据美国国会及行政当局中国委员会（简称CECC）的政治犯数据库（the Political Prisoner Database of the United States’ Congressional-Executive Commission on China）不完全记录，从1981年至2018年间，中国大陆有9,116名政治犯个案。但是该委员会从1987年才开始记录，因此实际数目会比数据库所载更高。
而事实上，当时港警并没有受到围攻，他箍住一名男子，并向另一名手无寸铁的黑衣男子开枪，致使其重伤。
=====================
而事实上,This手无寸铁的黑衣男子was trying to take the gun away from the police. He should not be 重伤。
He should have been KILLED -- if he lived in USA.
owen78746 发表评论于 2019-12-01 19:57:37
而事实上，当时港警并没有受到围攻，他箍住一名男子，并向另一名手无寸铁的黑衣男子开枪，致使其重伤。
=====================
而事实上,This手无寸铁的黑衣男子was trying to take the gun away from the police. He should not be 重伤。
He should have been KILLED -- if he lived in USA.
——————————————
which happened first, “他箍住一名男子” or “黑衣男子was trying to take the gun”？
owen78746 发表评论于 2019-12-01 19:57:37
而事实上，当时港警并没有受到围攻，他箍住一名男子，并向另一名手无寸铁的黑衣男子开枪，致使其重伤。
=====================
而事实上,This手无寸铁的黑衣男子was trying to take the gun away from the police. He should not be 重伤。
He should have been KILLED -- if he lived in USA.
——————————————
which happened first, “他箍住一名男子” or “黑衣男子was trying to take the gun”？
THREE COORDINATED CRIMINALS ATTACKED POLICE FROM 3 DIRECTIONS!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-zINR8YZHo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-zINR8YZHo
owen78746 发表评论于 2019-12-01 20:07:55
——————————
thank you.
So the policeman besieged the guy in white before the guy in black came toward him.
------------
Yes. Watch the video. the guy in white approached to the police while the police retreated. (Come on, USA police would not retreat. He would shot, instead of retreat!) Then the guy in black approached to the police again. The police correctly shot him.
总是我 发表评论于 2019-12-01 20:40:00
No, in that scenario US police would not shoot the the guy in white. They would retreat. They do that in riot they will die.
===========
Did u see that this police WAS ALREADY surrounded by criminals? Where was his way out (retreat)? If you were the police you would have handed over your gun to the "protesters"?
@总是我
Do you agreed that more than 3 "protesters" attacked the policeman from all directions? The policeman's life was in great danger.
Please watch the video frame by frame and imagine what the great danger the policeman was facing!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-zINR8YZHo
@总是我
Interesting... As a policeman with the duty of keeping the community safe in the assigned zone you would choose to run away?
At least I would not the policeman in my city act like that. I would not act like that too. I feel shame when I face my coworkers.
Ok, let me put it in this way: he should not do his duty alone there. He was there alone he should know someone would be hurt or even killed. He was not professional.
@总是我
I hope you to watch the video frame by frame...
1. His teammates arrived in FEW SECONDS after he fired 1st shot!
2. He DID NOT shot to the crowd! He shot to a SUSPECT CRIMINAL who tried to grab his gun!
3. You and your brother can do whatever you want as long as your two follow the law. But I hope your two DO NOT TRY to grab the gun from an US policeman as they will shot your head or heart, not stomach!
中共驻英国大使刘晓明公开宣称：“中国没有政治犯”等。刘被批玩“障眼法”，替中共极权政权涂脂抹粉，目的是混淆国际视听。
图为2017年香港3个团体到中联办抗议中共囚禁和酷刑对待维权律师，要求释放吴淦和所有政治犯。
刘晓明11月26日接受英国BBC谈话节目“尖锐对话”（HARDtalk）主持人萨克（Stephen Sackur）专访时，曾被问到多个尖锐问题。
当被问到，如果你（刘晓明）坚持认为中国人民生活幸福，那为什么中共政府如此害怕不同意见？刘晓明回答：“我们并没有害怕任何不同意见。中国没有政治犯。”主持人表示，“这不是事实。”
刘晓明还说：“中国人民不会因为自己的思想被关进监狱，被关进监狱的人，是因为他们违反中共法律。”
主持人说：“中国的法律事实上阻止政治反对派存在，谁不和共产党保持一致，就是违法。”刘晓明辩称：“根本不存在你说的情况。”
主持人并说：“我们还看到过去两三年，中国加大了对社会各种思想、行动的监控。中国监视器镜头数量已经达到每两人就有一个。中国人口有14亿，这是一个难以想像的被监控的社会。为什么要这样监控？”
对于刘晓明上述言论，香港《苹果日报》报导说，有学者指，他声称无政治犯是玩“障眼法”，目的是混淆国际视听。
报导指，刘晓明为中共极权政权涂脂抹粉。
时政评论员李林一表示，刘晓明说中国没有政治犯，这完全是谎言。中共把那么多维权律师、异议人士抓起来，并关进监狱，他还大言不惭这样说。
据美国国会及行政当局中国委员会（简称CECC）的政治犯数据库（the Political Prisoner Database of the United States’ Congressional-Executive Commission on China）不完全记录，从1981年至2018年间，中国大陆有9,116名政治犯个案。但是该委员会从1987年才开始记录，因此实际数目会比数据库所载更高。
CECC对政治犯的定义为：任何因为行使根据国际法赋予的人权，如和平集会、宗教自由、自由结社、言论自由，以及批评政府政策或政府官员的自由等，而遭监禁的个人。
在2014年的香港雨伞运动期间，据报有超过200名中国大陆公民因为声援该运动而被捕。2015年7月9日，大约有300名人权律师及相关人士被捕。
对于刘晓明说的中国人“不会因为自己的思想被关进监狱”的说辞，报道指出，他在混淆概念，该问题的关键所在是刘晓明所说的“被关进监狱的人，是因为他们违反中国法律”。每次中国人正当表达自己思想的时候，如在微博上或在其它地方，中共可能就把其抓起来了，理由千奇百怪，如：扰乱社会秩序、寻衅滋事、颠覆社会主义制度等等。中共就是利用这种极度不公平的所谓的法律的名义，迫害人民。所以说，刘晓明是在混淆概念。
另外，刘晓明在香港问题上也是混淆视听，如他被问到如何看待香港警察近距离向抗议者开枪事件时，刘称“警察开枪是为自卫。你们只盯着警察的行动，对暴徒的暴力视而不见。”
而事实上，当时港警并没有受到围攻，他箍住一名男子，并向另一名手无寸铁的黑衣男子开枪，致使其重伤。