你是在监狱工作吧，连英文搜索都不会？
The BBC has accepted one of its live air correspondents wrongly speculated that an Israeli airstrike might have been responsible for the rocket attack at a Gaza hospital that initial reports claimed killed 500 people, as Israel denied involvement.
The Context
BBC News Channel, 17 October 2023
We have reviewed our coverage of the immediate aftermath of an explosion at the Al-Ahli Arab hospital in Gaza City on Tuesday night. During this our correspondent was giving instant analysis on the ground from Jerusalem in what was a confusing and difficult story. The programme repeatedly made it clear that it had yet to verify who was behind the blast, including in the questioning by the presenter. The correspondent said that the Israelis had been contacted and were investigating, adding “It’s hard to see what else this could be really given the size of the explosion other than an Israeli air strike or several air strikes” He then explained that in his experience as a reporter in Gaza that he had never seen explosions of this scale caused by rockets being fired out of the territory. He again stressed that the pictures had yet to be verified. We accept that even in this fast-moving situation it was wrong to speculate in this way, although he did not at any point report that it was an Israeli strike. This doesn’t represent the entirety of the BBC’s output and anyone watching, listening to or reading our coverage can see we have set out both sides’ competing claims about the explosion, clearly showing who is saying them, and what we do or don’t know.
19/10/2023 [1评]
https://www.bbc.co.uk/helpandfeedback/corrections_clarifications
.
Corrections and Clarifications
The BBC's responses to editorial, technical and corporate issues.
脑瘫玩意，也不想想，这东西能造假吗?
一个导弹和炸弹都分不清的人，就知道在这里造谣
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-israel-hamas-gaza-hospital-wsj-bomb-494737195839
“ Wall Street Journal did not tie the Gaza hospital blast to a US-made bomb, contrary to online claims”
“The Wall Street Journal has not reported that an American MK-84 was deployed in the Gaza hospital blast Tuesday,” it said in a statement to the AP.
The claim does not appear on The Wall Street Journal’s website. It also does not turn up in archived versions of the site.
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2023/oct/18/social-media/the-wall-street-journal-didnt-report-that-an-ameri/
"A Wall Street Journal spokesperson told PolitiFact that the newspaper did not publish any report about an American MK-84 being used in the blast.
The newspaper has published multiple stories about the hospital explosion, along with live updates about the war. None mention an American-made missile causing the explosion.
We found no evidence that any other credible news source made such a report."
大哥，你不懂英文就直说
BBC的记者在现场含沙射影说这是以色列炸的.
BBC现在道歉,是因为这样的报道是speculation,是错误的
"We accept that even in this fast-moving situation it was wrong to speculate in this way, although he did not at any point report that it was an Israeli strike. "
（观察者网讯）在五角大楼发言人证实美海军击落了“可能飞向以色列”的导弹后，美国官员披露了此次交火的更多细节。
美国有线电视新闻网（CNN）20日援引一位熟悉情况的美官员的话称，美军舰19日的交火时间远比最初报道的更长，击落的目标也更多，美军舰在9小时内击落了胡塞武装发射的4枚巡航导弹和15架无人机。一名美官员向“动力”网站给出了类似的说法，但他称被击落的无人机数量为19架。
据CNN报道，美国海军“卡尼”号驱逐舰18日穿过苏伊士运河向南航行，19日拦截了上述沿着红海向北飞行的导弹和无人机。一名美国官员说，从飞行轨迹判断，它们“毫无疑问是飞向以色列的”。他说，这些导弹和无人机被“卡尼”号驱逐舰发射的“标准”2防空导弹拦截。美官员称，考虑到飞行高度，其中一些被拦截的目标对商业航空构成了潜在威胁。
美国海军阿利·伯克级驱逐舰“卡尼”号（DDG 64）
CNN称，这名官员的说法比五角大楼此前的表态更加清晰。
同日，美国“动力”网站也引述了美国官员的话报道了此事，他同样表示交火持续了9小时，美舰击落了4枚巡航导弹，但被击落的无人机数量为19架。
10月19日晚些时候，五角大楼发言人莱德证实，红海地区部署的“卡尼”号驱逐舰拦截了3枚也门胡塞武装发射的对地导弹及数架无人机。莱德表示，之所以进行拦截，是因为美军根据导弹飞行情况判定其“构成了潜在威胁”，“可能指向以色列的目标”。但莱德同时表示，拦截行动“可能仍在继续”。
CNN还称，美军拦截胡塞武装发射导弹的情况极其罕见，特别是在当下巴以局势升级之际，这起事件变得更加敏感。美联社（AP）此前认为，此次拦截行动可能意味着本次冲突中美军打响了“保卫以色列”的第一枪。
这起交火只是最近几天发生的一系列紧张事件之一。随着巴以冲突不断升级，中东地区紧张局势加剧，美国在叙利亚和伊拉克的基地多次成为了无人机和火箭弹的目标。
据路透社报道，美国官员当地时间19日表示，美国军队最近几天在伊拉克和叙利亚多次遭到袭击，位于叙利亚南部叙约边境的美军坦夫军事基地18日遭到两架无人机袭击，导致一些人受轻伤。但美国官员没有表示谁应当对这次袭击负责。
莱德在19日的记者会上说，针对叙利亚基地的无人机袭击造成联军“轻微损伤”。根据他的说法，在针对坦夫军事基地的袭击中，一架无人机被美军拦截坠毁，另一架无人机撞击基地后导致联军受到轻伤。