I have committed to not endorse a specific individual, but rather “We the People.” Though many today are making decisions based on fear and anger, I trust their judgment to logically examine the candidates and make the right decision by looking at: (1) Whether they have demonstrated significant accomplishments over their lives and careers. (2) If they have ideas that are clear and policies that are easy to find. (3) How they treat their family and others, as that is how they will lead the country. (4) What they have done to improve the lives of Americans; the people they are with, what they are saying and how they collaborate with others. (5) Their ethics, because what America needs is “Trickle-down ethics. Conservatives should not be embarrassed by capitalism, but must couple it with compassion, to lift people out of a culture of dependency and provide ladders of opportunity for all Americans to be a part of the fabric of society. People need to understand this is a most important election, in which we are deciding whether we allow the government to dictate our rights and take care of our needs, or whether individuals will rise up and take responsibility in an atmosphere of opportunity for all. The bottom line is, “We the People” are the ones making the decisions; but in order to do that, we must become active and informed, not manipulated by the political classes and media. Along with millions of patriots who have supported my campaign for President, I remain committed to saving America for future generations. We must not depart from our goals to restore what God and our Founders intended for this exceptional nation. Equally important, we need to understand that Republicans are not each others' enemies. We need to engage in conversation and challenge each others' positions, not fight each other. Conservatives need to unify together so that that we do not snatch defeat from the jaws of victory and put another secular progressive in the White House.
看了这个文章，以后要制定一个rule，总统在做任何决定的时候，都要亲自让自己和家人去enjoy 这个policy 带来的consequence： 1）比如说要接受illegal immigration，就应该在自己的家里附近或者white house里常驻几个illegal 出来的家庭。要接受叙利亚难民，所有approve的government official 家里附近都放一些
2）让section 8的人住到好区里，那就让自己的家里周围也放一点section 8
3）自己的子女去public school，和大家一样
4）自己弄得health care，自己带头用
在中国这叫以身作则，所有的民主国家领导人都要带头实现自己制定的政策。为什么founding father没有把这个写进宪法里呢。现在这些家伙制定的政策，全都是普通百姓来take 这些consequence，天理和在！！ ---------------- 发信人: beijingren (to thine own self be true), 信区: Military 标 题: Re: 床铺和被压迫人的奋起 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Mar 4 21:53:46 2016, 美东)
PEGGY NOONAN: Donald Trump and the Rise of the Unprotected:
There are the protected and the unprotected. The protected make public policy. The unprotected live in it. The unprotected are starting to push back, powerfully.
The protected are the accomplished, the secure, the successful—those who have power or access to it. They are protected from much of the roughness of the world. More to the point, they are protected from the world they have created. Again, they make public policy and have for some time.
I want to call them the elite to load the rhetorical dice, but let’s stick with the protected.
They are figures in government, politics and media. They live in nice neighborhoods, safe ones. Their families function, their kids go to good schools, they’ve got some money. All of these things tend to isolate them, or provide buffers. Some of them—in Washington it is important officials in the executive branch or on the Hill; in Brussels, significant figures in the European Union—literally have their own security details.
Because they are protected they feel they can do pretty much anything, impose any reality. They’re insulated from many of the effects of their own decisions.
One issue obviously roiling the U.S. and Western Europe is immigration. It is the issue of the moment, a real and concrete one but also a symbolic one: It stands for all the distance between governments and their citizens.
It is of course the issue that made Donald Trump.
Britain will probably leave the European Union over it. In truth immigration is one front in that battle, but it is the most salient because of the European refugee crisis and the failure of the protected class to address it realistically and in a way that offers safety to the unprotected.
If you are an unprotected American—one with limited resources and negligible access to power—you have absorbed some lessons from the past 20 years’ experience of illegal immigration. You know the Democrats won’t protect you and the Republicans won’t help you. Both parties refused to control the border. The Republicans were afraid of being called illiberal, racist, of losing a demographic for a generation. The Democrats wanted to keep the issue alive to use it as a wedge against the Republicans and to establish themselves as owners of the Hispanic vote.
Many Americans suffered from illegal immigration—its impact on labor markets, financial costs, crime, the sense that the rule of law was collapsing. But the protected did fine—more workers at lower wages. No effect of illegal immigration was likely to hurt them personally.
It was good for the protected. But the unprotected watched and saw. They realized the protected were not looking out for them, and they inferred that they were not looking out for the country, either.
The unprotected came to think they owed the establishment—another word for the protected—nothing, no particular loyalty, no old allegiance.
Mr. Trump came from that. . . . You see the dynamic in many spheres. In Hollywood, as we still call it, where they make our rough culture, they are careful to protect their own children from its ill effects. In places with failing schools, they choose not to help them through the school liberation movement—charter schools, choice, etc.—because they fear to go up against the most reactionary professional group in America, the teachers unions. They let the public schools flounder. But their children go to the best private schools.
This is a terrible feature of our age—that we are governed by protected people who don’t seem to care that much about their unprotected fellow citizens.
UIC Pavilion: Republican Presidential Candidate Donald Trump to Hold Rally in Chicago on March 11 “I’m planning to give a speech and stay at my world-famous hotel, the Trump Tower. I love Chicago. I love Mike Ditka. I love my hotel," Trump told Chicago Sun-Times columnist Michael Sneed.
UIC Pavilion: Republican Presidential Candidate Donald Trump to Hold Rally in Chicago on March 11 “I’m planning to give a speech and stay at my world-famous hotel, the Trump Tower. I love Chicago. I love Mike Ditka. I love my hotel," Trump told Chicago Sun-Times columnist Michael Sneed.
UIC Pavilion: Republican Presidential Candidate Donald Trump to Hold Rally in Chicago on March 11 “I’m planning to give a speech and stay at my world-famous hotel, the Trump Tower. I love Chicago. I love Mike Ditka. I love my hotel," Trump told Chicago Sun-Times columnist Michael Sneed.
UIC Pavilion: Republican Presidential Candidate Donald Trump to Hold Rally in Chicago on March 11 “I’m planning to give a speech and stay at my world-famous hotel, the Trump Tower. I love Chicago. I love Mike Ditka. I love my hotel," Trump told Chicago Sun-Times columnist Michael Sneed.
Mike Ditka: NFL Analyst Says Barack Obama Is 'The Worst President We’ve Ever Had' Ditka said Friday on a radio show in New York that President Obama is "not a leader." Ditka added that he would "probably vote for Trump" if he were to vote tomorrow.
“Attorney Dmitry Gorin, a former prosecutor, said that once a person has been acquitted of murder by a jury, it would be double jeopardy to try the same person again for the same crime.“You can’t be prosecuted again,” he said. The only exception is in federal court, Gorin said. But in that case, federal prosecutors would need to have a federal question that applies to a particular case.”
Cruz 234
Rubio 113
Kasich 27
切,trump还没low 到那份上,问他信用卡债务还了没?还去参加gay party不
I have committed to not endorse a specific individual, but rather “We the People.” Though many today are making decisions based on fear and anger, I trust their judgment to logically examine the candidates and make the right decision by looking at:
(1) Whether they have demonstrated significant accomplishments over their lives and careers.
(2) If they have ideas that are clear and policies that are easy to find.
(3) How they treat their family and others, as that is how they will lead the country.
(4) What they have done to improve the lives of Americans;
the people they are with, what they are saying and how they collaborate with others.
(5) Their ethics, because what America needs is “Trickle-down ethics.
Conservatives should not be embarrassed by capitalism, but must couple it with compassion, to lift people out of a culture of dependency and provide ladders of opportunity for all Americans to be a part of the fabric of society.
People need to understand this is a most important election, in which we are deciding whether we allow the government to dictate our rights and take care of our needs, or whether individuals will rise up and take responsibility in an atmosphere of opportunity for all.
The bottom line is, “We the People” are the ones making the decisions; but in order to do that, we must become active and informed, not manipulated by the political classes and media.
Along with millions of patriots who have supported my campaign for President, I remain committed to saving America for future generations. We must not depart from our goals to restore what God and our Founders intended for this exceptional nation.
Equally important, we need to understand that Republicans are not each others' enemies. We need to engage in conversation and challenge each others' positions, not fight each other. Conservatives need to unify together so that that we do not snatch defeat from the jaws of victory and put another secular progressive in the White House.
看了这个文章，以后要制定一个rule，总统在做任何决定的时候，都要亲自让自己和家人去enjoy 这个policy 带来的consequence：
1）比如说要接受illegal immigration，就应该在自己的家里附近或者white house里常驻几个illegal 出来的家庭。要接受叙利亚难民，所有approve的government official 家里附近都放一些
2）让section 8的人住到好区里，那就让自己的家里周围也放一点section 8
3）自己的子女去public school，和大家一样
4）自己弄得health care，自己带头用
在中国这叫以身作则，所有的民主国家领导人都要带头实现自己制定的政策。为什么founding father没有把这个写进宪法里呢。现在这些家伙制定的政策，全都是普通百姓来take 这些consequence，天理和在！！
----------------
发信人: beijingren (to thine own self be true), 信区: Military
标 题: Re: 床铺和被压迫人的奋起
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Mar 4 21:53:46 2016, 美东)
PEGGY NOONAN: Donald Trump and the Rise of the Unprotected:
There are the protected and the unprotected. The protected make public
policy. The unprotected live in it. The unprotected are starting to push
back, powerfully.
The protected are the accomplished, the secure, the successful—those who
have power or access to it. They are protected from much of the roughness of
the world. More to the point, they are protected from the world they have
created. Again, they make public policy and have for some time.
I want to call them the elite to load the rhetorical dice, but let’s stick
with the protected.
They are figures in government, politics and media. They live in nice
neighborhoods, safe ones. Their families function, their kids go to good
schools, they’ve got some money. All of these things tend to isolate them,
or provide buffers. Some of them—in Washington it is important officials in
the executive branch or on the Hill; in Brussels, significant figures in
the European Union—literally have their own security details.
Because they are protected they feel they can do pretty much anything,
impose any reality. They’re insulated from many of the effects of their own
decisions.
One issue obviously roiling the U.S. and Western Europe is immigration. It
is the issue of the moment, a real and concrete one but also a symbolic one:
It stands for all the distance between governments and their citizens.
It is of course the issue that made Donald Trump.
Britain will probably leave the European Union over it. In truth immigration
is one front in that battle, but it is the most salient because of the
European refugee crisis and the failure of the protected class to address it
realistically and in a way that offers safety to the unprotected.
If you are an unprotected American—one with limited resources and
negligible access to power—you have absorbed some lessons from the past 20
years’ experience of illegal immigration. You know the Democrats won’t
protect you and the Republicans won’t help you. Both parties refused to
control the border. The Republicans were afraid of being called illiberal,
racist, of losing a demographic for a generation. The Democrats wanted to
keep the issue alive to use it as a wedge against the Republicans and to
establish themselves as owners of the Hispanic vote.
Many Americans suffered from illegal immigration—its impact on labor
markets, financial costs, crime, the sense that the rule of law was
collapsing. But the protected did fine—more workers at lower wages. No
effect of illegal immigration was likely to hurt them personally.
It was good for the protected. But the unprotected watched and saw. They
realized the protected were not looking out for them, and they inferred that
they were not looking out for the country, either.
The unprotected came to think they owed the establishment—another word for
the protected—nothing, no particular loyalty, no old allegiance.
Mr. Trump came from that. . . . You see the dynamic in many spheres. In
Hollywood, as we still call it, where they make our rough culture, they are
careful to protect their own children from its ill effects. In places with
failing schools, they choose not to help them through the school liberation
movement—charter schools, choice, etc.—because they fear to go up against
the most reactionary professional group in America, the teachers unions.
They let the public schools flounder. But their children go to the best
private schools.
This is a terrible feature of our age—that we are governed by protected
people who don’t seem to care that much about their unprotected fellow
citizens.
好文，要推。
Cruz感觉这么做不明智啊，他的poll比机器人都差不少。
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/fl/florida_republican_presidential_primary-3555.html
“I’m planning to give a speech and stay at my world-famous hotel, the Trump Tower. I love Chicago. I love Mike Ditka. I love my hotel," Trump told Chicago Sun-Times columnist Michael Sneed.
Trump够猛，敢去O8老家演讲
☆ 发自 iPhone 华人一网 1.11.06
cruz这个小人太奸险了，趁这个unify的风势开始拉其他候选人的票了。
fox news最近比较偏向Trump。Cruz都呼吁好久了，可是他的立场和别人都离得太远，很难拉到别人的票，他那套卫道士的架势，投他的人都得掂量一个自己是不是“true conservative"。。。
Carson估计一半Trump一半Carson，可他的票本来没多少。
☆ 发自 iPhone 华人一网 1.11.06
☆ 发自 iPhone 华人一网 1.11.06
☆ 发自 iPhone 华人一网 1.11.06
佛州确实关键
怎么能帮帮他
她们就嘘嘘来着
那三只鬣犬一个啃Ohio, 两个啃Florida, Trump没盟友。
宝塔镇河妖。Trump有Trump Towel
这个只能说：人可千万不能胖
哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈，小胖年轻的时候还挺迷人的嘛
三朵瑞能不能不要这么搞笑啊
等他DC的邮局hotel九月份开门了，我也去瞅瞅
O'Malley那个花了n多钱买的办公室家具是咋回事，现在被拍卖呢
Ditka said Friday on a radio show in New York that President Obama is "not a leader." Ditka added that he would "probably vote for Trump" if he were to vote tomorrow.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/04/us/oj-simpson-property-knife/index.html
好像诉讼期没过！但是因为已经判过无醉了！就不能去在起诉！美国法律！
你有投票权么？
哈哈哈哈哈
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/03/04/on-taxes-bernie-sanders-makes-hillary-clinton-look-more-like-donald-trump/
好像是滴耶，这是什么鬼法律
“Attorney Dmitry Gorin, a former prosecutor, said that once a person has been acquitted of murder by a jury, it would be double jeopardy to try the same person again for the same crime.“You can’t be prosecuted again,” he said.
The only exception is in federal court, Gorin said. But in that case, federal prosecutors would need to have a federal question that applies to a particular case.”
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-knife-found-on-o-j-simpson-property-being-tested-by-lapd-20160304-story.html