Details[hide]
South Korea:[16]
137,899 dead
450,742 wounded
24,495 MIA
8,343 POW
United States:
36,574 dead[b][25][27]
103,284 wounded[25]
4,714 POW[28]
United Kingdom:
1,109 dead[29]
2,674 wounded[29]
179 MIA[16]
977 POW[16]
Turkey:[16]
741 dead
2,068 wounded
163 MIA
244 POW
Canada:
516 dead[30]
1,042 wounded[31]
1 MIA[16]
33 POW[32]
Australia:[33]
339 dead
1,216 wounded
43 MIA
26 POW
France:[16]
262 dead
1,008 wounded
7 MIA
12 POW
Greece[16]
192 dead
543 wounded
3 POW
Colombia:[16]
163 dead
448 wounded
28 POW
Thailand:[16]
129 dead
1,139 wounded
5 MIA
Ethiopia[16]
121 dead
536 wounded
Netherlands:[16]
122 dead
645 wounded
3 MIA
Belgium:[16]
101 dead
478 wounded
5 MIA
1 POW
Philippines:[34]
92 dead
299 wounded
97 MIA/POW
Japan:[3]
79 dead
South Africa:[16]
34 dead
9 POW
New Zealand:[34]
34 dead
299 wounded
1 MIA/POW
Norway:[16]
3 dead
Luxembourg:[16]
2 dead
13 wounded
India:[35]
1 dead
Total dead and missing: 398,000–589,000 dead and 145,000+ missing (335,000-526,000 North Koreans, 208,729 Chinese, 299 Soviet)
Total wounded: 686,500
Details[hide]
North Korea:
215,000–406,000 dead[36][37]
303,000 wounded
120,000 MIA or POW[38]
China:
(Chinese sources):[39]
183,108 dead[40]
383,500 wounded
450,000 hospitalized
25,621 missing (Those who defected or were captured were included in missing)
7,110 captured
14,190 defected
(U.S. estimates):[38]
400,000+ dead
486,000 wounded
Soviet Union:
299 dead
335 planes lost[41]
June 5, 2000 - CBS
For years after the war ended in 1953, the Pentagon published a figure of 54,260. That combined the 33,643 "battle deaths" with 20,617 "other deaths."
XYZ94538 发表评论于 2020-10-16 1
June 5, 2000 - CBS
For years after the war ended in 1953, the Pentagon published a figure of 54,260. That combined the 33,643 "battle deaths" with 20,617 "other deaths."
………………………………………
北京不是也把志愿军的伤亡数字从"X"调整了吗？ 四十多年后调整为死亡十九万多。 难产啊！
美国自己对朝鲜战争的回顾：麦克阿瑟忽视中国出兵警告，以为圣诞节前可以凯旋，结果中国说到做到，1950年圣诞节只有伤兵和死亡美军的棺材回到了美国。他们嘲笑中国军人不过是洗衣工，结果当年美军就被打回三八线，死亡5964，接下来1951至1953又要死亡22000美军……美国第一次在没有打胜的情况下不得不签下停火协议。
Ignoring his own intelligence reports of Chinese troop movements and consumed with his own confidence, MacArthur assured Washington that China would not enter the war -- and if they did he was certain they did not have the means to mount a significant threat. One of his top generals dismissed them as Chinese "laundrymen." MacArthur boasted that he would bring "the boys home by Christmas."
The only American boys who got home for Christmas in 1950 came on hospital ships or in coffins. The Chinese entered the war as they had promised they would, and they did it in far greater numbers and with greater military capacity than MacArthur had predicted.
Correspondent Homer Bigart reported that it was "the worst licking Americans had suffered since Bataan." The largely American UN force was pushed back south of the 38th parallel and 5,964 Americans died in November and December 1950.
And nearly 22,000 more Americans would die from 1951 to 1953.
@XYZ94538
你这么亢奋地提上甘岭战役，你是否知道相关的基本历史事实？52年板门店谈判因战俘是否可志愿遣返陷入僵局，但停战已成定局。双方军事指挥官都只是想局部冒险占点便宜。联军计划的是battle，根本不是你说的什么战役。当然最后升级到如此惨烈，人海对火海，是美军策划者没想到的，叫停了对这个无军事价值的山头的进攻。但最后战俘遣返仍然是按个人志愿的，上甘岭之战达到它的政治目的了吗？
我们姑且假设中方靠军事迫使联军遣返全部战俘，请看付的是什么代价，上甘岭上志愿军阵亡4838人，伤6691人 vs 美军阵亡365人，伤1174人。也就是说中方为了不让一个俘虏去第三方，不惜自己伤亡一人来换。XYZ94538请你来justify。以前你用“既无内债又无外债”论证毛时代经济的成功，这次希望你有点进步，用脑子用良心就好。
楼下：你可到youtube去听听体制内党史专家杨奎松的最新讲座:冷战背景下毛泽东对英美外交策略。洋知青说的大多是可考的。麦卡瑟韩战中很多鹰派言行是与美政府相左的.建议你读
“The General vs. the President: MacArthur and Truman at the Brink of Nuclear War”，作者是UT Austin的历史教授，H.W.Brands,曾两次被提名普利茨奖。
今年为韩战70周年，中国中山大学学者陈卓在首尔的国际学术会议上表示，从史料和美军数据分析，在韩战期间被当作战俘的“解放军战士”，有一半是国共内战后，被解放军俘虏的国民党军队。
《韩联社》报导，韩国首尔战争纪念馆今日举行有关韩战70周年的国际学术会议，中国中山大学学者陈卓在会议上指出，在毛泽东时代，中国的史料将参与韩战的国民党军队定义为被解放军俘虏，或是“从国民党被解放出来接受思想改造”的解放军军队。
陈卓的报告指出，一开始解放军只接受国共内战国民党战俘中的自愿加入者，但是在国共内战之后，除了老人和残疾人士，几乎所有人都“被加入”解放军军队；韩战爆发后，大量解放军便被派到朝鲜半岛作为北朝鲜军队的支援。
报导指出，美国陆军曾统计，韩战内的中国解放军战俘有2万1704人，其中有30%来自国民党，不过后来对韩战后来台的国民党战俘进行调查，发现在解放军中的国民党人大约有42.5%，还有一部分人回到中国，因此分析当时韩战的解放军战俘，里面有大约一半是国民党军。
陈卓指出，或许是因为当时某些战俘向美军或中国民国政府隐瞒自己是解放军的身份，声称自己是农民或商人，才会出现统计上的误差。