私人助理马蕊控告郭文贵强奸 诉状曝光(图)

  返回列表
42496 阅读
86 评论
多维

遭中共通缉的外逃商人郭文贵近期被前私人助理马蕊一纸诉状告上美国纽约最高法院,后者称郭在过去几年中多次对其强奸。

  9月14日,马蕊状告郭文贵强奸一案诉状内容曝光。其中,郭文贵,又名郭浩云,被指至少拥有香港、阿联酋护照,香港、瓦努阿图身份。

  但诉状未提及郭文贵是否有美国护照或身份。可能基于此,郭文贵才在走投无路的情况下向美国移民局申请政治庇护。

  根据美国相关法律规定,马蕊一直诉状可能让郭文贵的政治庇护申请化为泡影。

  诉状内容还披露,郭文贵目前拥有的资产在20亿美元左右。他利用巨额资金和西方的关系网将自身包装成政治异见人士,并频繁爆料中共腐败问题。但这只是烟幕弹。

  诉状落款时间为2017年9月7日。

  



  郭文贵或面临法律制裁,政治庇护恐成泡影(图源:Twitter KwokMiles)

  附:《马蕊状告郭文贵强奸一案诉状》中文版:

  原告:马蕊,由Arkin Solbakken律所律师代理。

  被告:郭文贵,又名郭浩云,Miles Kwok。

  一、预先声明

  1.在过去几年中,被告人精心将自己的形象打造为一名政治异见人士,曝光中国政府内部的腐败问题。

  2.然而,这种伪造公众形象只是其烟雾弹,是其通过个人雄厚的财富和与西方世界广泛的人际关系包装出来的。

  3.被告人精心编造的故事不仅是为了自我满足, 而且还是被告对包括原告在内的多名人员发起恐吓攻势的掩护。

  4. 据此诉状,原告要求被告对其施加的多次性侵犯行为予以经济赔偿,以便被告——其曾逃脱多次刑事司法制裁——接受民事法庭追究。

  二、当事人

  5.原告为 28岁中国籍女性,在涉此案相关时间被被告雇佣为私人助理。原告发誓其诉状所陈述指控属实。

  6.被告为50岁男性,持香港(护照号KJ0398054 )、阿联酋(护照号J11F59997 )护照,拥有香港(身份证号 P746467-7)、瓦努阿图身份。

  7.被告曾、且目前仍居住与纽约第五大道781号知名的 Sherry-Netherland酒店。

  8.根据下文陈述,被告被媒体描述为“转变为政治活跃者的中国亿万富豪”。

  三、管辖权和审判地

  9. 法院拥有此案管辖权,鉴于被告是纽约居民。

  10. 审判地符合CPLR501条款,鉴于被告是本国居民。

  四、支撑指控的事实

  11. 被告是知名人士,资产估值20亿美元。

  12. 上文已陈述,被告通过媒体专门塑造了个人形象,被以“敢言异议人士”形象被称赞,其在曼哈顿奢侈豪宅中冒个人风险做出大量中国政府腐败指控。

  13. 因此,被告的指控引发一系列本地及国外媒体报道,被告被称为勇敢的举报人,虽然其也面临经济诈骗指控。

  (一)被告开始对原告发起暴力恐吓

  14. 被告利用在美国的关系,继续开展商业活动。

  15. 为此,被告寻找私人助理,并雇佣了原告。

  16. 原告被要求与被告共同旅行,至包括美国、英国、巴哈马等多个国家和地区。

  17. 遗憾的是,原告乍看认为是好机会的工作,迅速转变向其从未想象的方向。

  18. 事实上,就在原告抵达纽约与被告共同后,被告强制收走原告护照,并不再归还原告。

  19. 被告随后建议原告称,鉴于原告已为其工作,她不可以再回到中国。被告警告称,如果原告回国,将被捕入狱并被虐待。

  20. 被告随后禁止原告与除最亲密家人外的任何人说话。并禁止原告与任何纽约本地或其他工作地点的人员交流。

  21. 被告为实现完全孤立原告的目的,没收了原告所有电子设备。

  22. 被告将原告从外部世界全面孤立,并声称自己是她的唯一救世主。

  23. 例如,被告经常将原告限制在某一房间内并将房间上锁,直至被告决定将其释放。

  24. 原告的处境进一步恶化,因为其当时并不是一名流利的英语使用者。因此,其与外界沟通的几率,在被被告囚禁在一个非母语国家中的情况下,事实上是不存在的。

  25. 由于被告的相关措施,原告完全处于被告的控制和监禁之下。

  (二)被告在纽约首次强奸未遂

  26. 在对原告施加了身体与精神的控制后,被告开始发起热切的身体与精神上的恐吓。

  27. 随后,被告开始了一系列性侵犯活动,原告为受害者。

  28. 例如,某晚,原告正在被告住处,Sherry- Netherland 酒店为其会客做准备。

  29. 出于未名原因,在当晚将其带至“放映室”。

  30. 被告将原告带至放映室后,随即将门上锁,撕扯原告衣服,并对其进行击打。

  31. 原告得以离开房间时,鉴于没有护照且无法和外界联络,且如果原告违背被告将面临安全威胁,所以原告持续被被告囚禁。

  (三)被告对原告首次强奸

  32. 此后,在巴哈马,被告强追原告与其饮酒。

  33. 随后,原告告辞回房休息。

  34. 不久,原告被被告唤醒。被告骑在她身上并企图分开原告双腿。

  35. 原告高声要求被告停止。但被告拒绝,最终暴力制服原告。

  36. 被告在未得到原告同意的情况下强制与之发生性关系。

  37. 暴行结束后,被告将流血的原告独自留在房间。

  38. 原告继续生活在对被告的恐惧中,晚上不得不锁上房门,并保持尽可能长时间的清醒状态,以防被告再次进入房间实施强奸。

  (四)被告笫二次强奸原告

  39. 强奸后,被告对原告的囚禁仍在持续。

  40. 第二次发生在被告伦敦Prince's Gate办公室内。

  41. 原告正在工作时,被告走入房间。

  42. 随后被告将门反锁。

  43. 被告直接走向原告,将其粗暴从椅子上拽起。

  44. 被告将原告摔在地上,开始尝试撕扯其衣服。

  45. 原告试图并持续做出身体反抗。

  46. 此时,原告试图用手盖住牛仔裤的扣子。

  47. 原告最终被被告暴力制服,强行将手分开。

  48. 原告被制服后,被告扯掉原告牛仔裤扣子,将其裤子与内裤脱掉。

  49. 整个反抗过程中,原告乞求被告停止。

  50. 被告拒绝,冷酷地告诉原告不要呼喊。

  51. 被告将原告双手控制住,以防其继续反抗,并将身体押上。

  52. 被告用腿分开原告双腿,随后实施强奸。

  (五)原告逃离并向中国警方报案

  53. 最终,原告得以逃离被告控制。

  54. 在一位英国律师的帮助下,原告发表了一封手写的《个人声明》,描述了上述内容,并向中国警方报案。

  55. 随后,原告向中国有关部门提供证词并起誓陈述属实,相关内容构成了本诉状主要内容。

  56. 声明中,原告描述了被告在英国强奸后,于自己内裤留下精液的情况。

  57. 接到报案后,中国警方将相关物证留存。相关证据是中国对被告发出第二张全球通缉令的依据。

  58. 被告令人震惊且胆大妄为的行径对原告造成了严重且长期的身体与精神伤害。

  59. 被告应对其非法囚禁、强奸、殴打等罪行负责。

  五、指控第一条罪行(殴打)

  60. 原告指控内容已在上文提及,完整陈述。

  61. 如上文所述,被告对原告持续地采取了一系列监禁、暴力及性侵行为。

  62.被告对原告实施物理监禁,殴打,强奸。

  63.被告的行为包括对原告的殴打,并实际实施且对原告造成身体伤害。

  64. 被告通过身体接触对原告施加痛苦的侵犯。

  65. 这些接触是故意的、未得到原告允许的且本质上极具攻击性。

  66. 这些接触未经允许,亦无合理原因,被告也未遭挑衅。被告清楚其行为未得到原告允许。

  67. 原告承受的伤害完全是由被告一个人施加。

  68. 因以上行径,原告经受了严重的身体与精神痛苦,及羞辱,且被限制人身自由,否则其将遭到更多伤害。

  69. 因以上行径,原告所受伤害应或赔偿,待法庭判决,应不少于2000万美元。

  六、指控第二条罪行(强奸)

  70. 原告指控内容已在上文提及,完整陈述。

  71. 如上文所述,被告对原告持续地采取了一系列监禁、暴力及性侵行为。

  72. 被告对原告实施物理监禁,殴打,强奸。

  73. 被告的行为包括对原告的强奸,并实际实施且对原告造成身体伤害。

  74. 被告通过身体接触对原告施加痛苦的侵犯。

  75. 这些接触是故意的、未得到原告允许的且本质上极具攻击性。

  76. 这些接触未经允许,亦无合理原因,被告也未遭挑衅。被告清楚其行为未得到原告允许。

  77. 原告承受的伤害完全是由被告一个人施加。

  78. 因以上行径,原告经受了严重的身体与精神痛苦,及羞辱,且被限制人身自由,否则其将遭到更多伤害。

  79. 因以上行径,原告所受伤害应或赔偿,待法庭判决, 应不少于 2000万美元。

  七、指控第三条罪行(故意造成精神损害)

  80. 原告指控内容已在上文提及,完整陈述。

  81. 被告的行径,包括对原告的囚禁,强奸,殴打,是极端,粗暴,完全不能被文明社会所容忍的。

  82. 被告行为均属故意实施。对原告造成了极大的精神损害。

  83. 被告的行为是原告遭受伤害的直接原因。

  84. 原告被剥夺自由,遭受了严重的身体和精神痛苦。

  85. 因以上行径,原告所受伤害应或赔偿,待法庭判决, 应不少于 2000万美元。

  八、指控第四条罪行(过失造成精神损害)

  86. 原告指控内容已在上文提及,完整陈述。

  87. 被告的行径,包括对原告的强奸,殴打,对原告精神造成严重伤害。

  88. 被告的行为是原告遭受伤害的直接原因。

  89. 原告被剥夺自由,遭受了严重的身体和精神痛苦。

  90. 因以上行径,原告所受伤害应或赔偿,待法庭判决,应不少于 2000 万美元。

  九、原告要求

  基于以上,原告要求法院作出以下判决:

  a )对于第一 条指控, 根据法院判决 结果, 应赔偿至少2,000万美元, 并支付法定 利息、罚金、律师费、相关费用及其他法庭认为合理合法的处罚。

  b )对于第二条指控, 根据法院判决结果,应赔偿至少2,000万美元,并支付法定利息、罚金、律师费、相关费用及其他法庭认为合理合法的处罚。

  c )对于第三条指控,根据法院判决结果,应赔偿至少2,000万美元,并支付法定利息、罚金、律师费、相关费用及其他法庭认为合理合法的处罚。

  d )对于第四条指控,根据法院判决结果,应赔偿至少 2,000万美元,并支付法定利息、罚金、律师费、相关费用及其他法庭认为合理合法的处罚。

  e )对以上指控,对原告作出惩罚性赔偿。

  纽约

  2017 年 9 月 7 日

  附:《马蕊状告郭文贵强奸一案诉状》英文版:

  SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

  RUIMA, Index. No.

  -against-

  Plaintiff,

  VERIFIED COMPLAINT

  GUO WENGUI a/k/a MILES KWOK and GOLDEN SPRING (NEW YORK) LTD.,

  Defendants.

  Plaintiff Rui Ma (“Plaintiff”), by her undersigned attorneys, as and for her verified complaint against defendant Guo Wengui a/k/a Miles Kwok (“Defendant Kwok”), and Golden

  Spring (New York) Ltd. (a/k/a Shiny Times Holding Limited, Spirit Charter Investment Limited and Beijing Pangu Investment Inc.) ("Golden Spring") respectfully alleges as follows:

  PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

  1. Over a period of several years, Defendant Kwok carefully cultivated an image of himself as a cultured political dissident who stands up to -- and exposes the rampant corruption within -- the tyrannical government of the People's Republic of China (the "PRC").

  2. This public persona, however, is a smokescreen, largely facilitated by Defendant Kwok's considerable personal wealth and prominent connections in the West.

  3. In fact, this crafted fiction serves not only to satisfy tl1e ego of Defendant Kwok and those who affiliate with him; it further provides Defendant Kwok with a means to

  mask the campaign of intimidation and terror he unleashes regularly upon those few of his employees, like Plaintiff, who dare not submit themselves entirely to his domination.

  4. By this Complaint, Plaintiff seeks recompense from Defendant Kwok for his repeated acts of mental cruelty and sexual violence, so that Defendant Kwok -- who has fled the jurisdictions in which he could be held criminally responsible - might be held accountable in a civil forum for his wrongs.

  THE:PARTIES

  5. Plaintiff is a 28-year old woman who is a Chinese national and who was, at all relevant times relevant here, employed as a personal assistant to Defendant Kwok. Plaintiff swears to the accuracy of the claims set forth herein by the verification attached to this pleading.

  6. Defendant Kwok is a 50-year old man, who is also a Chinese national.

  7. At all relevant times, Defendant Kwok was, and remains, a New York resident living in the Sherry-Netherland Hotel in an apartment that has been valued at approximately $68 million, located at 781 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York.

  8. Defendant Golden Spring is a Delaware Corporation affiliated with Defendant Kwok, authorized to do business in the State of New York.

  9. Upon information and belief, Defendant Kwok has used, and continues to use, an alias, which he perpetuates via forged and false official travel documents in connection with his international travel, to avoid the detection of relevant authorities.

  10. For exmple, on information and belief, Defendant Kwok has traveled under the Ho Wan Kwok and had official travel documents issued in that name, which is fictitious.

  11. It has been reported that Defendant has now sought asylum in the United States, claiming that he has become "a political opponent of the Chinese regime."

  12. Upon information and belief, Defendant's asylum application, which will allow him to remain in the United States perhaps for years, is nothing more than a ruse to allow him to continue to avoid answering for his crimes against Plaintiff in the PRC.

  JURISDICTION AND VENUE

  13. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter given that Defendant Kwok is a resident of the State of New York.

  14. Venue in this County is proper pursuant to CPLR 503 since Defendant Kwok is a resident of this County.

  FACTS SUPPORT CLAIMS

  15. Defendant Kwok is a well-known Chinese national with an estimated net worth in excess of $2 billion.

  16. Defendant Kwok has fashioned a particular persona via the media, such that he is lauded by some as a courageous dissident who has, at personal risk, detailed myriad allegations of corruption at the government of the PRC.

  17. Not surprisingly, Defendm1t Kwok's claims have resulted in a fair 皿 ount of press coverage, both locally and abroad, wherein Defendant Kwok is depicted as a whistleblower - albeit one with an indisputably checkered past rife with allegations of economic fraud.

  18. By his narrative, Defendant Kwok hopes to obtain political support for a petition for asylum in the United States, where he has yet to answer any of these the grave charges of misconduct pending in his homeland.

  Plaintiff Is Lured Away from her Family and Friends

  19. Perhaps emboldened by the respite from his foibles in China that afforded him by the status of his New York address and the prominence of his connections in the United States, Defendant Kwok commenced building an infrastructure that would allow for him to continue conducting business.

  20. To this end, Defendant Kwok established for himself a staff.

  21. Plaintiff, who was then employed by one of Defendant Kwok's China-based affiliated entities, was told that she was to travel to New York to meet with Defendant Kwok, in connection with a process that would require that she remain in the United States for only one week.

  22. This was a ruse. Unbeknownst to Plaintiff, she would not return to her home until almost three years later.

  Plaintiff's "Employment" Commences

  23. After meeting Defendant Kwok for the first time in New York, Plaintiff realized that she had taken no ordinary business trip.

  24. She was advised that she had arrived to act as Defendant Kwok's personal assistant.

  25. In this capacity, she would be required to travel with Defendant Kwok to many different countries, including the United Kingdom ("U.K.") and the Bahamas.

  26. Defendant Kwok further advised Plaintiff that, given that she was now in his employ, she could not at any point return to the PRC. If she did, Defendant Kwok warned, Plaintiff would be arrested and thrown in prison, where she would be tortured.

  27. To ensure that Plaintiff did not leave on her own, Defendant Kwok forcibly took away Plaintiff''''s passport, and precluded Plaintiff from accessing it.

  28. Defendant Kwok further closely monitor her access telephonic and electronic means of communication, choosing when she could use her phone and laptop, and obtaining from her the passwords she used for Facebook and other applications. He further had her internet browser monitored, so that he would be aware of any "inappropriate" website activity.

  29. Defendant Kwok additionally forbad Plaintiff from independently fraternizing in any way with others outside his presence. She was to have permission to call her parents;no other contact with family or friends was permitted.

  30. Plaintiff's isolation was exacerbated by the fact that she was not, at this time, a proficient English speaker. Accordingly, her limited opportunity to communicate with anyone while confined within Defendant Kwok's entourage in non-Chinese speaking countries was virtually non-existent.

  31. As a result of Defendant Kwok's actions, almost immediately upon her arrival to the United States and at all relevant times thereafter, Plaintiff became Defendant Kwok's captive.

  Defendant Kwok's Abuse Turns Physical

  32. Once he had obtained physical control over her person, Defendant Kwok began in earnest his program of terror.

  33. Among other things, for example, Defendant Kwok would require that Plaintiff until 2 a.m. or 4 a.m., seven days a week -- depriving her of any real opportunity to sleep.

  34. When she made a mistake of any sort (whether it be defying one of Defendant Kwok's "rules" or simply failing to attend to a business matter to his liking), Plaintiff would be subject to obscene ridicule, where she would be called a "pig" and a "whore", about whom her parents would be ashamed.

  35. This unrelenting verbal abuse was soon punctuated by acts of physical assault.

  36. For example, while assisting in preparations for guests who were to arrive at Defendant Kwok's New York apartment, Defendant Kwok directed Plaintiff to go into the“cinema room."

  37. Once there, Defendant Kwok pulled down his prults ruld underwear, and begrul to tear at Plaintiff's skirt **ld tights, physically battering her in the process.

  38. Plaintiff plead with Defendant Kwok and thereby narrowly avoided rape on this one occasion. Yet without her passport and in constant fear for her own safety and that of her parents (whom Defendant Kwok had threatened to harm physically if she crossed Defendant Kwok in any way), Plaintiff remained in Defendant Kwok's captivity.

  Defendant Kwok Rapes Plaintiff

  39. Not long after the incident in the cinema room, Defendant Kwok directed Plaintiff to have drinks with him.

  40. Plaintiff initially objected to this, indicating to him that she did not want to drink.

  41. Defendant Kwok, however, insisted - after which Plaintiff relented with the hopes of avoiding the humiliating and rage-filled outburst that she knew would occur if she did not.

  42. After some time, Plaintiff excused herself and went to her bedroom to sleep, only to be awoken by Defendant Kwok, who was lying on top of her and attempting to separate her legs.

  43. Plaintiff yelled at Defendant Kwok to stop, but he refused to do so. Eventually, Defendant Kwok overpowered her, and engaged in forced sexual intercourse with Plaintiff, without her consent.

  44. After this violence concluded, Defendant Kwok left Plaintiff alone, bleeding in her bed.

  45. Plaintiff continued to live in constant fear of Defendant Kwok thereafter, remaining awake for as long as she could muster for fear that Defendant Kwok would again enter her room.

  Defendant Kwok Rapes Plaintiff for the Second Time

  46. Subsequent to this rape, Defendant Kwok's confinement and isolation of Plaintiff continued, and while at Defendant Kwok's London home, Plaintiffs was raped for a second time.

  47. While Plaintiff was working Defendant Kwok entered the room where she was situated and locked the door behind him.

  48. He violently pulled Plaintiff from her chair, and threw Plaintiff to the floor and began to tear at her clothing.

  49. Plaintiff attempted to fight off Defendant Kwok's attack, engaging in a sustained physical struggle.

  50. Again, however, Plaintiff, however, was ultimately overpowered by Defendant Kwok, who tore at Plaintiff's pants and underwear.

  51. Throughout this entire struggle, Plaintiff begged Defendant Kwok to stop.

  52. But Defendant Kwok did not stop, and instead coldly responded that Plaintiff must stop shouting.

  53. Defendant Kwok proceeded to pin Plaintiff's hands together with one hand, so that she could no longer resist him, and put the full weight of his body on her.

  54. Defendant Kwok then proceeded to use his legs to separate Plaintiff's legs and again forcibly raped her.

  Plaintiff Escapes Defendant Kwok's Captivity and Reports Defendant Kwok to the PRC Criminal Authorities

  55. As a result of Defendant Kwok's unrelenting emotional and physical abuse, Plaintiff fell into a deep depression.

  56. She began to take as a given that her abuse would continue (and worsen) no matter how much she adhered to the rules that Defendant Kwok laid out for her.

  57. Plaintiff determined that she would attempt to reach out to people in ways that Defendant Kwok did not yet anticipate or could not yet control given his confiscation of her identification and passwords for social medial like Facebook and Twitter, if for no other reason than her desperate need for kindness from anotl1er human.

  58. Plaintiff then created a profile on a dating web application, and, upon receiving responses, would tentatively broach the subject of her mistreatment at tl1e hands of her employer.

  59. Plaintiff utilized tl1e dating application because she knew that Defendant Kwok was monitoring all other social media outlets, e.g. Facebook and Twitter, and she had virtually no other means of privately communicating with the outside world.

  60. This narrow band of potential access was soon thwarted, however.

  61. On information and belief, one of Defendant Kwok's favored employees (there were a number of females in the office that willing engaged in intercourse with him) discovered the account Plaintiff created and revealed Plaintiff's activities.

  62. Defendant Kwok's anger was extreme. After demeaning her in front of her colleagues he advised her that she would be subject to extreme punishment for her actions.

  63. Plaintiff, fearing for her life and the safety of her parents, Chinese nationals whom Defendant Kwok threatened were accessible to him through his vast resources and could be harmed, planned picked an appropriate time for escape.

  64. Without her belongings and with very little money, Plaintiff choose her best opportunity and fled from Defendant Kwok's London home.

  65. Upon arrival at the Chinese Embassy, she was able to communicate with an attorney in the United Kingdom, and was assured she would be protected from any retaliation Defendant Kwok might pursue if she pressed charges.

  Plaintiff File Criminal Complaints in the PRC

  66. Following her return home, Plaintiff issued various written statements in connection with filing a criminal action against Defendant Kwok in the PRC.

  67. In those statements, Plaintiff identified physical evidence of her allegations.

  68. Upon information and belief, that physical evidence is now in the custody of the PRC criminal authorities and is, in part, the basis for an arrest warrant issued by the PRC.

  69. Unfortunately, notwithstanding Plaintiff's escape from Defendant Kwok, his campaign of intimidation has continued.

  70. For example, Plaintiff's parent have been contacted repeatedly by individuals who, upon information and belief, are agents Defendant Kwok.

  71. Defendant Kwok has also taken to his twitter account, to post photos of Plaintiff (and her parents), as well as identifying information like her address.

  72. Upon information and belief, these efforts are directed at silencing Plaintiff so that Defendant Kwok might avoid answering for his wrongs.

  73. Defendant Kwok's shocking and outrageous conduct has caused serious and lasting physical and emotional damage to Plaintiff.

  74. Defendant Kwok should be held responsible for his continuing acts of confmement, assault, and battery.

  AS AND FOR A FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION

  (Battery)

  75. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the allegations contained in the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth herein at length.

  76. As set forth above, Defendant Kwok engaged in a series of continuous and related acts of confinement, physical violence and sexual attacks against Plaintiff.

  77. Defendant Kwok has physically detained Plaintiff, hit her, grabbed her and forcibly raped her.

  78. Defendant Kwok's acts constitute a battery upon Plaintiff in that Defendant Kwok intentionally attempted to and did in fact physically attack and injure Plaintiff.

  79. Defendant Kwok's wrongful bodily contact constituted a grievous affront to Plaintiff.

  80. Defendant Kwok's wrongful bodily contact was intentional, unauthorized, and grossly offensive in nature.

  81. Defendant Kwok's wrongful bodily contact was unwarranted, without any just cause or provocation ai1d Defendant Kwok knew at all times that his actions were without the consent of the Plaintiff.

  82. The injuries sustained by Plaintiff were caused wholly and solely by reason of the conduct described and Plaintiff did not contribute thereto.

  83. As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing, Plaintiff was subjected to great physical and emotional pain and humiliation, was deprived of her liberty and was otherwise damaged and injured.

  84. As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing, Plaintiff has been damaged in an amount to be determined at trial but in no event less than $20 million.

  85. The limitations on liability set forth in CPLR 1601 do not apply to this action.

  86. The limitations on liability set forth in CPLR 1601 do not apply to this action by reason of one or more of the exemptions set forth in CPLR 1602.

  AS AND FOR A SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION

  (Assault)

  87. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the allegations contained in the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth herein at length.

  88. As set forth above, Defendant Kwok engaged in a series of continuous and related acts of confinement, physical violence and sexual attacks against Plaintiff.

  89. Defendru1t Kwok has physically detained Plaintiff, hit her, grabbed her and forcibly raped her.

  90. Defendant Kwok's acts constitute fill assault upon Plaintiff in that DefendaJ1t Kwok intentionally threatened to **d did in fact physically attack aJ1d injure Plaintiff.

  91. Defendant Kwok's wrongful bodily contact constituted a grievous affront to Plaintiff.

  92. Defendant Kwok's threatened and actual wrongful bodily contact was intentional, unauthorized, m1d grossly offensive in nature.

  93. Defendant Kwok's threatened and wrongful bodily contact was unwarranted, without any just cause or provocation and Defendant Kwok knew at all times that his actions were without the consent of the Plaintiff.

  94. The injuries sustained by Plaintiff were caused wholly and solely by reason of the conduct described and Plaintiff did not contribute thereto.

  95. As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing, Plaintiff was subjected to great physical and emotional pain and humiliation, was deprived of her liberty and was otherwise damaged and injured.

  96. As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing, Plaintiff has been damaged in an amount to be determined at trial but in no event Jess than $20 million.

  97. The limitations on liability set forth in CPLR 1601 do not apply to this action.

  98. The limitations on liability set forth in CPLR 1601 do not apply to this action by reason of one or more of the exemptions set forth CPLR 1602.

  AS AND FORA THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION

  (Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress)

  99. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the allegations contained in the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth herein at length.

  100. Defendant Kwok's conduct, by confining, forcibly raping and physically battering Plaintiff, without provocation or justification, was extreme, outrageous, and utterly intolerable in a civilized community and was otherwise conduct that exceeded all reasonable bounds of decency.

  101. Defendant Kwok's conduct, desc1-ibed above, was intended to and did cause severe emotional distress to Plaintiff.

  102. Defendant Kwok's conduct was tl1e direct and proximate cause of injury and damage to Plaintiff.

  103. As a result of the foregoing, Plaintiff was deprived of her liberty, was subjected to serious physical and emotional pain and suffering and was otherwise damaged and injured.

  I04. As a direct and proximate result of 出e foregoing, Plaintiff has been damaged in an amount to be determined at trial but in no event less than $20 million.

  I 05. The limitations on liability set forth in CPLR 160I do not apply to this action.

  106. The limitations on liability set forth i.J.1 CPLR 1601 do not apply to this action by reason of one or more of the exemptions set forth in CPLR 1602.

  AS ANO FOR A FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION

  (Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress)

  I 07. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the allegations contained in the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth herein at length.

  108. Defendant Kwok's conduct, in assaulting and battering Plaintiff, was careless and negligent as to the emotional health of Plaintiff, and did, in fact, cause severe emotional distress to Plaintiff.

  109. The acts **1d conduct of Defendant Kwok was the direct and proximate cause of injury and damage to Plaintiff.

  110. As a result of the foregoing, Plaintiff was deprived of her liberty, was subjected to serious physical and emotional pain and suffering, and was otherwise damaged and injured.

  Ill. As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing, Plaintiff has been damaged in an amount to be detem1ined at trial but in no event less than $20 million.

  112. The limitations on liability set forth in CPLR 1601 do not apply to this action.

  113. The limitations on liability set forth in CPLR 1601 do not apply to this action by reason of one or more of the exemptions set forth in CPLR 1602.

  AS AND FOR A FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION

  (Negligence)

  114. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the allegations contained in the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth herein at length.

  115. As set forth above, Defendant Kwok engaged in a series of continuous and related acts of confinement, physical violence and sexual attacks against Plaintiff.

  116. Defendant Kwok has physically detained Plaintiff, hit her, grabbed her and forcibly raped her.

  117. At all relevant times, Defendant Kwok was Plaintiff's employer and thus had a duty to protect Plaintiff from injury while Plaintiff was performing the duties and responsibilities of her employment.

  118. Defendant Kwok breached this duty by engaging in the conduct set forth in detail hereinabove.

  119. As set forth above, Plaintiff was caused to be injured solely and wholly due to the negligence and carelessness of Defendant Kwok.

  120. As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing, Plaintiff was subjected to great physical and emotional p**n and humiliation, was deprived of her liberty and was otherwise damaged and injured.

  121. As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing, Plaintiff has been damaged in an amount to be determined at trial but in no event less than $20 million.

  122. The limitations on liability set forth in CPLR 1601 do not apply to this action.

  123. The limitations on liability set forth in CPLR 1601 do not apply to this action by reason of one or more of the exemptions set forth in CPLR 1602.

  AS AND FOR A SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION

  (False lmprisonment/Wrongful Confinement)

  124. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the allegations contained in the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth herein at length.

  125. As a result of Defendant Kwok's actions as set forth above, at all relevant times, Plaintiff was under Defendant Kwok's control and captivity.

  126. At all relevant times, Plaintiff was aware that she was being confined against her will.

  127. Plaintiff did not consent to confinement by Defendant Kwok and, instead, confinement was imposed upon her as set forth above.

  128. Defendant Kwok's wrongful confinement of Plaintiff was not authorized by law, regulation or otherwise.

  129. As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing, Plaintiff was subjected to great physical and emotional pain and humiliation, was deprived of her liberty and was otherwise damaged and injured.

  130. As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing, Plaintiff has been damaged in an amount to be determined at trial but in no event less than $20 million.

  131. The limitations on liability set forth in CPLR 1601 do not apply to this action.

  132. The limitations on liability set forth in CPLR 1601 do not apply to this action by reason of one or more of the exemptions set forth in CPLR 1602.

  AS AND FOR A SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION

  (Negligence As Against Defendant Golden Spring)

  133. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the allegations contained in the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth herein at length.

  134. Upon information m1d belief, at all relevant times, Plaintiff was employed by Golden Spring, which is business entity owned and/or controlled by Defendant Kwok.

  135. Upon information and belief, at all relevant times, Golden Spring owned, operated, managed, maintained, controlled, secured and supervised the Plaintiff's workspace and its employees, officers and/or agents within Plaintiff's workspace, including Defendant Kwok.

  136. Upon information and belief, at all relevant times, Golden Spring, as the owner, operator, supervisor and manager of Plaintiff's workspace and its employees, officers and/or agents within Plaintiff's workspace, including Defendant Kwok, had a duty to protect Plaintiff from injury while Plaintiff was lawfully within such workspace.

  137. Upon information m1d belief, that, as set forth above, on numerous occasions up

  through including November 19, 2016, while lawfully within such workspace, Plaintiff was caused to be injured solely ** wholly due to the negligence and

  C**elessness of Golden Spring in the ownership, operation, management, maintenance, control security and supervision of such workspace and its employees, officers and/or agents within Plaintiff's workspace, including Defendant Kwok, without any negligence on the part of the Plaintiff contributing thereto.

  138. As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing, Plaintiff was subjected to great physical and emotional pain and humiliation, was deprived of her liberty and was otherwise damaged and injured.

  139. As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing, Plaintiff has been damaged in an amount to be determined at trial but in no event less than $20 million.

  140. The limitations on liability set forth in CPLR 1601 do not apply to this

  action.

  141. The limitations on liability set forth in CPLR 1601 do not apply to this action by reason of one or more of the exemptions set forth in CPLR 1602.

  WHEREFORE Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court enter judgment as follows:

  (a) On the first cause of action against Defendant Kwok, in an amount to be determined at trial, but in no event less than $20,000,000, along with interest thereon as provided by law, punitive damages, attorneys' fees and costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper under the circumstances;

  (b) On tl1e second cause of action against Defendant Kwok, in an amount to be determined at trial, but in no event less than $20,000,000, along with interest

  thereon as provided by law, punitive damages, attorneys' fees and costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper under the circumstances;

  (c) On the third cause of action against Defendant Kwok, in an amount to be determined at trial, but in no event less than $20,000,000, along with interest thereon as provided by law, punitive damages, attorneys' fees and costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper under the circumstances;

  (d) On the fourth cause of action against Defendant Kwok, in an amount to be determined at trial, but in no event less tl1an $20,000,000, along with interest thereon as provided by law, punitive damages, attorneys' fees and costs, and such other and furtl1er relief as this Court deems just and proper under the circumstances;

  (e) On the fifth cause of action against Defendant Kwok, in an amount to be determined at trial, but in no event less than $20,000,000, along with interest thereon as provided by law, punitive damages, attorneys' fees and costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper under the circumstances;

  (f) On the sixth cause of action against Defendant Kwok, in an 印 10unt to be determined at trial, but in no event less than $20,000,000, along with interest

  thereon as provided by law, punitive damages, attorneys' fees and costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper under the circumstances;

  (g) On the seventh cause of action against Golden Spring, in an 血 10unt to be determined at trial, but in no event less than $20,000,000, along with interest thereon as provided by law, punitive damages, attorneys'fees and costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper under the circumstances; and

  (h) On all causes of action, awarding Plaintiff punitive damages.

  Dated: New York, New York September 11, 2017

  ARKIN SOLBAKKEN LLP

c
chatroom
1 楼
转: 郭文贵Guo Wengui ✊️ ✊️ ✊️‏Verified account @KwokMiles 2h2 hours ago More 尊敬的推友们好:9月15日纽约时间上午10点27分.北京时间晚上9点27分.在文贵You Tube 频道直播:孟建柱的最爱的情人.与政法黑暗到什么程度.除了杀人灭口.以黑占有当事人的巨额财富!还制造多起冤案欺骗习主席.党中央!他是百倍千倍的周永康!明天是第二季的第二集非成人勿看
t
tellmey
2 楼
谁来付律师费?
-
-宁静致远
3 楼
郭文怎么办?
o
o,dear
4 楼
原告应该有留下物证吧?
M
MovingTarget
5 楼
文贵现在是国民人渣了,他刚骂过王首富不久,现在又黑马首富。 仇家也不嫌太多。
弟兄
6 楼
中共把吃奶的力气都使出来了
G
GeorgeinSF
7 楼
It would be hard to make a rape suit like that.. Need witness and evidence. One-side words won't go to far.
-
-宁静致远
8 楼
Wondering if she has a skirt as evidence.
国境之南
9 楼
对郭文贵最强有力的反击是中国政府委托一个由国际知名律师组成的调查团,对郭爆料的海航股权问题,美国护照问题,美国房产问题等诸多问题进行调查核实,然后向民众公开结果,如果这些问题存在造假欺骗行为的,请美国政府立刻驱逐郭文贵,如果爆料属实,也请还他一个公道
青山留夕阳
10 楼
有证据吗?没有咋办?
T
Tomzeng64
11 楼
期待马小姐当庭作证。吃瓜群众观赏。
w
woodyonge
12 楼
也许又是一场马拉松式的官司。
M
MovingTarget
13 楼
对,要求联合国派维和部队把老王先控制起来,免得他垂死挣扎。 还有马前总统也得抓起来,可能是蛇鼠一窝。
猫爪
14 楼
案发地在外国,中国警方留有物证,哈哈,笑话
c
chatroom
15 楼
真是笨,这么久了,带个私生子来控诉赢面就更大.
大小姐太乖
16 楼
tellmey 发表评论于 2017-09-14 20:04:10 谁来付律师费? ============================================== 马蕊请的美国名律师 预计大概要花一千五百万美金 谁付这笔钱? 马蕊当然付不起了 既然是党国操纵和谋划的 那只有党国从维稳费中支付了!
M
Myteddybear
17 楼
tellmey 发表评论于 2017-09-14 20:04:10 谁来付律师费? ..................... 銀行先貸款,相信郭必败诉。由他最後赔付。
弟兄
18 楼
当年在东北,村里集体生活。我父亲是保管员。公社的牛被狼吃了,我娘拿回来牛骨头熬了yi guo tang一锅汤。为何对杨改兰触动我呢,我母亲养了八个孩子,每天吃了上顿没下顿,好像面临着死亡。所以杨改兰杀掉四个孩子在自杀,我深有感触。当母亲的太不容易了。 我相信中国有很多杨改兰事件,只是我们不知道而已。 挨饿太难受了。我娘把园子里的菜拿到市上卖了,买点盐油回来。七八个大男孩儿。大铁锅,十几斤的锅。弄点青菜,有点盐,吃吃,就好的不行了。大饼子,大碴子。
J
Jianghutong
19 楼
律师费谁付?
M
MovingTarget
20 楼
党国从维稳经费里出钱一点问题都没有,红通首犯,比老赖都高半级,这点代价算什么。 再说还有马首富,王首富,还有小潘,还有方正李友,还有范爷,还有…
q
qi91856
21 楼
Jianghutong 发表评论于 2017-09-14 20:34:11 律师费谁付? ---------------------------- 郭有20亿美元资产,律师的眼睛都绿了。
智者不惑
22 楼
@MovingTarget: 欣赏您的留言,幽默诙谐+点到穴上! 祝您周末愉快!
智者不惑
23 楼
@andromedaM31: 观点不同,理性讨论,骂人不好,有损素质。 祝您周末愉快!
T
Tomzeng64
24 楼
按照美国司法独立的原则,这个诉状不会影响政治庇护。这是两个独立的案件,不会互相影响。民事诉讼更不会影响政治庇护。马小姐赢了也遣返不了郭。民事诉讼不能算罪。
智者不惑
25 楼
@andromedaM31: 小弟之言,若有得罪,敬请谅解。 为您祝福,健康幸福,周末愉快!
静夜听雨
26 楼
扒墙头扒得时差都忘了,现在是周四晚上。
T
Tomzeng64
27 楼
大家都是吃瓜群众,观战就可,不要把自己装进去。自己不是当事人。都在云山雾罩里。何必那么激动。真相不是我等闲人看的明白的。呵呵。
智者不惑
28 楼
@andromedaM31: 哪里来的傻13, 滚到一边去!————是说你自个吧?! You go low, we go high!
智者不惑
29 楼
Tomzeng64 发表评论于 2017-09-14 21:05:32 大家都是吃瓜群众,观战就可,不要把自己装进去。自己不是当事人。都在云山雾罩里。何必那么激动。真相不是我等闲人看的明白的。呵呵。 明眼人,说得好!!!
智者不惑
30 楼
纷乱尘世,江湖混杂; 奇闻异事,屡见不鲜; 凡人论锅,戏谑仙魔; 各持己见,言论自由; 孰是孰非,难断对错; 扣帽脏话,可笑愚蠢; 骂人攻击,自暴丑恶; 既然同仁,包容理解; 尊重为上,仁义礼智; 团结一致,共同努力; 土供必亡,笑迎明天。
T
Tomzeng64
31 楼
公道自在人心。天道循环。自有公论。
城中良民
32 楼
郭最差的结局是在美国坐几年牢,不会被遣返。
M
MovingTarget
33 楼
M31情绪波动太大,sometimes goes very low. 你有道理完全可以讲啊,比如马航怎么看,马蕊怎么看,王雁平的录音怎么看。如果光吃瓜能安静一点么? 万一文贵输了呢?
京V-02009
34 楼
马蕊也挺可怜的,被共匪逼着说自己被强奸,作孽呀!
智者不惑
35 楼
@andromedaM31 你的心灵已经被中共污染,却全然不知,你粗鲁的表现,和中共一模一样——听不进不同意见! 尊重他人,才能更好地沟通,学会尊重他人,才会有一颗包容的心、才会被尊重;被尊重了,看事物才会更美好、才会招人喜欢,就像刘晓波先生的名言:”我没有敌人“,你把别人当成了敌人,容不下不同意见,这不是民主自由所倡导的,尊重对方有表达不同意见的权利,同时也包容对方的观点,这才是民主自由! 懂?
智者不惑
36 楼
MovingTarget 发表评论于 2017-09-14 21:18:17 M31情绪波动太大,sometimes goes very low. 你有道理完全可以讲啊,比如马航怎么看,马蕊怎么看,王雁平的录音怎么看。如果光吃瓜能安静一点么? 万一文贵输了呢? +100000000000000000000000000000000000000000
M
MovingTarget
37 楼
文贵给人出钱可能是心虚吧,但人家马蕊可能不同意啊。人家就想闹上法庭,弄你几千万出来。 你文贵公开爆料里面到处都是人体器官,从姚依林到许爷,在现实生活中有多渣完全可以理解。 纽约的那些对手,文贵自己都说了是福建的乡亲,文贵的仇家两只手都数不过来。 刘彦平暗示了,与其慢刀子割,还不如去东厂坐牢踏实。
M
MovingTarget
38 楼
有一段王雁平的与马蕊的录音,真假不能确知。 但是如果是真的马案就坐实了,不仅文贵得进去,小王也得进去。 小王再淡定都不管用。
智者不惑
39 楼
MovingTarget 发表评论于 2017-09-14 21:31:54 有一段王雁平的与马蕊的录音,真假不能确知。 但是如果是真的马案就坐实了,不仅文贵得进去,小王也得进去。 小王再淡定都不管用。 正解!! +10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
M
MovingTarget
40 楼
文贵睁眼说瞎话的事儿多了去了,随便说一桩,但跟韦石互怼,一口咬定自己是美国公民,好了,这会儿明白了,有美国公民申请美国政庇的么? 小事一桩,但是文贵的没底线可见一斑。
T
Tomzeng64
41 楼
不过网上有一个传言,这些音频是阿里巴巴一帧一帧做出来的,就是把人平时讲话录下来,一秒钟可以有32帧。就像电影一样。锲入就可以做出来了。缺点就是和此人平时的语调不一样。这个技术是完全可以做到的。Adobes 就有这技术。优酷哪帮人才有这种实力。
M
MovingTarget
42 楼
M31, 在你暴跳如雷之前,用你仅存的理智解答一下吧?
智者不惑
43 楼
MovingTarget 发表评论于 2017-09-14 21:36:13 文贵睁眼说瞎话的事儿多了去了,随便说一桩,但跟韦石互怼,一口咬定自己是美国公民,好了,这会儿明白了,有美国公民申请美国政庇的么? 小事一桩,但是文贵的没底线可见一斑。 言之有理! +100000000000000000000000000000000000000000
智者不惑
44 楼
MovingTarget 发表评论于 2017-09-14 21:39:17 M31, 在你暴跳如雷之前,用你仅存的理智解答一下吧? 9494 +100000000000000000000000000000000000000000
M
MovingTarget
45 楼
Tom, 我自信是software industry 里面很competent 的engineer 了。 我并不能说这个一定不可能,但是我比较同意有一个人的分析,这个即使能行,其工作量很大的。这是从无到有的凭空合成。 再说阿里为什么要淌这个浑水。万一那个执行的工程师捅出去,岂不是国家丑闻?
T
Tomzeng64
46 楼
郭的原话是他是美国居民和纳税人。我的判断就是工作或商务签证。现在的申请政庇是他唯一的选择。否则一旦拒签就必须离开美国。
心无所住
47 楼
看這個訴狀,阿貴這回慘了,被判有罪的機會非常大,時日無多了,阿貴抓緊時間爆料,吃瓜群衆想知道,誰是老領導?哈哈哈
M
MovingTarget
48 楼
文贵案子能不能定罪难说,但他不是被冤枉的。 老王也不能说一定是好人,但是他有罪的可能性并不超过一个普通人。 这应该是个比较公允的看法吧。 塔西佗是在作恶!
T
Tomzeng64
49 楼
马云已经趟浑水了。他的南华早报报道事件已经卷入了。网上说的是阿里和优酷30多人加入了这个团队。不知真假?
M
MovingTarget
50 楼
“韦石指名道姓的质问郭文贵:你是美国公民吗?什么时候入籍的。 郭文贵的回答:我们向全世界保证。你我都带者美国护照上明镜TV.还保证:你指出我的那句话是假的,我付你一百万,要求签订合同”
T
Tomzeng64
51 楼
我没看过这段视频。也许您是对的
M
MovingTarget
52 楼
Tom,这个传言你自己判断吧,要不然问一下学习旅,他是文贵的推友,看他愿不愿意背书。
天眼里人
53 楼
王岐山真是急疯了,给马蕊出这么多钱来美国,最后还是像之前乱编的视频一样白搭,无用功。 这不是太傻了吗!?
T
Tomzeng64
54 楼
我不关心郭是否撒谎。是否美国公民。他的爆料太震撼了。这也是大多数人的反应。而这些普通人都无法核实的东西是所有人都希望看到真相。绝大多数人的是中立的。大家其实都有疑问。这会是真的吗?现在的局面是看不明白?所以最好法庭上见,各出示证据。才能知道一点点事实。我没有判断,判断是主观的,而且一定是错的。
M
MovingTarget
55 楼
美国才不会管郭是否造谣呢,美国自己大选的时候,左右互相造谣玩儿,早习惯了。 文贵被指控的案子大部分在中国,正义要申张一定得把文贵弄回来。
T
Tomzeng64
56 楼
这就不管我们吃瓜群众的事了。这是两个国家之间的事。我们无力也不想管这种事。
T
Tomzeng64
57 楼
本来就和我们无关
M
MovingTarget
58 楼
文贵又不是先爆料才被通缉的,他是先被通缉才爆的料。 如果中国民意与司法为一个有重大嫌疑而又已经证明毫无诚信的人所左右,那才是灾难。
心无所住
59 楼
那么多人告啊贵诽谤,阿贵哪怕有一点点的证据,可以在法庭上出示,因为在法庭那是发誓讲真话的,撒谎会触犯法律,如果他的证据被法庭采用,大家可以相信。现在他只是满嘴跑火车的爆料而已,好无营养
T
Tomzeng64
60 楼
我们只是观众不是参与者
w
worley
61 楼
郭文贵从来没有说过他是美国公民,也没有说过他是川普的好朋友。 他说过他可以持L1或B1或B2呆在美国。他的家人有美国绿卡,他为了避税放弃了美国绿卡。
w
worley
62 楼
这明显是诬陷郭文贵,一点证据也没有,事情过了两年才报警,并且在中国报警。 这跟川普竞选时,跳出一堆人说强奸一样。大选结束后,全都不见了。
拿铁咖啡
63 楼
反正党国有的是民脂民膏,不怕钱白花。如果从某人自己腰包里掏,恐怕舍不得掏。
凝露玫瑰
64 楼
一个强奸诉状,写上人家爆料的事干嘛,有啥关联吗?老王可以直接到纽约告郭诬陷罪啊。
M
MovingTarget
65 楼
“Replying to @wmeng8 韦石先生:我们向全世界保证:你我都同意我们双方都要带着美国护照上明镜TV陈小平先生直播!你说句干净的男人应该说的话!中.还是.不中.!另外:你能指出我那句话是假的,我付给你一百万,你敢和我签这个对等的合同吗?伪石先生? 7:29 AM · Mar 4, 2017 ”
凝露玫瑰
66 楼
艾玛,老王,老傅,老马......可以组团到纽约告郭诬陷罪,想想都热闹啊,比啥连续剧都好看。
S
Sam大树
67 楼
精彩,好好耍这小丑!
谷惠子
68 楼
即使马小姐有精液裙,那也不能是强奸的证据。只能证明二人有过关系,甚至都不是性交过的证据。克林顿说过。
傻大目
69 楼
她背后有强大的祖国 我档的支持
t
tiiannayuama
70 楼
中华人民共和国公民:当你在海外遭遇危险,不要放弃!请记住,在你身后,有一个强大的祖国! 马蕊,你要向你身后强大的祖国的求助。他们会红捅一切东西。就是铜墙铁壁也会被捅穿的。
c
chatroom
71 楼
郭文貴專案組升級,幾名高官靠邊站(《點點今天事》):凌晨兩點才完成的這期節目披露了,習近平已經察覺異樣,負責郭文貴案件的幾名高官已被撤換,而且面臨比李東生、周永康更慘的下場..... youtu.be/a2EnDctEJZM
幸福的老山羊
72 楼
这是学人家对待阿桑奇的手法啊。
w
wwwode
73 楼
解开裤带,分开腿,把动作一个个细化一下,就可以值1.4亿? 七十多个动作,每个动作分解成200万美元。 这不就是诈钱的吗? 那还搞什么预先声明,那声明与强奸什么关系?似乎证明是政治案在先,强奸案在后。 不打自招!
L
LaoxiangPAPA
74 楼
没见过新闻把强奸诉状全部公开的,干脆几尺长的枪几丈深的洞也曝光一下,不然凭什么一丈一亿啊? 郭云贵流氓?比郭流氓的是这公开的诉状!
鹧鸪不知春秋
75 楼
坐牢? 民事案坐牢 ,美国有么? 民事案告强奸?门都没有。桑兰要18 亿,结果一分也没有得到。魏天冰的下属要8.5 亿,得到还没有支付的535 万。
丰台大营
76 楼
看看文贵, 再看看马蕊, 若真有强奸, 谁强奸谁呀?
思蜜达
77 楼
问问马蕊打官司的钱是谁给的?
r
ridicu
78 楼
土共一贯的伎俩,对政敌从下三路入手
t
tuv
79 楼
马小姐到纽约后一定要加强监控.最怕她也逃了.到时鸡飞蛋打,还落下一个笑柄.
J
JXTiger
80 楼
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6i-3HOF79_w
J
JXTiger
81 楼
https: //www.youtube.com/watch?v=6i-3HOF79_w
n
netcitizen
82 楼
不怕恶心的话就请看这位马蕊的尊容: https://www.youtube点com/watch?v=a0lMr1cfaQQ
K
KMT88
83 楼
本来是你情我愿的事,N多年过去了,但现在国家有需要,于是。。。 百姓都能点灯,州官放把火又能咋地,你以为就你老郭会耍流氓,胡咧咧
q
qi91856
84 楼
思蜜达 发表评论于 2017-09-15 05:53:27 问问马蕊打官司的钱是谁给的? --------------------------------- 就郭的财富,不付钱,律师打破脑袋给她打官司。
q
qi91856
85 楼
思蜜达 发表评论于 2017-09-15 05:53:27 问问马蕊打官司的钱是谁给的? --------------------------------- 就郭的财富,不付钱,律师打破脑袋给她打官司。
q
qi91856
86 楼
思蜜达 发表评论于 2017-09-15 05:53:27 问问马蕊打官司的钱是谁给的? --------------------------------- 当然是郭文贵给的钱。就郭的财富,不付钱,律师打破脑袋给她打官司。