STATEMENT REGARDING TRUMP UNIVERSITY It is unfortunate that my comments have been misconstrued as a categorical attack against people of Mexican heritage. I am friends with and employ thousands of people of Mexican and Hispanic descent. The American justice system relies on fair and impartial judges. All judges should be held to that standard. I do not feel that one’s heritage makes them incapable of being impartial, but, based on the rulings that I have received in the Trump University civil case, I feel justified in questioning whether I am receiving a fair trial. Over the past few weeks, I have watched as the media has reported one inaccuracy after another concerning the ongoing litigation involving Trump University. There are several important facts the public should know and that the media has failed to report. Throughout the litigation my attorneys have continually demonstrated that students who participated in Trump University were provided a substantive, valuable education based upon a curriculum developed by professors from Northwestern University, Columbia Business School, Stanford University and other respected institutions. And, the response from students was overwhelming. Over a five year period, more than 10,000 paying students filled out surveys giving the courses high marks and expressing their overwhelming satisfaction with Trump University’s programs. For example: Former student Tarla Makaeff, the original plaintiff in the litigation, not only completed multiple surveys rating Trump University’s three-day seminar “excellent” in every category, but also praised Trump University’s mentorship program in a glowing 5 plus minute video testimonial. When asked “how could Trump University help to meet [her] goals”, she simply stated “[c]ontinue to offer great classes.” Once the plaintiffs’ lawyers realized how disastrous a witness she was, they asked to have her removed from the case. Over my lawyers’ objections, the judge granted the plaintiffs’ motion, but allowed the case to continue. Art Cohen, a lead plaintiffs in the litigation, completed a survey in which he not only rated Trump University’s three-day seminar “excellent” in virtually every category, but went so far as to indicate that he would “ attend another Trump University seminar” and even “recommend Trump University seminars to a friend.” When asked how Trump University could improve the seminar, Mr. Cohen’s only suggestion was to “[h]ave lunch sandwiches brought in” and make the lunch break 45 minutes. Former student Bob Giullo, who has been critical of Trump University in numerous interviews and negative advertisements from my political opponents, also expressed his satisfaction, rating Trump University’s programs “ excellent” in every category. When asked how Trump University could improve its programs, Mr. Giullo simply asked that students be provided “more comfortable chairs.” Indeed, these are just a few of literally thousands of positive surveys, all of which can be viewed online at www.98percentapproval.com. For those students who decided that Trump University’s programs were not for them, the company had a generous refund policy, offering a full refund to any student who asked for their money back within 3 days of signing up for a program or by the end of the first day of any multi-day program, whichever came later. Normally, legal issues in a civil case would be heard in a neutral environment. However, given my unique circumstances as nominee of the Republican Party and the core issues of my campaign that focus on illegal immigration, jobs and unfair trade, I have concerns as to my ability to receive a fair trial. I am fighting hard to bring jobs back to the United States. Many companies – like Ford, General Motors, Nabisco, Carrier – are moving production to Mexico. Drugs and illegal immigrants are also pouring across our border. This is bad for all Americans, regardless of their heritage. Due to what I believe are unfair and mistaken rulings in this case and the Judge’s reported associations with certain professional organizations, questions were raised regarding the Obama appointed Judge’s impartiality. It is a fair question. I hope it is not the case. While this lawsuit should have been dismissed, it is now scheduled for trial in November. I do not intend to comment on this matter any further. With all of the thousands of people who have given the courses such high marks and accolades, we will win this case! Donald J. Trump https://www.facebook.com/DonaldTrump/posts/10157137879345725
Sorry Liberals, A Violent Response To Trump Is As Logical As Any
The rise of Donald Trump has exposed the frightening underbelly of America’s foulest tendencies. Our racism, nativism, xenophobia, misogyny, Islamophobia, ableism, and propensity toward authoritarianism have been laid bare. Reactions from those who stand opposed to these manifestations of oppression have varied from calm condemnation and routine peaceful protests, to blockades of roads and borderline riotous outbursts, including sporadic violence in various cities.
This isn’t a coincidence.
There are so many examples of Trump inciting violence the New York Times put together this video documenting some of them. A powerful video juxtaposing his longing for the violence against protestors from the “good ol’ days” with images from the Civil Rights Era recently went viral. There’s been an upswing in anti-Muslim hate crimes that correlates with his candidacy—including several offenders who cite him as their inspiration. Another of his supporters beat an unhoused Latino man. Yet another sucker punched a demonstrator at a rally and then, more alarmingly, went on to say, “The next time we see him, we might have to kill him.” Trump has not just flagrantly violated the typical boundaries of political discourse, his candidacy is linked to multiple instances of violence. It shouldn’t be a surprise that opposition to him has responded in kind. Yet, a lot of people seem shocked and appalled at this perfectly logical reaction. In the face of media, politicians, and GOP primary voters normalizing Trump as a presidential candidate—whatever your personal beliefs regarding violent resistance—there’s an inherent value in forestalling Trump’s normalization. Violent resistance accomplishes this. In spite of this, such resistance is apparently more offensive and unacceptable to societal norms and liberal sensibilities than the nastiness being resisted in the first place.
Embed from Getty Images
As a result, a litany of think-pieces and condemnations from liberal media and politicians are making their rounds to make it clear how unacceptable and counterproductive any violence or rioting is, urging people to “listen to the other side,” and to use “legitimate means“ to fight Trump’s rise—ignoring the possibility of fascism in the US rising with it. Those who stray from this nonviolent narrative, like Emmet Rensin, an editor at Vox who tweeted that people should riot when Trump comes to town, face swift and punitive redress, urging them to fall back in line. Amidst the hot takes and denunciations from liberals, they all seem to miss a few key points. First, they misplace the blame. Second, they misunderstand the desired outcome from violent resistance and those protesting Trump in general. And third, they ignore the history of successful violent insurrection in the US, instead favoring the elementary school version of history in which nonviolence is the only means of struggle that’s ever achieved a thing.
Let’s go point by point.
Point one. These denunciations of violence from anti-Trump protestors rest on the misguided view that the divide Trump’s exposed is a typical political disagreement between partisans, and should be handled as such. This couldn’t be further from the truth. Trump might not be a fascist in the 20th century European sense of the term—though many of his supporters are—but he might represent its 21st century US version. There’s no doubt he’s expanded the Overton Window to include rhetoric previously well outside its bounds. His calls for a “deportation force“ to expel 11+ million people from the country, his claims that most Mexican immigrants are rapists and criminals, his calls to keep databases of Muslims and to enact a total ban on Muslims entering the country, his rampant sexism, his mocking people with disabilities, and his propensity for lying have brought the already pathetic state of US political discourse to astoundingly precarious lows. Treating this like politics as usual allows it to become politics as usual, and those who do so risk complicity ushering in a new era of fascist politics in the United States. Violence that takes place at Trump rallies—in support or opposition—is a reaction to the tone he’s set, and the blame for it should land primarily on his shoulders. As awful as Ted Cruz is, and he’s genuinely terrible, like there’s no way to overemphasize how terribly awful Ted Cruz is—politically, personally, as a colleague, a roommate, a presidential candidate... I mean he’s really the worst. But if he was the presumptive GOP nominee things wouldn’t look this way.
Embed from Getty Images
Point two. Politicians and liberal pundits seem to believe the principal goal for everyone resisting Trump is to halt his entry into the Oval Office. This, by default, means assisting Hillary Clinton’s entry. That’s a fine goal for some people to embrace, and in the heat of an election year perhaps partisans and pundits can be forgiven for having such a narrow view, but there’s more to this fight than helping get another Clinton into the White House. And for some, posing that as the goal is a good way to motivate them to stay home. My biggest issue with looking at the Trump problem as an exclusively political issue, though, is that if he loses this fall everyone will go back to ignoring the things that got us here in the first place. No matter who wins in November, the forces underpinning his rise will remain.
Trump doesn’t exist in a vacuum. He’s the natural consequence of, among other things, Republicans longstanding embrace of racism, perpetual attacks on the credibility of media, scientists, and the federal government, defunding public education, railing against so-called PC culture, and using immigrants as scape goats. Defeating these systems of power and their underlying apparatuses—think tanks, conservative radio, Fox News, the Tea Party, etc.—is a much longer-term and more demanding task than assuring Trump isn’t elected. Taking on the attitudes that drive them is even more difficult. Assuming anti-Trump protests should be strictly focused on electoral politics and not these broader goals would be a detrimental oversight. Understanding European anti-fascists use of violent tactics to shut down large rallies from White Supremacists can be illustrative here. Because while Trump isn’t leading full bore White Supremacist rallies, there is value in making it clear that even his fascism-lite has no place in civilized society. And whether his candidacy represents how fascism comes to the US or he’s simply opened the door to it is immaterial. Either should be stopped post haste.
Embed from Getty Images
Point three. Violent resistance matters. Riots can lead to major change (*note the irony of that hyperlink going to a Vox article). It’s not liberal politicians or masses that historians identify as the spark underlying the modern movement for LGBTQ equality. Nor was it a think piece from some smarmy liberal writer. It was the people who took to the streets during the Stonewall Uprising. It was the Watts Rebellion, not the Watts Battle of Ideas, that exposed the enduring systemic neglect, poverty, inequality, and racism faced by that community. Similarly, it was the LA Uprising, not the LA Protests, that led to significant changes in the Los Angeles Police Department. More recently, the Ferguson and Baltimore Uprisings both helped prompt the Justice Department to investigate their corrupt police forces. And since we’re talking about fascism, it’s worth remembering that it wasn’t the election of a moderate centrist (hello, Hillary) or a sanguine protest that stopped its ascent in Europe. It was, primarily, the Russian military, and to a lesser extent the US military; neither of which practiced nonviolence if memory serves.
Last, I want to briefly note the problematic nature of people with privilege condemning violent resistance to Trump as an absolute moral failing, or denying its logic. Whether you would personally engage in violent conduct matters little to your ability to understand where it comes from. Some people have the privilege to consider the implications of Trump’s rise in the abstract and negotiate which means are necessary. That’s not true for everyone. And when those who hold that privilege dismiss the potential validity or logic of violent resistance, it’s effectively an effort to dictate the rules under which oppressed peoples respond to existential threats, and to silence forms of resistance disagreeable to privileged sensibilities. Don’t be that liberal.
NJ是CLOSED PRIMARY吧 Trump welcomes Sanders supporters 'left out in the cold' http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/282619-trump-welcomes-sanders-supporters-left-out-in-the-cold
[quote]嗯嗯 GOP这几天正在civil war against Trump U judge speech，总觉得这个提名宣布的还是扭扭捏捏 NND icylava 发表于 6/8/2016 11:57:15 AM [url=http://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2024094&p...... 含笑的猫 发表于 6/8/2016 12:09:02 PM
Florida: Trump vs. Clinton PPP (D) Clinton 44, Trump 45 Trump +1 Florida: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein PPP (D) Trump 41, Clinton 40, Johnson 4, Stein 2 Trump +1
Donald Trump's racially-charged comments about federal judge Gonzalo Curiel might have proven to be an embarrassment to top Republican Party officials, but some advisers to the presumptive GOP nominee argue the billionaire businessman is also voicing what many inside the party often keep to themselves. "He's saying what a good amount of people are thinking and don't want to say," said one Trump adviser.
要不恐怖分子都找控枪最严的地区下手？巴黎，加州，生活在一帮暴徒和恐怖分子喜爱袭击之地，真是拜一帮白痴左棍所赐
以暴制暴还是有道理的，对支付那些无脑野蛮人还是管用的。
就是这个道理，左棍太白痴了。。。。
现在的反枪政客没有什么不同。他们反的是别人的枪，不是自己的枪。作家Charles Krauthammer曾一针见血地指出：“通过禁止进攻性武器的法律是象征性的，纯粹是象征性的...它的真正目的不是减少犯罪，而是让公众对限制武器的行为变得不敏感，这就对将来收回民众所有的武器做好了准备。”
http://qiangyou.org/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=5997
为什么我周围所有白人都支持HILLARY。。。我老公周围也是 。 他是IT 公司来着。目前周围支持TRUMP的全是中国人。
有的人嘴上不承认吧，不然trump那么多票哪来的，华人参与投票的本来就少，我周围的中产基本都是支持共和党的所以支持trump的~
嘴里说什么和实际投谁的票不一定一致。。。。。。
我在想 虽然GOP 内部 支持TRUMP的多。 但总数上 支持GOP的 可能已经远不如支持DEM的， 尤其是在DEM 这几年的精心策划下。
好几个都是一说TRUMP 就超激动各种指责那种
是啊，GE是一场硬战。。。。。。扭转现在这种大厦将倾的格局需要争取一切可以争取的力量
你是在东西海岸的深蓝州吗？如果是就不奇怪啦。
STATEMENT REGARDING TRUMP UNIVERSITY
It is unfortunate that my comments have been misconstrued as a categorical
attack against people of Mexican heritage. I am friends with and employ
thousands of people of Mexican and Hispanic descent. The American justice
system relies on fair and impartial judges. All judges should be held to
that standard. I do not feel that one’s heritage makes them incapable of
being impartial, but, based on the rulings that I have received in the Trump
University civil case, I feel justified in questioning whether I am
receiving a fair trial.
Over the past few weeks, I have watched as the media has reported one
inaccuracy after another concerning the ongoing litigation involving Trump
University. There are several important facts the public should know and
that the media has failed to report.
Throughout the litigation my attorneys have continually demonstrated that
students who participated in Trump University were provided a substantive,
valuable education based upon a curriculum developed by professors from
Northwestern University, Columbia Business School, Stanford University and
other respected institutions. And, the response from students was
overwhelming. Over a five year period, more than 10,000 paying students
filled out surveys giving the courses high marks and expressing their
overwhelming satisfaction with Trump University’s programs. For example:
Former student Tarla Makaeff, the original plaintiff in the litigation, not
only completed multiple surveys rating Trump University’s three-day seminar
“excellent” in every category, but also praised Trump University’s
mentorship program in a glowing 5 plus minute video testimonial. When asked
“how could Trump University help to meet [her] goals”, she simply stated
“[c]ontinue to offer great classes.” Once the plaintiffs’ lawyers
realized how disastrous a witness she was, they asked to have her removed
from the case. Over my lawyers’ objections, the judge granted the
plaintiffs’ motion, but allowed the case to continue.
Art Cohen, a lead plaintiffs in the litigation, completed a survey in which
he not only rated Trump University’s three-day seminar “excellent” in
virtually every category, but went so far as to indicate that he would “
attend another Trump University seminar” and even “recommend Trump
University seminars to a friend.” When asked how Trump University could
improve the seminar, Mr. Cohen’s only suggestion was to “[h]ave lunch
sandwiches brought in” and make the lunch break 45 minutes.
Former student Bob Giullo, who has been critical of Trump University in
numerous interviews and negative advertisements from my political opponents,
also expressed his satisfaction, rating Trump University’s programs “
excellent” in every category. When asked how Trump University could improve
its programs, Mr. Giullo simply asked that students be provided “more
comfortable chairs.”
Indeed, these are just a few of literally thousands of positive surveys, all
of which can be viewed online at www.98percentapproval.com.
For those students who decided that Trump University’s programs were not
for them, the company had a generous refund policy, offering a full refund
to any student who asked for their money back within 3 days of signing up
for a program or by the end of the first day of any multi-day program,
whichever came later.
Normally, legal issues in a civil case would be heard in a neutral
environment. However, given my unique circumstances as nominee of the
Republican Party and the core issues of my campaign that focus on illegal
immigration, jobs and unfair trade, I have concerns as to my ability to
receive a fair trial.
I am fighting hard to bring jobs back to the United States. Many companies
– like Ford, General Motors, Nabisco, Carrier – are moving production to
Mexico. Drugs and illegal immigrants are also pouring across our border.
This is bad for all Americans, regardless of their heritage.
Due to what I believe are unfair and mistaken rulings in this case and the
Judge’s reported associations with certain professional organizations,
questions were raised regarding the Obama appointed Judge’s impartiality.
It is a fair question. I hope it is not the case.
While this lawsuit should have been dismissed, it is now scheduled for trial
in November. I do not intend to comment on this matter any further. With
all of the thousands of people who have given the courses such high marks
and accolades, we will win this case!
Donald J. Trump
https://www.facebook.com/DonaldTrump/posts/10157137879345725
川普上台也没说要减福利ss也没有要延长，而且非法移民和穆斯林进来分蛋糕福利很快就会破产，真要吃福利的，为了自己一直能吃福利也要投川普啊。
原来的呢?
莫名其妙被锁了，不知因为什么。可能楼太高了huaren backend支持不了了？
大家看看这个，左派媒体简直是不要脸了，公开宣称暴力反对特朗普是自我防卫符合正义，把你们打的头破血流也是保卫自己不受特朗普言论的伤害。
Sorry Liberals, A Violent Response To Trump Is As Logical As Any
The rise of Donald Trump has exposed the frightening underbelly of America’s foulest tendencies. Our racism, nativism, xenophobia, misogyny, Islamophobia, ableism, and propensity toward authoritarianism have been laid bare. Reactions from those who stand opposed to these manifestations of oppression have varied from calm condemnation and routine peaceful protests, to blockades of roads and borderline riotous outbursts, including sporadic violence in various cities.
This isn’t a coincidence.
There are so many examples of Trump inciting violence the New York Times put together this video documenting some of them. A powerful video juxtaposing his longing for the violence against protestors from the “good ol’ days” with images from the Civil Rights Era recently went viral. There’s been an upswing in anti-Muslim hate crimes that correlates with his candidacy—including several offenders who cite him as their inspiration. Another of his supporters beat an unhoused Latino man. Yet another sucker punched a demonstrator at a rally and then, more alarmingly, went on to say, “The next time we see him, we might have to kill him.” Trump has not just flagrantly violated the typical boundaries of political discourse, his candidacy is linked to multiple instances of violence. It shouldn’t be a surprise that opposition to him has responded in kind. Yet, a lot of people seem shocked and appalled at this perfectly logical reaction. In the face of media, politicians, and GOP primary voters normalizing Trump as a presidential candidate—whatever your personal beliefs regarding violent resistance—there’s an inherent value in forestalling Trump’s normalization. Violent resistance accomplishes this. In spite of this, such resistance is apparently more offensive and unacceptable to societal norms and liberal sensibilities than the nastiness being resisted in the first place.
Embed from Getty Images
As a result, a litany of think-pieces and condemnations from liberal media and politicians are making their rounds to make it clear how unacceptable and counterproductive any violence or rioting is, urging people to “listen to the other side,” and to use “legitimate means“ to fight Trump’s rise—ignoring the possibility of fascism in the US rising with it. Those who stray from this nonviolent narrative, like Emmet Rensin, an editor at Vox who tweeted that people should riot when Trump comes to town, face swift and punitive redress, urging them to fall back in line. Amidst the hot takes and denunciations from liberals, they all seem to miss a few key points. First, they misplace the blame. Second, they misunderstand the desired outcome from violent resistance and those protesting Trump in general. And third, they ignore the history of successful violent insurrection in the US, instead favoring the elementary school version of history in which nonviolence is the only means of struggle that’s ever achieved a thing.
Let’s go point by point.
Point one. These denunciations of violence from anti-Trump protestors rest on the misguided view that the divide Trump’s exposed is a typical political disagreement between partisans, and should be handled as such. This couldn’t be further from the truth. Trump might not be a fascist in the 20th century European sense of the term—though many of his supporters are—but he might represent its 21st century US version. There’s no doubt he’s expanded the Overton Window to include rhetoric previously well outside its bounds. His calls for a “deportation force“ to expel 11+ million people from the country, his claims that most Mexican immigrants are rapists and criminals, his calls to keep databases of Muslims and to enact a total ban on Muslims entering the country, his rampant sexism, his mocking people with disabilities, and his propensity for lying have brought the already pathetic state of US political discourse to astoundingly precarious lows. Treating this like politics as usual allows it to become politics as usual, and those who do so risk complicity ushering in a new era of fascist politics in the United States. Violence that takes place at Trump rallies—in support or opposition—is a reaction to the tone he’s set, and the blame for it should land primarily on his shoulders. As awful as Ted Cruz is, and he’s genuinely terrible, like there’s no way to overemphasize how terribly awful Ted Cruz is—politically, personally, as a colleague, a roommate, a presidential candidate... I mean he’s really the worst. But if he was the presumptive GOP nominee things wouldn’t look this way.
Embed from Getty Images
Point two. Politicians and liberal pundits seem to believe the principal goal for everyone resisting Trump is to halt his entry into the Oval Office. This, by default, means assisting Hillary Clinton’s entry. That’s a fine goal for some people to embrace, and in the heat of an election year perhaps partisans and pundits can be forgiven for having such a narrow view, but there’s more to this fight than helping get another Clinton into the White House. And for some, posing that as the goal is a good way to motivate them to stay home. My biggest issue with looking at the Trump problem as an exclusively political issue, though, is that if he loses this fall everyone will go back to ignoring the things that got us here in the first place. No matter who wins in November, the forces underpinning his rise will remain.
Trump doesn’t exist in a vacuum. He’s the natural consequence of, among other things, Republicans longstanding embrace of racism, perpetual attacks on the credibility of media, scientists, and the federal government, defunding public education, railing against so-called PC culture, and using immigrants as scape goats. Defeating these systems of power and their underlying apparatuses—think tanks, conservative radio, Fox News, the Tea Party, etc.—is a much longer-term and more demanding task than assuring Trump isn’t elected. Taking on the attitudes that drive them is even more difficult. Assuming anti-Trump protests should be strictly focused on electoral politics and not these broader goals would be a detrimental oversight. Understanding European anti-fascists use of violent tactics to shut down large rallies from White Supremacists can be illustrative here. Because while Trump isn’t leading full bore White Supremacist rallies, there is value in making it clear that even his fascism-lite has no place in civilized society. And whether his candidacy represents how fascism comes to the US or he’s simply opened the door to it is immaterial. Either should be stopped post haste.
Embed from Getty Images
Point three. Violent resistance matters. Riots can lead to major change (*note the irony of that hyperlink going to a Vox article). It’s not liberal politicians or masses that historians identify as the spark underlying the modern movement for LGBTQ equality. Nor was it a think piece from some smarmy liberal writer. It was the people who took to the streets during the Stonewall Uprising. It was the Watts Rebellion, not the Watts Battle of Ideas, that exposed the enduring systemic neglect, poverty, inequality, and racism faced by that community. Similarly, it was the LA Uprising, not the LA Protests, that led to significant changes in the Los Angeles Police Department. More recently, the Ferguson and Baltimore Uprisings both helped prompt the Justice Department to investigate their corrupt police forces. And since we’re talking about fascism, it’s worth remembering that it wasn’t the election of a moderate centrist (hello, Hillary) or a sanguine protest that stopped its ascent in Europe. It was, primarily, the Russian military, and to a lesser extent the US military; neither of which practiced nonviolence if memory serves.
Last, I want to briefly note the problematic nature of people with privilege condemning violent resistance to Trump as an absolute moral failing, or denying its logic. Whether you would personally engage in violent conduct matters little to your ability to understand where it comes from. Some people have the privilege to consider the implications of Trump’s rise in the abstract and negotiate which means are necessary. That’s not true for everyone. And when those who hold that privilege dismiss the potential validity or logic of violent resistance, it’s effectively an effort to dictate the rules under which oppressed peoples respond to existential threats, and to silence forms of resistance disagreeable to privileged sensibilities. Don’t be that liberal.
Follow Jesse Benn on Twitter: www.twitter.com/JesseBenn
热，伊万卡又漂亮又聪明，招人喜爱
不过看turnout的票数比例，投DEM的人比投REP的多多了。NJ到GE的时候翻红可能性还是微乎其微
今天有6个州投票，往年到了加州都没俺什么事了
NJ是CLOSED PRIMARY吧
Trump welcomes Sanders supporters 'left out in the cold' http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/282619-trump-welcomes-sanders-supporters-left-out-in-the-cold
https://www.change.org/p/the-citizens-of-san-jose-san-jose-mayor-sam-liccado-should-resign
☆ 发自 iPhone 华人一网 1.11.07
签了两个邮箱
有黑8在，就是看着美国一天天沦落，却又不可能怎么样，软泡这个混球也该下台，弹劾总统本来该house 这边做，他们本身就是罪恶的一部分
☆ 发自 iPhone 华人一网 1.11.07
☆ 发自 iPhone 华人一网 1.11.07
害我白激动了一下，原来还没正式提名。据说gop内部在商量对策，想通过有关修改章程来阻止船长提名！
☆ 发自 iPhone 华人一网 1.11.07
哈哈哈哈，真绝
第一个la raza协会长期支持非法移民，组织非法移民被遣返，给非法移民提供奖学金。
第二个协会去年开始抵制川普所有商业活动。
最重要的一点，这个法官是奥巴马指派的。原告代理律师事务所给希拉里竞选注资，支付希拉里演讲费100多万。原告makaeff早就撤销了案件，但本案继续由希拉里亲信的律师事务所代表进行集体诉讼。
总结起来就是奥巴马和希拉里利用一个普通的民事案件对川普进行政治迫害。
新浪新闻 http://dailynews.sina.com/gb/news/usa/usnews/chinapress/20160603/00357356079.html
加州希望拓展obamacare, 非法移民或能参与加州医保
奥巴马和猪党就是play race card 去迫害攻击船长。实在受不了奥巴马了，自从他上台，种族主义每天都在迫害正常人。他才是个纳粹份子，伪装的爱哭的希特勒
http://www.dw.com/en/ahead-of-brexit-vote-support-for-eu-falls-across-europe/a-19313102
Tories favorite pollster predicts Britain will vote for Brexit
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/08/tories-favorite-pollster-predicts-britain-will-vote-for-brexit/
Florida: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein PPP (D) Trump 41, Clinton 40, Johnson 4, Stein 2 Trump +1
惊喜地发现佛罗里达的民调川普还加分了！
TRUMP的团队每一步都是有策略的，很少人看的懂。
Donald Trump to visit UK day before Brexit vote
http://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-to-visit-uk-day-before-brexit-vote/
http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/678104/The-Referendum-Game-song-Brexit-EU
A BRILLIANT new song which rips into the European Union and David Cameron's failed renegotiation is set to become an internet hit.
Nigel Farage predicts Brexit will be 'end of the EU'
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/521710/Brexit-Nigel-Farage-David-Cameron-referendum-Vote-Leave-Vote-Remain-EU-country-England-UK
Osborne blasted for Brexit scaremongering and dodging debating Vote Leave http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/678186/EU-referendum-George-Osborne-Brexit-scaremongering-Vote-Leave
Tories favorite pollster predicts Britain will vote for Brexit
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/08/tories-favorite-pollster-predicts-britain-will-vote-for-brexit/
Top economists blast Government 'deceit' over Brexit and reveal risks of staying in Europe
http://www.express.co.uk/finance/city/676295/economists-Government-Brexit-deceit-reveal-risks-of-staying-in-Europe
'VoteLeave' dominates Twitter users' posts on Brexit: data
http://uk.reuters.com/article/us-britain-eu-twitter-idUKKCN0YU1OV
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jun/04/donald-trump-bernie-sanders-brexit-anti-establishment-politics
Trump, GOP sources: Trump is saying what many people are thinking
http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/06/politics/donald-trump-gop-racial-comments/
Donald Trump's racially-charged comments about federal judge Gonzalo Curiel might have proven to be an embarrassment to top Republican Party officials, but some advisers to the presumptive GOP nominee argue the billionaire businessman is also voicing what many inside the party often keep to themselves.
"He's saying what a good amount of people are thinking and don't want to say," said one Trump adviser.
什么时候可以大概知道TRUMP 对HILLARY 的大致形势啊。
☆ 发自 iPhone 华人一网 1.11.06
我喜欢你的id名，呵呵
虽然Trump在加州winner take all，但看到我们county有3万多人投了Trump和1万8左右投其他GOP候选人，vs 主党那边有10万多人投了老巫婆，7万多投了三德子，就觉得心塞。。。。。。希望这跟GOP是closed ballot有关系。