓，希拉里言之无物，没有可信力
https://gop.com/clintons-top-5-lies-of-the-night/
Birther conspiracy theory. Holt never asked Clinton about her past record of racist statements, including her “super-predator” remarks as First Lady, or her explicit appeal to “white Americans” in her 2008 primary campaign against Obama. Yet he asked Trump about the Birther conspiracy theory and cast it as racist.
Stop-and-frisk. After an exchange between the candidates over the policy of “stop-and-frisk,” Holt interjected to bolster Clinton’s point by stating, erroneously, that stop-and-frisk had ended in New York because it had been declared unconstitutional by a court. Trump countered, correctly, that the new mayor had canceled the policy before the litigation was over.
“A presidential look.” Towards the end of the debate, Holt asked Trump about what he meant by saying Hillary Clinton did not have “a presidential look.” He did so after noting that Clinton had become “the first woman” to be nominated for president by a major political party, thus setting Trump up as a sexist. As Trump answered, Holt interrupted him, then gave Clinton a chance to respond with her talking points about Trump’s past comments on women.
Iraq War. The question of whether Trump supported the Iraq War or not has been widely debated. What is beyond doubt is that Hillary Clinton voted for it. Holt only represented one side of the debate about Trump, and never asked Clinton about her own vote.
30 mins ·
Thank you Senator Ted Cruz!
Ted Cruz
1 hr ·
Facebook Mentions
·
Tonight, a clear contrast was drawn between the two nominees. Tonight, Hillary Clinton made it clearer than ever that if elected President, our future will continue on the same path that is hurting millions of Americans.
If Clinton is elected, we know that the havoc Obamacare is wreaking on American families, on small businesses, and on our healthcare system will continue. We know that President Obama’s relentless efforts to crush the oil and gas industry and to wage war on coal will continue. We know that the Obama administration’s willful blindness to radical Islamic terrorism and the influx of unvetted refugees from nations infiltrated by terrorists will continue. We know that President Obama’s lawless executive amnesty will continue and even expand.
If Clinton is elected, we know that a liberal justice will be named to fill Scalia’s seat and we will lose the Supreme Court for a generation. With that, we know for a certainty that our right to keep and bear arms, our religious liberty and federalism are in danger.
Tonight we received insight into what a Hillary Clinton presidency would look like for Americans. We know that her policies would kill jobs, reduce wages, and continue the downward spiral our country has endured under President Obama.
Tonight, Donald Trump had his strongest debate performance of the election cycle. He drew strong contrasts with Hillary on taxes, regulations, law and order, and the disastrous Iran deal.
Rather than Hillary's America, we need to take a different path. A path that would begin to restore our country from the damage it has suffered the last eight years. We need to unite to defend freedom and restore the Constitution. And Hillary Clinton made absolutely clear tonight she would not do so.
赞同～～～～～～～～～
这才更像OUTSIDER
和我的感觉一样。好些地方攻击力稀拉拉的弱点。
The ref not only made himself part of the game on Monday night, he ran up to the scrimmage line, then sacked the quarterback three times.
In the early going, it looked like it was going to be an ideal, Jim Lehrer-style performance from Lester Holt, the NBC Nightly News anchor. Lehrer was so boringly nonpartisan, so unwilling to play gotcha that he was always hotly in demand to moderate debates. For the first half or so, Holt gave simple, broad, open-ended questions and let the candidates go at it. He didn’t venture into live fact-checking, didn’t much quarrel with the nominees, didn’t ask
persnickety questions.
For the most part, Holt asked the kinds of basic questions that gave Hillary Clinton and Trump plenty of opportunities to repeat favored talking points: what would you do to pump some life into the job market? How would you heal the race divide? Are police biased against minorities? What’s your policy on homegrown terrorist attacks?
But in the last half of the show, Holt started going after Trump. He got into an unfortunate bickering match with the Republican nominee over the latter’s (apparently offhand) support for the Iraq War in a 2002 Howard Stern interview. It was perfectly reasonable to bring up the point, but the exchange became tiresome on both sides, with the two men talking past each other. Holt would have been wiser to simply say, “In 2002, you told Howard Stern you supported the Iraq War. Tonight you say you didn’t. Can you explain?” Arguing with Trump is Clinton’s job, not Holt’s.
Trump’s birther argle-bargle is something the media have shown far too much interest in given its relative non-importance, but it was also fair of Holt to give Trump a chance to put the question to rest in front of a large audience. Trump bungled the opportunity, but it was hardly an unfair topic to bring up given that questioning President Obama’s birthplace is how Trump became a national political figure in the first place, and given that Trump made a circus out of the matter just 10 days earlier.
Still, having put Trump on the hot seat on a couple of questions, and giving no such pushback to Clinton, Holt then got into a third tug-of-war with the GOP standard-bearer, demanding that Trump answer for his remark that Clinton didn’t have “the look” of a president.
When Trump tried to change the subject to stamina, Holt (and then Clinton) pressed the point.
So Holt’s questions were fair game, but it’s not the case that Clinton has nothing to be embarrassed about either. Holt might have questioned her about, for instance, the role she played in arranging the sale of American uranium assets to Russia after Clinton and her foundation accepted large checks from shady intermediaries. He might have noted that she was chided by the FBI for her reckless mishandling of classified information, or that she put sensitive national security information on a server, less secure than Gmail, that could easily be hacked by the Russians. He could have asked her whether she could be trusted about her health given that she apparently wasn’t going to tell the public she had pneumonia until she collapsed on 9/11 (and even then stonewalled for hours).
True, Hillary Clinton has answered a lot of these kinds of questions before, but the not in front of a huge national audience. For Holt to allow her to get away with saying, “”It was a mistake” on her usage of email doesn’t cut it, not from a guy who was willing to hammer Trump on a remark like “I just don’t think she has a presidential look.”
http://nypost.com/2016/09/26/lester-holt-shows-he-doesnt-know-the-meaning-of-impartial/
26% of the respondents who participated in tonight's survey identified themselves as Republicans, 41% identified themselves as Democrats,
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/09/26/clinton-scores-by-staying-on-offense-trump-by-sticking-to-serious-issues.html
JOHN H. SUNUNU ENDORSES DONALD J. TRUMP
Former New Hampshire Governor, Chief of Staff To President George H.W. Bush Backs Trump-Pence Ticket
“Donald Trump is the only candidate in this race who can bring bold change to Washington D.C. I support the Trump-Pence ticket for their pro-growth agenda and commitment to protecting American interests. Republicans, Independents and smart Democrats need to come together to elect Donald Trump and Mike Pence.” – Governor John H. Sununu
http://lamecherry.huaren.us/2016/09/how-hillary-clinton-was-fed-information.html?m=1