"The speaker is grateful for the support, but he is not interested. He will not accept a nomination and believes our nominee should be someone who ran this year,"
I don't think so if he dares to mess up Trump's campaign.
goldengate 发表于 3/16/2016 4:30:11 PM
The Republican Party has been practicing obstructionism for 8 years now. Another 4 years won't hurt him that much. Plus, the Democrats will join him if Trump is President. Ryan can claim he united the Democrats and Republicans.
The Republican Party has been practicing obstructionism for 8 years now. Another 4 years won't hurt him that much. Plus, the Democrats will join him if Trump is President. Ryan can claim he united the Democrats and Republicans.
BlueNDGold 发表于 3/16/2016 4:36:16 PM
The past 8 years is nothing compared to today's situation. Trump's supporters are tough, strong and royal. Everyone attack was doomed and went to hell. Look at Romney, look at Rubio, look at Sanders. That is why Paul Ryan has been nice to Trump at least above the table. He dares not go against so many voters.
The past 8 years is nothing compared to today's situation. Trump's supporters are tough, strong and royal. Everyone attack was doomed and went to hell. Look at Romney, look at Rubio, look at Sanders. That is why Paul Ryan has been nice to Trump at least above the table. He dares not go against so many voters.
goldengate 发表于 3/16/2016 4:39:41 PM
I doubt it. Even if Trump is elected President, the political system is still set up to depend on party loyalty. Congressional members are not going to work with Trump simply because he's the President.
I doubt it. Even if Trump is elected President, the political system is still set up to depend on party loyalty. Congressional members are not going to work with Trump simply because he's the President.
BlueNDGold 发表于 3/16/2016 4:46:46 PM
Well, looked at how Regan dealt with that. He was not the party wanted but now they think he is the best president ever. I think Trump is smart enough to deal with the system.
I doubt it. Even if Trump is elected President, the political system is still set up to depend on party loyalty. Congressional members are not going to work with Trump simply because he's the President.
BlueNDGold 发表于 3/16/2016 4:46:46 PM
为什么一定要WORK WITH WITH TRUMP呢。奥巴马在台上的时候共和党也不见得就配合啊。你难道不知道CHECKS AND BALANCES是为了制衡而不是配合啊，这是美国体制的优越性啊。
I doubt it. Even if Trump is elected President, the political system is still set up to depend on party loyalty. Congressional members are not going to work with Trump simply because he's the President.
Political parties, not voters, choose their presidential nominees, a Republican convention rules member told CNBC, a day after GOP front-runner Donald Trump rolled up more big primary victories.
老头绝对是商场上打滚谈判的好手，知道怎么做对自己有利，TRUMP只要拿到明显领先其他人的票数，ESTABLISHMENT违反民意就不占理，发生什么和TRUMP没关系，是ESTABLISHMENT搞砸的，我不是事先提醒过你们吗。
看最后结果发现cruz 居然咬的很紧呐。民主党那边也很接近。
本来就是个奇葩州，发生了那么多奇葩的事，不提也罢
好几十万票呢？Cruz拿自家钱去雇人数吗。。哈哈。
赞。这个可以翻译成英文用来反击那些说trump分裂民众的媒体。
re，说的好～
对啊，简直了。。。先take好care of美国人再拉拢外国好吗！好像外国领导人能给她选票
但是轻信媒体的也还真不少～ 好些就跟选圣人似的，自己选老公都没这么严格。
————————————————————————————————————————
发信人: Milanol (Milanol), 信区: USANews
标 题: Re: 商人真不适合出任美国这种国家的元首
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Mar 16 11:21:48 2016, 美东)
我的理解，现在候选人中，有国际视野和大舞台外交能力的，只有克林顿一人。卡西奇
州长干得很好，但是真的是百（千）里之才，视野只在一个州。
其他几个不说了。国际政策都有硬伤。相比之下Trump还算好的。Sanders这种奉行不干
预的，Cruz这种要改中国使馆为刘晓波1号，纯挑衅纯闹剧的，更加不行。
但问题是克林顿的鹰派政策实在费钱。唐老创的防御政策在现今经济环境下更加现实。
我个人认为克林顿能力强，但方向是错的。视野虽然大，但一屁股坐进一个坑跳不出来
，敌我界限太明显，限制了她视野的发挥。唐老创思路正确，虽然能力有限，但可以靠
幕僚来补。而他的bias少，有可能开创国际外交的新局面。就好像尼克松当年和苏联谈
判，和中国建交，在传统政客看来简直是不可理喻的疯子，但事后证明是美国外交史上
的经典杰作。如果唐老创当选，希望他能找到自己的基辛格。
--————————————————————————————————————————————
是啊，这种人不能客观的分析的，没必要多争，楼外头那些除了造谣的我也难得去理了。选总统的原则就是less evil， 大方向认定都认定不了、非纠结小节的都没啥争的，而且她们反对的真正理由也并不一定是她们嘴上强调的那些，之前有个反trump奋力发帖的我就去考古了下，明明是有别的原因，呵呵。
这嘴真够毒的,我喜欢，哈哈。
是明明有私心，却打着大义凌然的旗帜讨伐的。 后来我几个贴都提到了这类人的理由没指明id，她心虚的话知道我说的她，后来也的确再没见她发反trump的帖了。
GOP presidential primary debate in SLC canceled http://fox13now.com/2016/03/16/gop-presidential-primary-debate-scheduled-for-next-week-has-been-canceled/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
"Let Cruz debate himself…he has enough material"
ha ha ha
后来exit poll更新了，两个人tie的
不多说了，今天再给船长捐钱去
☆ 发自 iPhone 华人一网 1.11.06
☆ 发自 iPhone 华人一网 1.11.06
☆ 发自 iPhone 华人一网 1.11.06
无外乎家人的身份和福利， 有点太惊弓之鸟了～
短视啊，也不想想，皮之不存毛将焉附？整个美国都烂了的话，还要那个鸡肋的身份和福利有什么用。。。更何况Trump从没反对过合法移民身份和福利啊
Fox News Cancels GOP Debate After Donald Trump Says He Won’t Attend
http://variety.com/2016/biz/news/donald-trump-republican-debate-cancelled-1201731692/
昨天的5个州里只有OH, FL是通吃。这楼里的别人没意识到也罢了，怎么你也被忽悠了？
这也算给他们个教训
MO类似赢者通吃吧，本来TRUMP没把握赢，赢了当然是OFFSET。我觉得现在很难挡住TRUMP了, ESTABLISHMENT不占理啊，TRUMP说了要是就差个几票，你非不让上，选民可能会RIOT.
狗叫视频成船长广告了，笑趴了
IL不是拿了49票吗
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/
已经拿了49/69.
IL: 51
MO: 25 (but will get as many as 47)
NC: 29
Trump will eventually get about 226
not accept a nomination and believes our nominee should be someone who ran
this year,"
http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/16/politics/paul-ryan-brokered-conve
I don't think so if he dares to mess up Trump's campaign.
你那个POLL太老了吧，我怎么看的CNN当时最新的POLL，开始说的是CRUZ领先，后来又做了一次是TIE，所以当时就知道没把握TRUMP能赢，只是没想到这么CLOSE。
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/03/16/we-choose-the-nominee-not-the-voters-senior-gop-official.html
Agree.
Well, looked at how Regan dealt with that. He was not the party wanted but now they think he is the best president ever. I think Trump is smart enough to deal with the system.
为什么一定要WORK WITH WITH TRUMP呢。奥巴马在台上的时候共和党也不见得就配合啊。你难道不知道CHECKS AND BALANCES是为了制衡而不是配合啊，这是美国体制的优越性啊。
他是妥妥的establishment的人，绝对的姓党啊
再不合作08也都当了八年总统。trump上去就算不合作比起08也有限。
Political parties, not voters, choose their presidential nominees, a Republican convention rules member told CNBC, a day after GOP front-runner Donald Trump rolled up more big primary victories.
看这言论，恍惚中我还以为是中共的发言人呢。。。。