What SATCOM, ACARS and Pings tell us about the missing Malaysia Airlines MH370
Mar 16 2014 - 21 Comments
By David Cenciotti
Eight days since the Malaysian Airlines flight MH370 disappeared somewhere over southeast Asia, the last known details about the missing Boeing 777 come from the onboard SATCOM system.
Very few details about the MH370 flight from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing, disappered from the skies on Mar. 7, 2014 have emerged. First of all we don’t know if it crashed or landed somewhere. Second, provided it was really hijacked as Malaysian authorities suggest, we don’t really know whether the pilot or co-pilot played an active role in the operation even if investigators are scrutinizing their profile and personal life.
Based on the information that were released so far, we have been able to draw several different scenarios, each featuring a certain degree of likeliness. The few details that were gathered past the loss of radio contact with the aircraft, come from satellites.
Let’s see why.
ACARS
ACARS is the acronym for Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System. It’s an automated communication system used by commercial planes to transmit and receive messages from ground facilities (airline, maintenance department, aircraft or system manufacturer, etc). Therefore, along with the general information about the flight (callsign, speed, altitude, position, etc), these messages may contain what we can consider systems health checks.
ACARS is a service: airlines have to pay for it. According to the information available to date, it looks like Malaysia Airlines subscribed only to engine health monitoring that enabled MH370 to send data to Rolls Royce.
The ACARS system aboard MH370 was switched off some minutes before the transponder.
ACARS rely on VHF frequencies (indeed, you can track planes and decode messages with a simple radio receiver tuned on the proper ACARS frequencies and a software running on your computer) or SATCOM (SATellite COMmunication).
Although this is still debated, according to several pilots the ACARS transmissions can be switched off by the pilot from inside the cockpit, by disabling the use of VHF and SATCOM channels. This means that the system is not completely switched off, but it can’t transmit to the receiving stations.
SATCOM
SATCOM is a radio system that uses a constellation of satellites used to trasmit voice, data or both. As said, ACARS can make use of SATCOM to transmit its data to ground stations. Dealing with ACARS, the SATCOM system used by MH370 was linked to the INMARSAT network.
Inmarsat is a British satellite telecommunications company, which offers global, mobile services through a constellation of three geostationary satellites.
The system relies on “pings”.
Ping
A Ping is a quite common term for IT Networking. It refers to a utility used to test the reachability of a host on an IP network and measure the round-trip time (RTT) of the packets even if it is more frequently associated to the data messages themselves, or “pings”.
Similarly to what happens on a Local Area Network, satellites send pings (once a hour) to their receiving peers that respond to it thus signaling their network presence. Hence, these pings are no more than simple probes used to check the reachability of SATCOM systems aboard the planes.
Based on details recently disclosed, the last response to a satellite ping, was sent by the SATCOM aboard MH370 at 08.11AM Malaysia time, some 7 hours past the loss of contact with the Boeing 777.
From the analysis of the time between request and responce it is possible to work out the distance of the plane which is a circumference of certain radius from the satellite based on which, two possible routes were drawn by the investigators.
The question is why the hijacker(s) did not prevent the plane from responding to pings: most probably, being a networking detail, not even pilots know that their system/antenna respond “I am here” even if the SATCOM is not being used by any onboard systems (i.e. ACARS).
http://news.ifeng.com/world/special/malaixiyakejishilian/content-4/detail_2014_03/17/34853346_0.shtml来源：凤凰卫视 现场有英国记者问，“马政府是否应该向家属道歉”，马交通部长希沙姆丁回答：“政府是负责任的，你这样问是不负责任的。” what the fk!
就象网络传送数据，送出去的数据是不是给对方收到要等下一个handshake回来才能确定。简单说就是, the receiver sent back a message to the sender and confirm it received the last message, I am ready for the next one.
http://news.ifeng.com/world/special/malaixiyakejishilian/content-4/detail_2014_03/17/34853346_0.shtml来源：凤凰卫视 现场有英国记者问，“马政府是否应该向家属道歉”，马交通部长希沙姆丁回答：“政府是负责任的，你这样问是不负责任的。” what the fk!
Russia “Puzzled” Over Malaysia Airlines “Capture” By US Navy
美国海军“俘获”马来西亚航班，俄罗斯“很困惑”
Posted by EU Times on Mar 14th, 2014
载于欧盟时报，2014.3.14
A new report circulating in the Kremlin today prepared by the Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff of the Armed Forces (GRU) states that Aerospace Defence Forces (VKO) experts remain “puzzled” as to why the United States Navy “captured and then diverted” a Malaysia Airlines civilian aircraft from its intended flight-path to their vast and highly-secretive Indian Ocean base located on the Diego Garcia atoll.
According to this report, Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 (also marketed as China Southern Airlines flight 748 through a codeshare) was a scheduled passenger flight from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, to Beijing, China, when on 8 March this Boeing 777-200ER aircraft “disappeared” in flight with 227 passengers on board from 15 countries, most of whom were Chinese, and 12 crew members.
Interesting to note, this report says, was that Flight 370 was already under GRU “surveillance” after it received a “highly suspicious” cargo load that had been traced to the Indian Ocean nation Republic of Seychelles, and where it had previously been aboard the US-flagged container ship MV Maersk Alabama.
What first aroused GRU suspicions regarding the MV Maersk Alabama, this report continues, was that within 24-hours of off-loading this “highly suspicious” cargo load bound for Malaysia Airlines Flight 370, the two highly-trained US Navy Seals assigned to protect it, Mark Daniel Kennedy, 43 , and Jeffrey Keith Reynolds, 44, were found dead under “suspicious circumstances.”
报告说，MV Maersk Alabama号引起GRU怀疑，是因为(后来上马航370的)“高度可 疑”货物从船上卸载后24小时内，受命保护该货物得两名高度训练过的美国海军海豹队 员（43岁的Mark Daniel Kennedy和44岁的Jeffrey Keith Reynolds）死于“可疑的环 境”。
Both Kennedy and Reynolds, this report says, were employed by the Virginia Beach, Virginia-based maritime security firm The Trident Group which was founded by US Navy Special Operations Personnel (SEAL’s) and Senior US Naval Surface Warfare Officers and has long been known by the GRU to protect vital transfers of both atomic and biological materials throughout the world.
Upon GRU “assests” confirming that this “highly suspicious” cargo was aboard Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 on 8 March, this report notes, Moscow notified China’s Ministry of State Security (MSS) of their concerns and received “assurances” that “all measures” would be taken as to ascertain what was being kept so hidden when this aircraft entered into their airspace.
However, this report says, and as yet for still unknown reasons, the MSS was preparing to divert Flight 370 from its scheduled destination of Beijing to Haikou Meilan International Airport (HAK) located in Hainan Province (aka Hainan Island).
Prior to entering the People Liberation Army (PLA) protected zones of the South China Sea known as the Spratly Islands, this report continues, Flight 370 “significantly deviated” from its flight course and was tracked by VKO satellites and radar flying into the Indian Ocean region and completing its nearly 3,447 kilometer (2,142 miles) flight to Diego Garcia.
Critical to note about Flight 370’s flight deviation, GRU experts in this report say, was that it occurred during the same time period that all of the Spratly Island mobile phone communications operated by China Mobile were being jammed.
China Mobile, it should be noted, extended phone coverage in the Spratly Islands in 2011 so that PLA soldiers stationed on the islands, fishermen, and merchant vessels within the area would be able to use mobile services, and can also provide assistance during storms and sea rescues.
As to how the US Navy was able to divert Flight 370 to its Diego Garcia base, this report says, appears to have been accomplished remotely as this Boeing 777-200ER aircraft is equipped with a fly-by-wire (FBW) system that replaces the conventional manual flight controls of an aircraft with an electronic interface allowing it to be controlled like any drone-type aircraft.
However, this report notes, though this aircraft can be controlled remotely, the same cannot be said of its communication systems which can only be shut down manually; and in the case of Flight 370, its data reporting system was shut down at 1:07 a.m., followed by its transponder ( which transmits location and altitude) which was shut down at 1:21 a.m.
What remains “perplexing” about this incident, GRU analysts in this report say, are why the American mainstream media outlets have yet to demand from the Obama regime the radar plots and satellite images of the Indian Ocean and South China Sea regions as the US military covers this entire area from Diego Garcia like no other seas in the world due to its vital shipping and air lanes.
Most sadly, this report concludes, the US is actually able to conceal the reason(s) for the “disappearance” of Flight 370 as they have already done so after the events of 11 September 2011 when the then Bush regime “ disappeared” American Airlines Flight 77 and its 64 passengers and crew after falsely claiming it hit the Pentagon, but which was confirmed by the CNN News Service [see video HERE] not to have happened.
Malaysia Airlines Mystery Deepens After Top Disease Experts Rushed To Indian Ocean
Posted by EU Times on Mar 16th, 2014
A grim report prepared by the Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff of the Armed Forces (GRU) on Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 is stating today that within 24-hours of this aircrafts “diversion” to the highly secretive Indian Ocean US military base located on the Diego Garcia atoll, no less than four flights, within the past week, containing top American and Chinese disease scientists and experts have, likewise, been flown to there.
According to this report, Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 (also marketed as China Southern Airlines flight 748 through a codeshare) was a scheduled passenger flight from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, to Beijing, China, when on 8 March this Boeing 777-200ER aircraft “disappeared” in flight with 227 passengers on board from 15 countries, most of whom were Chinese, and 12 crew members.
As we had previously noted in our report “Russia “Puzzled” Over Malaysia Airlines “Capture” By US Navy,” the GRU had previously notified China’s Ministry of State Security (MSS) of its suspicions regarding this flight due its containing a “highly suspicious” cargo that had been offloaded in the Republic of Seychelles from the US-flagged container ship MV Maersk Alabama.
First arousing the GRU’s concerns regarding this “highly suspicious” cargo, this report continues, was that after its unloading from the MV Maersk Alabama on 17 February, its then transfer to Seychelles International Airport where it was loaded on an Emirates flight bound for Kuala Lumpur International Airport in Malaysia, after first stopping over in Dubai, the two highly trained US Navy SEALS who were guarding it were found dead.
The two US Navy SEALS protecting this “highly suspicious” cargo, Mark Daniel Kennedy, 43, and Jeffrey Keith Reynolds, 44, were found dead under “ suspicious circumstances” aboard the MV Maersk Alabama, this report says, further raising Russian intelligence suspicions as they were both employed by the Virginia Beach, Virginia-based maritime security firm The Trident Group which was founded by US Navy Special Operations Personnel (SEAL’s) and Senior US Naval Surface Warfare Officers and has long been known by the GRU to protect vital transfers of both atomic and biological materials throughout the world.
Upon Flight 370’s departure from Malaysia on 8 March, this report continues, the GRU was notified by the MSS that they were going to divert it from its scheduled destination of Beijing to Haikou Meilan International Airport (HAK) located in Hainan Province (aka Hainan Island).
Prior to this planes entering into People Liberation Army (PLA) protected zones of the South China Sea known as the Spratly Islands, however , this report continues, Flight 370 “significantly deviated” from its flight course and was tracked by VKO satellites and radar flying into the Indian Ocean region and completing its nearly 3,447 kilometer (2,142 miles) flight to Diego Garcia.
In a confirmation of the GRU’s assertion that Flight 370 was, indeed, flown to Diego Garcia, this report says, satellite transmission data analyzed by US investigators showed that this planes most likely last-known position was in a zone about 1,609 kilometers (1,000 miles) west of Perth, Australia in the Indian Ocean..
Most troubling to the GRU about Flight 370’s “diversion” to Diego Garcia, this report says, was that it was “nearly immediately” followed by some of the top disease scientists and experts from the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CCDCP) embarking to Diego Garcia on at least four flights.
As to why both American and Chinese disease experts were taken to Diego Garcia where Flight 370 is now known to be, this report says, has as yet not been answered by either of these governments after repeated Foreign Ministry requests for “explanations and clarification.”
What is to be known, this report says, is that as Malaysia has been forced to admit Flight 370 was, indeed, “diverted” from its flight path as the GRU had previously reported, and as at least 25 nations are now involved in searching for it, it remains a mystery as to what is actually occurring.
Also known, this report concludes, is that Diego Garcia as a designated ETOPS emergency landing site for flight planning purposes of commercial airliners transversing the Indian Ocean, and as one of 33 emergency landing sites worldwide for the NASA Space Shuttle, it is “inconceivable” that any type of aircraft, let alone Flight 370, can fly anywhere in the Southern Hemisphere without being tracked, monitored and recorded in totality.
http://news.ifeng.com/world/special/malaixiyakejishilian/content-4/detail_2014_03/17/34853346_0.shtml来源：凤凰卫视 现场有英国记者问，“马政府是否应该向家属道歉”，马交通部长希沙姆丁回答：“政府是负责任的，你这样问是不负责任的。” what the fk!
我已经是重度患者了。。。
上次apple mm科普，发动机是不会自己ping的，要通过acars，到底是不是ping固定的卫星也不好说
关于这个ping，一开始说的是只有request，没有内容，但是后来是说acars都有speed and altitude info，不然那个45000 feet从何而知
但我们都不是家属，还可以依旧生活，没啥改变。
家属怕是生活彻底改变了
http://theaviationist.com/2014/03/16/satcom-acars-explained/
What SATCOM, ACARS and Pings tell us about the missing Malaysia Airlines MH370
Mar 16 2014 - 21 Comments
By David Cenciotti
Eight days since the Malaysian Airlines flight MH370 disappeared somewhere over southeast Asia, the last known details about the missing Boeing 777 come from the onboard SATCOM system.
Very few details about the MH370 flight from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing, disappered from the skies on Mar. 7, 2014 have emerged. First of all we don’t know if it crashed or landed somewhere. Second, provided it was really hijacked as Malaysian authorities suggest, we don’t really know whether the pilot or co-pilot played an active role in the operation even if investigators are scrutinizing their profile and personal life.
Based on the information that were released so far, we have been able to draw several different scenarios, each featuring a certain degree of likeliness. The few details that were gathered past the loss of radio contact with the aircraft, come from satellites.
Let’s see why.
ACARS
ACARS is the acronym for Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System. It’s an automated communication system used by commercial planes to transmit and receive messages from ground facilities (airline, maintenance department, aircraft or system manufacturer, etc). Therefore, along with the general information about the flight (callsign, speed, altitude, position, etc), these messages may contain what we can consider systems health checks.
ACARS is a service: airlines have to pay for it. According to the information available to date, it looks like Malaysia Airlines subscribed only to engine health monitoring that enabled MH370 to send data to Rolls Royce.
The ACARS system aboard MH370 was switched off some minutes before the transponder.
ACARS rely on VHF frequencies (indeed, you can track planes and decode messages with a simple radio receiver tuned on the proper ACARS frequencies and a software running on your computer) or SATCOM (SATellite COMmunication).
Although this is still debated, according to several pilots the ACARS transmissions can be switched off by the pilot from inside the cockpit, by disabling the use of VHF and SATCOM channels. This means that the system is not completely switched off, but it can’t transmit to the receiving stations.
SATCOM
SATCOM is a radio system that uses a constellation of satellites used to trasmit voice, data or both. As said, ACARS can make use of SATCOM to transmit its data to ground stations. Dealing with ACARS, the SATCOM system used by MH370 was linked to the INMARSAT network.
Inmarsat is a British satellite telecommunications company, which offers global, mobile services through a constellation of three geostationary satellites.
The system relies on “pings”.
Ping
A Ping is a quite common term for IT Networking. It refers to a utility used to test the reachability of a host on an IP network and measure the round-trip time (RTT) of the packets even if it is more frequently associated to the data messages themselves, or “pings”.
Similarly to what happens on a Local Area Network, satellites send pings (once a hour) to their receiving peers that respond to it thus signaling their network presence. Hence, these pings are no more than simple probes used to check the reachability of SATCOM systems aboard the planes.
Based on details recently disclosed, the last response to a satellite ping, was sent by the SATCOM aboard MH370 at 08.11AM Malaysia time, some 7 hours past the loss of contact with the Boeing 777.
From the analysis of the time between request and responce it is possible to work out the distance of the plane which is a circumference of certain radius from the satellite based on which, two possible routes were drawn by the investigators.
The question is why the hijacker(s) did not prevent the plane from responding to pings: most probably, being a networking detail, not even pilots know that their system/antenna respond “I am here” even if the SATCOM is not being used by any onboard systems (i.e. ACARS).
Ping是不是只有信号，但没有高度和速度数据？
美国在印度洋就一个军事基地，前面那个澳大利亚的说得挺对，雷达不是万能的，美国就靠印度洋那一个军事基地，我一直觉得是不可能cover整个印度洋的，以前漏算了澳大利亚的雷达，现在把它加进来，我觉得也还是很可能有不少盲区的地方。
ping应该是独立于acars，不过我也许理解错了
我深信绝不是普通空难事故。
点击查看原文 ->
http://news.sohu.com/20140317/n396750484.shtml
马方不是事件的主导方?那么也就是说劫机分子不是冲着马方面去的?
what the fk!
顶ls！ 决定这辈子不去马来西亚，猪一样的政府。。。
Russia “Puzzled” Over Malaysia Airlines “Capture” By US Navy
美国海军“俘获”马来西亚航班，俄罗斯“很困惑”
Posted by EU Times on Mar 14th, 2014
载于欧盟时报，2014.3.14
A new report circulating in the Kremlin today prepared by the Main
Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff of the Armed Forces (GRU)
states that Aerospace Defence Forces (VKO) experts remain “puzzled” as to
why the United States Navy “captured and then diverted” a Malaysia
Airlines civilian aircraft from its intended flight-path to their vast and
highly-secretive Indian Ocean base located on the Diego Garcia atoll.
今日在克里姆林宫流传一份新报告，该报告由武装力量总参谋部(GRU)的情报部门
完成。报告说，防空军（VKO）专家仍然“困惑”于为什么美国海军“俘获并转移”一
架马来西亚民航航班，从其原定路线到美海军位于印度洋上迭戈加西亚岛的巨大保密基
地。
According to this report, Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 (also marketed as
China Southern Airlines flight 748 through a codeshare) was a scheduled
passenger flight from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, to Beijing, China, when on 8
March this Boeing 777-200ER aircraft “disappeared” in flight with 227
passengers on board from 15 countries, most of whom were Chinese, and 12
crew members.
按这份报告，马来西亚航班370（与中国南航748代码共享）为马来西亚科伦坡至中
国北京的常规客机，在3月8日该波音777-200ER飞机在飞行中“消失”，机上有来自15
个国家的227名乘客（多数来自中国），以及12名机组人员。
Interesting to note, this report says, was that Flight 370 was already
under GRU “surveillance” after it received a “highly suspicious” cargo
load that had been traced to the Indian Ocean nation Republic of Seychelles,
and where it had previously been aboard the US-flagged container ship MV
Maersk Alabama.
值得一提的是，该报告说，航班370早已处于GRU“监控”之下。此前它上面装了“
高度可疑的货物”，该货物来自印度洋国家塞舌尔，挂美国旗的集装箱船MV Maersk
Alabama号曾停泊于此。
What first aroused GRU suspicions regarding the MV Maersk Alabama, this
report continues, was that within 24-hours of off-loading this “highly
suspicious” cargo load bound for Malaysia Airlines Flight 370, the two
highly-trained US Navy Seals assigned to protect it, Mark Daniel Kennedy, 43
, and Jeffrey Keith Reynolds, 44, were found dead under “suspicious
circumstances.”
报告说，MV Maersk Alabama号引起GRU怀疑，是因为(后来上马航370的)“高度可
疑”货物从船上卸载后24小时内，受命保护该货物得两名高度训练过的美国海军海豹队
员（43岁的Mark Daniel Kennedy和44岁的Jeffrey Keith Reynolds）死于“可疑的环
境”。
Both Kennedy and Reynolds, this report says, were employed by the
Virginia Beach, Virginia-based maritime security firm The Trident Group
which was founded by US Navy Special Operations Personnel (SEAL’s) and
Senior US Naval Surface Warfare Officers and has long been known by the GRU
to protect vital transfers of both atomic and biological materials
throughout the world.
报告说，这两个人受雇于位于佛吉尼亚的海上安全企业三叉戟集团Virginia分部，
该集团由美国海军特种部队（海豹）人事部门和高级军官建立，GRU早已知道他们负责
保护世界范围内的关键核、生化材料传递。
Upon GRU “assests” confirming that this “highly suspicious” cargo
was aboard Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 on 8 March, this report notes,
Moscow notified China’s Ministry of State Security (MSS) of their concerns
and received “assurances” that “all measures” would be taken as to
ascertain what was being kept so hidden when this aircraft entered into
their airspace.
GRU“断言”，此“高度可疑”货物在3月8日上了马航370，报告说，莫斯科就此提
醒了中国国家安全部并收到“保证”说会采取“一切措施”以弄清楚这里面藏了什么，
只要航班一进入中国领空。
However, this report says, and as yet for still unknown reasons, the MSS
was preparing to divert Flight 370 from its scheduled destination of
Beijing to Haikou Meilan International Airport (HAK) located in Hainan
Province (aka Hainan Island).
然而，报告说，因未知原因，中国国安部准备转移370航班，从计划的北京路线到
位于海南的海口美兰国际机场。
Prior to entering the People Liberation Army (PLA) protected zones of
the South China Sea known as the Spratly Islands, this report continues,
Flight 370 “significantly deviated” from its flight course and was tracked
by VKO satellites and radar flying into the Indian Ocean region and
completing its nearly 3,447 kilometer (2,142 miles) flight to Diego Garcia.
报告继续说，在进入解放军保护的南中国海区域（南沙群岛）之前，370航班“大
幅偏离”其航线并（由航空军VKO卫星及雷达跟踪）飞入了印度洋区域，最终完成其
3447公里飞行到达迭戈加西亚。
Critical to note about Flight 370’s flight deviation, GRU experts in
this report say, was that it occurred during the same time period that all
of the Spratly Island mobile phone communications operated by China Mobile
were being jammed.
GRU专家说，关于370航班偏航，特别值得说明的是事件发生时整个南沙群岛的中国
移动手机通讯信号都被屏蔽了。
China Mobile, it should be noted, extended phone coverage in the Spratly
Islands in 2011 so that PLA soldiers stationed on the islands, fishermen,
and merchant vessels within the area would be able to use mobile services,
and can also provide assistance during storms and sea rescues.
中国移动在2011年扩充了南沙劝导的手机覆盖范围，以方便守岛的解放军战士，渔
民，商船使用手机服务，也可在风暴和海事救援方面提供支持。
As to how the US Navy was able to divert Flight 370 to its Diego Garcia
base, this report says, appears to have been accomplished remotely as this
Boeing 777-200ER aircraft is equipped with a fly-by-wire (FBW) system that
replaces the conventional manual flight controls of an aircraft with an
electronic interface allowing it to be controlled like any drone-type
aircraft.
关于美国海军何以能让370航班转飞到其迭戈加西亚基地，报告说，似乎是通过远
程操纵该飞机的电传操控系统（FBW）以替代传统手工飞行控制，使用类似无人机的操
控界面。
However, this report notes, though this aircraft can be controlled
remotely, the same cannot be said of its communication systems which can
only be shut down manually; and in the case of Flight 370, its data
reporting system was shut down at 1:07 a.m., followed by its transponder (
which transmits location and altitude) which was shut down at 1:21 a.m.
然而，报告说，虽然飞机可以远程控制，其通讯系统可能只能手工关闭；具体到
370的情况，其数据报告系统于1:07被关闭，其位置报告系统于1:21被关闭。
What remains “perplexing” about this incident, GRU analysts in this
report say, are why the American mainstream media outlets have yet to demand
from the Obama regime the radar plots and satellite images of the Indian
Ocean and South China Sea regions as the US military covers this entire area
from Diego Garcia like no other seas in the world due to its vital shipping
and air lanes.
GRU分析员说，这次事件中仍然“令人困惑”的是为何美国主流媒体还没有要求奥
巴马政府提供印度洋和中国南海地区的雷达图及卫星图。美国军队从迭戈加西亚起覆盖
这片广大区域远超世界其它海域，由于位于航空、航海要冲位置。
Most sadly, this report concludes, the US is actually able to conceal
the reason(s) for the “disappearance” of Flight 370 as they have already
done so after the events of 11 September 2011 when the then Bush regime “
disappeared” American Airlines Flight 77 and its 64 passengers and crew
after falsely claiming it hit the Pentagon, but which was confirmed by the
CNN News Service [see video HERE] not to have happened.
报告总结，悲哀的是，美国实际上有能力隐藏370航班“消失”的原因。在2011年9
.11事件后，当时的布什政府使美国航空77航班及其64名乘客及机组人员“消失”，声
称它击中了五角大楼，但CNN后来确认攻击五角大楼这事没有发生。
------------------------------------------------------------
Malaysia Airlines Mystery Deepens After Top Disease Experts Rushed To
Indian Ocean
Posted by EU Times on Mar 16th, 2014
A grim report prepared by the Main Intelligence Directorate of the
General Staff of the Armed Forces (GRU) on Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 is
stating today that within 24-hours of this aircrafts “diversion” to the
highly secretive Indian Ocean US military base located on the Diego Garcia
atoll, no less than four flights, within the past week, containing top
American and Chinese disease scientists and experts have, likewise, been
flown to there.
According to this report, Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 (also marketed as
China Southern Airlines flight 748 through a codeshare) was a scheduled
passenger flight from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, to Beijing, China, when on 8
March this Boeing 777-200ER aircraft “disappeared” in flight with 227
passengers on board from 15 countries, most of whom were Chinese, and 12
crew members.
As we had previously noted in our report “Russia “Puzzled” Over
Malaysia Airlines “Capture” By US Navy,” the GRU had previously notified
China’s Ministry of State Security (MSS) of its suspicions regarding this
flight due its containing a “highly suspicious” cargo that had been
offloaded in the Republic of Seychelles from the US-flagged container ship
MV Maersk Alabama.
First arousing the GRU’s concerns regarding this “highly suspicious”
cargo, this report continues, was that after its unloading from the MV
Maersk Alabama on 17 February, its then transfer to Seychelles International
Airport where it was loaded on an Emirates flight bound for Kuala Lumpur
International Airport in Malaysia, after first stopping over in Dubai, the
two highly trained US Navy SEALS who were guarding it were found dead.
The two US Navy SEALS protecting this “highly suspicious” cargo, Mark
Daniel Kennedy, 43, and Jeffrey Keith Reynolds, 44, were found dead under “
suspicious circumstances” aboard the MV Maersk Alabama, this report says,
further raising Russian intelligence suspicions as they were both employed
by the Virginia Beach, Virginia-based maritime security firm The Trident
Group which was founded by US Navy Special Operations Personnel (SEAL’s)
and Senior US Naval Surface Warfare Officers and has long been known by the
GRU to protect vital transfers of both atomic and biological materials
throughout the world.
Upon Flight 370’s departure from Malaysia on 8 March, this report
continues, the GRU was notified by the MSS that they were going to divert it
from its scheduled destination of Beijing to Haikou Meilan International
Airport (HAK) located in Hainan Province (aka Hainan Island).
Prior to this planes entering into People Liberation Army (PLA)
protected zones of the South China Sea known as the Spratly Islands, however
, this report continues, Flight 370 “significantly deviated” from its
flight course and was tracked by VKO satellites and radar flying into the
Indian Ocean region and completing its nearly 3,447 kilometer (2,142 miles)
flight to Diego Garcia.
In a confirmation of the GRU’s assertion that Flight 370 was, indeed,
flown to Diego Garcia, this report says, satellite transmission data
analyzed by US investigators showed that this planes most likely last-known
position was in a zone about 1,609 kilometers (1,000 miles) west of Perth,
Australia in the Indian Ocean..
Most troubling to the GRU about Flight 370’s “diversion” to Diego
Garcia, this report says, was that it was “nearly immediately” followed by
some of the top disease scientists and experts from the United States
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Chinese Center for
Disease Control and Prevention (CCDCP) embarking to Diego Garcia on at least
four flights.
关于370航班偏航到迭戈加西亚，GRU报告说，最麻烦的是“几乎”立刻跟着来了至
少四架飞机，机上是美国疾病控制与方中心和中国疾病控制预防中心的顶级专家。
As to why both American and Chinese disease experts were taken to Diego
Garcia where Flight 370 is now known to be, this report says, has as yet not
been answered by either of these governments after repeated Foreign
Ministry requests for “explanations and clarification.”
至于为什么美国和中国疾病专家到迭戈加西亚（370航班所在），报告说，（俄）
外交部要求“解释澄清”之后，相关政府至今还没有回答。
What is to be known, this report says, is that as Malaysia has been
forced to admit Flight 370 was, indeed, “diverted” from its flight path as
the GRU had previously reported, and as at least 25 nations are now
involved in searching for it, it remains a mystery as to what is actually
occurring.
现在知道的，是马来西亚被迫承认，370航班如GRU前面说的偏离了原定航线。至少
25个国家卷入了搜索，至今实际发生的还是个谜。
Also known, this report concludes, is that Diego Garcia as a designated
ETOPS emergency landing site for flight planning purposes of commercial
airliners transversing the Indian Ocean, and as one of 33 emergency landing
sites worldwide for the NASA Space Shuttle, it is “inconceivable” that any
type of aircraft, let alone Flight 370, can fly anywhere in the Southern
Hemisphere without being tracked, monitored and recorded in totality.
报告总结，还知道的是迭戈加西亚是为商业航班横跨大西洋时指定的ETOPS紧急着
陆点，也是NASA航天飞机在世界上的33个紧急着陆点之一，“不可想象”任何航空器（
别说370航班）可能在南半球飞行而没有完整的跟踪、监视、记录。
马来西亚为何撒谎连连？ 我基于公开资料研究后，发现了马航事件可能的内幕。马航是被劫持的，且劫机者向马来西亚政府提出了与马来西亚国内政治有关的政治诉求，马政府在接到劫机者的要求后，经过5个小时的谈判，最后没有答应劫机者的诉求，劫机者在等待无果耗尽燃料后。。。。马政府从始至终都知道飞机在哪里。在得知飞机燃料耗尽后，马政府决定将事件描述成常规失事。以避免人道主义压力和避免让国内政治力量知道劫机者的政治诉求。以下是逻辑分析： 飞机为什么折返马来西亚？ 答：劫机者在控制飞机后立即折回马来西亚反映劫机者的诉求与马来西亚有关。 谁是劫机者？ 答：机组人员 劫机者的诉求是什么？ 诉求如下：马来西亚政府立即答应某个政治要求，比如，宣布释放政治犯安华（3月7日，马来西亚上诉法庭推翻反对派领导人安华鸡奸案被判无罪的裁决。现年66岁的前副总理安华说，政府企图用这项指控毁掉他的政治生涯。） 如果答应条件，会保证飞机安全，并对外宣称飞机出现故障，返航降落在马来西亚或者那个机场，否则将会毁灭飞机。 劫机者为什么主动关闭与地面导航的通讯联系？ 答：在控制飞机后，在提出诉求前，劫机者不希望导航台知道飞机被劫持，以便在政府答应条件后，以故障为理由体面的降落，劫机者认为政府会因为230多人的生命答应他们的条件，劫机者是希望活着回来的。于是关闭导航通讯，并启动了与马航总部内部通话的设备， 劫机者为什么一直在飞 这是一个关键 。，如果劫机者不是因为有某种诉求，只是因为心理失衡自杀，他早就自杀了！而不是飞到燃料耗尽，劫机者一直在等，等马政府的回复。 马来西亚政府为什么说谎 答：劫机者的政治诉求如果被大众知道，会引起政治地震，同时如果让国际社会知道马来西亚政府拒绝劫机者要求使飞机毁灭，将不利于马来西亚的声誉 美国已经知道真相 当马来西亚行为把事件搞成一个普通的航空事故或者一个永远找不飞机残骸的迷，然后赔偿家属了事。波音公司受不了，这样会使得波音公司背上飞机有质量问题的黑锅，于是波音公司和美国政府公布了飞机在失联后又飞了5个小时的铁证。在铁证面前逼马来西亚政府承认事件是劫机事件不是飞机技术故障，由此将美国波音公司洗白。事实上美国已经知道了事情的全部真相，美国甚至直到飞机最终到了那里。美国只发布对自己有利的，美国也不想发布全部真相，以得罪马来西亚，相反美国以真相要挟马来西亚政府，获取巨 大的政治利益。 为什么马来西亚在失联5个小时后才公开飞机失联？ 这个时间差马来西亚政府正在和劫机者讨价还价，这段时间飞机没有失联，联系一直在马来西亚政府与劫机者之间通畅保持着，且马来西亚政府也希望说服劫机者无条件放弃劫机，因此无法发布失联信息。当马来西亚政府确认飞机燃料耗尽，并定下隐瞒真相的策略后，公开了失联信息，并误导国际社会，制造找不到飞机的假象。但没有想到，波音飞机不堪忍受被抹黑，且有飞机继续飞行的铁证，公布了关键证据。 飞机就在马来西亚附近 根据马航的资料一开始飞机不断的折返游弋马来西亚附近，之后向西北消失在雷达上。劫机者的政治诉求主要是马来西亚国内事情，因此没有必要飞他国，另外劫机者是希望政府答应条件，自己能活着回来的，因此，也不会飞往印度洋，飞往印度洋是死路。飞往哈萨克斯坦其实和飞往印度洋一样也没有出路和必要，在马来西亚附近游弋等待谈判结果是最合理的。马来西亚政府现在还试图掩盖真相！事实上可能飞机从始至终都没有离开马来西亚的雷达，并与马来西亚高层政治人物保持联系，这也是一国总理担当事件发言人的原因之一！
太气人了，两百多人就这样消失
所以大马这个尿性，没什么奇怪的。东南亚猴子都是一路货色。