从此人法庭作证和其所谓的家庭发言人事后的言论来看，没有任何良知的表现，反而认为这是值得自豪的行为。
这是剥夺了人命，不论对方是什么样的人，你也是剥夺了人命，人类应该有的conscious难道没有吗？
你专门买了枪，跑到外州去参加游行或者反游行的行动，出了事情说是自卫，而显然你持枪去是有要使用的意图的，是一种选择。
这就意味任何人都可以到有事情发生的地方去持有武器参与，然后说是自卫，这是文革中的文攻武卫的概念。
整个事件会发生的前提是你跑去了，是你自己的选择，而不是被逼无奈（比如路上被人劫了）。只要你是有选择的性的行为导致开枪，就不是自卫的性质，这是任何关于持枪自卫的法律定义的。
支持这种人的人更是社会渣滓的概念了，可以肯定的是在目前美国疫情开始反复（昨天美国突破平均每天十万的感染率，we are number one again）的情况下，通胀让占人口50%的年收入只有两万多的贫困家庭感到压力的环境下，社会矛盾会进一步激化，包括种族矛盾，你一个黄皮难道还觉得自己主流了？可以肯定这种持枪杀人的事件会增加，因为都可以一某种借口“自卫”，因为杀人已经不是社会需要谴责的事情，而是开始有了“正义”的标签。
人家都打到你家里就更不用怕了。风能进雨能进国王不能进。
体制内 发表评论于 2021-11-19 11:54:09
It's only in Wisconsin. Doing the same thing in other states can be a death penalty. Don't try it at home.
这段时间不是很多人搞不清楚那个波士顿新市长³吴弭啥路数吗？她在她的推特里写:Our country aches for accountability. My heart is with those traumatized by Kenosha &the failures of our justice system.
真是婊到家了!
great, American justice system still we trust. Solute to the jury who stand the pressure from the left and the main media and deliver the verdict based on the facts. No surprises, left cries racist and reject to accept everytime they lose. thanks you the jury, you let me still have faith in American Justice system.
“I‘m still trying to figure out what it says, what is prohibited,” Schroeder said Friday before making his final decision. “Now I have the good fortune of having some experience and a legal education. How is your ordinary citizen supposed to acquaint herself with what this law says?”
Legal experts agreed the statute is poorly worded, but said the legislature’s intention was to give teenagers the legal right to hunt as long as they weren’t using short-barrel rifles or sawed-off shotguns. The judge could have recognized that fact and allowed the jury to consider the charge, said John Gross, director of the Public Defender Project at the University of Wisconsin Law School.
“I think the legislature just did a bad job and you have really, clumsy awkward wording,” Gross said. “But it would seem clear that this was about hunting and not about giving 17-year-olds the right to open carry.”
In a memorandum issued in 2018, the Wisconsin Legislative Council — a government-supported, nonpartisan legislative service agency — shared the prosecution’s understanding of the open carry law and made no mention of rifle size in its summary of the state’s firearm regulations.
“Under Wisconsin law, with certain exceptions for hunting, military service, and target practice, a person under age 18 is generally prohibited from possessing or going armed with a firearm,” the memorandum states.
If the judge had allowed jurors to consider the misdemeanor charge and they convicted Rittenhouse, he could have appealed the decision to a higher court. The prosecution, however, has no recourse to challenge Schroeder’s ruling.
“It’s a bit of a tough pill to swallow at this point in the case,” Gross said. “This was the only charge he (Rittenhouse) admitted to. This was really the only lock for the prosecution.”
威斯康星州基诺沙市（Kenosha）的陪审员周五宣布凯尔·瑞特豪斯(Kyle Rittenhouse)所有罪名不成立，结束了围绕去年夏天该市致命动乱的激烈审判。
18岁的里滕豪斯如果被判有罪并被认定为一级故意杀人罪，将面临强制性的终身监禁。
布鲁斯·施罗德法官（Bruce Schroeder）在宣布判决后说：“我不可能要求一个更好的陪审团，这确实是我的荣幸”，“我认为，在不评论你们的判决的情况下，判决本身，只是在你们的细心和你们给予我们的合作方面，证明了我们国家的创始人对你们的信任，所以我在这个时候解散你们”。
他继续说道：“你从来没有任何义务与任何人讨论这个案件的任何方面。欢迎你这样做，不管你想做多少，都可以。”
陪审员共商议了26个小时，认定瑞特豪斯的五项罪名无罪，包括一级鲁莽杀人罪、两项一级故意杀人罪和两项一级鲁莽危害罪。法官施罗德此前已撤销了与他的武器有关的另外两项指控。
周五，人们看到当地官员、媒体和抗议者被安排在基诺沙县法院周围。
瑞特豪斯在2020年8月25日基诺沙内乱的第二个晚上向两人开枪并打伤第三人后，面临一级鲁莽杀人、一级故意杀人、一级故意杀人未遂和两项一级鲁莽危害安全的指控。
在瑞特豪斯的辩护团队认为，法律中有关短管步枪的一个小节是驳回指控的理由后，法官于周一驳回了一项18岁以下人士持有危险武器的指控。
他的律师认为，在警察枪杀29岁黑人男子雅各布·布莱克（Jacob Blake）后发生的骚乱中，当时17岁的他在被人从背后袭击后采取了自卫行动，他打伤了27岁的盖奇·格罗斯克鲁兹（Gaige Grosskreutz），打死了36岁的约瑟夫·罗森鲍姆（Joseph Rosenbaum）和26岁的安东尼·休伯。