A man has been set on fire in Hong Kong only hours after a protester was shot by police with a live round, as the city experiences one of the most dramatic days in over five months of protests.
在警方开枪射击示威者后仅几小时后，一男子被点燃，香港遭遇了5个月示威活动以来最惊险的一天。
Via CNN
NBC的导语：
A man was set on fire outside a subway station in Hong Kong and in a separate incident, police shot and critically wounded a protester, marking a dramatic escalation in the unrest in the former British territory.
@ Celine Ferry No matter what with different opinion, putting people on fire is ridiculous. I don’t want to say, but you’re not flighting for democracy! Shame on you!
因为别人反对你，就把别人点燃，太可笑了。你们不是在争取民主！你们太无耻了！
@ SMmrz I was wrong . I thought they are rioters not peaceful protestors. They are terrorist indeed.
我错了，我原以为他们是暴徒，不是和平示威者。他们其实是恐怖分子。
@Running Debate Rioters set man on fire!!! Try to make it sound as if the police did it.
是暴徒放火烧了人!!!你们想尽量甩锅到警察头上。
@Johnny Walker Blatantly biased reporting only undermines your credibility shame on you
公然带有偏见的报道只会损害你的可信度。
@Dave The pot Now, people finally see the truth.
现在人们终于知道真相了。
多家外媒的油管视频，也明显有被编辑过的痕迹和标题党的嫌疑，全程没有纵火的画面和视频。
@X Y Z Where is the video clip on the man set on fire?
You deliberately omitted the info on WHO set him on fire
被点燃男子的视频在哪里？你们故意不让人知道是谁放的火。
John Lee Only rioter, I can't find any protester.
视频里只有暴徒，我找不到任何示威者。
@akacurryful 10 hours ago (edited) Let me add to your bias headline CNBC, "another set on fire, by a so called peaceful protestor"
我来改一下你们CNBC的偏见的标题“还有一人被‘被所谓的和平抗议者’纵火”。
还有网友反映，老人被纵火的视频还遭到油管下架和审核。
@Andrew Smith This video was removed by YouTube 5 times already in the past hour. End censorship now!
这段视频在过去一小时内已经被YouTube删了5次。不要再审查！
@ u look tasty I downloaded the video so that when YouTube deleted it...I can post back again
乱港暴徒11月11日发起的暴力行为一直持续到深夜。其中两件事情，也吸引了外媒的关注（选择性失明）。
一件事是，有警务人员在西湾河拘捕违法者时，曾开枪及射中一名男子。港警回应，强调开枪警员并非有意伤人，而是为避免被暴徒抢枪。
港警开枪击倒围攻夺枪暴徒
另一件事，有身穿黑衣的暴徒在马鞍山向一名居民泼易燃液体放火。当事人身体多处烧伤，送院治理，情况危急。
香港警队证实：今天有暴徒泼易燃液体放火烧市民
但外媒在报道这两起事件时，又搞起了小动作：刻意不指明纵火者是谁，还联系“警员开枪”的报道有意混淆警察和暴徒。
这些标题出奇的一致：示威者被（警察）射伤，还有人被点燃了。但是，就是不说是谁放的火。
CNN的导语说:
A man has been set on fire in Hong Kong only hours after a protester was shot by police with a live round, as the city experiences one of the most dramatic days in over five months of protests.
在警方开枪射击示威者后仅几小时后，一男子被点燃，香港遭遇了5个月示威活动以来最惊险的一天。
Via CNN
NBC的导语：
A man was set on fire outside a subway station in Hong Kong and in a separate incident, police shot and critically wounded a protester, marking a dramatic escalation in the unrest in the former British territory.
一男子在香港地铁站外被点燃。在另一起事件中，警方开枪击中了一个示威者，使这个前英国殖民地的动乱升级。
Via NBC
所以，放火的是谁？在一些西方媒体的标题和报道中，只字未提。这样的选择性报道和视频，让很多外国网友都在质疑西方媒体的“假新闻”。
在相关视频传到油管后，外国网友炸了：这就是暴徒！
@ Celine Ferry No matter what with different opinion, putting people on fire is ridiculous. I don’t want to say, but you’re not flighting for democracy! Shame on you!
因为别人反对你，就把别人点燃，太可笑了。你们不是在争取民主！你们太无耻了！
@ SMmrz I was wrong . I thought they are rioters not peaceful protestors. They are terrorist indeed.
我错了，我原以为他们是暴徒，不是和平示威者。他们其实是恐怖分子。
@Running Debate Rioters set man on fire!!! Try to make it sound as if the police did it.
是暴徒放火烧了人!!!你们想尽量甩锅到警察头上。
@Johnny Walker Blatantly biased reporting only undermines your credibility shame on you
公然带有偏见的报道只会损害你的可信度。
@Dave The pot Now, people finally see the truth.
现在人们终于知道真相了。
多家外媒的油管视频，也明显有被编辑过的痕迹和标题党的嫌疑，全程没有纵火的画面和视频。
@X Y Z Where is the video clip on the man set on fire?
You deliberately omitted the info on WHO set him on fire
被点燃男子的视频在哪里？你们故意不让人知道是谁放的火。
John Lee Only rioter, I can't find any protester.
视频里只有暴徒，我找不到任何示威者。
@akacurryful 10 hours ago (edited) Let me add to your bias headline CNBC, "another set on fire, by a so called peaceful protestor"
我来改一下你们CNBC的偏见的标题“还有一人被‘被所谓的和平抗议者’纵火”。
还有网友反映，老人被纵火的视频还遭到油管下架和审核。
@Andrew Smith This video was removed by YouTube 5 times already in the past hour. End censorship now!
这段视频在过去一小时内已经被YouTube删了5次。不要再审查！
@ u look tasty I downloaded the video so that when YouTube deleted it...I can post back again
我已经下载了这段视频，YouTube删一次，我就发一次。
好在，一些外媒也开始用“暴徒”riots来称呼乱港份子，比如“今日俄罗斯”
一个令人深感不安的视频显示，暴徒向一男子身上泼洒易燃液体，并将他点燃。据报道，原因是受害者不同意他们日益暴力的政治运动。