Donald Trump Tuesday responded to President Barack Obama's attacks by describing him as "a failed leader who along with Secretary of State Clinton created a foreign policy that has destabilized the world and made it an unsafe place."
"He is the one who is unfit to be president and Hillary Clinton is equally unfit," Trump said in a statement issued after Obama charged in a White House news conference that the Republican nominee was "unfit" and "woefully unprepared" to be president.
Obama also challenged GOP lawmakers to drop their support for their party's nominee, declaring "There has to come a point at which you say enough."
However, Trump hit back quickly, linking the president and Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton.
"Obama-Clinton have single-handedly destabilized the Middle East, handed Iraq, Libya and Syria to ISIS, and allowed our personnel to be slaughtered at Benghazi," he said. "Then, they put Iran on the path to nuclear weapons.
"Then they allowed dozens of veterans to die waiting for medical care that never came. Hillary Clinton put the whole country at risk with her illegal email server, deleted evidence of her crime, and lied repeatedly about her conduct, which endangered us all.
"They released criminal aliens into our country who killed one innocent American after another — like Sarah Root and Kate Steinle — and have repeatedly admitted migrants later implicated in terrorism," Trump continued.
Root, 21, was killed by a drunk driver from Honduras in Omaha, Nebraska, in January. Steinle, 32, was gunned down in July 2015 by a Mexican immigrant while walking on a San Francisco pier with her father.
"They have produced the worst recovery since the Great Depression," Trump said of Obama and Clinton.
"They have shipped millions of our best jobs overseas to appease their global special interests. They have betrayed our security and our workers, and Hillary Clinton has proven herself unfit to serve in any government office."
"She is reckless with her emails, reckless with regime change, and reckless with American lives," he continued. "Our nation has been humiliated abroad and compromised by radical Islam brought onto our shores.
ZT：米犹媒体把川普对奥黑的反击都撤下来了。。。 刚刚还看到，一会儿就没有了。。。 Donald Trump Tuesday responded to President Barack Obama's attacks by describing him as "a failed leader who along with Secretary of State Clinton created a foreign policy that has destabilized the world and made it an unsafe place." "He is the one who is unfit to be president and Hillary Clinton is equally unfit," Trump said in a statement issued after Obama charged in a White House news conference that the Republican nominee was "unfit" and "woefully unprepared" to be president. Obama also challenged GOP lawmakers to drop their support for their party's nominee, declaring "There has to come a point at which you say enough." However, Trump hit back quickly, linking the president and Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. "Obama-Clinton have single-handedly destabilized the Middle East, handed Iraq, Libya and Syria to ISIS, and allowed our personnel to be slaughtered at Benghazi," he said. "Then, they put Iran on the path to nuclear weapons. "Then they allowed dozens of veterans to die waiting for medical care that never came. Hillary Clinton put the whole country at risk with her illegal email server, deleted evidence of her crime, and lied repeatedly about her conduct, which endangered us all. "They released criminal aliens into our country who killed one innocent American after another — like Sarah Root and Kate Steinle — and have repeatedly admitted migrants later implicated in terrorism," Trump continued. Root, 21, was killed by a drunk driver from Honduras in Omaha, Nebraska, in January. Steinle, 32, was gunned down in July 2015 by a Mexican immigrant while walking on a San Francisco pier with her father. "They have produced the worst recovery since the Great Depression," Trump said of Obama and Clinton. "They have shipped millions of our best jobs overseas to appease their global special interests. They have betrayed our security and our workers, and Hillary Clinton has proven herself unfit to serve in any government office." "She is reckless with her emails, reckless with regime change, and reckless with American lives," he continued. "Our nation has been humiliated abroad and compromised by radical Islam brought onto our shores. "We need change now."
Heads roll at DNC: 3 top officials out after email hack
The Democratic National Committee’s CEO and two other top officials have resigned in the wake of the leaked email controversy that marred the start of the party’s convention last week – in the latest shake-up at party headquarters.
STATEMENT FROM CHARLES WOODS, FATHER OF BENGHAZI HERO TYRONE WOODS
(New York, NY) August 2nd, 2016 - Today Donald J. Trump received the endorsement of Charles Woods the father of Tyrone Woods, a former Navy SEAL, who gave his life fighting to protect Americans during the terror attacks on the U.S. consulate and the CIA compound in Benghazi. Ty’s sacrifice saved more than twenty-five American lives, and he is truly an American hero.
Mr. Woods chose to endorse Mr. Trump stating, “I support Donald Trump, and the main reason is national security as well as the economy are the two most important issues that voters are going to have to decide upon next November.”
Hillary Clinton's poor judgment led to these tragic deaths in Libya. First, her reckless decision to invade Libya unleashed radical Islamic terror groups that threatened Americans. Compounded with her failure to provide the necessary security upgrades and reinforcements cost four Americans their lives. After it all, she lied to the world about what happened to cover up the role of Radical Islam. We could have known more about her actions, but she illegally stored and then deleted 33,000 emails.
Mr. Trump stated, “Tyrone Woods is an American hero and his father is a tremendous person whom I have great respect for. His support is so important to me. Together we are going to defeat Hillary Clinton in November and make America safe again.”
现在的媒体确实卑鄙，除了少数外。今天在车上听local电台说，“o8说川普unfit to be president, 那他竞选时有那些资格呢？” 然后给出这样的答案，“He was only qualified to make speeches". 我听得很过瘾，很开心。如果受众多一点就好了！希望多一点这样有良知的媒体。
U.S. Sent Cash to Iran as Americans Were Freed http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-sent-cash-to-iran-as-americans-were-freed-1470181874 The Obama administration secretly organized an airlift of $400 million worth of cash to Iran that coincided with the January release of four Americans detained in Tehran, according to U.S. and European officials and congressional staff briefed on the operation afterward.
The $400 million was paid in foreign currency because any transaction with Iran in U.S. dollars is illegal under U.S. law. Sanctions also complicate Tehran’s access to global banks. ====We are not allowed to pay ransoms. It is against the law. A terrible precedent! ===No other president has ever paid a terrorist country for the release of our Soldiers. ==there was a prohibition against USA paying ransom money. Does this mean that Obama and his cohorts lied (again) to the American public?
Khizr Khan Believes the Constitution ‘Must Always Be Subordinated to the Sharia’ by PAUL SPERRY2 Aug 2016
Notwithstanding his war-hero son’s genuinely patriotic example, Khizr M. Khan has published papers supporting the supremacy of Islamic law over “man -made” Western law — including the very Constitution he championed in his Democratic National Convention speech attacking GOP presidential nod Donald Trump.
In 1983, for example, Khan wrote a glowing review of a book compiled from a seminar held in Kuwait called “Human Rights In Islam” in which he singles out for praise the keynote address of fellow Pakistani Allah K. Brohi, a pro -jihad Islamic jurist who was one of the closest advisers to late Pakistani dictator Gen. Zia ul-Haq, the father of the Taliban movement.
Khan speaks admiringly of Brohi’s interpretation of human rights, even though it included the right to kill and mutilate those who violate Islamic laws and even the right of men to “beat” wives who act “unseemly.”
As Pakistani minister of law and religious affairs, Brohi helped create hundreds of jihadi incubators called madrassas and restored Sharia punishments, such as amputations for theft and demands that rape victims produce four male witnesses or face adultery charges. He also made insulting the Muslim prophet Muhammad a crime punishable by death. To speed the Islamization of Pakistan, he and Zia issued a law that required judges to consult mullahs on every judicial decision for Sharia compliance.
Khan, who says he immigrated to the U.S. in 1980 to escape Pakistan’s “ military rule,” nonetheless spoke admiringly of Brohi in his review of his speech. He praised his remarks even though Brohi advocated for the enforcement of the medieval Sharia punishments, known as “hudood” ( singular “hadd”), that were later adopted and carried out with brutal efficiency by the Taliban in neighboring Afghanistan.
“Divinely ordained punishments have to be inflicted,” Brohi asserted, “ and there is very little option for the judge called upon to impose Hadd, if facts and circumstances are established that the Hadd in question has been transgressed, to refuse to impose the punishment.”
Of course, such cruel and unusual Sharia punishments, ranging from stonings and floggings to beheadings, would be a flagrant violation of the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution.
Western society is built on individualism and secularism, concepts enshrined in the Constitution. But Brohi scoffs at them, arguing, “The individual has to be sacrificed. Collectivity has a special sanctity attached to it in Islam.”
Brohi goes on to argue that human rights bestowed by Islam include the right of men to “beat” their wives.
“The best statement of the human rights is also to be found in the address delivered by the prophet [Muhammad] so often described as his last address, ” Brohi said, quoting: “ ‘You have rights over your wives and they have rights over you. You have the right that they should not defile your bed and that they should not behave with open unseemliness. If they do, God allows you to put them in separate rooms and to beat them but not with severity.’ ”
In his book review, Khan takes no issue with Brohi’s shocking interpretation of human rights. In fact, he claims Brohi “successfully” explains them and argues his points “convincingly.” (The review, which lists Khan as “director” of an Islamic center in Houston, was published in the Texas International Law Journal.)
“The keynote speech of Dr. A.K. Brohi, former Pakistani minister of legal and religious affairs, is a hallmark in this book,” Khan writes. “It successfully explains the Islamic concepts of ‘right’ and ‘just’ in comparison to their Christian and Judaic counterparts.”
Adds Khan: “Brohi argues convincingly for the establishment of a moral value system before guarantees can be given for any kind of rights. To illustrate the point he notes, ‘There is no such thing as human right in the abstract.’”
In other words, Khan concurs that human rights can only be guaranteed through the establishment of Sharia’s moral and legal code.
Khan provides his own advocacy for Sharia law in a separate academic paper titled “Juristic Classification of Islamic Law,” which he also wrote in 1983, while studying in Saudi Arabia.
“The invariable and basic rules of Islamic law are only those prescribed in the Shari’ah,” Khan writes. “All other juridical works… must always be subordinated to the Shari’ah.”
He explains that Sharia is derived from the Quran and Sunnah, and that the Quran “is the absolute authority from which springs the very conception of legality and every legal obligation.”
Khan then notes that Quranic law includes “constitutional law.”
“Family law is laid down in 70 injunctions; civil law in another 70; penal law in 30; jurisdiction and procedure in 13; constitutional law in 10; international relations in 25; and economic and financial order in 10,” he said.
Khan defers to an early Islamic jurist who ruled: “For every issue concerning a Muslim, either there is a binding text (of the Shariah) that rules it, or there is a guidance that may indicate the way to truth. If there is a text, then the Muslim has to follow it.”
A devout Muslim, Khan also cites two radical Muslim Brotherhood figures as scholarly sources — Said Ramadan and Muhammad Hamidullah.
Though described by the Clinton camp and media as a “Pakistani-American lawyer,” less known is Khan’s an acknowledged expert on Sharia law doctrine. His 13-page article, which was published in the Houston Journal of International Law, has been cited in dozens of Islamic law articles and has been used in college syllabi for Islamic law courses as recently as 2013.
By comparison, his expertise in American constitutional law is barely evident. In fact, there appears to be few if any legal citations in federal or state court records for Khan, who describes himself on his business website (removed Tuesday from the Internet) as “attorney at law.”
Even so, Khan questioned Trump’s understanding of the Constitution, calling him “ignorant” and suggesting that if he had studied it he would never propose imposing a temporary ban on Muslim immigration to protect the nation from ISIS and other terrorist infiltrators.
“Let me ask you: have you even read the United States Constitution? I will gladly lend you my copy,” a visibly angry Khan bellowed, while waving a pamphlet version in the air.
It’s not immediately clear if Khan has ever repudiated his earlier support for the anti-Constitutional principles of Sharia law. Searches turn up no subsequent writings or statements to that effect. Attempts to reach Khan by phone and email were unsuccessful.
For now, the most patriotic Muslim in America, according to media myth- making, remains Khizr Muazzam Khan, the father of a fallen American soldier who claims to hold the Constitution so dear he keeps a copy in his breast pocket.
But what does he really believe? His Islamist writings offer a window into his ideological thinking — and the view is a contradictory and highly disturbing one, especially in light of the fanfare he has received.
Paul Sperry is a former Hoover Institution media fellow and author of Infiltration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives Have Penetrated Washington.
[quote]U.S. Sent Cash to Iran as Americans Were Freed [url=http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-sent-cash-to-iran-as-americans-were-freed-1470181874]http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-sent-cash-to-iran-as-am...... AngelBeibei 发表于 8/2/2016 11:54:30 PM
Make America Great Again这个口号之所以在进步主义者听来格外冒犯，原因之一是过去几十年进步主义的潜在主题是America Was Never Great。当前学术研究基本共识是这个所谓America的建立基础是奴隶制帝国主义，怎么可能有什么Great可言呢？-------------------------------看到一个推上的发言，就明白白左研究界的共识就是自恨！他们的代表人物差不多就跟奥巴马妈妈一个样，为自己生为白人而感到对不起全世界，然后让自己成为全体白人的代言人（其实大多数白人没叫他们做代表）
Trump refuses to support Paul Ryan, John McCain in upcoming Republican primaries https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-refuses-to-endorse-paul-ryan-in-gop-primary-im-just-not-quite-there-yet/2016/08/02/1449f028-58e9-11e6-831d-0324760ca856_story.html Trump said that Ryan has sought his endorsement
HILARY CLINTON LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE
HILARY FOR PRISON
08不是出来说要共和党撤销川普嘛，08真以为自己是皇上了？？？这家伙是变相的帮助川普吧，不知道自己的话会起反作用吗。
刚刚还看到，一会儿就没有了。。。
Donald Trump Tuesday responded to President Barack Obama's attacks by
describing him as "a failed leader who along with Secretary of State Clinton
created a foreign policy that has destabilized the world and made it an
unsafe place."
"He is the one who is unfit to be president and Hillary Clinton is equally
unfit," Trump said in a statement issued after Obama charged in a White
House news conference that the Republican nominee was "unfit" and "woefully
unprepared" to be president.
Obama also challenged GOP lawmakers to drop their support for their party's
nominee, declaring "There has to come a point at which you say enough."
However, Trump hit back quickly, linking the president and Democratic
nominee Hillary Clinton.
"Obama-Clinton have single-handedly destabilized the Middle East, handed
Iraq, Libya and Syria to ISIS, and allowed our personnel to be slaughtered
at Benghazi," he said. "Then, they put Iran on the path to nuclear weapons.
"Then they allowed dozens of veterans to die waiting for medical care that
never came. Hillary Clinton put the whole country at risk with her illegal
email server, deleted evidence of her crime, and lied repeatedly about her
conduct, which endangered us all.
"They released criminal aliens into our country who killed one innocent
American after another — like Sarah Root and Kate Steinle — and have
repeatedly admitted migrants later implicated in terrorism," Trump continued.
Root, 21, was killed by a drunk driver from Honduras in Omaha, Nebraska, in
January. Steinle, 32, was gunned down in July 2015 by a Mexican immigrant
while walking on a San Francisco pier with her father.
"They have produced the worst recovery since the Great Depression," Trump
said of Obama and Clinton.
"They have shipped millions of our best jobs overseas to appease their
global special interests. They have betrayed our security and our workers,
and Hillary Clinton has proven herself unfit to serve in any government
office."
"She is reckless with her emails, reckless with regime change, and reckless
with American lives," he continued. "Our nation has been humiliated abroad
and compromised by radical Islam brought onto our shores.
"We need change now."
http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/trump-obama-unfit/2016/08/02/id/741801/
http://prntly.com/2016/07/30/july-poll-nehlen-is-beating-ryan-in-the-wisconsin-open-primary-in-2-weeks-video/ Paul Ryan: 41% Paul Nehlen: 46%
人这儿子是真正的英雄,他爸爸站出来发公开信支持Trump, 比那个穆斯林老头强多了,他儿子是在一次穆斯林式自杀是袭击中身亡,并非在战斗中阵亡
媒体没人发的，他们只会发不利于川普的
Heads roll at DNC: 3 top officials out after email hack
The Democratic National Committee’s CEO and two other top officials have resigned in the wake of the leaked email controversy that marred the start of the party’s convention last week – in the latest shake-up at party headquarters.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/08/02/heads-roll-at-dnc-3-top-officials-out-after-email-hack.html
(New York, NY) August 2nd, 2016 - Today Donald J. Trump received the endorsement of Charles Woods the father of Tyrone Woods, a former Navy SEAL, who gave his life fighting to protect Americans during the terror attacks on the U.S. consulate and the CIA compound in Benghazi. Ty’s sacrifice saved more than twenty-five American lives, and he is truly an American hero.
Mr. Woods chose to endorse Mr. Trump stating, “I support Donald Trump, and the main reason is national security as well as the economy are the two most important issues that voters are going to have to decide upon next November.”
Hillary Clinton's poor judgment led to these tragic deaths in Libya. First, her reckless decision to invade Libya unleashed radical Islamic terror groups that threatened Americans. Compounded with her failure to provide the necessary security upgrades and reinforcements cost four Americans their lives. After it all, she lied to the world about what happened to cover up the role of Radical Islam. We could have known more about her actions, but she illegally stored and then deleted 33,000 emails.
Mr. Trump stated, “Tyrone Woods is an American hero and his father is a tremendous person whom I have great respect for. His support is so important to me. Together we are going to defeat Hillary Clinton in November and make America safe again.”
虚伪双标胡搅蛮缠是左党的一贯作风
http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-sent-cash-to-iran-as-americans-were-freed-1470181874
The Obama administration secretly organized an airlift of $400 million worth of cash to Iran that coincided with the January release of four Americans detained in Tehran, according to U.S. and European officials and congressional staff briefed on the operation afterward.
The $400 million was paid in foreign currency because any transaction with Iran in U.S. dollars is illegal under U.S. law. Sanctions also complicate Tehran’s access to global banks.
====We are not allowed to pay ransoms. It is against the law. A terrible precedent!
===No other president has ever paid a terrorist country for the release of our Soldiers.
==there was a prohibition against USA paying ransom money. Does this mean that Obama and his cohorts lied (again) to the American public?
Khizr Khan Believes the Constitution ‘Must Always Be Subordinated to the Sharia’
by PAUL SPERRY2 Aug 2016
Notwithstanding his war-hero son’s genuinely patriotic example, Khizr M.
Khan has published papers supporting the supremacy of Islamic law over “man
-made” Western law — including the very Constitution he championed in his
Democratic National Convention speech attacking GOP presidential nod Donald
Trump.
In 1983, for example, Khan wrote a glowing review of a book compiled from a
seminar held in Kuwait called “Human Rights In Islam” in which he singles
out for praise the keynote address of fellow Pakistani Allah K. Brohi, a pro
-jihad Islamic jurist who was one of the closest advisers to late Pakistani
dictator Gen. Zia ul-Haq, the father of the Taliban movement.
Khan speaks admiringly of Brohi’s interpretation of human rights, even
though it included the right to kill and mutilate those who violate Islamic
laws and even the right of men to “beat” wives who act “unseemly.”
As Pakistani minister of law and religious affairs, Brohi helped create
hundreds of jihadi incubators called madrassas and restored Sharia
punishments, such as amputations for theft and demands that rape victims
produce four male witnesses or face adultery charges. He also made insulting
the Muslim prophet Muhammad a crime punishable by death. To speed the
Islamization of Pakistan, he and Zia issued a law that required judges to
consult mullahs on every judicial decision for Sharia compliance.
Khan, who says he immigrated to the U.S. in 1980 to escape Pakistan’s “
military rule,” nonetheless spoke admiringly of Brohi in his review of his
speech. He praised his remarks even though Brohi advocated for the
enforcement of the medieval Sharia punishments, known as “hudood” (
singular “hadd”), that were later adopted and carried out with brutal
efficiency by the Taliban in neighboring Afghanistan.
“Divinely ordained punishments have to be inflicted,” Brohi asserted, “
and there is very little option for the judge called upon to impose Hadd, if
facts and circumstances are established that the Hadd in question has been
transgressed, to refuse to impose the punishment.”
Of course, such cruel and unusual Sharia punishments, ranging from stonings
and floggings to beheadings, would be a flagrant violation of the Eighth
Amendment of the United States Constitution.
Western society is built on individualism and secularism, concepts enshrined
in the Constitution. But Brohi scoffs at them, arguing, “The individual
has to be sacrificed. Collectivity has a special sanctity attached to it in
Islam.”
Brohi goes on to argue that human rights bestowed by Islam include the right
of men to “beat” their wives.
“The best statement of the human rights is also to be found in the address
delivered by the prophet [Muhammad] so often described as his last address,
” Brohi said, quoting: “ ‘You have rights over your wives and they have
rights over you. You have the right that they should not defile your bed and
that they should not behave with open unseemliness. If they do, God allows
you to put them in separate rooms and to beat them but not with severity.’ ”
In his book review, Khan takes no issue with Brohi’s shocking
interpretation of human rights. In fact, he claims Brohi “successfully”
explains them and argues his points “convincingly.” (The review, which
lists Khan as “director” of an Islamic center in Houston, was published in
the Texas International Law Journal.)
“The keynote speech of Dr. A.K. Brohi, former Pakistani minister of legal
and religious affairs, is a hallmark in this book,” Khan writes. “It
successfully explains the Islamic concepts of ‘right’ and ‘just’ in
comparison to their Christian and Judaic counterparts.”
Adds Khan: “Brohi argues convincingly for the establishment of a moral
value system before guarantees can be given for any kind of rights. To
illustrate the point he notes, ‘There is no such thing as human right in
the abstract.’”
In other words, Khan concurs that human rights can only be guaranteed
through the establishment of Sharia’s moral and legal code.
Khan provides his own advocacy for Sharia law in a separate academic paper
titled “Juristic Classification of Islamic Law,” which he also wrote in
1983, while studying in Saudi Arabia.
“The invariable and basic rules of Islamic law are only those prescribed in
the Shari’ah,” Khan writes. “All other juridical works… must always be
subordinated to the Shari’ah.”
He explains that Sharia is derived from the Quran and Sunnah, and that the
Quran “is the absolute authority from which springs the very conception of
legality and every legal obligation.”
Khan then notes that Quranic law includes “constitutional law.”
“Family law is laid down in 70 injunctions; civil law in another 70; penal
law in 30; jurisdiction and procedure in 13; constitutional law in 10;
international relations in 25; and economic and financial order in 10,” he
said.
Khan defers to an early Islamic jurist who ruled: “For every issue
concerning a Muslim, either there is a binding text (of the Shariah) that
rules it, or there is a guidance that may indicate the way to truth. If
there is a text, then the Muslim has to follow it.”
A devout Muslim, Khan also cites two radical Muslim Brotherhood figures as
scholarly sources — Said Ramadan and Muhammad Hamidullah.
Though described by the Clinton camp and media as a “Pakistani-American
lawyer,” less known is Khan’s an acknowledged expert on Sharia law
doctrine. His 13-page article, which was published in the Houston Journal of
International Law, has been cited in dozens of Islamic law articles and has
been used in college syllabi for Islamic law courses as recently as 2013.
By comparison, his expertise in American constitutional law is barely
evident. In fact, there appears to be few if any legal citations in federal
or state court records for Khan, who describes himself on his business
website (removed Tuesday from the Internet) as “attorney at law.”
Even so, Khan questioned Trump’s understanding of the Constitution, calling
him “ignorant” and suggesting that if he had studied it he would never
propose imposing a temporary ban on Muslim immigration to protect the nation
from ISIS and other terrorist infiltrators.
“Let me ask you: have you even read the United States Constitution? I will
gladly lend you my copy,” a visibly angry Khan bellowed, while waving a
pamphlet version in the air.
It’s not immediately clear if Khan has ever repudiated his earlier support
for the anti-Constitutional principles of Sharia law. Searches turn up no
subsequent writings or statements to that effect. Attempts to reach Khan by
phone and email were unsuccessful.
For now, the most patriotic Muslim in America, according to media myth-
making, remains Khizr Muazzam Khan, the father of a fallen American soldier
who claims to hold the Constitution so dear he keeps a copy in his breast
pocket.
But what does he really believe? His Islamist writings offer a window into
his ideological thinking — and the view is a contradictory and highly
disturbing one, especially in light of the fanfare he has received.
Paul Sperry is a former Hoover Institution media fellow and author of
Infiltration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives Have Penetrated Washington.
http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2016/08/02/khizr-khan-constitution-sharia/
太棒了！
就凭他毫无逻辑的骂完 Trump，人Trump就说了句他老婆没有说话，他就配合无良媒体满世界地扮可怜接受采访说Trump对不起他，那自然是深得“温和”MSL精髓的呀……不奇怪
当然可以，欢迎
还有什么扒皮内容？
顶了，大家都去顶，让更多的人看到。
进来看看有没有我认识的小盆友
老大，我不是你认识的，但是我看到上面有人说positivevide mm 被封ID了，是真的吗？她怎么了？能把她放出来吗？她发过很多有内容的贴现在都看不了
老大，我不是你认识的，但是我看到上面有人说positivevide mm 被封ID了，是真的吗？她怎么了？能把她放出来吗？她发过很多有内容的贴现在都看不了了。
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Lkbw_BZ8nao
我看看咋么回事。80%被封的都是因为骂人，恶意发帖，顶撞高层等严重违法违规行为。
隔离可以避免冲突。
发重了，呵呵，一激动
现在删不了啦。
不知她是什么原因。但是顶撞高层，如果没骂人，也要封吗？这个标准很vague啊
我支持一下。其实08年超女的时候，也是大家一通乱吵，后来各自建楼，自己在自己花园里玩，就和谐了。
其实选总统和选超女也差不多
有时也有DNC的内容，前些日子还有人为Bernie不值。话说不违反版规，我的帖子想叫什么叫什么，这你也要管？你愿意开楼支持希拉里请便，但请尊重我的言论自由。
助长恐怖分子绑架的习惯，以后会绑更多人。
我自己觉得是，奥八这个穆斯林背景，不定是不是利用这个机会转钱给穆斯林组织呢。
我如果想找希拉里的情况，也去他们楼看。
那个建议改标题的就管太多了。支持楼主爱起什么就起什么，现在这样基本属于翻译新闻标题的最好了，一眼就知道有什么时事话题了。
取个名字的自由是名正言顺earn回来的
http://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=1868851&page=1
超过一年，被系统锁了。
基本是初选的流水帐记录，从第一次辩论开始。大家开始支持谁的都有，后来逐渐都支持川普了。有兴趣的可以看看老楼，看看大家的一年来的心路历程。所以这个贴我自以为是earn了大选聊天帖的资格的。
news report
开三个集中楼好了，各找各的组织，为自己支持的出谋献力；各楼负责人及时更新首页。
1，支持老川的
2，支持老克的
3，完全无所谓，吃瓜群众
我看这个楼直接改成支持trump楼好了。进来挑衅的就别理她们，自己说话也注意点，争取积极正面的讨论和支持
不是要反驳马甲，是把这个楼建设好。就把这个想像成一个拉票的阵地，表面功夫需要做的。陈述清楚为什么要选trump；我赌5毛钱，很多大妈真的搞不清楚的
我就搞不清楚一些华人怎么想的，我家两口人都在liberal大本营的高校，都已经实在是受不了民主党营造的氛围了。我连去gym，电视默认都是cnn。。。我真的不觉得华人有那么多在中国城工作生活的，按理说不该对民主党的倒行逆施没感觉啊
希拉里就是wall street控制的，反华尔街不是bernie的核心诉求吗? 我认得一个Bernie粉，以前老转Bernie的东西，最近闷闷不乐，也不发东西了。
必然会加税啊
过去20年积累的社会矛盾本质是经济问题，不是种族问题。是资本家及其代言人摸索了一套后殖民主义高利润的赚钱方式，换个方式继续掠夺全球资源啊。谁在乎上班打工的中产啊，不捏中产，捏谁啊？
medicare会从55岁开始，这个我爸妈就直接可以有受益，虽然不知道猴年马月能通过…… 现在的Obama care还是月付很高的说
Bernie很多的政策确实很欧洲化，但是受惠面很广的
你就想14%的人供86%的人上个学对吧，到时候你不想交税了，就提前退休呗
我不觉得我会享受到，但是确实有这个选择的权利，这是整个社会的正反馈的好事，你在14%里面为了86%吐点出来也是应该的
我提这点也是要说Bernie的努力没白费